Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Insertion: A Randomized, Blinded Trial

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance for continuous femoral perineural catheters may be supplemented by electrical stimulation through a needle or through a stimulating catheter. The authors tested the primary hypothesis that ultrasound guidance alone is noninferior on both postoperative pain scores and o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2014-08, Vol.121 (2), p.239-248
Hauptverfasser: Farag, Ehab, Atim, Abdulkadir, Ghosh, Raktim, Bauer, Maria, Sreenivasalu, Thilak, Kot, Michael, Kurz, Andrea, Dalton, Jarrod E, Mascha, Edward J, Mounir-Soliman, Loran, Zaky, Sherif, Ali Sakr Esa, Wael, Udeh, Belinda L, Barsoum, Wael, Sessler, Daniel I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 248
container_issue 2
container_start_page 239
container_title Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume 121
creator Farag, Ehab
Atim, Abdulkadir
Ghosh, Raktim
Bauer, Maria
Sreenivasalu, Thilak
Kot, Michael
Kurz, Andrea
Dalton, Jarrod E
Mascha, Edward J
Mounir-Soliman, Loran
Zaky, Sherif
Ali Sakr Esa, Wael
Udeh, Belinda L
Barsoum, Wael
Sessler, Daniel I
description BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance for continuous femoral perineural catheters may be supplemented by electrical stimulation through a needle or through a stimulating catheter. The authors tested the primary hypothesis that ultrasound guidance alone is noninferior on both postoperative pain scores and opioid requirement and superior on at least one of the two. Second, the authors compared all interventions on insertion time and incremental cost. METHODS:Patients having knee arthroplasty with femoral nerve catheters were randomly assigned to catheter insertion guided by(1) ultrasound alone (n = 147); (2) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through the needle (n = 152); or (3) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through both the needle and catheter (n = 138). Noninferiority between any two interventions was defined for pain as not more than 0.5 points worse on a 0 to 10 verbal response scale and for opioid consumption as not more than 25% greater than the mean. RESULTS:The stimulating needle group was significantly noninferior to the stimulating catheter group (difference [95% CI] in mean verbal response scale pain score [stimulating needle vs. stimulating catheter] of −0.16 [−0.61 to 0.29], P < 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −5% [−25 to 21%], P = 0.002) and to ultrasound-only group (difference in mean verbal response scale pain score of −0.28 [−0.72 to 0.16], P < 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −2% [−22 to 25%], P = 0.006). In addition, the use of ultrasound alone for femoral nerve catheter insertion was faster and cheaper than the other two methods. CONCLUSION:Ultrasound guidance alone without adding either stimulating needle or needle/catheter combination thus seems to be the best approach to femoral perineural catheters.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000262
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4110116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1548635480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4813-a947bd315fd97af5516b2b18727062c37cc413cad1009ab8b402db1ee15fd3383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUVtv0zAUthCIdYN_gJBfkHhYhm-JEx6QSsVgUjUk1D1bjnOyGBy7s5NN8Otx1TIKluyjY38X2x9Cryi5oKSR75br6wtyPFjFnqAFLVldUCrLp2iRN3nBCWMn6DSl77mVJa-foxMmZFlLWS5QXIVxq6NNwePQ480QAfAGzODt3QwJ9yHiGzdFncLsu-J2th10-BLGELXD1xDvAa_0NMAEEV_5BHGywb_HS_xN-y6M9hd05_ijs37H20Sr3Qv0rNcuwctDPUM3l582qy_F-uvnq9VyXRhRU17oRsi247Tsu0bqvixp1bKW1pJJUjHDpTGCcqM7Skij27oVhHUtBdgxOK_5Gfqw193O7QidAZ-f4dQ22lHHnypoq_498XZQt-FeCUoJpVUWeHsQiGH3GZMabTLgnPYQ5qRoKeqK54VkqNhDTQwpRegfbShRu7hUjkv9H1emvT6-4iPpTz4Z8OYA0Mlo10ftjU1_cXXVMMaP_B-Cy0mkH25-gKgG0G4a9r6lYAUjVJA6N0WelPPfXXut8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548635480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Insertion: A Randomized, Blinded Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Farag, Ehab ; Atim, Abdulkadir ; Ghosh, Raktim ; Bauer, Maria ; Sreenivasalu, Thilak ; Kot, Michael ; Kurz, Andrea ; Dalton, Jarrod E ; Mascha, Edward J ; Mounir-Soliman, Loran ; Zaky, Sherif ; Ali Sakr Esa, Wael ; Udeh, Belinda L ; Barsoum, Wael ; Sessler, Daniel I</creator><creatorcontrib>Farag, Ehab ; Atim, Abdulkadir ; Ghosh, Raktim ; Bauer, Maria ; Sreenivasalu, Thilak ; Kot, Michael ; Kurz, Andrea ; Dalton, Jarrod E ; Mascha, Edward J ; Mounir-Soliman, Loran ; Zaky, Sherif ; Ali Sakr Esa, Wael ; Udeh, Belinda L ; Barsoum, Wael ; Sessler, Daniel I</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance for continuous femoral perineural catheters may be supplemented by electrical stimulation through a needle or through a stimulating catheter. The authors tested the primary hypothesis that ultrasound guidance alone is noninferior on both postoperative pain scores and opioid requirement and superior on at least one of the two. Second, the authors compared all interventions on insertion time and incremental cost. METHODS:Patients having knee arthroplasty with femoral nerve catheters were randomly assigned to catheter insertion guided by(1) ultrasound alone (n = 147); (2) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through the needle (n = 152); or (3) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through both the needle and catheter (n = 138). Noninferiority between any two interventions was defined for pain as not more than 0.5 points worse on a 0 to 10 verbal response scale and for opioid consumption as not more than 25% greater than the mean. RESULTS:The stimulating needle group was significantly noninferior to the stimulating