Effectiveness of three treatment strategies on occupational limitations and quality of life for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Is a multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a significant public health problem, being the primary cause of work absenteeism, as well as affecting sufferers' quality of life, in industrialized society. International guidelines recommend intensive multidisciplinary approaches for patients with cLBP. However...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2014-04, Vol.15 (1), p.131-131, Article 131
Hauptverfasser: Petit, Audrey, Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine, Bontoux, Luc, Dubus, Valérie, Ronzi, Yohann, Roquelaure, Yves, Richard, Isabelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 131
container_title BMC musculoskeletal disorders
container_volume 15
creator Petit, Audrey
Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine
Bontoux, Luc
Dubus, Valérie
Ronzi, Yohann
Roquelaure, Yves
Richard, Isabelle
description Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a significant public health problem, being the primary cause of work absenteeism, as well as affecting sufferers' quality of life, in industrialized society. International guidelines recommend intensive multidisciplinary approaches for patients with cLBP. However, these costly and time-consuming programs can only be offered to a minority of the most heavily affected patients and therefore do not seem likely to respond to public health requirements. Lighter programs may be an alternative to full time hospital-based programs with valuable results in terms of disability and occupational activity for cLBP patients. It is therefore important to define both what the determining components of management to improve activity restriction are and how to treat a larger number of patients more effectively at a lower cost. The aim of this study is to compare three programs with various levels of intensity and multidisciplinary. This paper describes the protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial in working aged patients with cLBP. Three treatment strategies are compared: (1) intensive and multidisciplinary program conducted in a rehabilitation center; (2) less intensive outpatient program conducted by a private physiotherapist; (3) mixed strategy combining the same out program with a multidisciplinary intervention. The primary outcome of the trial is the impact of the mixed strategy on being able to work compared to hospital centered-program and out program. The secondary outcome is the impact of the mixed strategy on quality of life and social ability compared to the two others programs. The intervention part of the trial programs will take 5 weeks and observational follow-up will take 12 months. The sample size will be 180 participants (60 for each arm). The project has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Angers Hospital, France. On the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary approach is the key feature to programs success in reducing social and occupational impairment in cLBP patients, we suggest that it is possible to achieve the same results with less intensive strategies if a multidisciplinary approach is maintained. Current Controlled Trials NCT02030171.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2474-15-131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4031373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539592384</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539592384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b655t-cefe6d9a2c782fcac1972713d998e4708897e7520855faf8d8b778a6849b310c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1k8Fv0zAUxiMEYmNw54QscYFDRhwnjbMDUlUNNqkSFzhbrvO8enPszHY6lT8e8bKOap2GcrD9_Hufvxc_Z9l7WpxSymdfaNXQvKyaKqd1Thl9kR3vQy8fzY-yNzFeFwVtOGtfZ0cYY-2sbo-zP-dag0pmAw5iJF6TtA4AJAWQqQeXSExBJrgygLuOeKXGQSbjnbTEmt6k-0Uk0nXkdpTWpO2kYo0Gon0gE4wykdyZtCbOuzwOoIw2iqh18A5H6-_ISqobZI07I5coRvrRJtOZqMxgjZNhS-QwBC_VGg0CuYEt0ehwDGjVkzgqhfbP0OzYbQmCyStv7w1IEtCb781v6IjyLgVvLU5TMNK-zV5paSO8exhPsl_fzn8uLvLlj--Xi_kyX83qOuUKNMy6Vpaq4aVWUtG2KRvKurblUDUF520DTV0WvK611Lzjq6bhcsardsVoodhJ9nWnO4yrHjqFfyRIK4ZgeqxNeGnE4Y4za3HlN6IqGGUNQ4HPO4H1k7SL-VJMsYJVRcUY3VBkFzt2Zfx_DjvcUb4XU6-IqVcErQW2Eqp8erAc_O0IMYkerwOslQ78GBFjZcUpaydzH5-g134M2CETVXJa8wKxPXUlLQjjtMfD1SQq5jVr67ZkvELq9BkKvw56g9cH2mD8IKHYJajgYwyg94XSQkyv5LnSPjy-jX3Cv2fB_gJZtBNl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1528158039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of three treatment strategies on occupational limitations and quality of life for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Is a multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Petit, Audrey ; Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine ; Bontoux, Luc ; Dubus, Valérie ; Ronzi, Yohann ; Roquelaure, Yves ; Richard, Isabelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Petit, Audrey ; Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine ; Bontoux, Luc ; Dubus, Valérie ; Ronzi, Yohann ; Roquelaure, Yves ; Richard, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a significant public health problem, being the primary cause of work absenteeism, as well as affecting sufferers' quality of life, in industrialized society. International guidelines recommend intensive multidisciplinary approaches for patients with cLBP. However, these costly and time-consuming programs can only be offered to a minority of the most heavily affected patients and therefore do not seem likely to respond to public health requirements. Lighter programs may be an alternative to full time hospital-based programs with valuable results in terms of disability and occupational activity for cLBP patients. It is therefore important to define both what the determining components of management to improve activity restriction are and how to treat a larger number of