Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues
We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2011-04, Vol.210 (2), p.173-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 210 |
creator | Rader, Andrew A. Oman, Charles M. Merfeld, Daniel M. |
description | We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4074006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A404895247</galeid><sourcerecordid>A404895247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwA7igCASIQ8rYmSTOBamq-KhUCcTH2Zo4zq4rb7y1nS2IP4_TLW0XgZAP9tjPvB7NvFn2mMEhA2heBwDOWQGMFbxmvMA72T7DkheMQX032wdgWKBg7V72IISzOSwbuJ_tcYYceSX2s5-ftFfabHSfR2NjTmM6eBqDpWjcmPeTN-Mi35A31FldeOrNFPJwMd-u3CVzYeIyV25c-EmPMXd-DgZrVLxMNWEieym80SGabrKUiEmHh9m9gWzQj672g-zbu7dfjz8Upx_fnxwfnRaqrnksBKim6UVHWJZVWzUC2r5rNTaaes3LoSWuNCdew8BEiRUyhE6UFWt7TqXuyoPszVZ3PXUr3atUpCcr196syP-QjozcfRnNUi7cRiI0CFAngZdXAt6dp8KjXJmgtLU0ajcF2QIvKyxR_JcUVYttzQQm8ukf5Jmb_Jj6MEMckUOToGdbaEFWSzMOLtWnZkl5hICirTjO1OFfqLR6vTJpFHow6X4n4dVOQmKi_h4XNIUgT7583mVf3GKXmmxcBmenefJhF2RbUHkXgtfDdYMZyNmucmtXmewqZ7vKuQlPbk_mOuO3PxPw_AqgoMgOyZnKhBsOQTCsIHF8y4X17Fftb7r5799_AeL1ARs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859244207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Rader, Andrew A. ; Oman, Charles M. ; Merfeld, Daniel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rader, Andrew A. ; Oman, Charles M. ; Merfeld, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21424258</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXBRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain research ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Feedback, Sensory - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motion perception (Vision) ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Perceptions ; Physiological aspects ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Research Article ; Set (Psychology) ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology ; Visual perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2011-04, Vol.210 (2), p.173-184</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24081450$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21424258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rader, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oman, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merfeld, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motion perception (Vision)</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwA7igCASIQ8rYmSTOBamq-KhUCcTH2Zo4zq4rb7y1nS2IP4_TLW0XgZAP9tjPvB7NvFn2mMEhA2heBwDOWQGMFbxmvMA72T7DkheMQX032wdgWKBg7V72IISzOSwbuJ_tcYYceSX2s5-ftFfabHSfR2NjTmM6eBqDpWjcmPeTN-Mi35A31FldeOrNFPJwMd-u3CVzYeIyV25c-EmPMXd-DgZrVLxMNWEieym80SGabrKUiEmHh9m9gWzQj672g-zbu7dfjz8Upx_fnxwfnRaqrnksBKim6UVHWJZVWzUC2r5rNTaaes3LoSWuNCdew8BEiRUyhE6UFWt7TqXuyoPszVZ3PXUr3atUpCcr196syP-QjozcfRnNUi7cRiI0CFAngZdXAt6dp8KjXJmgtLU0ajcF2QIvKyxR_JcUVYttzQQm8ukf5Jmb_Jj6MEMckUOToGdbaEFWSzMOLtWnZkl5hICirTjO1OFfqLR6vTJpFHow6X4n4dVOQmKi_h4XNIUgT7583mVf3GKXmmxcBmenefJhF2RbUHkXgtfDdYMZyNmucmtXmewqZ7vKuQlPbk_mOuO3PxPw_AqgoMgOyZnKhBsOQTCsIHF8y4X17Fftb7r5799_AeL1ARs</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Rader, Andrew A.</creator><creator>Oman, Charles M.</creator><creator>Merfeld, Daniel M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</title><author>Rader, Andrew A. ; Oman, Charles M. ; Merfeld, Daniel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c662t-80c77d8ba4335957809db9e47eade23f9a2ce2a260f183454140b83519d2a3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motion perception (Vision)</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rader, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oman, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merfeld, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rader, Andrew A.</au><au>Oman, Charles M.</au><au>Merfeld, Daniel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>210</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>173-184</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><coden>EXBRAP</coden><abstract>We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual–vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21424258</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2011-04, Vol.210 (2), p.173-184 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4074006 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain research Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision Feedback, Sensory - physiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Middle Aged Motion perception (Vision) Motion Perception - physiology Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration Neurology Neurosciences Perceptions Physiological aspects Postural Balance - physiology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Research Article Set (Psychology) Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology Visual perception Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
title | Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A14%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20tilt%20and%20translation%20during%20variable-radius%20swing%20motion%20with%20congruent%20or%20conflicting%20visual%20and%20vestibular%20cues&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Rader,%20Andrew%20A.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=210&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=173-184&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft.coden=EXBRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA404895247%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859244207&rft_id=info:pmid/21424258&rft_galeid=A404895247&rfr_iscdi=true |