The Current Status of Usability Studies of Information Technologies in China : A Systematic Study
Objectives. To systematically review and analyze the current status and characteristics of usability studies in China in the field of information technology in general and in the field of healthcare in particular. Methods. We performed a quantitative literature analysis in three major Chinese academ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BioMed research international 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-10 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 10 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2014 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | BioMed research international |
| container_volume | 2014 |
| creator | Lei, Jianbo Xu, Lufei Meng, Qun Zhang, Jiajie Gong, Yang |
| description | Objectives. To systematically review and analyze the current status and characteristics of usability studies in China in the field of information technology in general and in the field of healthcare in particular. Methods. We performed a quantitative literature analysis in three major Chinese academic databases and one English language database using Chinese search terms equivalent to the concept of usability. Results. Six hundred forty-seven publications were selected for analysis. We found that in China the literature on usability in the field of information technology began in 1994 and increased thereafter. The usability definitions from ISO 9241-11:1998 and Nielsen (1993) have been widely recognized and cited. Authors who have published several publications are rare. Fourteen journals have a publishing rate over 1%. Only nine publications about HIT were identified. Discussions. China’s usability research started relatively late. There is a lack of organized research teams and dedicated usability journals. High-impact theoretical studies are scarce. On the application side, no original and systematic research frameworks have been developed. The understanding and definition of usability is not well synchronized with international norms. Besides, usability research in HIT is rare. Conclusions. More human and material resources need to be invested in China’s usability research, particularly in HIT. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2014/568303 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4090495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A427023573</galeid><sourcerecordid>A427023573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-4f53a1d3dfbce25c8f37a543c9cd568b1ffb7556275466efdb004d8ad16922bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1rFDEYxgdRbKk9eVYCXqSyNt-ZeBCWpWqh4KHbc8hkkt2U2UlNZpT9732nU9ePSw2EhOSX5-V581TVS4LfEyLEOcWEnwtZM8yeVMeUEb6QhJOnhz1jR9VpKbcYRk0k1vJ5dUQFFphJelzZ9daj1Ziz7wd0PdhhLCgFdFNsE7s47OFsbKO_P7zsQ8o7O8TUo7V32z51aTPdxR6ttrG36ANaout9GfxEufu3-xfVs2C74k8f1pPq5tPFevVlcfX18-VqebVwQuJhwYNglrSsDY3zVLg6MGUFZ067Fvw1JIRGCSGpElxKH9oGY97WtiVSU9o4dlJ9nHXvxmbnWweGsu3MXY47m_cm2Wj-vunj1mzSd8OxxlwLEHj7IJDTt9GXwexicb7rbO_TWAyRigjNtJL_gRIimVCSPo6Ce6wVkwrQN_-gt2nMPTQNKEFrpmH-pja28ybCn4AbN4maJacKU6g7Ue9myuVUSvbh0AiCzZQcMyXHzMkB-vWfvTuwv3ICwNkMwDe39kd8RO3VDEMMoLI9wLwm4IH9BLRQ0ho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552839283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Current Status of Usability Studies of Information Technologies in China : A Systematic Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lei, Jianbo ; Xu, Lufei ; Meng, Qun ; Zhang, Jiajie ; Gong, Yang</creator><contributor>Shen, Bairong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lei, Jianbo ; Xu, Lufei ; Meng, Qun ; Zhang, Jiajie ; Gong, Yang ; Shen, Bairong</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. To systematically review and analyze the current status and characteristics of usability studies in China in the field of information technology in general and in the field of healthcare in particular. Methods. We performed a quantitative literature analysis in three major Chinese academic databases and one English language database using Chinese search terms equivalent to the concept of usability. Results. Six hundred forty-seven publications were selected for analysis. We found that in China the literature on usability in the field of information technology began in 1994 and increased thereafter. The usability definitions from ISO 9241-11:1998 and Nielsen (1993) have been widely recognized and cited. Authors who have published several publications are rare. Fourteen journals have a publishing rate over 1%. Only nine publications about HIT were identified. Discussions. China’s usability research started relatively late. There is a lack of organized research teams and dedicated usability journals. High-impact theoretical studies are scarce. On the application side, no original and systematic research frameworks have been developed. The understanding and definition of usability is not well synchronized with international norms. Besides, usability research in HIT is rare. Conclusions. More human and material resources need to be invested in China’s usability research, particularly in HIT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2014/568303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25050362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><subject>China ; Design ; Documents ; Economic development ; Electronic health records ; Equivalence ; Health care ; Human ; Humans ; Information technology ; Medical Informatics - trends ; Methods ; Norms ; Periodicals as Topic ; Publishing ; Review ; Studies</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Jianbo Lei et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Jianbo Lei et al. Jianbo Lei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Jianbo Lei et al. