Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion
The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) is a multisensory perceptual phenomenon in which the number of brief visual stimuli perceived by an observer is influenced by the number of concurrently presented sounds. While the strength of this illusion has been shown to be modulated by the temporal congru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-06, Vol.14 (7), p.12-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 12 |
container_title | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Kumpik, Daniel P Roberts, Helen E King, Andrew J Bizley, Jennifer K |
description | The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) is a multisensory perceptual phenomenon in which the number of brief visual stimuli perceived by an observer is influenced by the number of concurrently presented sounds. While the strength of this illusion has been shown to be modulated by the temporal congruence of the stimuli from each modality, there is conflicting evidence regarding its dependence upon their spatial congruence. We addressed this question by examining SIFIs under conditions in which the spatial reliability of the visual stimuli was degraded and different sound localization cues were presented using either free-field or closed-field stimulation. The likelihood of reporting a SIFI varied with the spatial cue composition of the auditory stimulus and was highest when binaural cues were presented over headphones. SIFIs were more common for small flashes than for large flashes, and for small flashes at peripheral locations, subjects experienced a greater number of illusory fusion events than fission events. However, the SIFI was not dependent on the spatial proximity of the audiovisual stimuli, but was instead determined primarily by differences in subjects' underlying sensitivity across the visual field to the number of flashes presented. Our findings indicate that the influence of auditory stimulation on visual numerosity judgments can occur independently of the spatial relationship between the stimuli. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1167/14.7.12 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4070624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1540707666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-8d950d057d7b977da757b7ec6e643bdfee373dcc90a13cc9dc9f18ea3f2144ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFOHDEMhiPUqtCl4g2q3NrLLMkkkzCXShWiBQmJC3CNsolnN9VMso0TpD3z4p3VUgQX2_L_-bclE3LG2ZJzpc-5XOolb4_ICe-EbLRQ7Yc39TH5jPiHsZZ1jH8ix63sFZ_DCXl-DFjtSBEihhKeQtnRgNRSLDnFNWTqoUCeQrSx0DTQMI4VU97RbU4OEAFp2dhIbfWh7PuuAt3abKf9HNIQZx0ophp9E6KvDjwdRoubg1VI8ZR8HOyI8OUlL8jDr6v7y-vm9u73zeXP28Z1rCvNhe875lmnvV71WnurO73S4BQoKVZ-ABBaeOd6ZrmYk3f9wC_AiqHlUjoQC_Lj4Lutqwm8g1iyHc02h8nmnUk2mPdKDBuzTk9GMs1UK2eD7y8GOf2tgMVMAR2Mo42QKhre7UmtlJrRbwfU5YSYYXhdw5nZv8xwaebQzuTXt1e9cv9_JP4BQ3eWLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540707666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kumpik, Daniel P ; Roberts, Helen E ; King, Andrew J ; Bizley, Jennifer K</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumpik, Daniel P ; Roberts, Helen E ; King, Andrew J ; Bizley, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><description>The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) is a multisensory perceptual phenomenon in which the number of brief visual stimuli perceived by an observer is influenced by the number of concurrently presented sounds. While the strength of this illusion has been shown to be modulated by the temporal congruence of the stimuli from each modality, there is conflicting evidence regarding its dependence upon their spatial congruence. We addressed this question by examining SIFIs under conditions in which the spatial reliability of the visual stimuli was degraded and different sound localization cues were presented using either free-field or closed-field stimulation. The likelihood of reporting a SIFI varied with the spatial cue composition of the auditory stimulus and was highest when binaural cues were presented over headphones. SIFIs were more common for small flashes than for large flashes, and for small flashes at peripheral locations, subjects experienced a greater number of illusory fusion events than fission events. However, the SIFI was not dependent on the spatial proximity of the audiovisual stimuli, but was instead determined primarily by differences in subjects' underlying sensitivity across the visual field to the number of flashes presented. Our findings indicate that the influence of auditory stimulation on visual numerosity judgments can occur independently of the spatial relationship between the stimuli.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/14.7.12</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24961249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Cues ; Female ; Humans ; Illusions - physiology ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sound ; Sound Localization ; Visual Fields ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-06, Vol.14 (7), p.12-12</ispartof><rights>2014 ARVO.