Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues

We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2011-04, Vol.210 (2), p.173-184
Hauptverfasser: Rader, Andrew A., Oman, Charles M., Merfeld, Daniel M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2
container_start_page 173
container_title Experimental brain research
container_volume 210
creator Rader, Andrew A.
Oman, Charles M.
Merfeld, Daniel M.
description We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4074006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A404895247</galeid><sourcerecordid>A404895247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwA7igCASIQ8rYmSTOBamq-KhUCcTH2Zo4zq4rb7y1nS2IP4_TLW0XgZAP9tjPvB7NvFn2mMEhA2heBwDOWQGMFbxmvMA72T7DkheMQX032wdgWKBg7V72IISzOSwbuJ_tcYYceSX2s5-ftFfabHSfR2NjTmM6eBqDpWjcmPeTN-Mi35A31FldeOrNFPJwMd-u3CVzYeIyV25c-EmPMXd-DgZrVLxMNWEieym80SGabrKUiEmHh9m9gWzQj672g-zbu7dfjz8Upx_fnxwfnRaqrnksBKim6UVHWJZVWzUC2r5rNTaaes3LoSWuNCdew8BEiRUyhE6UFWt7TqXuyoPszVZ3PXUr3atUpCcr196syP-QjozcfRnNUi7cRiI0CFAngZdXAt6dp8KjXJmgtLU0ajcF2QIvKyxR_JcUVYttzQQm8ukf5Jmb_Jj6MEMckUOToGdbaEFWSzMOLtWnZkl5hICirTjO1OFfqLR6vTJpFHow6X4n4dVOQmKi_h4XNIUgT7583mVf3GKXmmxcBmenefJhF2RbUHkXgtfDdYMZyNmucmtXmewqZ7vKuQlPbk_mOuO3PxPw_AqgoMgOyZnKhBsOQTCsIHF8y4X17Fftb7r5799_AeL1ARs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859244207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Rader, Andrew A. ; Oman, Charles M. ; Merfeld, Daniel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rader, Andrew A. ; Oman, Charles M. ; Merfeld, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21424258</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXBRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain research ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Feedback, Sensory - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motion perception (Vision) ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Perceptions ; Physiological aspects ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Research Article ; Set (Psychology) ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology ; Visual perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2011-04, Vol.210 (2), p.173-184</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24081450$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21424258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rader, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oman, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merfeld, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motion perception (Vision)</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwA7igCASIQ8rYmSTOBamq-KhUCcTH2Zo4zq4rb7y1nS2IP4_TLW0XgZAP9tjPvB7NvFn2mMEhA2heBwDOWQGMFbxmvMA72T7DkheMQX032wdgWKBg7V72IISzOSwbuJ_tcYYceSX2s5-ftFfabHSfR2NjTmM6eBqDpWjcmPeTN-Mi35A31FldeOrNFPJwMd-u3CVzYeIyV25c-EmPMXd-DgZrVLxMNWEieym80SGabrKUiEmHh9m9gWzQj672g-zbu7dfjz8Upx_fnxwfnRaqrnksBKim6UVHWJZVWzUC2r5rNTaaes3LoSWuNCdew8BEiRUyhE6UFWt7TqXuyoPszVZ3PXUr3atUpCcr196syP-QjozcfRnNUi7cRiI0CFAngZdXAt6dp8KjXJmgtLU0ajcF2QIvKyxR_JcUVYttzQQm8ukf5Jmb_Jj6MEMckUOToGdbaEFWSzMOLtWnZkl5hICirTjO1OFfqLR6vTJpFHow6X4n4dVOQmKi_h4XNIUgT7583mVf3GKXmmxcBmenefJhF2RbUHkXgtfDdYMZyNmucmtXmewqZ7vKuQlPbk_mOuO3PxPw_AqgoMgOyZnKhBsOQTCsIHF8y4X17Fftb7r5799_AeL1ARs</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Rader, Andrew A.</creator><creator>Oman, Charles M.</creator><creator>Merfeld, Daniel M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</title><author>Rader, Andrew A. ; Oman, Charles M. ; Merfeld, Daniel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motion perception (Vision)</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rader, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oman, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merfeld, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rader, Andrew A.</au><au>Oman, Charles M.</au><au>Merfeld, Daniel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>210</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>173-184</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><coden>EXBRAP</coden><abstract>We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21424258</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4819
ispartof Experimental brain research, 2011-04, Vol.210 (2), p.173-184
issn 0014-4819
1432-1106
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4074006
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Brain research
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Feedback, Sensory - physiology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motion perception (Vision)
Motion Perception - physiology
Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration
Neurology
Neurosciences
Perceptions
Physiological aspects
Postural Balance - physiology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Research Article
Set (Psychology)
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology
Visual perception
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A14%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20tilt%20and%20translation%20during%20variable-radius%20swing%20motion%20with%20congruent%20or%20conflicting%20visual%20and%20vestibular%20cues&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Rader,%20Andrew%20A.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=210&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=173-184&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft.coden=EXBRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA404895247%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859244207&rft_id=info:pmid/21424258&rft_galeid=A404895247&rfr_iscdi=true