Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy

AIM:To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol(4-L SF-PEG)vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid(2-L PEG+Asc)in patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy.METHODS:206 patients(mean age 56.7 years,61%male)undergoing outpatient sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2014-08, Vol.20 (30), p.10620-10627
Hauptverfasser: Rivas, John M, Perez, Alejandro, Hernandez, Marlow, Schneider, Alison, Castro, Fernando J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10627
container_issue 30
container_start_page 10620
container_title World journal of gastroenterology : WJG
container_volume 20
creator Rivas, John M
Perez, Alejandro
Hernandez, Marlow
Schneider, Alison
Castro, Fernando J
description AIM:To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol(4-L SF-PEG)vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid(2-L PEG+Asc)in patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy.METHODS:206 patients(mean age 56.7 years,61%male)undergoing outpatient screening or surveillance colonoscopies were prospectively randomized to receive either 4-L SF-PEG(n=104)or 2-L PEG+Asc solution(n=102).Colonoscopies were performed by two blinded endoscopists.Bowel preparation was graded using the Ottawa scale.Each participant completed a satisfaction and side effect survey.RESULTS:There was no difference in patient demographics amongst groups.4-L SF-PEG resulted in better Ottawa scores compared to 2-L PEG+Asc,4.2 vs4.9(P=0.0186);left colon:1.33 vs 1.57 respectively(P=0.0224),right colon:1.38 vs 1.63 respectively(P=0.0097).No difference in Ottawa scores was found for the mid colon or amount of fluid.Patient satisfaction was similar for both arms but those assigned to 4-L SF-PEG reported less bloating:23.1%vs 11.5%(P=0.0235).Overall polyp detection,adenomatous polyp and advanced adenoma detection rates were similar between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Morning only 4-L SF-PEG provided superior cleansing with less bloating as compared to 2-L PEG+Asc bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy.Thus,future studies evaluating efficacy of morning only preparation for afternoon colonoscopy should use4-L SF-PEG as the standard comparator.
doi_str_mv 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10620
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4130875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>90888889504849525148485255</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>25132784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-da0fb1a50160b81f7975d9147abf94f44d5ccb7c6d47691d8a5140f998aa76523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1uFDEQhS0EIkPgAGyQL9BD-a9tb5BQFH6kSGxgbbnddo8jjz24OxP1GXJpHDKMQKI2T6p679XiQ-gtgS2TXL2_v522RwrbyGBLoKfwDG0oJbqjisNztCEAstOMygv0ap5vAShjgr5EF1SQtlV8gx6uQ4jOuhWXgPel5pinruS0Yo5TXHzF810KFofqPT6UtPpltyafPZ7S6krCxxnTk_N_5_u47LCdXalDdNi6OOJQKrahBXIpGTdTyaUZDutr9CLYNPs3J71EPz5df7_60t18-_z16uNN5zjA0o0WwkCsANLDoEiQWopREy7tEDQPnI_CuUG6fuSy12RUVhAOQWtlrewFZZfow1Pv4W7Y-9H5vFSbzKHGva2rKTaafy857sxUjoYTBkqKVkCeClwt81x9OGcJmEcyppExjYxpZMxvMi3z7u-n58QfFM3ATqW7kqefjcPZo0E9jhbAFdeiRZqqpoL9AvG8nsY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rivas, John M ; Perez, Alejandro ; Hernandez, Marlow ; Schneider, Alison ; Castro, Fernando J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivas, John M ; Perez, Alejandro ; Hernandez, Marlow ; Schneider, Alison ; Castro, Fernando J</creatorcontrib><description>AIM:To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol(4-L SF-PEG)vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid(2-L PEG+Asc)in patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy.METHODS:206 patients(mean age 56.7 years,61%male)undergoing outpatient screening or surveillance colonoscopies were prospectively randomized to receive either 4-L SF-PEG(n=104)or 2-L PEG+Asc solution(n=102).Colonoscopies were performed by two blinded endoscopists.Bowel preparation was graded using the Ottawa scale.Each participant completed a satisfaction and side effect survey.RESULTS:There was no difference in patient demographics amongst groups.4-L SF-PEG resulted in better Ottawa scores compared to 2-L PEG+Asc,4.2 vs4.9(P=0.0186);left colon:1.33 vs 1.57 respectively(P=0.0224),right colon:1.38 vs 1.63 respectively(P=0.0097).No difference in Ottawa scores was found for the mid colon or amount of fluid.Patient satisfaction was similar for both arms but those assigned to 4-L SF-PEG reported less bloating:23.1%vs 11.5%(P=0.0235).Overall polyp detection,adenomatous polyp and advanced adenoma detection rates were similar between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Morning