Randomized controlled trial of the Tobacco Tactics website versus 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and usage of the Tobacco Tactics website compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers (heavy equipment operators). Methods: Smokers attending workplace safety training groups were randomized to either the T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tobacco induced diseases 2014-06, Vol.12 (S1), p.A13-A13, Article A13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A13 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | A13 |
container_title | Tobacco induced diseases |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Choi, Seung Hee Waltje, Andrea H Ronis, David L Noonan, Devon Hong, Oisaeng Richardson, Caroline Meeker, John D Duffy, Sonia A |
description | Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and usage of the Tobacco Tactics website compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers (heavy equipment operators). Methods: Smokers attending workplace safety training groups were randomized to either the Tobacco Tactics website with nurse phone counseling and access to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line which provided an equal number of phone calls and NRT. Participating Operating Engineers completed a baseline survey as well as mailed surveys at 30-days and 6-months. Urinary cotinine tests were used to verify 6-month smoking status. The outcomes were compared using χ2 tests, t-tests, mixed models, generalized mixed models, and logistic regression models. Results: Compared to participants in the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group, significantly more of those in the Tobacco Tactics website group participated in the intervention, received phone calls and found the intervention helpful (p< 0.05). Seventy percent of the website group received NRT compared to 5.1% of the quitline group (p< 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the Tobacco Tactics website group showed significantly higher quit rates (26.9%) than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (7.7%) (p< 0.05), but this difference was no longer significant at 6-month follow-up. There were significantly more positive changes in harm reduction measures (quit attempts, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and nicotine dependence) at both 30-day and 6-month follow-up in the Tobacco Tactics website group compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The Tobacco Tactics website showed higher efficacy and reach than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW intervention. Longer counseling sessions may be needed to improve 6-month cessation rates. This intervention has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality among Operating Engineers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1617-9625-12-S1-A13 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4101402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586566136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2853-309a9442c5dcb158546fa0576b8eb2f00131344f33099dfbbd37c3329ace012c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhhdRsH78Ai8Bz9FMskl3L0IRv0AsasVjSLLZNmV3U5NtRX-9KRWxoJfkZebNM5mZLDsBcgZQiHMQMMSloBwDxc-AR8B2ssFPdPeX3s8OYpwTwgvIYZB9PKmu8q37tBUyvuuDb5ok--BUg3yN-plFE6-VMR5NlOmdiejd6uh6i1Y2xGVEgAtC8OPL3QQ_jF9Rbxu7mPnOosalQ7W-m6LxwgbVu6SuumkKp5dH2V6tmmiPv-_D7OX6anJ5i-_HN3eXo3usacEZZqRUZZ5TwyujgRc8F7UifCh0YTWtCQEGLM9rloxlVWtdsaFhjJbKWALUsMPsYsNdLHVrK2NTk6qRi-BaFT6kV05uZzo3k1O_kjkQyAlNgOsNQDv_D2A7Y3wr1_OW63lLoPIZZNpIAp1-_yT4t6WNvZz7ZehS85LyQnAhgInkYhuXCT7GYOufSkDkett_sr8A1QaewQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586566136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized controlled trial of the Tobacco Tactics website versus 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Choi, Seung Hee ; Waltje, Andrea H ; Ronis, David L ; Noonan, Devon ; Hong, Oisaeng ; Richardson, Caroline ; Meeker, John D ; Duffy, Sonia A</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seung Hee ; Waltje, Andrea H ; Ronis, David L ; Noonan, Devon ; Hong, Oisaeng ; Richardson, Caroline ; Meeker, John D ; Duffy, Sonia A</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and usage of the Tobacco Tactics website compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers (heavy equipment operators). Methods: Smokers attending workplace safety training groups were randomized to either the Tobacco Tactics website with nurse phone counseling and access to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line which provided an equal number of phone calls and NRT. Participating Operating Engineers completed a baseline survey as well as mailed surveys at 30-days and 6-months. Urinary cotinine tests were used to verify 6-month smoking status. The outcomes were compared using χ2 tests, t-tests, mixed models, generalized mixed models, and logistic regression models. Results: Compared to participants in the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group, significantly more of those in the Tobacco Tactics website group participated in the intervention, received phone calls and found the intervention helpful (p< 0.05). Seventy percent of the website group received NRT compared to 5.1% of the quitline group (p< 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the Tobacco Tactics website group showed significantly higher quit rates (26.9%) than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (7.7%) (p< 