Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal

AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed ret...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2006-07, Vol.12 (26), p.4170-4174
Hauptverfasser: Li, Shao-Qiang, Liang, Li-Jian, Peng, Bao-Gang, Lai, Jia-Ming, Lu, Ming-De, Li, Dong-Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4174
container_issue 26
container_start_page 4170
container_title World journal of gastroenterology : WJG
container_volume 12
creator Li, Shao-Qiang
Liang, Li-Jian
Peng, Bao-Gang
Lai, Jia-Ming
Lu, Ming-De
Li, Dong-Ming
description AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.
doi_str_mv 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4087366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>22422649</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>wjg200626009</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>wjg200626009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFu1DAURS0EokNhzwpFCLHL9NmO7XhDVVVAkSp1A2vrxePMOGTi1E5a9Vf4Fv6pv4CjGUFZWbLvO772IeQthTVXVX12323Xd5StPZPriip4RlaMUV2yuoLnZEUBVKk5UyfkVUodAONcsJfkhMqaA5dqRc6v3IiTt6Fz3TyENIX9Q9GGWOyW_dD7aecx-fT4-1dxUdjocxb7Ascxok_YvyYvWuyTe3NcT8mPL5-_X16V1zdfv11eXJe2EjCVwvKKIQrdSIWqARRc1pIh1Q0ilU422m5Y3QrdIhNCbjbKakcb66RSIFp-Sj4duOPc7N3GumGK2Jsx-j3GBxPQm_9PBr8z23BnKqgVlzIDPhwA9zi0OGxNF-Y45MomfyIDkEwC6Bz7eLwnhtvZpcnsfbKu73FwYU5maS2lXnhwCNoYUoqu_duFglnkLFyT5Zgsxyxy8si7p2_4N3C0kQPvj8xdGLa3Prds0P5sfe8MYxVjstL8D_b2mgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68626696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Shao-Qiang ; Liang, Li-Jian ; Peng, Bao-Gang ; Lai, Jia-Ming ; Lu, Ming-De ; Li, Dong-Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Shao-Qiang ; Liang, Li-Jian ; Peng, Bao-Gang ; Lai, Jia-Ming ; Lu, Ming-De ; Li, Dong-Ming</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16830367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-san University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholangitis - etiology ; Clinical Research ; Drainage ; Female ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Jejunostomy - methods ; Lithiasis - surgery ; Lithotripsy - instrumentation ; Lithotripsy - methods ; Liver Diseases - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; 病理机制 ; 肝管空肠吻合术 ; 肝结石</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2006-07, Vol.12 (26), p.4170-4174</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved. 2006</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087366/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087366/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16830367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Shao-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Li-Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Bao-Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jia-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ming-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong-Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cholangitis - etiology</subject><subject>Clinical Research</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jejunostomy - methods</subject><subject>Lithiasis - surgery</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - methods</subject><subject>Liver Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>病理机制</subject><subject>肝管空肠吻合术</subject><subject>肝结石</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFu1DAURS0EokNhzwpFCLHL9NmO7XhDVVVAkSp1A2vrxePMOGTi1E5a9Vf4Fv6pv4CjGUFZWbLvO772IeQthTVXVX12323Xd5StPZPriip4RlaMUV2yuoLnZEUBVKk5UyfkVUodAONcsJfkhMqaA5dqRc6v3IiTt6Fz3TyENIX9Q9GGWOyW_dD7aecx-fT4-1dxUdjocxb7Ascxok_YvyYvWuyTe3NcT8mPL5-_X16V1zdfv11eXJe2EjCVwvKKIQrdSIWqARRc1pIh1Q0ilU422m5Y3QrdIhNCbjbKakcb66RSIFp-Sj4duOPc7N3GumGK2Jsx-j3GBxPQm_9PBr8z23BnKqgVlzIDPhwA9zi0OGxNF-Y45MomfyIDkEwC6Bz7eLwnhtvZpcnsfbKu73FwYU5maS2lXnhwCNoYUoqu_duFglnkLFyT5Zgsxyxy8si7p2_4N3C0kQPvj8xdGLa3Prds0P5sfe8MYxVjstL8D_b2mgQ</recordid><startdate>20060714</startdate><enddate>20060714</enddate><creator>Li, Shao-Qiang</creator><creator>Liang, Li-Jian</creator><creator>Peng, Bao-Gang</creator><creator>Lai, Jia-Ming</creator><creator>Lu, Ming-De</creator><creator>Li, Dong-Ming</creator><general>Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-san University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China</general><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060714</creationdate><title>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</title><author>Li, Shao-Qiang ; Liang, Li-Jian ; Peng, Bao-Gang ; Lai, Jia-Ming ; Lu, Ming-De ; Li, Dong-Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cholangitis - etiology</topic><topic>Clinical Research</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jejunostomy - methods</topic><topic>Lithiasis - surgery</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - methods</topic><topic>Liver Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>病理机制</topic><topic>肝管空肠吻合术</topic><topic>肝结石</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Shao-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Li-Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Bao-Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jia-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ming-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong-Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Shao-Qiang</au><au>Liang, Li-Jian</au><au>Peng, Bao-Gang</au><au>Lai, Jia-Ming</au><au>Lu, Ming-De</au><au>Li, Dong-Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2006-07-14</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>26</issue><spage>4170</spage><epage>4174</epage><pages>4170-4174</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-san University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China</pub><pmid>16830367</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1007-9327
ispartof World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2006-07, Vol.12 (26), p.4170-4174
issn 1007-9327
2219-2840
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4087366
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cholangitis - etiology
Clinical Research
Drainage
Female
Hepatectomy - methods
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Jejunostomy - methods
Lithiasis - surgery
Lithotripsy - instrumentation
Lithotripsy - methods
Liver Diseases - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
病理机制
肝管空肠吻合术
肝结石
title Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hepaticojejunostomy%20for%20hepatolithiasis%EF%BC%9A%20A%20critical%20appraisal&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Li,%20Shao-Qiang&rft.date=2006-07-14&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=4170&rft.epage=4174&rft.pages=4170-4174&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_pubme%3Ewjg200626009%3C/wanfang_jour_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68626696&rft_id=info:pmid/16830367&rft_cqvip_id=22422649&rft_wanfj_id=wjg200626009&rfr_iscdi=true