catheter group (difference [95% CI] in mean verbal response scale pain score [stimulating needle vs. stimulating catheter] of −0.16 [−0.61 to 0.29], P &lt; 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −5% [−25 to 21%], P = 0.002) and to ultrasound-only group (difference in mean verbal response scale pain score of −0.28 [−0.72 to 0.16], P &lt; 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −2% [−22 to 25%], P = 0.006). In addition, the use of ultrasound alone for femoral nerve catheter insertion was faster and cheaper than the other two methods. CONCLUSION:Ultrasound guidance alone without adding either stimulating needle or needle/catheter combination thus seems to be the best approach to femoral perineural catheters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000262</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24758775</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization - economics ; Catheterization - methods ; Cost Control ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Electric Stimulation ; Female ; Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Morphine - administration &amp; dosage ; Morphine - therapeutic use ; Needles ; Nerve Block - economics ; Nerve Block - methods ; Pain Management ; Pain Measurement - drug effects ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Sample Size ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2014-08, Vol.121 (2), p.239-248</ispartof><rights>2014 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4813-a947bd315fd97af5516b2b18727062c37cc413cad1009ab8b402db1ee15fd3383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28692230$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24758775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farag, Ehab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atim, Abdulkadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Raktim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreenivasalu, Thilak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kot, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Jarrod E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascha, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mounir-Soliman, Loran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaky, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Sakr Esa, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udeh, Belinda L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsoum, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sessler, Daniel I</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Insertion: A Randomized, Blinded Trial</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance for continuous femoral perineural catheters may be supplemented by electrical stimulation through a needle or through a stimulating catheter. The authors tested the primary hypothesis that ultrasound guidance alone is noninferior on both postoperative pain scores and opioid requirement and superior on at least one of the two. Second, the authors compared all interventions on insertion time and incremental cost. METHODS:Patients having knee arthroplasty with femoral nerve catheters were randomly assigned to catheter insertion guided by(1) ultrasound alone (n = 147); (2) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through the needle (n = 152); or (3) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through both the needle and catheter (n = 138). Noninferiority between any two interventions was defined for pain as not more than 0.5 points worse on a 0 to 10 verbal response scale and for opioid consumption as not more than 25% greater than the mean. RESULTS:The stimulating needle group was significantly noninferior to the stimulating catheter group (difference [95% CI] in mean verbal response scale pain score [stimulating needle vs. stimulating catheter] of −0.16 [−0.61 to 0.29], P &lt; 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −5% [−25 to 21%], P = 0.002) and to ultrasound-only group (difference in mean verbal response scale pain score of −0.28 [−0.72 to 0.16], P &lt; 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −2% [−22 to 25%], P = 0.006). In addition, the use of ultrasound alone for femoral nerve catheter insertion was faster and cheaper than the other two methods. CONCLUSION:Ultrasound guidance alone without adding either stimulating needle or needle/catheter combination thus seems to be the best approach to femoral perineural catheters.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization - economics</subject><subject>Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Cost Control</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Morphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Nerve Block - economics</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - drug effects</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUVtv0zAUthCIdYN_gJBfkHhYhm-JEx6QSsVgUjUk1D1bjnOyGBy7s5NN8Otx1TIKluyjY38X2x9Cryi5oKSR75br6wtyPFjFnqAFLVldUCrLp2iRN3nBCWMn6DSl77mVJa-foxMmZFlLWS5QXIVxq6NNwePQ480QAfAGzODt3QwJ9yHiGzdFncLsu-J2th10-BLGELXD1xDvAa_0NMAEEV_5BHGywb_HS_xN-y6M9hd05_ijs37H20Sr3Qv0rNcuwctDPUM3l582qy_F-uvnq9VyXRhRU17oRsi247Tsu0bqvixp1bKW1pJJUjHDpTGCcqM7Skij27oVhHUtBdgxOK_5Gfqw193O7QidAZ-f4dQ22lHHnypoq_498XZQt-FeCUoJpVUWeHsQiGH3GZMabTLgnPYQ5qRoKeqK54VkqNhDTQwpRegfbShRu7hUjkv9H1emvT6-4iPpTz4Z8OYA0Mlo10ftjU1_cXXVMMaP_B-Cy0mkH25-gKgG0G4a9r6lYAUjVJA6N0WelPPfXXut8g</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Farag, Ehab</creator><creator>Atim, Abdulkadir</creator><creator>Ghosh, Raktim</creator><creator>Bauer, Maria</creator><creator>Sreenivasalu, Thilak</creator><creator>Kot, Michael</creator><creator>Kurz, Andrea</creator><creator>Dalton, Jarrod E</creator><creator>Mascha, Edward