0.05), but this difference was no longer significant at 6-month follow-up. There were significantly more positive changes in harm reduction measures (quit attempts, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and nicotine dependence) at both 30-day and 6-month follow-up in the Tobacco Tactics website group compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The Tobacco Tactics website showed higher efficacy and reach than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW intervention. Longer counseling sessions may be needed to improve 6-month cessation rates. This intervention has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality among Operating Engineers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-9625</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2070-7266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-9625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1617-9625-12-S1-A13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heraklion: European Publishing</publisher><subject>Cigarettes ; Cotinine ; Drug dependence ; Engineers ; Meeting Abstract ; Morbidity ; Nicotine ; Occupational safety ; Polls & surveys ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Smoking ; Tactics ; Telephone calls ; Tobacco ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Tobacco induced diseases, 2014-06, Vol.12 (S1), p.A13-A13, Article A13</ispartof><rights>2014. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Choi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Choi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2853-309a9442c5dcb158546fa0576b8eb2f00131344f33099dfbbd37c3329ace012c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101402/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101402/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltje, Andrea H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronis, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noonan, Devon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Oisaeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeker, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Sonia A</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized controlled trial of the Tobacco Tactics website versus 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers</title><title>Tobacco induced diseases</title><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and usage of the Tobacco Tactics website compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers (heavy equipment operators). Methods: Smokers attending workplace safety training groups were randomized to either the Tobacco Tactics website with nurse phone counseling and access to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line which provided an equal number of phone calls and NRT. Participating Operating Engineers completed a baseline survey as well as mailed surveys at 30-days and 6-months. Urinary cotinine tests were used to verify 6-month smoking status. The outcomes were compared using χ2 tests, t-tests, mixed models, generalized mixed models, and logistic regression models. Results: Compared to participants in the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group, significantly more of those in the Tobacco Tactics website group participated in the intervention, received phone calls and found the intervention helpful (p< 0.05). Seventy percent of the website group received NRT compared to 5.1% of the quitline group (p< 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the Tobacco Tactics website group showed significantly higher quit rates (26.9%) than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (7.7%) (p< 0.05), but this difference was no longer significant at 6-month follow-up. There were significantly more positive changes in harm reduction measures (quit attempts, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and nicotine dependence) at both 30-day and 6-month follow-up in the Tobacco Tactics website group compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The Tobacco Tactics website showed higher efficacy and reach than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW intervention. Longer counseling sessions may be needed to improve 6-month cessation rates. This intervention has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality among Operating Engineers.</description><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Cotinine</subject><subject>Drug dependence</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Meeting Abstract</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Tactics</subject><subject>Telephone calls</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1617-9625</issn><issn>2070-7266</issn><issn>1617-9625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhhdRsH78Ai8Bz9FMskl3L0IRv0AsasVjSLLZNmV3U5NtRX-9KRWxoJfkZebNM5mZLDsBcgZQiHMQMMSloBwDxc-AR8B2ssFPdPeX3s8OYpwTwgvIYZB9PKmu8q37tBUyvuuDb5ok--BUg3yN-plFE6-VMR5NlOmdiejd6uh6i1Y2xGVEgAtC8OPL3QQ_jF9Rbxu7mPnOosalQ7W-m6LxwgbVu6SuumkKp5dH2V6tmmiPv-_D7OX6anJ5i-_HN3eXo3usacEZZqRUZZ5TwyujgRc8F7UifCh0YTWtCQEGLM9rloxlVWtdsaFhjJbKWALUsMPsYsNdLHVrK2NTk6qRi-BaFT6kV05uZzo3k1O_kjkQyAlNgOsNQDv_D2A7Y3wr1_OW63lLoPIZZNpIAp1-_yT4t6WNvZz7ZehS85LyQnAhgInkYhuXCT7GYOufSkDkett_sr8A1QaewQ</recordid><startdate>20140606</startdate><enddate>20140606</enddate><creator>Choi, Seung Hee</creator><creator>Waltje, Andrea H</creator><creator>Ronis, David