</rights><rights>2014 ARVO 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-8d950d057d7b977da757b7ec6e643bdfee373dcc90a13cc9dc9f18ea3f2144ce3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070624/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070624/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24961249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumpik, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Helen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizley, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><title>Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) is a multisensory perceptual phenomenon in which the number of brief visual stimuli perceived by an observer is influenced by the number of concurrently presented sounds. While the strength of this illusion has been shown to be modulated by the temporal congruence of the stimuli from each modality, there is conflicting evidence regarding its dependence upon their spatial congruence. We addressed this question by examining SIFIs under conditions in which the spatial reliability of the visual stimuli was degraded and different sound localization cues were presented using either free-field or closed-field stimulation. The likelihood of reporting a SIFI varied with the spatial cue composition of the auditory stimulus and was highest when binaural cues were presented over headphones. SIFIs were more common for small flashes than for large flashes, and for small flashes at peripheral locations, subjects experienced a greater number of illusory fusion events than fission events. However, the SIFI was not dependent on the spatial proximity of the audiovisual stimuli, but was instead determined primarily by differences in subjects' underlying sensitivity across the visual field to the number of flashes presented. Our findings indicate that the influence of auditory stimulation on visual numerosity judgments can occur independently of the spatial relationship between the stimuli.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illusions - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Sound Localization</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFOHDEMhiPUqtCl4g2q3NrLLMkkkzCXShWiBQmJC3CNsolnN9VMso0TpD3z4p3VUgQX2_L_-bclE3LG2ZJzpc-5XOolb4_ICe-EbLRQ7Yc39TH5jPiHsZZ1jH8ix63sFZ_DCXl-DFjtSBEihhKeQtnRgNRSLDnFNWTqoUCeQrSx0DTQMI4VU97RbU4OEAFp2dhIbfWh7PuuAt3abKf9HNIQZx0ophp9E6KvDjwdRoubg1VI8ZR8HOyI8OUlL8jDr6v7y-vm9u73zeXP28Z1rCvNhe875lmnvV71WnurO73S4BQoKVZ-ABBaeOd6ZrmYk3f9wC_AiqHlUjoQC_Lj4Lutqwm8g1iyHc02h8nmnUk2mPdKDBuzTk9GMs1UK2eD7y8GOf2tgMVMAR2Mo42QKhre7UmtlJrRbwfU5YSYYXhdw5nZv8xwaebQzuTXt1e9cv9_JP4BQ3eWLg</recordid><startdate>20140624</startdate><enddate>20140624</enddate><creator>Kumpik, Daniel P</creator><creator>Roberts, Helen E</creator><creator>King, Andrew J</creator><creator>Bizley, Jennifer K</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140624</creationdate><title>Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion</title><author>Kumpik, Daniel P ; Roberts, Helen E ; King, Andrew J ; Bizley, Jennifer K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-8d950d057d7b977da757b7ec6e643bdfee373dcc90a13cc9dc9f18ea3f2144ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illusions - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Sound Localization</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumpik, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Helen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizley, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumpik, Daniel P</au><au>Roberts, Helen E</au><au>King, Andrew J</au><au>Bizley, Jennifer K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2014-06-24</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>12-12</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) is a multisensory perceptual phenomenon in which the number of brief visual stimuli perceived by an observer is influenced by the number of concurrently presented sounds. While the strength of this illusion has been shown to be modulated by the temporal congruence of the stimuli from each modality, there is conflicting evidence regarding its dependence upon their spatial congruence. We addressed this question by examining SIFIs under conditions in which the spatial reliability of the visual stimuli was degraded and different sound localization cues were presented using either free-field or closed-field stimulation. The likelihood of reporting a SIFI varied with the spatial cue composition of the auditory stimulus and was highest when binaural cues were presented over headphones. SIFIs were more common for small flashes than for large flashes, and for small flashes at peripheral locations, subjects experienced a greater number of illusory fusion events than fission events. However, the SIFI was not dependent on the spatial proximity of the audiovisual stimuli, but was instead determined primarily by differences in subjects' underlying sensitivity across the visual field to the number of flashes presented. Our findings indicate that the influence of auditory stimulation on visual numerosity judgments can occur independently of the spatial relationship between the stimuli.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>24961249</pmid><doi>10.1167/14.7.12</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-7362 |
ispartof | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-06, Vol.14 (7), p.12-12 |
issn | 1534-7362 1534-7362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4070624 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Auditory Perception - physiology Cues Female Humans Illusions - physiology Male Photic Stimulation Reproducibility of Results Sound Sound Localization Visual Fields Young Adult |
title | Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A42%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20sensitivity%20is%20a%20stronger%20determinant%20of%20illusory%20processes%20than%20auditory%20cue%20parameters%20in%20the%20sound-induced%20flash%20illusion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Kumpik,%20Daniel%20P&rft.date=2014-06-24&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=12-12&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/14.7.12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1540707666%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540707666&rft_id=info:pmid/24961249&rfr_iscdi=true |