J</creator><creator>Mounir-Soliman, Loran</creator><creator>Zaky, Sherif</creator><creator>Ali Sakr Esa, Wael</creator><creator>Udeh, Belinda L</creator><creator>Barsoum, Wael</creator><creator>Sessler, Daniel I</creator><general>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Insertion: A Randomized, Blinded Trial</title><author>Farag, Ehab ; Atim, Abdulkadir ; Ghosh, Raktim ; Bauer, Maria ; Sreenivasalu, Thilak ; Kot, Michael ; Kurz, Andrea ; Dalton, Jarrod E ; Mascha, Edward J ; Mounir-Soliman, Loran ; Zaky, Sherif ; Ali Sakr Esa, Wael ; Udeh, Belinda L ; Barsoum, Wael ; Sessler, Daniel I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4813-a947bd315fd97af5516b2b18727062c37cc413cad1009ab8b402db1ee15fd3383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization - economics</topic><topic>Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Cost Control</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Morphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Nerve Block - economics</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - drug effects</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farag, Ehab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atim, Abdulkadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Raktim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreenivasalu, Thilak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kot, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Jarrod E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascha, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mounir-Soliman, Loran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaky, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Sakr Esa, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udeh, Belinda L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsoum, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sessler, Daniel I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farag, Ehab</au><au>Atim, Abdulkadir</au><au>Ghosh, Raktim</au><au>Bauer, Maria</au><au>Sreenivasalu, Thilak</au><au>Kot, Michael</au><au>Kurz, Andrea</au><au>Dalton, Jarrod E</au><au>Mascha, Edward J</au><au>Mounir-Soliman, Loran</au><au>Zaky, Sherif</au><au>Ali Sakr Esa, Wael</au><au>Udeh, Belinda L</au><au>Barsoum, Wael</au><au>Sessler, Daniel I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Insertion: A Randomized, Blinded Trial</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>239-248</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:Ultrasound guidance for continuous femoral perineural catheters may be supplemented by electrical stimulation through a needle or through a stimulating catheter. The authors tested the primary hypothesis that ultrasound guidance alone is noninferior on both postoperative pain scores and opioid requirement and superior on at least one of the two. Second, the authors compared all interventions on insertion time and incremental cost. METHODS:Patients having knee arthroplasty with femoral nerve catheters were randomly assigned to catheter insertion guided by(1) ultrasound alone (n = 147); (2) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through the needle (n = 152); or (3) ultrasound and electrical stimulation through both the needle and catheter (n = 138). Noninferiority between any two interventions was defined for pain as not more than 0.5 points worse on a 0 to 10 verbal response scale and for opioid consumption as not more than 25% greater than the mean. RESULTS:The stimulating needle group was significantly noninferior to the stimulating catheter group (difference [95% CI] in mean verbal response scale pain score [stimulating needle vs. stimulating catheter] of −0.16 [−0.61 to 0.29], P &lt; 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −5% [−25 to 21%], P = 0.002) and to ultrasound-only group (difference in mean verbal response scale pain score of −0.28 [−0.72 to 0.16], P &lt; 0.001; percentage difference in mean IV morphine equivalent dose of −2% [−22 to 25%], P = 0.006). In addition, the use of ultrasound alone for femoral nerve catheter insertion was faster and cheaper than the other two methods. CONCLUSION:Ultrasound guidance alone without adding either stimulating needle or needle/catheter combination thus seems to be the best approach to femoral perineural catheters.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</pub><pmid>24758775</pmid><doi>10.1097/ALN.0000000000000262</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2014-08, Vol.121 (2), p.239-248
issn 0003-3022
1528-1175
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4110116
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Catheterization - economics
Catheterization - methods
Cost Control
Costs and Cost Analysis
Electric Stimulation
Female
Femoral Nerve - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Morphine - administration & dosage
Morphine - therapeutic use
Needles
Nerve Block - economics
Nerve Block - methods
Pain Management
Pain Measurement - drug effects
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Sample Size
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
Young Adult
title Comparison of Three Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Insertion: A Randomized, Blinded Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A44%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Three%20Techniques%20for%20Ultrasound-guided%20Femoral%20Nerve%20Catheter%20Insertion:%20A%20Randomized,%20Blinded%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=Farag,%20Ehab&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=239-248&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000262&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1548635480%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548635480&rft_id=info:pmid/24758775&rfr_iscdi=true