Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal
AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed ret...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2006-07, Vol.12 (26), p.4170-4174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4174 |
---|---|
container_issue | 26 |
container_start_page | 4170 |
container_title | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Li, Shao-Qiang Liang, Li-Jian Peng, Bao-Gang Lai, Jia-Ming Lu, Ming-De Li, Dong-Ming |
description | AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4087366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>22422649</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>wjg200626009</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>wjg200626009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFu1DAURS0EokNhzwpFCLHL9NmO7XhDVVVAkSp1A2vrxePMOGTi1E5a9Vf4Fv6pv4CjGUFZWbLvO772IeQthTVXVX12323Xd5StPZPriip4RlaMUV2yuoLnZEUBVKk5UyfkVUodAONcsJfkhMqaA5dqRc6v3IiTt6Fz3TyENIX9Q9GGWOyW_dD7aecx-fT4-1dxUdjocxb7Ascxok_YvyYvWuyTe3NcT8mPL5-_X16V1zdfv11eXJe2EjCVwvKKIQrdSIWqARRc1pIh1Q0ilU422m5Y3QrdIhNCbjbKakcb66RSIFp-Sj4duOPc7N3GumGK2Jsx-j3GBxPQm_9PBr8z23BnKqgVlzIDPhwA9zi0OGxNF-Y45MomfyIDkEwC6Bz7eLwnhtvZpcnsfbKu73FwYU5maS2lXnhwCNoYUoqu_duFglnkLFyT5Zgsxyxy8si7p2_4N3C0kQPvj8xdGLa3Prds0P5sfe8MYxVjstL8D_b2mgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68626696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Shao-Qiang ; Liang, Li-Jian ; Peng, Bao-Gang ; Lai, Jia-Ming ; Lu, Ming-De ; Li, Dong-Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Shao-Qiang ; Liang, Li-Jian ; Peng, Bao-Gang ; Lai, Jia-Ming ; Lu, Ming-De ; Li, Dong-Ming</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16830367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-san University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholangitis - etiology ; Clinical Research ; Drainage ; Female ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Jejunostomy - methods ; Lithiasis - surgery ; Lithotripsy - instrumentation ; Lithotripsy - methods ; Liver Diseases - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; 病理机制 ; 肝管空肠吻合术 ; 肝结石</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2006-07, Vol.12 (26), p.4170-4174</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved. 2006</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087366/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087366/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16830367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Shao-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Li-Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Bao-Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jia-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ming-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong-Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cholangitis - etiology</subject><subject>Clinical Research</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jejunostomy - methods</subject><subject>Lithiasis - surgery</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - methods</subject><subject>Liver Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>病理机制</subject><subject>肝管空肠吻合术</subject><subject>肝结石</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFu1DAURS0EokNhzwpFCLHL9NmO7XhDVVVAkSp1A2vrxePMOGTi1E5a9Vf4Fv6pv4CjGUFZWbLvO772IeQthTVXVX12323Xd5StPZPriip4RlaMUV2yuoLnZEUBVKk5UyfkVUodAONcsJfkhMqaA5dqRc6v3IiTt6Fz3TyENIX9Q9GGWOyW_dD7aecx-fT4-1dxUdjocxb7Ascxok_YvyYvWuyTe3NcT8mPL5-_X16V1zdfv11eXJe2EjCVwvKKIQrdSIWqARRc1pIh1Q0ilU422m5Y3QrdIhNCbjbKakcb66RSIFp-Sj4duOPc7N3GumGK2Jsx-j3GBxPQm_9PBr8z23BnKqgVlzIDPhwA9zi0OGxNF-Y45MomfyIDkEwC6Bz7eLwnhtvZpcnsfbKu73FwYU5maS2lXnhwCNoYUoqu_duFglnkLFyT5Zgsxyxy8si7p2_4N3C0kQPvj8xdGLa3Prds0P5sfe8MYxVjstL8D_b2mgQ</recordid><startdate>20060714</startdate><enddate>20060714</enddate><creator>Li, Shao-Qiang</creator><creator>Liang, Li-Jian</creator><creator>Peng, Bao-Gang</creator><creator>Lai, Jia-Ming</creator><creator>Lu, Ming-De</creator><creator>Li, Dong-Ming</creator><general>Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-san University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China</general><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060714</creationdate><title>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</title><author>Li, Shao-Qiang ; Liang, Li-Jian ; Peng, Bao-Gang ; Lai, Jia-Ming ; Lu, Ming-De ; Li, Dong-Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5c342aa59b67a7b0a536862a19baa16e6b9cd28f59fa2556dd7c9e1bce67705f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cholangitis - etiology</topic><topic>Clinical Research</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jejunostomy - methods</topic><topic>Lithiasis - surgery</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - methods</topic><topic>Liver Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>病理机制</topic><topic>肝管空肠吻合术</topic><topic>肝结石</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Shao-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Li-Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Bao-Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jia-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ming-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong-Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Shao-Qiang</au><au>Liang, Li-Jian</au><au>Peng, Bao-Gang</au><au>Lai, Jia-Ming</au><au>Lu, Ming-De</au><au>Li, Dong-Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2006-07-14</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>26</issue><spage>4170</spage><epage>4174</epage><pages>4170-4174</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy (H J) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1: hepatectomy+HJ; group A2: choledochoctomy+HJ; group B1: hepatectomy + choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2: choledochoctomy + T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group (0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01). Hepatectomy + choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy + HJ (8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034). The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group (16/23, 70.0%), and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group (34/35, 97.1%). The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION: The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-san University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China</pub><pmid>16830367</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1007-9327 |
ispartof | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2006-07, Vol.12 (26), p.4170-4174 |
issn | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4087366 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cholangitis - etiology Clinical Research Drainage Female Hepatectomy - methods Hospital Mortality Humans Jejunostomy - methods Lithiasis - surgery Lithotripsy - instrumentation Lithotripsy - methods Liver Diseases - surgery Male Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - etiology Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome 病理机制 肝管空肠吻合术 肝结石 |
title | Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hepaticojejunostomy%20for%20hepatolithiasis%EF%BC%9A%20A%20critical%20appraisal&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Li,%20Shao-Qiang&rft.date=2006-07-14&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=4170&rft.epage=4174&rft.pages=4170-4174&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_pubme%3Ewjg200626009%3C/wanfang_jour_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68626696&rft_id=info:pmid/16830367&rft_cqvip_id=22422649&rft_wanfj_id=wjg200626009&rfr_iscdi=true |