L</creator><creator>Noonan, Devon</creator><creator>Hong, Oisaeng</creator><creator>Richardson, Caroline</creator><creator>Meeker, John D</creator><creator>Duffy, Sonia A</creator><general>European Publishing</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140606</creationdate><title>Randomized controlled trial of the Tobacco Tactics website versus 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers</title><author>Choi, Seung Hee ; Waltje, Andrea H ; Ronis, David L ; Noonan, Devon ; Hong, Oisaeng ; Richardson, Caroline ; Meeker, John D ; Duffy, Sonia A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2853-309a9442c5dcb158546fa0576b8eb2f00131344f33099dfbbd37c3329ace012c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Cotinine</topic><topic>Drug dependence</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Meeting Abstract</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Tactics</topic><topic>Telephone calls</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seung Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltje, Andrea H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronis, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noonan, Devon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Oisaeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeker, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Sonia A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco induced diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Seung Hee</au><au>Waltje, Andrea H</au><au>Ronis, David L</au><au>Noonan, Devon</au><au>Hong, Oisaeng</au><au>Richardson, Caroline</au><au>Meeker, John D</au><au>Duffy, Sonia A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized controlled trial of the Tobacco Tactics website versus 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco induced diseases</jtitle><date>2014-06-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>A13</spage><epage>A13</epage><pages>A13-A13</pages><artnum>A13</artnum><issn>1617-9625</issn><issn>2070-7266</issn><eissn>1617-9625</eissn><abstract>Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and usage of the Tobacco Tactics website compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers (heavy equipment operators). Methods: Smokers attending workplace safety training groups were randomized to either the Tobacco Tactics website with nurse phone counseling and access to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line which provided an equal number of phone calls and NRT. Participating Operating Engineers completed a baseline survey as well as mailed surveys at 30-days and 6-months. Urinary cotinine tests were used to verify 6-month smoking status. The outcomes were compared using χ2 tests, t-tests, mixed models, generalized mixed models, and logistic regression models. Results: Compared to participants in the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group, significantly more of those in the Tobacco Tactics website group participated in the intervention, received phone calls and found the intervention helpful (p< 0.05). Seventy percent of the website group received NRT compared to 5.1% of the quitline group (p< 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the Tobacco Tactics website group showed significantly higher quit rates (26.9%) than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (7.7%) (p< 0.05), but this difference was no longer significant at 6-month follow-up. There were significantly more positive changes in harm reduction measures (quit attempts, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and nicotine dependence) at both 30-day and 6-month follow-up in the Tobacco Tactics website group compared to the 1-800-QUIT-NOW group (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The Tobacco Tactics website showed higher efficacy and reach than the 1-800-QUIT-NOW intervention. Longer counseling sessions may be needed to improve 6-month cessation rates. This intervention has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality among Operating Engineers.</abstract><cop>Heraklion</cop><pub>European Publishing</pub><doi>10.1186/1617-9625-12-S1-A13</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1617-9625 |
ispartof | Tobacco induced diseases, 2014-06, Vol.12 (S1), p.A13-A13, Article A13 |
issn | 1617-9625 2070-7266 1617-9625 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4101402 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cigarettes Cotinine Drug dependence Engineers Meeting Abstract Morbidity Nicotine Occupational safety Polls & surveys Regression analysis Regression models Smoking Tactics Telephone calls Tobacco Websites |
title | Randomized controlled trial of the Tobacco Tactics website versus 1-800-QUIT-NOW telephone line among Operating Engineers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A21%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20controlled%20trial%20of%20the%20Tobacco%20Tactics%20website%20versus%201-800-QUIT-NOW%20telephone%20line%20among%20Operating%20Engineers&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20induced%20diseases&rft.au=Choi,%20Seung%20Hee&rft.date=2014-06-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=A13&rft.epage=A13&rft.pages=A13-A13&rft.artnum=A13&rft.issn=1617-9625&rft.eissn=1617-9625&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1617-9625-12-S1-A13&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2586566136%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586566136&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |