An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study
There is worldwide debate surrounding the safety and appropriateness of different birthplaces for well women. One of the primary objectives of the Evaluating Maternity Units prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical outcomes for well women, intending to give birth in either an obstetric-l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2014-06, Vol.14 (1), p.210-210, Article 210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 210 |
container_title | BMC pregnancy and childbirth |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Grigg, Celia Tracy, Sally K Daellenbach, Rea Kensington, Mary Schmied, Virginia |
description | There is worldwide debate surrounding the safety and appropriateness of different birthplaces for well women. One of the primary objectives of the Evaluating Maternity Units prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical outcomes for well women, intending to give birth in either an obstetric-led tertiary hospital or a free-standing midwifery-led primary maternity unit. This paper addresses a secondary aim of the study--to describe and explore the influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand, which has a publicly funded, midwifery-led continuity of care maternity system.
This mixed method study utilised data from the six week postpartum survey and focus groups undertaken in the Christchurch area in New Zealand (2010-2012). Christchurch has a tertiary hospital and four primary maternity units. The survey was completed by 82% of the 702 study participants, who were well, pregnant women booked to give birth in one of these places. All women received midwifery-led continuity of care, regardless of their intended or actual birthplace.
Almost all the respondents perceived themselves as the main birthplace decision-makers. Accessing a 'specialist facility' was the most important factor for the tertiary hospital group. The primary unit group identified several factors, including 'closeness to home', 'ease of access', the 'atmosphere' of the unit and avoidance of 'unnecessary intervention' as important. Both groups believed their chosen birthplace was the right and 'safe' place for them. The concept of 'safety' was integral and based on the participants' differing perception of safety in childbirth.
Birthplace is a profoundly important aspect of women's experience of childbirth. This is the first published study reporting New Zealand women's perspectives on their birthplace decision-making. The groups' responses expressed different ideologies about childbirth. The tertiary hospital group identified with the 'medical model' of birth, and the primary unit group identified with the 'midwifery model' of birth. Research evidence affirming the 'clinical safety' of primary units addresses only one aspect of the beliefs influencing women's birthplace decision-making. In order for more women to give birth at a primary unit other aspects of women's beliefs need addressing, and much wider socio-political change is required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-210 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4076764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1561037836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-a79001f43c53ee129c6f9e743794224177d6a3381e990caad1caf24d56118543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUsFu1DAQjRCIlsKdE7LEAS6hduzEaw5IVdVSpFIu5cLFcp1J45LYqe3sdj-nf8qstl0VTlxsa_zem5mnVxRvGf3E2KI5ZEKysuKKl0yUFaPPiv1d6fmT917xKqUbSplc1PRlsVcJVTOq-H5xf-QJ3E1DiCa74EnoiPPdMIO3kAgWVmEE_yGRKxdzPw3GAmnBuoTgcjS_nb9GArmAFfkFZjC-_UwMGd0dtGSE3Ic2kSmGNIHNbgnEhj7ETFYu90jLPZCTpRlmbI5C302G6F1ek594JpLy3K5fFy86MyR483AfFJenJ5fHZ-X5j6_fjo_OS1tXPJdGKtyvE9zWHIBVyjadAim4VKKqBJOybQznCwZKUWtMy6zpKtHWDTpZC35QfNnKTvPVCK0Fn6MZ9BTdaOJaB-P03z_e9fo6LLWgspHNRuDjg0AMtzOkrEeXLAzoCYQ5aYadKJcL3vwHFEdWiimK0Pf_QG_CHD0asUXVXFYKUXSLsmh1itDt5mZUb5KiN1HQmyjgS2NSkPLu6b47wmM0-B8-jbuB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542253729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Grigg, Celia ; Tracy, Sally K ; Daellenbach, Rea ; Kensington, Mary ; Schmied, Virginia</creator><creatorcontrib>Grigg, Celia ; Tracy, Sally K ; Daellenbach, Rea ; Kensington, Mary ; Schmied, Virginia</creatorcontrib><description>There is worldwide debate surrounding the safety and appropriateness of different birthplaces for well women. One of the primary objectives of the Evaluating Maternity Units prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical outcomes for well women, intending to give birth in either an obstetric-led tertiary hospital or a free-standing midwifery-led primary maternity unit. This paper addresses a secondary aim of the study--to describe and explore the influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand, which has a publicly funded, midwifery-led continuity of care maternity system.
This mixed method study utilised data from the six week postpartum survey and focus groups undertaken in the Christchurch area in New Zealand (2010-2012). Christchurch has a tertiary hospital and four primary maternity units. The survey was completed by 82% of the 702 study participants, who were well, pregnant women booked to give birth in one of these places. All women received midwifery-led continuity of care, regardless of their intended or actual birthplace.