patients more effectively at a lower cost. The aim of this study is to compare three programs with various levels of intensity and multidisciplinary. This paper describes the protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial in working aged patients with cLBP. Three treatment strategies are compared: (1) intensive and multidisciplinary program conducted in a rehabilitation center; (2) less intensive outpatient program conducted by a private physiotherapist; (3) mixed strategy combining the same out program with a multidisciplinary intervention. The primary outcome of the trial is the impact of the mixed strategy on being able to work compared to hospital centered-program and out program. The secondary outcome is the impact of the mixed strategy on quality of life and social ability compared to the two others programs. The intervention part of the trial programs will take 5 weeks and observational follow-up will take 12 months. The sample size will be 180 participants (60 for each arm). The project has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Angers Hospital, France. On the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary approach is the key feature to programs success in reducing social and occupational impairment in cLBP patients, we suggest that it is possible to achieve the same results with less intensive strategies if a multidisciplinary approach is maintained. Current Controlled Trials NCT02030171.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24739659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Back pain ; Chronic Disease ; Clinical trials ; Combined Modality Therapy - methods ; Epidemiology ; Exercise ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Life Sciences ; Low Back Pain - diagnosis ; Low Back Pain - psychology ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Male ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Occupational Health ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain Measurement - psychology ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Public health ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Studies ; Study Protocol ; Success ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2014-04, Vol.15 (1), p.131-131, Article 131</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Petit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Petit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Petit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b655t-cefe6d9a2c782fcac1972713d998e4708897e7520855faf8d8b778a6849b310c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b655t-cefe6d9a2c782fcac1972713d998e4708897e7520855faf8d8b778a6849b310c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6918-0909 ; 0000-0002-3653-6160</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031373/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031373/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24739659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-angers.hal.science/hal-03404331$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petit, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontoux, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubus, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronzi, Yohann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roquelaure, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of three treatment strategies on occupational limitations and quality of life for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Is a multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><title>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</title><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a significant public health problem, being the primary cause of work absenteeism, as well as affecting sufferers' quality of life, in industrialized society. International guidelines recommend intensive multidisciplinary approaches for patients with cLBP. However, these costly and time-consuming programs can only be offered to a minority of the most heavily affected patients and therefore do not seem likely to respond to public health requirements. Lighter programs may be an alternative to full time hospital-based programs with valuable results in terms of disability and occupational activity for cLBP patients. It is therefore important to define both what the determining components of management to improve activity restriction are and how to treat a larger number of patients more effectively at a lower cost. The aim of this study is to compare three programs with various levels of intensity and multidisciplinary. This paper describes the protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial in working aged patients with cLBP. Three treatment strategies are compared: (1) intensive and multidisciplinary program conducted in a rehabilitation center; (2) less intensive outpatient program conducted by a private physiotherapist; (3) mixed strategy combining the same out program with a multidisciplinary intervention. The primary outcome of the trial is the impact of the mixed strategy on being able to work compared to hospital centered-program and out program. The secondary outcome is the impact of the mixed strategy on quality of life and social ability compared to the two others programs. The intervention part of the trial programs will take 5 weeks and observational follow-up will take 12 months. The sample size will be 180 participants (60 for each arm). The project has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Angers Hospital, France. On the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary approach is the key feature to programs success in reducing social and occupational impairment in cLBP patients, we suggest that it is possible to achieve the same results with less intensive strategies if a multidisciplinary approach is maintained. Current Controlled Trials NCT02030171.