only 4-L SF-PEG provided superior cleansing with less bloating as compared to 2-L PEG+Asc bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy.Thus,future studies evaluating efficacy of morning only preparation for afternoon colonoscopy should use4-L SF-PEG as the standard comparator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25132784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Adenoma - pathology ; Ascorbic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Ascorbic Acid - adverse effects ; Bowel ; Cathartics - administration &amp; dosage ; Cathartics - adverse effects ; Colonic Neoplasms - pathology ; Colonic Polyps - pathology ; colonoscop ; Colonoscopy ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Florida ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage ; Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects ; Predictive Value of Tests ; preparation ; Prospective Studies ; Randomized Clinical Trial ; Screening ; Single-Blind Method ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects ; Therapeutic Irrigation - methods ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2014-08, Vol.20 (30), p.10620-10627</ispartof><rights>2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2014</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-da0fb1a50160b81f7975d9147abf94f44d5ccb7c6d47691d8a5140f998aa76523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-da0fb1a50160b81f7975d9147abf94f44d5ccb7c6d47691d8a5140f998aa76523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130875/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130875/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25132784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivas, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Marlow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Fernando J</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>AIM:To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol(4-L SF-PEG)vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid(2-L PEG+Asc)in patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy.METHODS:206 patients(mean age 56.7 years,61%male)undergoing outpatient screening or surveillance colonoscopies were prospectively randomized to receive either 4-L SF-PEG(n=104)or 2-L PEG+Asc solution(n=102).Colonoscopies were performed by two blinded endoscopists.Bowel preparation was graded using the Ottawa scale.Each participant completed a satisfaction and side effect survey.RESULTS:There was no difference in patient demographics amongst groups.4-L SF-PEG resulted in better Ottawa scores compared to 2-L PEG+Asc,4.2 vs4.9(P=0.0186);left colon:1.33 vs 1.57 respectively(P=0.0224),right colon:1.38 vs 1.63 respectively(P=0.0097).No difference in Ottawa scores was found for the mid colon or amount of fluid.Patient satisfaction was similar for both arms but those assigned to 4-L SF-PEG reported less bloating:23.1%vs 11.5%(P=0.0235).Overall polyp detection,adenomatous polyp and advanced adenoma detection rates were similar between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Morning only 4-L SF-PEG provided superior cleansing with less bloating as compared to 2-L PEG+Asc bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy.Thus,future studies evaluating efficacy of morning only preparation for afternoon colonoscopy should use4-L SF-PEG as the standard comparator.</description><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Ascorbic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ascorbic Acid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bowel</subject><subject>Cathartics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cathartics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>colonoscop</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>preparation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Randomized Clinical Trial</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1uFDEQhS0EIkPgAGyQL9BD-a9tb5BQFH6kSGxgbbnddo8jjz24OxP1GXJpHDKMQKI2T6p679XiQ-gtgS2TXL2_v522RwrbyGBLoKfwDG0oJbqjisNztCEAstOMygv0ap5vAShjgr5EF1SQtlV8gx6uQ4jOuhWXgPel5pinruS0Yo5TXHzF810KFofqPT6UtPpltyafPZ7S6krCxxnTk_N_5_u47LCdXalDdNi6OOJQKrahBXIpGTdTyaUZDutr9CLYNPs3J71EPz5df7_60t18-_z16uNN5zjA0o0WwkCsANLDoEiQWopREy7tEDQPnI_CuUG6fuSy12RUVhAOQWtlrewFZZfow1Pv4W7Y-9H5vFSbzKHGva2rKTaafy857sxUjoYTBkqKVkCeClwt81x9OGcJmEcyppExjYxpZMxvMi3z7u-n58QfFM3ATqW7kqefjcPZo0E9jhbAFdeiRZqqpoL9AvG8nsY</recordid><startdate>20140814</startdate><enddate>20140814</enddate><creator>Rivas, John M</creator><creator>Perez, Alejandro</creator><creator>Hernandez, Marlow</creator><creator>Schneider, Alison</creator><creator>Castro, Fernando