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-4f53a1d3dfbce25c8f37a543c9cd568b1ffb7556275466efdb004d8ad16922bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-4f53a1d3dfbce25c8f37a543c9cd568b1ffb7556275466efdb004d8ad16922bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090495/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090495/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Shen, Bairong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lei, Jianbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lufei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>The Current Status of Usability Studies of Information Technologies in China : A Systematic Study</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>Objectives. To systematically review and analyze the current status and characteristics of usability studies in China in the field of information technology in general and in the field of healthcare in particular. Methods. We performed a quantitative literature analysis in three major Chinese academic databases and one English language database using Chinese search terms equivalent to the concept of usability. Results. Six hundred forty-seven publications were selected for analysis. We found that in China the literature on usability in the field of information technology began in 1994 and increased thereafter. The usability definitions from ISO 9241-11:1998 and Nielsen (1993) have been widely recognized and cited. Authors who have published several publications are rare. Fourteen journals have a publishing rate over 1%. Only nine publications about HIT were identified. Discussions. China’s usability research started relatively late. There is a lack of organized research teams and dedicated usability journals. High-impact theoretical studies are scarce. On the application side, no original and systematic research frameworks have been developed. The understanding and definition of usability is not well synchronized with international norms. Besides, usability research in HIT is rare. Conclusions. More human and material resources need to be invested in China’s usability research, particularly in HIT.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Medical Informatics - trends</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1rFDEYxgdRbKk9eVYCXqSyNt-ZeBCWpWqh4KHbc8hkkt2U2UlNZpT9732nU9ePSw2EhOSX5-V581TVS4LfEyLEOcWEnwtZM8yeVMeUEb6QhJOnhz1jR9VpKbcYRk0k1vJ5dUQFFphJelzZ9daj1Ziz7wd0PdhhLCgFdFNsE7s47OFsbKO_P7zsQ8o7O8TUo7V32z51aTPdxR6ttrG36ANaout9GfxEufu3-xfVs2C74k8f1pPq5tPFevVlcfX18-VqebVwQuJhwYNglrSsDY3zVLg6MGUFZ067Fvw1JIRGCSGpElxKH9oGY97WtiVSU9o4dlJ9nHXvxmbnWweGsu3MXY47m_cm2Wj-vunj1mzSd8OxxlwLEHj7IJDTt9GXwexicb7rbO_TWAyRigjNtJL_gRIimVCSPo6Ce6wVkwrQN_-gt2nMPTQNKEFrpmH-pja28ybCn4AbN4maJacKU6g7Ue9myuVUSvbh0AiCzZQcMyXHzMkB-vWfvTuwv3ICwNkMwDe39kd8RO3VDEMMoLI9wLwm4IH9BLRQ0ho</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Lei, Jianbo</creator><creator>Xu, Lufei</creator><creator>Meng, Qun</creator><creator>Zhang, Jiajie</creator><creator>Gong, Yang</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>The Current Status of Usability Studies of Information Technologies in China : A Systematic Study</title><author>Lei, Jianbo ; Xu, Lufei ; Meng, Qun ; Zhang, Jiajie ; Gong, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-4f53a1d3dfbce25c8f37a543c9cd568b1ffb7556275466efdb004d8ad16922bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Medical Informatics - trends</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lei, Jianbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lufei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lei, Jianbo</au><au>Xu, Lufei</au><au>Meng, Qun</au><au>Zhang, Jiajie</au><au>Gong, Yang</au><au>Shen, Bairong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Current Status of Usability Studies of Information Technologies in China : A Systematic Study</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2014</volume><issue>2014</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>Objectives. To systematically review and analyze the current status and characteristics of usability studies in China in the field of information technology in general and in the field of healthcare in particular. Methods. We performed a quantitative literature analysis in three major Chinese academic databases and one English language database using Chinese search terms equivalent to the concept of usability. Results. Six hundred forty-seven publications were selected for analysis. We found that in China the literature on usability in the field of information technology began in 1994 and increased thereafter. The usability definitions from ISO 9241-11:1998 and Nielsen (1993) have been widely recognized and cited. Authors who have published several publications are rare. Fourteen journals have a publishing rate over 1%. Only nine publications about HIT were identified. Discussions. China’s usability research started relatively late. There is a lack of organized research teams and dedicated usability journals. High-impact theoretical studies are scarce. On the application side, no original and systematic research frameworks have been developed. The understanding and definition of usability is not well synchronized with international norms. Besides, usability research in HIT is rare. Conclusions. More human and material resources need to be invested in China’s usability research, particularly in HIT.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><pmid>25050362</pmid><doi>10.1155/2014/568303</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
| ispartof | BioMed research international, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-10 |
| issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4090495 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | China Design Documents Economic development Electronic health records Equivalence Health care Human Humans Information technology Medical Informatics - trends Methods Norms Periodicals as Topic Publishing Review Studies |
| title | The Current Status of Usability Studies of Information Technologies in China : A Systematic Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A34%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Current%20Status%20of%20Usability%20Studies%20of%20Information%20Technologies%20in%20China%20:%20A%20Systematic%20Study&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Lei,%20Jianbo&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=2014&rft.issue=2014&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2014/568303&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA427023573%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552839283&rft_id=info:pmid/25050362&rft_galeid=A427023573&rfr_iscdi=true |