Termination-of-resuscitation rule for emergency department physicians treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an observational cohort study
The 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend emergency medical services (EMS) personnel consider prehospital termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) following basic life support and/or advanced life support efforts in the field. However, the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.R235-R235, Article R235 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | R235 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | R235 |
container_title | Critical care (London, England) |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Goto, Yoshikazu Maeda, Tetsuo Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu |
description | The 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend emergency medical services (EMS) personnel consider prehospital termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) following basic life support and/or advanced life support efforts in the field. However, the rate of implementation of international TOR rules is still low. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians to replace the international TOR rules for EMS personnel in the field. This rule aims to guide physicians in deciding whether to withhold further resuscitation attempts or terminate on-going resuscitation immediately after patient arrival.
We analyzed data prospectively collected in a nationwide Utstein-style Japanese database between 2005 and 2009, from 495,607 adult patients with OHCA. Patients were divided into development (n = 390,577) and validation (n = 105,030) groups. The main outcome measures were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the newly developed TOR rule.
We developed a new TOR rule that includes 3 criteria based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting a 1-month death after OHCA: no prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 25.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.7-26.9), unshockable initial rhythm (adjusted OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.54-3.01), and unwitnessed by bystanders (adjusted OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.09-2.28). The specificity, PPV, and area under the ROC curve for this new TOR rule for predicting 1-month death in the validation group were 0.903 (95% CI, 0.894-0.911), 0.993 (95% CI, 0.992-0.993), and 0.874 (95% CI, 0.872-0.876), respectively.
We developed and validated a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians consisting of 3 prehospital variables (no prehospital ROSC, unshockable initial rhythm, and unwitnessed by bystanders) that is a >99% predictor of very poor outcome. However, the implementation of this new rule in other countries or EMS systems requires further validation studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/cc13058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4057266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534778083</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534778083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fbc292377c4e6e8aab129a5e7bcc22243883b54e0f27604a6779548db6259a7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks9qFTEUhwex2FrFN5CAC91Mzf9kXAilaFsouKngLmQyZ-6NzCRjMlO4D-L7mum9LRZKFgkn3-_LCZyqekfwGSFafnaOMCz0i-qEcClriZtfL8uZSV5rwcRx9Trn3xgTpSV7VR1TTkijND2p_t5CGn2ws4-hjn2dIC_Z-fm-gNIyAOpjQjBC2kBwO9TBZNM8QpjRtN1l77wNGc0JSiJsUFzmVbONeSqSATmbOm8dsqmYS6RQJZq_IBtQbDOku_uXVjJuY5pRnpdu96Y66u2Q4e1hP61-fv92e3FV3_y4vL44v6mdwHSu-9bRhjKlHAcJ2tqW0MYKUK1zlFLOtGat4IB7qiTmVirVCK67VlLRWAXstPq6905LO0LnSmvJDmZKfrRpZ6L15ulN8FuziXeGY6GolEXw6SBI8c9SfmhGnx0Mgw0Ql2yIEI2kjHNW0A97dGMHMD70sRjdiptzwbhSGuuVOnuGKquD0bsYoPel_iTwcR9wKeacoH_snmCzzoY5zEYh3___2UfuYRjYP9fHuDs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559623443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Termination-of-resuscitation rule for emergency department physicians treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an observational cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Goto, Yoshikazu ; Maeda, Tetsuo ; Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu</creator><creatorcontrib>Goto, Yoshikazu ; Maeda, Tetsuo ; Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu</creatorcontrib><description>The 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend emergency medical services (EMS) personnel consider prehospital termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) following basic life support and/or advanced life support efforts in the field. However, the rate of implementation of international TOR rules is still low. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians to replace the international TOR rules for EMS personnel in the field. This rule aims to guide physicians in deciding whether to withhold further resuscitation attempts or terminate on-going resuscitation immediately after patient arrival.