Almost all the respondents perceived themselves as the main birthplace decision-makers. Accessing a 'specialist facility' was the most important factor for the tertiary hospital group. The primary unit group identified several factors, including 'closeness to home', 'ease of access', the 'atmosphere' of the unit and avoidance of 'unnecessary intervention' as important. Both groups believed their chosen birthplace was the right and 'safe' place for them. The concept of 'safety' was integral and based on the participants' differing perception of safety in childbirth.
Birthplace is a profoundly important aspect of women's experience of childbirth. This is the first published study reporting New Zealand women's perspectives on their birthplace decision-making. The groups' responses expressed different ideologies about childbirth. The tertiary hospital group identified with the 'medical model' of birth, and the primary unit group identified with the 'midwifery model' of birth. Research evidence affirming the 'clinical safety' of primary units addresses only one aspect of the beliefs influencing women's birthplace decision-making. In order for more women to give birth at a primary unit other aspects of women's beliefs need addressing, and much wider socio-political change is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2393</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24951093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Adult ; Birthing Centers ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Decision Making ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Health Care Surveys ; Health Services Accessibility ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Maternity ; Humans ; Medical research ; Methods ; Midwifery - organization & administration ; New Zealand ; Patient Care Planning ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care ; Prospective Studies ; Safety ; Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2014-06, Vol.14 (1), p.210-210, Article 210</ispartof><rights>2014 Grigg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Grigg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Grigg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-a79001f43c53ee129c6f9e743794224177d6a3381e990caad1caf24d56118543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-a79001f43c53ee129c6f9e743794224177d6a3381e990caad1caf24d56118543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076764/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076764/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24951093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grigg, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tracy, Sally K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daellenbach, Rea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kensington, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmied, Virginia</creatorcontrib><title>An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study</title><title>BMC pregnancy and childbirth</title><addtitle>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth</addtitle><description>There is worldwide debate surrounding the safety and appropriateness of different birthplaces for well women. One of the primary objectives of the Evaluating Maternity Units prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical outcomes for well women, intending to give birth in either an obstetric-led tertiary hospital or a free-standing midwifery-led primary maternity unit. This paper addresses a secondary aim of the study--to describe and explore the influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand, which has a publicly funded, midwifery-led continuity of care maternity system.
This mixed method study utilised data from the six week postpartum survey and focus groups undertaken in the Christchurch area in New Zealand (2010-2012). Christchurch has a tertiary hospital and four primary maternity units. The survey was completed by 82% of the 702 study participants, who were well, pregnant women booked to give birth in one of these places. All women received midwifery-led continuity of care, regardless of their intended or actual birthplace.
Almost all the respondents perceived themselves as the main birthplace decision-makers. Accessing a 'specialist facility' was the most important factor for the tertiary hospital group. The primary unit group identified several factors, including 'closeness to home', 'ease of access', the 'atmosphere' of the unit and avoidance of 'unnecessary intervention' as important. Both groups believed their chosen birthplace was the right and 'safe' place for them. The concept of 'safety' was integral and based on the participants' differing perception of safety in childbirth.
