Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research
The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular & cellular proteomics 2014-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1598-1610 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1610 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1598 |
container_title | Molecular & cellular proteomics |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Huffman, Jennifer E. Pučić-Baković, Maja Klarić, Lucija Hennig, René Selman, Maurice H.J. Vučković, Frano Novokmet, Mislav Krištić, Jasminka Borowiak, Matthias Muth, Thilo Polašek, Ozren Razdorov, Genadij Gornik, Olga Plomp, Rosina Theodoratou, Evropi Wright, Alan F. Rudan, Igor Hayward, Caroline Campbell, Harry Deelder, André M. Reichl, Udo Aulchenko, Yurii S. Rapp, Erdmann Wuhrer, Manfred Lauc, Gordan |
description | The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1074/mcp.M113.037465 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4047478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1535947620330899</els_id><sourcerecordid>1532942502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw5oZ85JKtndjr5IJUrdptpVYgBGfL64wTI_8JdrLSfgk-M15tWcGBi8fWvPc8mh9C7ylZUSLYtdfT6onSZkUawdb8BbqkvOFVx1r28nwX6wv0JucfhNSECv4aXdRM0I7x-hL92kQ_qaRmuwf8BZKJyaugAUeD7-KS8BPMY-wzLg18b4exmscUl2Gclhlv3UHHfHDFHQO-Ccodss1H64P3S4iDi7vF2YC3-HhAgNlqrEKPbyfbg7fRxcFq5fBXyKCSHt-iV0a5DO-e6xX6fnf7bXNfPX7ePmxuHivNSTdXTd3TxrB-R7gRmkDTtlSs2648qGjWO9EZ2lAQdac410CN4L0yQugWgAitmyv06ZQ7LTsPvYYwJ-XklKxX6SCjsvLfTrCjHOJeMsIEE20J-PgckOLPBfIsvc0anFMB4pJlWX3dsZqTukivT1KdYs4JzPkbSuSRoiwU5ZGiPFEsjg9_T3fW_8FWBN1JAGVHewtJZm2hYOttAj3LPtr_hv8GHxGwOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1532942502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Huffman, Jennifer E. ; Pučić-Baković, Maja ; Klarić, Lucija ; Hennig, René ; Selman, Maurice H.J. ; Vučković, Frano ; Novokmet, Mislav ; Krištić, Jasminka ; Borowiak, Matthias ; Muth, Thilo ; Polašek, Ozren ; Razdorov, Genadij ; Gornik, Olga ; Plomp, Rosina ; Theodoratou, Evropi ; Wright, Alan F. ; Rudan, Igor ; Hayward, Caroline ; Campbell, Harry ; Deelder, André M. ; Reichl, Udo ; Aulchenko, Yurii S. ; Rapp, Erdmann ; Wuhrer, Manfred ; Lauc, Gordan</creator><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Jennifer E. ; Pučić-Baković, Maja ; Klarić, Lucija ; Hennig, René ; Selman, Maurice H.J. ; Vučković, Frano ; Novokmet, Mislav ; Krištić, Jasminka ; Borowiak, Matthias ; Muth, Thilo ; Polašek, Ozren ; Razdorov, Genadij ; Gornik, Olga ; Plomp, Rosina ; Theodoratou, Evropi ; Wright, Alan F. ; Rudan, Igor ; Hayward, Caroline ; Campbell, Harry ; Deelder, André M. ; Reichl, Udo ; Aulchenko, Yurii S. ; Rapp, Erdmann ; Wuhrer, Manfred ; Lauc, Gordan</creatorcontrib><description>The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-9476</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-9484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-9484</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M113.037465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24719452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Electrophoresis, Capillary ; Glycosylation ; High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Immunoglobulin G - genetics ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Polysaccharides - genetics ; Polysaccharides - isolation & purification ; Technological Innovation and Resources</subject><ispartof>Molecular & cellular proteomics, 2014-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1598-1610</ispartof><rights>2014 © 2014 ASBMB. Currently published by Elsevier Inc; originally published by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.</rights><rights>2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047478/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047478/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24719452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pučić-Baković, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klarić, Lucija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennig, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selman, Maurice H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučković, Frano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novokmet, Mislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krištić, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowiak, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polašek, Ozren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razdorov, Genadij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gornik, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plomp, Rosina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoratou, Evropi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Alan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudan, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelder, André M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichl, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Erdmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuhrer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauc, Gordan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</title><title>Molecular & cellular proteomics</title><addtitle>Mol Cell Proteomics</addtitle><description>The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Capillary</subject><subject>Glycosylation</subject><subject>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - genetics</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Polysaccharides - genetics</subject><subject>Polysaccharides - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Technological Innovation and Resources</subject><issn>1535-9476</issn><issn>1535-9484</issn><issn>1535-9484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw5oZ85JKtndjr5IJUrdptpVYgBGfL64wTI_8JdrLSfgk-M15tWcGBi8fWvPc8mh9C7ylZUSLYtdfT6onSZkUawdb8BbqkvOFVx1r28nwX6wv0JucfhNSECv4aXdRM0I7x-hL92kQ_qaRmuwf8BZKJyaugAUeD7-KS8BPMY-wzLg18b4exmscUl2Gclhlv3UHHfHDFHQO-Ccodss1H64P3S4iDi7vF2YC3-HhAgNlqrEKPbyfbg7fRxcFq5fBXyKCSHt-iV0a5DO-e6xX6fnf7bXNfPX7ePmxuHivNSTdXTd3TxrB-R7gRmkDTtlSs2648qGjWO9EZ2lAQdac410CN4L0yQugWgAitmyv06ZQ7LTsPvYYwJ-XklKxX6SCjsvLfTrCjHOJeMsIEE20J-PgckOLPBfIsvc0anFMB4pJlWX3dsZqTukivT1KdYs4JzPkbSuSRoiwU5ZGiPFEsjg9_T3fW_8FWBN1JAGVHewtJZm2hYOttAj3LPtr_hv8GHxGwOA</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Huffman, Jennifer E.