J</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140814</creationdate><title>Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy</title><author>Rivas, John M ; Perez, Alejandro ; Hernandez, Marlow ; Schneider, Alison ; Castro, Fernando J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-da0fb1a50160b81f7975d9147abf94f44d5ccb7c6d47691d8a5140f998aa76523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Ascorbic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ascorbic Acid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bowel</topic><topic>Cathartics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cathartics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>colonoscop</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>preparation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Randomized Clinical Trial</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivas, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Marlow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Fernando J</creatorcontrib><collection>维普_期刊</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>维普中文医药期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivas, John M</au><au>Perez, Alejandro</au><au>Hernandez, Marlow</au><au>Schneider, Alison</au><au>Castro, Fernando J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2014-08-14</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>10620</spage><epage>10627</epage><pages>10620-10627</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>AIM:To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol(4-L SF-PEG)vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid(2-L PEG+Asc)in patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy.METHODS:206 patients(mean age 56.7 years,61%male)undergoing outpatient screening or surveillance colonoscopies were prospectively randomized to receive either 4-L SF-PEG(n=104)or 2-L PEG+Asc solution(n=102).Colonoscopies were performed by two blinded endoscopists.Bowel preparation was graded using the Ottawa scale.Each participant completed a satisfaction and side effect survey.RESULTS:There was no difference in patient demographics amongst groups.4-L SF-PEG resulted in better Ottawa scores compared to 2-L PEG+Asc,4.2 vs4.9(P=0.0186);left colon:1.33 vs 1.57 respectively(P=0.0224),right colon:1.38 vs 1.63 respectively(P=0.0097).No difference in Ottawa scores was found for the mid colon or amount of fluid.Patient satisfaction was similar for both arms but those assigned to 4-L SF-PEG reported less bloating:23.1%vs 11.5%(P=0.0235).Overall polyp detection,adenomatous polyp and advanced adenoma detection rates were similar between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Morning only 4-L SF-PEG provided superior cleansing with less bloating as compared to 2-L PEG+Asc bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy.Thus,future studies evaluating efficacy of morning only preparation for afternoon colonoscopy should use4-L SF-PEG as the standard comparator.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>25132784</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10620</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1007-9327
ispartof World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2014-08, Vol.20 (30), p.10620-10627
issn 1007-9327
2219-2840
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4130875
source Open Access: PubMed Central; MEDLINE; Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenoma - pathology
Ascorbic Acid - administration & dosage
Ascorbic Acid - adverse effects
Bowel
Cathartics - administration & dosage
Cathartics - adverse effects
Colonic Neoplasms - pathology
Colonic Polyps - pathology
colonoscop
Colonoscopy
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Florida
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage
Polyethylene Glycols - adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
preparation
Prospective Studies
Randomized Clinical Trial
Screening
Single-Blind Method
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects
Therapeutic Irrigation - methods
Time Factors
title Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20morning-only%204%20liter%20sulfa%20free%20polyethylene%20glycol%20vs%202%20liter%20polyethylene%20glycol%20with%20ascorbic%20acid%20for%20afternoon%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Rivas,%20John%20M&rft.date=2014-08-14&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=10620&rft.epage=10627&rft.pages=10620-10627&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10620&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E25132784%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/25132784&rft_cqvip_id=90888889504849525148485255&rfr_iscdi=true