Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages

Xenopus laevis has regenerative and non-regenerative stages. As a tadpole, it is fully capable of functional recovery after a spinal cord injury, while its juvenile form (froglet) loses this capability during metamorphosis. We envision that comparative studies between regenerative and non-regenerati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neural development 2014-05, Vol.9 (1), p.12-12, Article 12
Hauptverfasser: Lee-Liu, Dasfne, Moreno, Mauricio, Almonacid, Leonardo I, Tapia, Víctor S, Muñoz, Rosana, von Marées, Javier, Gaete, Marcia, Melo, Francisco, Larraín, Juan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Neural development
container_volume 9
creator Lee-Liu, Dasfne
Moreno, Mauricio
Almonacid, Leonardo I
Tapia, Víctor S
Muñoz, Rosana
von Marées, Javier
Gaete, Marcia
Melo, Francisco
Larraín, Juan
description Xenopus laevis has regenerative and non-regenerative stages. As a tadpole, it is fully capable of functional recovery after a spinal cord injury, while its juvenile form (froglet) loses this capability during metamorphosis. We envision that comparative studies between regenerative and non-regenerative stages in Xenopus could aid in understanding why spinal cord regeneration fails in human beings. To identify the mechanisms that allow the tadpole to regenerate and inhibit regeneration in the froglet, we obtained a transcriptome-wide profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We found extensive transcriptome changes in regenerative tadpoles at 1 day after injury, while this was only observed by 6 days after injury in non-regenerative froglets. In addition, when comparing both stages, we found that they deployed a very different repertoire of transcripts, with more than 80% of them regulated in only one stage, including previously unannotated transcripts. This was supported by gene ontology enrichment analysis and validated by RT-qPCR, which showed that transcripts involved in metabolism, response to stress, cell cycle, development, immune response and inflammation, neurogenesis, and axonal regeneration were regulated differentially between regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We identified differences in the timing of the transcriptional response and in the inventory of regulated transcripts and biological processes activated in response to spinal cord injury when comparing regenerative and non-regenerative stages. These genes and biological processes provide an entry point to understand why regeneration fails in mammals. Furthermore, our results introduce Xenopus laevis as a genetic model organism to study spinal cord regeneration.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1749-8104-9-12
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4046850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A540687204</galeid><sourcerecordid>A540687204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-2dc04b0ee162579b65c86c8d011f57ba160462b0f5bf3ae7412574b67cc665183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r1jAUgIsobk5vvZSAN3rRmaRJmt4IL0PnYCD4Ad6FND3t8tImNWnfuR_k_zR183XVCZKLhJPnPPk4J8ueEnxMiBSvSMmqXBLM8ion9F52uA_cv7U-yB7FuMWYYyrkw-yAMik55_gw-34Kzg-QX9oGEHwbA8RovUNj8K3tAfkWTReAUnj0LgKaPIqjdbpHxocGWbedw1Wa0JfkGeeIeg07G1PCDnQfk3ICF-0OUGPbFgI4AxHVMF0CuER14CDoaQG0a5DzLl8F46Q7iI-zB22ywZOb-Sj7_PbNp5N3-fn707OTzXlei1JMOW0MZjUGIILysqoFN1IY2WBCWl7WmgjMBK1xy-u20FAykjCWco0RghNZHGWvr73jXA_QGHBT0L0agx10uFJeW7XecfZCdX6nWBJLjpNgcy2orf-HYL1j_KCWMqmlTKpShCbHi5tLBP91hjipwUYDfa8d-DkqwhmmRSUr8R9owXBVlXJ52vM_0K2fQyrkT0oyySnFv6lO96Csa326pVmkapOOFbKkmCXq-A4qjQYGa7yDpXXWCS9XCYmZUmd0eo5RnX38cKfcBB9jgHb_ewSrpef__q9nt4u2x381efEDwG3-dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1538485220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee-Liu, Dasfne ; Moreno, Mauricio ; Almonacid, Leonardo I ; Tapia, Víctor S ; Muñoz, Rosana ; von Marées, Javier ; Gaete, Marcia ; Melo, Francisco ; Larraín, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee-Liu, Dasfne ; Moreno, Mauricio ; Almonacid, Leonardo I ; Tapia, Víctor S ; Muñoz, Rosana ; von Marées, Javier ; Gaete, Marcia ; Melo, Francisco ; Larraín, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>Xenopus laevis has regenerative and non-regenerative stages. As a tadpole, it is fully capable of functional recovery after a spinal cord injury, while its juvenile form (froglet) loses this capability during metamorphosis. We envision that comparative studies between regenerative and non-regenerative stages in Xenopus could aid in understanding why spinal cord regeneration fails in human beings. To identify the mechanisms that allow the tadpole to regenerate and inhibit regeneration in the froglet, we obtained a transcriptome-wide profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We found extensive transcriptome changes in regenerative tadpoles at 1 day after injury, while this was only observed by 6 days after injury in non-regenerative froglets. In addition, when comparing both stages, we found that they deployed a very different repertoire of transcripts, with more than 80% of them regulated in only one stage, including previously unannotated transcripts. This was supported by gene ontology enrichment analysis and validated by RT-qPCR, which showed that transcripts involved in metabolism, response to stress, cell cycle, development, immune response and inflammation, neurogenesis, and axonal regeneration