</creator><creator>Pučić-Baković, Maja</creator><creator>Klarić, Lucija</creator><creator>Hennig, René</creator><creator>Selman, Maurice H.J.</creator><creator>Vučković, Frano</creator><creator>Novokmet, Mislav</creator><creator>Krištić, Jasminka</creator><creator>Borowiak, Matthias</creator><creator>Muth, Thilo</creator><creator>Polašek, Ozren</creator><creator>Razdorov, Genadij</creator><creator>Gornik, Olga</creator><creator>Plomp, Rosina</creator><creator>Theodoratou, Evropi</creator><creator>Wright, Alan F.</creator><creator>Rudan, Igor</creator><creator>Hayward, Caroline</creator><creator>Campbell, Harry</creator><creator>Deelder, André M.</creator><creator>Reichl, Udo</creator><creator>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</creator><creator>Rapp, Erdmann</creator><creator>Wuhrer, Manfred</creator><creator>Lauc, Gordan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</title><author>Huffman, Jennifer E. ; Pučić-Baković, Maja ; Klarić, Lucija ; Hennig, René ; Selman, Maurice H.J. ; Vučković, Frano ; Novokmet, Mislav ; Krištić, Jasminka ; Borowiak, Matthias ; Muth, Thilo ; Polašek, Ozren ; Razdorov, Genadij ; Gornik, Olga ; Plomp, Rosina ; Theodoratou, Evropi ; Wright, Alan F. ; Rudan, Igor ; Hayward, Caroline ; Campbell, Harry ; Deelder, André M. ; Reichl, Udo ; Aulchenko, Yurii S. ; Rapp, Erdmann ; Wuhrer, Manfred ; Lauc, Gordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Capillary</topic><topic>Glycosylation</topic><topic>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - genetics</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Polysaccharides - genetics</topic><topic>Polysaccharides - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Technological Innovation and Resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pučić-Baković, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klarić, Lucija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennig, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selman, Maurice H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučković, Frano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novokmet, Mislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krištić, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowiak, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polašek, Ozren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razdorov, Genadij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gornik, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plomp, Rosina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoratou, Evropi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Alan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudan, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelder, André M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichl, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Erdmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuhrer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauc, Gordan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Molecular & cellular proteomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huffman, Jennifer E.</au><au>Pučić-Baković, Maja</au><au>Klarić, Lucija</au><au>Hennig, René</au><au>Selman, Maurice H.J.</au><au>Vučković, Frano</au><au>Novokmet, Mislav</au><au>Krištić, Jasminka</au><au>Borowiak, Matthias</au><au>Muth, Thilo</au><au>Polašek, Ozren</au><au>Razdorov, Genadij</au><au>Gornik, Olga</au><au>Plomp, Rosina</au><au>Theodoratou, Evropi</au><au>Wright, Alan F.</au><au>Rudan, Igor</au><au>Hayward, Caroline</au><au>Campbell, Harry</au><au>Deelder, André M.</au><au>Reichl, Udo</au><au>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</au><au>Rapp, Erdmann</au><au>Wuhrer, Manfred</au><au>Lauc, Gordan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</atitle><jtitle>Molecular & cellular proteomics</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Cell Proteomics</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1598</spage><epage>1610</epage><pages>1598-1610</pages><issn>1535-9476</issn><issn>1535-9484</issn><eissn>1535-9484</eissn><abstract>The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24719452</pmid><doi>10.1074/mcp.M113.037465</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-9476 |
ispartof | Molecular & cellular proteomics, 2014-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1598-1610 |
issn | 1535-9476 1535-9484 1535-9484 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4047478 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Chromatography, Liquid Electrophoresis, Capillary Glycosylation High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods Humans Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions Immunoglobulin G - genetics Mass Spectrometry - methods Polymorphism, Genetic Polysaccharides - genetics Polysaccharides - isolation & purification Technological Innovation and Resources |
title | Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Performance%20of%20Four%20Methods%20for%20High-throughput%20Glycosylation%20Analysis%20of%20Immunoglobulin%20G%20in%20Genetic%20and%20Epidemiological%20Research&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20&%20cellular%20proteomics&rft.au=Huffman,%20Jennifer%20E.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1598&rft.epage=1610&rft.pages=1598-1610&rft.issn=1535-9476&rft.eissn=1535-9484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.037465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1532942502%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1532942502&rft_id=info:pmid/24719452&rft_els_id=S1535947620330899&rfr_iscdi=true |