Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research

The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular & cellular proteomics 2014-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1598-1610
Hauptverfasser: Huffman, Jennifer E., Pučić-Baković, Maja, Klarić, Lucija, Hennig, René, Selman, Maurice H.J., Vučković, Frano, Novokmet, Mislav, Krištić, Jasminka, Borowiak, Matthias, Muth, Thilo, Polašek, Ozren, Razdorov, Genadij, Gornik, Olga, Plomp, Rosina, Theodoratou, Evropi, Wright, Alan F., Rudan, Igor, Hayward, Caroline, Campbell, Harry, Deelder, André M., Reichl, Udo, Aulchenko, Yurii S., Rapp, Erdmann, Wuhrer, Manfred, Lauc, Gordan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1610
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1598
container_title Molecular & cellular proteomics
container_volume 13
creator Huffman, Jennifer E.
Pučić-Baković, Maja
Klarić, Lucija
Hennig, René
Selman, Maurice H.J.
Vučković, Frano
Novokmet, Mislav
Krištić, Jasminka
Borowiak, Matthias
Muth, Thilo
Polašek, Ozren
Razdorov, Genadij
Gornik, Olga
Plomp, Rosina
Theodoratou, Evropi
Wright, Alan F.
Rudan, Igor
Hayward, Caroline
Campbell, Harry
Deelder, André M.
Reichl, Udo
Aulchenko, Yurii S.
Rapp, Erdmann
Wuhrer, Manfred
Lauc, Gordan
description The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1074/mcp.M113.037465
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4047478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1535947620330899</els_id><sourcerecordid>1532942502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw5oZ85JKtndjr5IJUrdptpVYgBGfL64wTI_8JdrLSfgk-M15tWcGBi8fWvPc8mh9C7ylZUSLYtdfT6onSZkUawdb8BbqkvOFVx1r28nwX6wv0JucfhNSECv4aXdRM0I7x-hL92kQ_qaRmuwf8BZKJyaugAUeD7-KS8BPMY-wzLg18b4exmscUl2Gclhlv3UHHfHDFHQO-Ccodss1H64P3S4iDi7vF2YC3-HhAgNlqrEKPbyfbg7fRxcFq5fBXyKCSHt-iV0a5DO-e6xX6fnf7bXNfPX7ePmxuHivNSTdXTd3TxrB-R7gRmkDTtlSs2648qGjWO9EZ2lAQdac410CN4L0yQugWgAitmyv06ZQ7LTsPvYYwJ-XklKxX6SCjsvLfTrCjHOJeMsIEE20J-PgckOLPBfIsvc0anFMB4pJlWX3dsZqTukivT1KdYs4JzPkbSuSRoiwU5ZGiPFEsjg9_T3fW_8FWBN1JAGVHewtJZm2hYOttAj3LPtr_hv8GHxGwOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1532942502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Huffman, Jennifer E. ; Pučić-Baković, Maja ; Klarić, Lucija ; Hennig, René ; Selman, Maurice H.J. ; Vučković, Frano ; Novokmet, Mislav ; Krištić, Jasminka ; Borowiak, Matthias ; Muth, Thilo ; Polašek, Ozren ; Razdorov, Genadij ; Gornik, Olga ; Plomp, Rosina ; Theodoratou, Evropi ; Wright, Alan F. ; Rudan, Igor ; Hayward, Caroline ; Campbell, Harry ; Deelder, André M. ; Reichl, Udo ; Aulchenko, Yurii S. ; Rapp, Erdmann ; Wuhrer, Manfred ; Lauc, Gordan</creator><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Jennifer E. ; Pučić-Baković, Maja ; Klarić, Lucija ; Hennig, René ; Selman, Maurice H.J. ; Vučković, Frano ; Novokmet, Mislav ; Krištić, Jasminka ; Borowiak, Matthias ; Muth, Thilo ; Polašek, Ozren ; Razdorov, Genadij ; Gornik, Olga ; Plomp, Rosina ; Theodoratou, Evropi ; Wright, Alan F. ; Rudan, Igor ; Hayward, Caroline ; Campbell, Harry ; Deelder, André M. ; Reichl, Udo ; Aulchenko, Yurii S. ; Rapp, Erdmann ; Wuhrer, Manfred ; Lauc, Gordan</creatorcontrib><description>The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-9476</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-9484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-9484</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M113.037465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24719452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Electrophoresis, Capillary ; Glycosylation ; High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Immunoglobulin G - genetics ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Polysaccharides - genetics ; Polysaccharides - isolation &amp; purification ; Technological Innovation and Resources</subject><ispartof>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics, 2014-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1598-1610</ispartof><rights>2014 © 2014 ASBMB. Currently published by Elsevier Inc; originally published by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.