were regulated differentially between regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We identified differences in the timing of the transcriptional response and in the inventory of regulated transcripts and biological processes activated in response to spinal cord injury when comparing regenerative and non-regenerative stages. These genes and biological processes provide an entry point to understand why regeneration fails in mammals. Furthermore, our results introduce Xenopus laevis as a genetic model organism to study spinal cord regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-8104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-8104</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1749-8104-9-12</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24885550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Amputation ; Animals ; Cell cycle ; Comparative analysis ; Experiments ; Neurogenesis ; Neurogenesis - genetics ; Physiological aspects ; RNA sequencing ; Rodents ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - genetics ; Spinal Cord Regeneration - genetics ; Transcriptome ; Xenopus laevis</subject><ispartof>Neural development, 2014-05, Vol.9 (1), p.12-12, Article 12</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Lee-Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Lee-Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Lee-Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-2dc04b0ee162579b65c86c8d011f57ba160462b0f5bf3ae7412574b67cc665183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-2dc04b0ee162579b65c86c8d011f57ba160462b0f5bf3ae7412574b67cc665183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046850/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046850/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee-Liu, Dasfne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Mauricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almonacid, Leonardo I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia, Víctor S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Rosana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Marées, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaete, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larraín, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages</title><title>Neural development</title><addtitle>Neural Dev</addtitle><description>Xenopus laevis has regenerative and non-regenerative stages. As a tadpole, it is fully capable of functional recovery after a spinal cord injury, while its juvenile form (froglet) loses this capability during metamorphosis. We envision that comparative studies between regenerative and non-regenerative stages in Xenopus could aid in understanding why spinal cord regeneration fails in human beings. To identify the mechanisms that allow the tadpole to regenerate and inhibit regeneration in the froglet, we obtained a transcriptome-wide profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We found extensive transcriptome changes in regenerative tadpoles at 1 day after injury, while this was only observed by 6 days after injury in non-regenerative froglets. In addition, when comparing both stages, we found that they deployed a very different repertoire of transcripts, with more than 80% of them regulated in only one stage, including previously unannotated transcripts. This was supported by gene ontology enrichment analysis and validated by RT-qPCR, which showed that transcripts involved in metabolism, response to stress, cell cycle, development, immune response and inflammation, neurogenesis, and axonal regeneration were regulated differentially between regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We identified differences in the timing of the transcriptional response and in the inventory of regulated transcripts and biological processes activated in response to spinal cord injury when comparing regenerative and non-regenerative stages. These genes and biological processes provide an entry point to understand why regeneration fails in mammals. Furthermore, our results introduce Xenopus laevis as a genetic model organism to study spinal cord regeneration.</description><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell cycle</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Neurogenesis</subject><subject>Neurogenesis - genetics</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>RNA sequencing</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - genetics</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Regeneration - genetics</subject><subject>Transcriptome</subject><subject>Xenopus laevis</subject><issn>1749-8104</issn><issn>1749-8104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r1jAUgIsobk5vvZSAN3rRmaRJmt4IL0PnYCD4Ad6FND3t8tImNWnfuR_k_zR183XVCZKLhJPnPPk4J8ueEnxMiBSvSMmqXBLM8ion9F52uA_cv7U-yB7FuMWYYyrkw-yAMik55_gw-34Kzg-QX9oGEHwbA8RovUNj8K3tAfkWTReAUnj0LgKaPIqjdbpHxocGWbedw1Wa0JfkGeeIeg07G1PCDnQfk3ICF-0OUGPbFgI4AxHVMF0CuER14CDoaQG0a5DzLl8F46Q7iI-zB22ywZOb-Sj7_PbNp5N3-fn707OTzXlei1JMOW0MZjUGIILysqoFN1IY2WBCWl7WmgjMBK1xy-u20FAykjCWco0RghNZHGWvr73jXA_QGHBT0L0agx10uFJeW7XecfZCdX6nWBJLjpNgcy2orf-HYL1j_KCWMqmlTKpShCbHi5tLBP91hjipwUYDfa8d-DkqwhmmRSUr8R9owXBVlXJ52vM_0K2fQyrkT0oyySnFv6lO96Csa326pVmkapOOFbKkmCXq-A4qjQYGa7yDpXXWCS9XCYmZUmd0eo5RnX38cKfcBB9jgHb_ewSrpef__q9nt4u2x381efEDwG3-dg</recordid><startdate>20140522</startdate><enddate>20140522</enddate><creator>Lee-Liu, Dasfne</creator><creator>Moreno, Mauricio</creator><creator>Almonacid, Leonardo