Birthplace is a profoundly important aspect of women's experience of childbirth. This is the first published study reporting New Zealand women's perspectives on their birthplace decision-making. The groups' responses expressed different ideologies about childbirth. The tertiary hospital group identified with the 'medical model' of birth, and the primary unit group identified with the 'midwifery model' of birth. Research evidence affirming the 'clinical safety' of primary units addresses only one aspect of the beliefs influencing women's birthplace decision-making. In order for more women to give birth at a primary unit other aspects of women's beliefs need addressing, and much wider socio-political change is required.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birthing Centers</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Maternity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Midwifery - organization & administration</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2393</issn><issn>1471-2393</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUsFu1DAQjRCIlsKdE7LEAS6hduzEaw5IVdVSpFIu5cLFcp1J45LYqe3sdj-nf8qstl0VTlxsa_zem5mnVxRvGf3E2KI5ZEKysuKKl0yUFaPPiv1d6fmT917xKqUbSplc1PRlsVcJVTOq-H5xf-QJ3E1DiCa74EnoiPPdMIO3kAgWVmEE_yGRKxdzPw3GAmnBuoTgcjS_nb9GArmAFfkFZjC-_UwMGd0dtGSE3Ic2kSmGNIHNbgnEhj7ETFYu90jLPZCTpRlmbI5C302G6F1ek594JpLy3K5fFy86MyR483AfFJenJ5fHZ-X5j6_fjo_OS1tXPJdGKtyvE9zWHIBVyjadAim4VKKqBJOybQznCwZKUWtMy6zpKtHWDTpZC35QfNnKTvPVCK0Fn6MZ9BTdaOJaB-P03z_e9fo6LLWgspHNRuDjg0AMtzOkrEeXLAzoCYQ5aYadKJcL3vwHFEdWiimK0Pf_QG_CHD0asUXVXFYKUXSLsmh1itDt5mZUb5KiN1HQmyjgS2NSkPLu6b47wmM0-B8-jbuB</recordid><startdate>20140620</startdate><enddate>20140620</enddate><creator>Grigg, Celia</creator><creator>Tracy, Sally K</creator><creator>Daellenbach, Rea</creator><creator>Kensington, Mary</creator><creator>Schmied, Virginia</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140620</creationdate><title>An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study</title><author>Grigg, Celia ; Tracy, Sally K ; Daellenbach, Rea ; Kensington, Mary ; Schmied, Virginia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-a79001f43c53ee129c6f9e743794224177d6a3381e990caad1caf24d56118543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birthing Centers</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Maternity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Midwifery - organization & administration</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grigg, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tracy, Sally K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daellenbach, Rea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kensington, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmied, Virginia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC pregnancy and childbirth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grigg, Celia</au><au>Tracy, Sally K</au><au>Daellenbach, Rea</au><au>Kensington, Mary</au><au>Schmied, Virginia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study</atitle><jtitle>BMC pregnancy and childbirth</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth</addtitle><date>2014-06-20</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>210-210</pages><artnum>210</artnum><issn>1471-2393</issn><eissn>1471-2393</eissn><abstract>There is worldwide debate surrounding the safety and appropriateness of different birthplaces for well women. One of the primary objectives of the Evaluating Maternity Units prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical outcomes for well women, intending to give birth in either an obstetric-led tertiary hospital or a free-standing midwifery-led primary maternity unit. This paper addresses a secondary aim of the study--to describe and explore the influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand, which has a publicly funded, midwifery-led continuity of care maternity system.
This mixed method study utilised data from the six week postpartum survey and focus groups undertaken in the Christchurch area in New Zealand (2010-2012). Christchurch has a tertiary hospital and four primary maternity units. The survey was completed by 82% of the 702 study participants, who were well, pregnant women booked to give birth in one of these places. All women received midwifery-led continuity of care, regardless of their intended or actual birthplace.
Almost all the respondents perceived themselves as the main birthplace decision-makers. Accessing a 'specialist facility' was the most important factor for the tertiary hospital group. The primary unit group identified several factors, including 'closeness to home', 'ease of access', the 'atmosphere' of the unit and avoidance of 'unnecessary intervention' as important. Both groups believed their chosen birthplace was the right and 'safe' place for them. The concept of 'safety' was integral and based on the participants' differing perception of safety in childbirth.
Birthplace is a profoundly important aspect of women's experience of childbirth. This is the first published study reporting New Zealand women's perspectives on their birthplace decision-making. The groups' responses expressed different ideologies about childbirth. The tertiary hospital group identified with the 'medical model' of birth, and the primary unit group identified with the 'midwifery model' of birth. Research evidence affirming the 'clinical safety' of primary units addresses only one aspect of the beliefs influencing women's birthplace decision-making. In order for more women to give birth at a primary unit other aspects of women's beliefs need addressing, and much wider socio-political change is required.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>24951093</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2393-14-210</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2393 |
ispartof | BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2014-06, Vol.14 (1), p.210-210, Article 210 |
issn | 1471-2393 1471-2393 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4076764 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Birthing Centers Continuity of Patient Care Decision Making Female Focus Groups Health Care Surveys Health Services Accessibility Hospitals Hospitals, Maternity Humans Medical research Methods Midwifery - organization & administration New Zealand Patient Care Planning Pregnancy Prenatal Care Prospective Studies Safety Studies Tertiary Care Centers Womens health Young Adult |
title | An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A54%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20exploration%20of%20influences%20on%20women's%20birthplace%20decision-making%20in%20New%20Zealand:%20a%20mixed%20methods%20prospective%20cohort%20within%20the%20Evaluating%20Maternity%20Units%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20pregnancy%20and%20childbirth&rft.au=Grigg,%20Celia&rft.date=2014-06-20&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=210-210&rft.artnum=210&rft.issn=1471-2393&rft.eissn=1471-2393&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2393-14-210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1561037836%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542253729&rft_id=info:pmid/24951093&rfr_iscdi=true |