</rights><rights>2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047478/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047478/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24719452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pučić-Baković, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klarić, Lucija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennig, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selman, Maurice H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučković, Frano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novokmet, Mislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krištić, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowiak, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polašek, Ozren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razdorov, Genadij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gornik, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plomp, Rosina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoratou, Evropi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Alan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudan, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelder, André M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichl, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Erdmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuhrer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauc, Gordan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</title><title>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics</title><addtitle>Mol Cell Proteomics</addtitle><description>The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Capillary</subject><subject>Glycosylation</subject><subject>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - genetics</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Polysaccharides - genetics</subject><subject>Polysaccharides - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Technological Innovation and Resources</subject><issn>1535-9476</issn><issn>1535-9484</issn><issn>1535-9484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw5oZ85JKtndjr5IJUrdptpVYgBGfL64wTI_8JdrLSfgk-M15tWcGBi8fWvPc8mh9C7ylZUSLYtdfT6onSZkUawdb8BbqkvOFVx1r28nwX6wv0JucfhNSECv4aXdRM0I7x-hL92kQ_qaRmuwf8BZKJyaugAUeD7-KS8BPMY-wzLg18b4exmscUl2Gclhlv3UHHfHDFHQO-Ccodss1H64P3S4iDi7vF2YC3-HhAgNlqrEKPbyfbg7fRxcFq5fBXyKCSHt-iV0a5DO-e6xX6fnf7bXNfPX7ePmxuHivNSTdXTd3TxrB-R7gRmkDTtlSs2648qGjWO9EZ2lAQdac410CN4L0yQugWgAitmyv06ZQ7LTsPvYYwJ-XklKxX6SCjsvLfTrCjHOJeMsIEE20J-PgckOLPBfIsvc0anFMB4pJlWX3dsZqTukivT1KdYs4JzPkbSuSRoiwU5ZGiPFEsjg9_T3fW_8FWBN1JAGVHewtJZm2hYOttAj3LPtr_hv8GHxGwOA</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Huffman, Jennifer E.</creator><creator>Pučić-Baković, Maja</creator><creator>Klarić, Lucija</creator><creator>Hennig, René</creator><creator>Selman, Maurice H.J.</creator><creator>Vučković, Frano</creator><creator>Novokmet, Mislav</creator><creator>Krištić, Jasminka</creator><creator>Borowiak, Matthias</creator><creator>Muth, Thilo</creator><creator>Polašek, Ozren</creator><creator>Razdorov, Genadij</creator><creator>Gornik, Olga</creator><creator>Plomp, Rosina</creator><creator>Theodoratou, Evropi</creator><creator>Wright, Alan F.</creator><creator>Rudan, Igor</creator><creator>Hayward, Caroline</creator><creator>Campbell, Harry</creator><creator>Deelder, André M.</creator><creator>Reichl, Udo</creator><creator>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</creator><creator>Rapp, Erdmann</creator><creator>Wuhrer, Manfred</creator><creator>Lauc, Gordan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</title><author>Huffman, Jennifer E. ; Pučić-Baković, Maja ; Klarić, Lucija ; Hennig, René ; Selman, Maurice H.J. ; Vučković, Frano ; Novokmet, Mislav ; Krištić, Jasminka ; Borowiak, Matthias ; Muth, Thilo ; Polašek, Ozren ; Razdorov, Genadij ; Gornik, Olga ; Plomp, Rosina ; Theodoratou, Evropi ; Wright, Alan F. ; Rudan, Igor ; Hayward, Caroline ; Campbell, Harry ; Deelder, André M. ; Reichl, Udo ; Aulchenko, Yurii S. ; Rapp, Erdmann ; Wuhrer, Manfred ; Lauc, Gordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-32d13f4db05f7c0e38817689f7c1736b79f131e729a55ce1f75daf77c8ee07cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Capillary</topic><topic>Glycosylation</topic><topic>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - genetics</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Polysaccharides - genetics</topic><topic>Polysaccharides - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Technological Innovation and Resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pučić-Baković, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klarić, Lucija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennig, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selman, Maurice H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučković, Frano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novokmet, Mislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krištić, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowiak, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muth, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polašek, Ozren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razdorov, Genadij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gornik, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plomp, Rosina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoratou, Evropi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Alan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudan, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelder, André M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichl, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Erdmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuhrer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauc, Gordan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huffman, Jennifer E.</au><au>Pučić-Baković, Maja</au><au>Klarić, Lucija</au><au>Hennig, René</au><au>Selman, Maurice H.J.</au><au>Vučković, Frano</au><au>Novokmet, Mislav</au><au>Krištić, Jasminka</au><au>Borowiak, Matthias</au><au>Muth, Thilo</au><au>Polašek, Ozren</au><au>Razdorov, Genadij</au><au>Gornik, Olga</au><au>Plomp, Rosina</au><au>Theodoratou, Evropi</au><au>Wright, Alan F.</au><au>Rudan, Igor</au><au>Hayward, Caroline</au><au>Campbell, Harry</au><au>Deelder, André M.</au><au>Reichl, Udo</au><au>Aulchenko, Yurii S.</au><au>Rapp, Erdmann</au><au>Wuhrer, Manfred</au><au>Lauc, Gordan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research</atitle><jtitle>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Cell Proteomics</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1598</spage><epage>1610</epage><pages>1598-1610</pages><issn>1535-9476</issn><issn>1535-9484</issn><eissn>1535-9484</eissn><abstract>The biological and clinical relevance of glycosylation is becoming increasingly recognized, leading to a growing interest in large-scale clinical and population-based studies. In the past few years, several methods for high-throughput analysis of glycans have been developed, but thorough validation and standardization of these methods is required before significant resources are invested in large-scale studies. In this study, we compared liquid chromatography, capillary gel electrophoresis, and two MS methods for quantitative profiling of N-glycosylation of IgG in the same data set of 1201 individuals. To evaluate the accuracy of the four methods we then performed analysis of association with genetic polymorphisms and age. Chromatographic methods with either fluorescent or MS-detection yielded slightly stronger associations than MS-only and multiplexed capillary gel electrophoresis, but at the expense of lower levels of throughput. Advantages and disadvantages of each method were identified, which should inform the selection of the most appropriate method in future studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24719452</pmid><doi>10.1074/mcp.M113.037465</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-9476
ispartof Molecular & cellular proteomics, 2014-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1598-1610
issn 1535-9476
1535-9484
1535-9484
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4047478
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Chromatography, Liquid
Electrophoresis, Capillary
Glycosylation
High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods
Humans
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Immunoglobulin G - genetics
Mass Spectrometry - methods
Polymorphism, Genetic
Polysaccharides - genetics
Polysaccharides - isolation & purification
Technological Innovation and Resources
title Comparative Performance of Four Methods for High-throughput Glycosylation Analysis of Immunoglobulin G in Genetic and Epidemiological Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Performance%20of%20Four%20Methods%20for%20High-throughput%20Glycosylation%20Analysis%20of%20Immunoglobulin%20G%20in%20Genetic%20and%20Epidemiological%20Research&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20&%20cellular%20proteomics&rft.au=Huffman,%20Jennifer%20E.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1598&rft.epage=1610&rft.pages=1598-1610&rft.issn=1535-9476&rft.eissn=1535-9484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1074/mcp.M113.037465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1532942502%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1532942502&rft_id=info:pmid/24719452&rft_els_id=S1535947620330899&rfr_iscdi=true