Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction

The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous sys...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2014-06, Vol.11 (1), p.94-94
Hauptverfasser: Kaneko, Fuminari, Hayami, Tatsuya, Aoyama, Toshiyuki, Kizuka, Tomohiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 94
container_issue 1
container_start_page 94
container_title Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
container_volume 11
creator Kaneko, Fuminari
Hayami, Tatsuya
Aoyama, Toshiyuki
Kizuka, Tomohiro
description The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1743-0003-11-94
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4113028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539682255</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539682255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-71d9af5eb40731da70cb9f0070d94e27b334f7af1c28b5d0ddf08a643abeb8593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1vFSEUxSdGY2t17c6QuHEzLQwwM2xMmsavpMaNrgkDlycNA09gXtqV_7qM7_nSGheGBXD5nRM43KZ5SfA5IWN_QQZGW4wxbQlpBXvUnB4rj--tT5pnOd_UBcOcPW1OOiZwNwpy2vz8HEtMyM1qA-kOqWAQeNAlOa08ysXNi1fFxYASbFM0iwakYypOx7x1oTJwq11Rk_OuVH1BHnbgM8pudl4lVCLaRb-Eoqr9vGTtV4NQktKr7fPmiVU-w4vDfNZ8e__u69XH9vrLh09Xl9et7ntW2oEYoSyHieGBEqMGrCdhMR6wEQy6YaKU2UFZortx4gYbY_GoekbVBNPIBT1r3u59t8s0g9Gw3sDLbaovT3cyKicfngT3XW7iTjJCaM2qGrw5GKT4Y4Fc5OyyBu9VgLhkSThngvWYD_-BMtFTLASt6Ou_0Ju4pBrrnuKs578ND9RGeZAu2LjGt5rKS05FP3Yd55U6_wdVh4G5flcA62r9geBiL9Ap5pzAHuMgWK7tJdcGkmsD1a0UrCpe3U_xyP_pJ_oLBDnM9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1549546557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kaneko, Fuminari ; Hayami, Tatsuya ; Aoyama, Toshiyuki ; Kizuka, Tomohiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Fuminari ; Hayami, Tatsuya ; Aoyama, Toshiyuki ; Kizuka, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><description>The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-94</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24902891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain ; Electric Stimulation ; Electromyography ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Humans ; Imagination - physiology ; Male ; Motor ability ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscular system ; Pyramidal Tracts - physiology ; Rehabilitation - methods ; Studies ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2014-06, Vol.11 (1), p.94-94</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Kaneko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Kaneko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Kaneko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-71d9af5eb40731da70cb9f0070d94e27b334f7af1c28b5d0ddf08a643abeb8593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113028/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113028/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Fuminari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayami, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoyama, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizuka, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><title>Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction</title><title>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><description>The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagination - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscular system</subject><subject>Pyramidal Tracts - physiology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation - methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1743-0003</issn><issn>1743-0003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1vFSEUxSdGY2t17c6QuHEzLQwwM2xMmsavpMaNrgkDlycNA09gXtqV_7qM7_nSGheGBXD5nRM43KZ5SfA5IWN_QQZGW4wxbQlpBXvUnB4rj--tT5pnOd_UBcOcPW1OOiZwNwpy2vz8HEtMyM1qA-kOqWAQeNAlOa08ysXNi1fFxYASbFM0iwakYypOx7x1oTJwq11Rk_OuVH1BHnbgM8pudl4lVCLaRb-Eoqr9vGTtV4NQktKr7fPmiVU-w4vDfNZ8e__u69XH9vrLh09Xl9et7ntW2oEYoSyHieGBEqMGrCdhMR6wEQy6YaKU2UFZortx4gYbY_GoekbVBNPIBT1r3u59t8s0g9Gw3sDLbaovT3cyKicfngT3XW7iTjJCaM2qGrw5GKT4Y4Fc5OyyBu9VgLhkSThngvWYD_-BMtFTLASt6Ou_0Ju4pBrrnuKs578ND9RGeZAu2LjGt5rKS05FP3Yd55U6_wdVh4G5flcA62r9geBiL9Ap5pzAHuMgWK7tJdcGkmsD1a0UrCpe3U_xyP_pJ_oLBDnM9Q</recordid><startdate>20140605</startdate><enddate>20140605</enddate><creator>Kaneko, Fuminari</creator><creator>Hayami, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Aoyama, Toshiyuki</creator><creator>Kizuka, Tomohiro</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140605</creationdate><title>Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction</title><author>Kaneko, Fuminari ; Hayami, Tatsuya ; Aoyama, Toshiyuki ; Kizuka, Tomohiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-71d9af5eb40731da70cb9f0070d94e27b334f7af1c28b5d0ddf08a643abeb8593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagination - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscular system</topic><topic>Pyramidal Tracts - physiology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation - methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Fuminari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayami, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoyama, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizuka, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaneko, Fuminari</au><au>Hayami, Tatsuya</au><au>Aoyama, Toshiyuki</au><au>Kizuka, Tomohiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><date>2014-06-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>94-94</pages><issn>1743-0003</issn><eissn>1743-0003</eissn><abstract>The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24902891</pmid><doi>10.1186/1743-0003-11-94</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-0003
ispartof Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2014-06, Vol.11 (1), p.94-94
issn 1743-0003
1743-0003
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4113028
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Brain
Electric Stimulation
Electromyography
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Humans
Imagination - physiology
Male
Motor ability
Motor Activity - physiology
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscular system
Pyramidal Tracts - physiology
Rehabilitation - methods
Studies
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Young Adult
title Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motor%20imagery%20and%20electrical%20stimulation%20reproduce%20corticospinal%20excitability%20at%20levels%20similar%20to%20voluntary%20muscle%20contraction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroengineering%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Kaneko,%20Fuminari&rft.date=2014-06-05&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=94-94&rft.issn=1743-0003&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1743-0003-11-94&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539682255%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1549546557&rft_id=info:pmid/24902891&rft_galeid=A539682255&rfr_iscdi=true