We analyzed data prospectively collected in a nationwide Utstein-style Japanese database between 2005 and 2009, from 495,607 adult patients with OHCA. Patients were divided into development (n = 390,577) and validation (n = 105,030) groups. The main outcome measures were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the newly developed TOR rule.
We developed a new TOR rule that includes 3 criteria based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting a 1-month death after OHCA: no prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 25.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.7-26.9), unshockable initial rhythm (adjusted OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.54-3.01), and unwitnessed by bystanders (adjusted OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.09-2.28). The specificity, PPV, and area under the ROC curve for this new TOR rule for predicting 1-month death in the validation group were 0.903 (95% CI, 0.894-0.911), 0.993 (95% CI, 0.992-0.993), and 0.874 (95% CI, 0.872-0.876), respectively.
We developed and validated a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians consisting of 3 prehospital variables (no prehospital ROSC, unshockable initial rhythm, and unwitnessed by bystanders) that is a >99% predictor of very poor outcome. However, the implementation of this new rule in other countries or EMS systems requires further validation studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc13058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24119782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cardiac arrest ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards ; Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; CPR (First aid) ; Decision Support Techniques ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Japan - epidemiology ; Life Support Care - standards ; Life support systems (Critical care) ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - mortality ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy ; Physicians ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Resuscitation Orders ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.R235-R235, Article R235</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Goto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Goto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fbc292377c4e6e8aab129a5e7bcc22243883b54e0f27604a6779548db6259a7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fbc292377c4e6e8aab129a5e7bcc22243883b54e0f27604a6779548db6259a7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057266/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057266/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24119782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goto, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu</creatorcontrib><title>Termination-of-resuscitation rule for emergency department physicians treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an observational cohort study</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>The 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend emergency medical services (EMS) personnel consider prehospital termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) following basic life support and/or advanced life support efforts in the field. However, the rate of implementation of international TOR rules is still low. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians to replace the international TOR rules for EMS personnel in the field. This rule aims to guide physicians in deciding whether to withhold further resuscitation attempts or terminate on-going resuscitation immediately after patient arrival.
We analyzed data prospectively collected in a nationwide Utstein-style Japanese database between 2005 and 2009, from 495,607 adult patients with OHCA. Patients were divided into development (n = 390,577) and validation (n = 105,030) groups. The main outcome measures were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the newly developed TOR rule.
We developed a new TOR rule that includes 3 criteria based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting a 1-month death after OHCA: no prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 25.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.7-26.9), unshockable initial rhythm (adjusted OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.54-3.01), and unwitnessed by bystanders (adjusted OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.09-2.28). The specificity, PPV, and area under the ROC curve for this new TOR rule for predicting 1-month death in the validation group were 0.903 (95% CI, 0.894-0.911), 0.993 (95% CI, 0.992-0.993), and 0.874 (95% CI, 0.872-0.876), respectively.