I</creator><creator>Tapia, Víctor S</creator><creator>Muñoz, Rosana</creator><creator>von Marées, Javier</creator><creator>Gaete, Marcia</creator><creator>Melo, Francisco</creator><creator>Larraín, Juan</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140522</creationdate><title>Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages</title><author>Lee-Liu, Dasfne ; Moreno, Mauricio ; Almonacid, Leonardo I ; Tapia, Víctor S ; Muñoz, Rosana ; von Marées, Javier ; Gaete, Marcia ; Melo, Francisco ; Larraín, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-2dc04b0ee162579b65c86c8d011f57ba160462b0f5bf3ae7412574b67cc665183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell cycle</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Neurogenesis</topic><topic>Neurogenesis - genetics</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>RNA sequencing</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - genetics</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Regeneration - genetics</topic><topic>Transcriptome</topic><topic>Xenopus laevis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee-Liu, Dasfne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Mauricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almonacid, Leonardo I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia, Víctor S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Rosana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Marées, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaete, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larraín, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neural development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee-Liu, Dasfne</au><au>Moreno, Mauricio</au><au>Almonacid, Leonardo I</au><au>Tapia, Víctor S</au><au>Muñoz, Rosana</au><au>von Marées, Javier</au><au>Gaete, Marcia</au><au>Melo, Francisco</au><au>Larraín, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages</atitle><jtitle>Neural development</jtitle><addtitle>Neural Dev</addtitle><date>2014-05-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>12-12</pages><artnum>12</artnum><issn>1749-8104</issn><eissn>1749-8104</eissn><abstract>Xenopus laevis has regenerative and non-regenerative stages. As a tadpole, it is fully capable of functional recovery after a spinal cord injury, while its juvenile form (froglet) loses this capability during metamorphosis. We envision that comparative studies between regenerative and non-regenerative stages in Xenopus could aid in understanding why spinal cord regeneration fails in human beings. To identify the mechanisms that allow the tadpole to regenerate and inhibit regeneration in the froglet, we obtained a transcriptome-wide profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We found extensive transcriptome changes in regenerative tadpoles at 1 day after injury, while this was only observed by 6 days after injury in non-regenerative froglets. In addition, when comparing both stages, we found that they deployed a very different repertoire of transcripts, with more than 80% of them regulated in only one stage, including previously unannotated transcripts. This was supported by gene ontology enrichment analysis and validated by RT-qPCR, which showed that transcripts involved in metabolism, response to stress, cell cycle, development, immune response and inflammation, neurogenesis, and axonal regeneration were regulated differentially between regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We identified differences in the timing of the transcriptional response and in the inventory of regulated transcripts and biological processes activated in response to spinal cord injury when comparing regenerative and non-regenerative stages. These genes and biological processes provide an entry point to understand why regeneration fails in mammals. Furthermore, our results introduce Xenopus laevis as a genetic model organism to study spinal cord regeneration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24885550</pmid><doi>10.1186/1749-8104-9-12</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-8104
ispartof Neural development, 2014-05, Vol.9 (1), p.12-12, Article 12
issn 1749-8104
1749-8104
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4046850
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Amputation
Animals
Cell cycle
Comparative analysis
Experiments
Neurogenesis
Neurogenesis - genetics
Physiological aspects
RNA sequencing
Rodents
Spinal cord injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries - genetics
Spinal Cord Regeneration - genetics
Transcriptome
Xenopus laevis
title Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A48%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genome-wide%20expression%20profile%20of%20the%20response%20to%20spinal%20cord%20injury%20in%20Xenopus%20laevis%20reveals%20extensive%20differences%20between%20regenerative%20and%20non-regenerative%20stages&rft.jtitle=Neural%20development&rft.au=Lee-Liu,%20Dasfne&rft.date=2014-05-22&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=12-12&rft.artnum=12&rft.issn=1749-8104&rft.eissn=1749-8104&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1749-8104-9-12&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA540687204%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1538485220&rft_id=info:pmid/24885550&rft_galeid=A540687204&rfr_iscdi=true