We developed and validated a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians consisting of 3 prehospital variables (no prehospital ROSC, unshockable initial rhythm, and unwitnessed by bystanders) that is a >99% predictor of very poor outcome. However, the implementation of this new rule in other countries or EMS systems requires further validation studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>CPR (First aid)</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Life Support Care - standards</subject><subject>Life support systems (Critical care)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Resuscitation Orders</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptks9qFTEUhwex2FrFN5CAC91Mzf9kXAilaFsouKngLmQyZ-6NzCRjMlO4D-L7mum9LRZKFgkn3-_LCZyqekfwGSFafnaOMCz0i-qEcClriZtfL8uZSV5rwcRx9Trn3xgTpSV7VR1TTkijND2p_t5CGn2ws4-hjn2dIC_Z-fm-gNIyAOpjQjBC2kBwO9TBZNM8QpjRtN1l77wNGc0JSiJsUFzmVbONeSqSATmbOm8dsqmYS6RQJZq_IBtQbDOku_uXVjJuY5pRnpdu96Y66u2Q4e1hP61-fv92e3FV3_y4vL44v6mdwHSu-9bRhjKlHAcJ2tqW0MYKUK1zlFLOtGat4IB7qiTmVirVCK67VlLRWAXstPq6905LO0LnSmvJDmZKfrRpZ6L15ulN8FuziXeGY6GolEXw6SBI8c9SfmhGnx0Mgw0Ql2yIEI2kjHNW0A97dGMHMD70sRjdiptzwbhSGuuVOnuGKquD0bsYoPel_iTwcR9wKeacoH_snmCzzoY5zEYh3___2UfuYRjYP9fHuDs</recordid><startdate>20131013</startdate><enddate>20131013</enddate><creator>Goto, Yoshikazu</creator><creator>Maeda, Tetsuo</creator><creator>Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131013</creationdate><title>Termination-of-resuscitation rule for emergency department physicians treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an observational cohort study</title><author>Goto, Yoshikazu ; Maeda, Tetsuo ; Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fbc292377c4e6e8aab129a5e7bcc22243883b54e0f27604a6779548db6259a7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>CPR (First aid)</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Life Support Care - standards</topic><topic>Life support systems (Critical care)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Resuscitation Orders</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goto, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goto, Yoshikazu</au><au>Maeda, Tetsuo</au><au>Goto, Yumiko Nakatsu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Termination-of-resuscitation rule for emergency department physicians treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an observational cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2013-10-13</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>R235</spage><epage>R235</epage><pages>R235-R235</pages><artnum>R235</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>The 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend emergency medical services (EMS) personnel consider prehospital termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) following basic life support and/or advanced life support efforts in the field. However, the rate of implementation of international TOR rules is still low. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians to replace the international TOR rules for EMS personnel in the field. This rule aims to guide physicians in deciding whether to withhold further resuscitation attempts or terminate on-going resuscitation immediately after patient arrival.
We analyzed data prospectively collected in a nationwide Utstein-style Japanese database between 2005 and 2009, from 495,607 adult patients with OHCA. Patients were divided into development (n = 390,577) and validation (n = 105,030) groups. The main outcome measures were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the newly developed TOR rule.
We developed a new TOR rule that includes 3 criteria based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting a 1-month death after OHCA: no prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 25.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.7-26.9), unshockable initial rhythm (adjusted OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.54-3.01), and unwitnessed by bystanders (adjusted OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.09-2.28). The specificity, PPV, and area under the ROC curve for this new TOR rule for predicting 1-month death in the validation group were 0.903 (95% CI, 0.894-0.911), 0.993 (95% CI, 0.992-0.993), and 0.874 (95% CI, 0.872-0.876), respectively.
We developed and validated a new TOR rule for emergency department physicians consisting of 3 prehospital variables (no prehospital ROSC, unshockable initial rhythm, and unwitnessed by bystanders) that is a >99% predictor of very poor outcome. However, the implementation of this new rule in other countries or EMS systems requires further validation studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24119782</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc13058</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8535 |
ispartof | Critical care (London, England), 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.R235-R235, Article R235 |
issn | 1364-8535 1466-609X 1364-8535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4057266 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Cardiac arrest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards Care and treatment Comparative analysis CPR (First aid) Decision Support Techniques Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital - standards Female Humans Japan - epidemiology Life Support Care - standards Life support systems (Critical care) Male Middle Aged Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - mortality Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy Physicians Practice Guidelines as Topic Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Resuscitation Orders Sensitivity and Specificity Survival Rate |
title | Termination-of-resuscitation rule for emergency department physicians treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an observational cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A23%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Termination-of-resuscitation%20rule%20for%20emergency%20department%20physicians%20treating%20out-of-hospital%20cardiac%20arrest%20patients:%20an%20observational%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Goto,%20Yoshikazu&rft.date=2013-10-13&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=R235&rft.epage=R235&rft.pages=R235-R235&rft.artnum=R235&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc13058&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534778083%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559623443&rft_id=info:pmid/24119782&rft_galeid=A534778083&rfr_iscdi=true |