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - psychology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Study Protocol</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2474</issn><issn>1471-2474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1k8Fv0zAUxiMEYmNw54QscYFDRhwnjbMDUlUNNqkSFzhbrvO8enPszHY6lT8e8bKOap2GcrD9_Hufvxc_Z9l7WpxSymdfaNXQvKyaKqd1Thl9kR3vQy8fzY-yNzFeFwVtOGtfZ0cYY-2sbo-zP-dag0pmAw5iJF6TtA4AJAWQqQeXSExBJrgygLuOeKXGQSbjnbTEmt6k-0Uk0nXkdpTWpO2kYo0Gon0gE4wykdyZtCbOuzwOoIw2iqh18A5H6-_ISqobZI07I5coRvrRJtOZqMxgjZNhS-QwBC_VGg0CuYEt0ehwDGjVkzgqhfbP0OzYbQmCyStv7w1IEtCb781v6IjyLgVvLU5TMNK-zV5paSO8exhPsl_fzn8uLvLlj--Xi_kyX83qOuUKNMy6Vpaq4aVWUtG2KRvKurblUDUF520DTV0WvK611Lzjq6bhcsardsVoodhJ9nWnO4yrHjqFfyRIK4ZgeqxNeGnE4Y4za3HlN6IqGGUNQ4HPO4H1k7SL-VJMsYJVRcUY3VBkFzt2Zfx_DjvcUb4XU6-IqVcErQW2Eqp8erAc_O0IMYkerwOslQ78GBFjZcUpaydzH5-g134M2CETVXJa8wKxPXUlLQjjtMfD1SQq5jVr67ZkvELq9BkKvw56g9cH2mD8IKHYJajgYwyg94XSQkyv5LnSPjy-jX3Cv2fB_gJZtBNl</recordid><startdate>20140416</startdate><enddate>20140416</enddate><creator>Petit, Audrey</creator><creator>Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine</creator><creator>Bontoux, Luc</creator><creator>Dubus, Valérie</creator><creator>Ronzi, Yohann</creator><creator>Roquelaure, Yves</creator><creator>Richard, Isabelle</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-0909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-6160</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140416</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of three treatment strategies on occupational limitations and quality of life for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Is a multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Petit, Audrey ; Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine ; Bontoux, Luc ; Dubus, Valérie ; Ronzi, Yohann ; Roquelaure, Yves ; Richard, Isabelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b655t-cefe6d9a2c782fcac1972713d998e4708897e7520855faf8d8b778a6849b310c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - psychology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Study Protocol</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petit, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontoux, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubus, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronzi, Yohann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roquelaure, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petit, Audrey</au><au>Roche-Leboucher, Ghislaine</au><au>Bontoux, Luc</au><au>Dubus, Valérie</au><au>Ronzi, Yohann</au><au>Roquelaure, Yves</au><au>Richard, Isabelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of three treatment strategies on occupational limitations and quality of life for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Is a multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2014-04-16</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>131-131</pages><artnum>131</artnum><issn>1471-2474</issn><eissn>1471-2474</eissn><abstract>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a significant public health problem, being the primary cause of work absenteeism, as well as affecting sufferers' quality of life, in industrialized society. International guidelines recommend intensive multidisciplinary approaches for patients with cLBP. However, these costly and time-consuming programs can only be offered to a minority of the most heavily affected patients and therefore do not seem likely to respond to public health requirements. Lighter programs may be an alternative to full time hospital-based programs with valuable results in terms of disability and occupational activity for cLBP patients. It is therefore important to define both what the determining components of management to improve activity restriction are and how to treat a larger number of patients more effectively at a lower cost. The aim of this study is to compare three programs with various levels of intensity and multidisciplinary. This paper describes the protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial in working aged patients with cLBP. Three treatment strategies are compared: (1) intensive and multidisciplinary program conducted in a rehabilitation center; (2) less intensive outpatient program conducted by a private physiotherapist; (3) mixed strategy combining the same out program with a multidisciplinary intervention. The primary outcome of the trial is the impact of the mixed strategy on being able to work compared to hospital centered-program and out program. The secondary outcome is the impact of the mixed strategy on quality of life and social ability compared to the two others programs. The intervention part of the trial programs will take 5 weeks and observational follow-up will take 12 months. The sample size will be 180 participants (60 for each arm). The project has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Angers Hospital, France. On the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary approach is the key feature to programs success in reducing social and occupational impairment in cLBP patients, we suggest that it is possible to achieve the same results with less intensive strategies if a multidisciplinary approach is maintained. Current Controlled Trials NCT02030171.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24739659</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2474-15-131</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-0909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-6160</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2474
ispartof BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2014-04, Vol.15 (1), p.131-131, Article 131
issn 1471-2474
1471-2474
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4031373
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Absenteeism
Adolescent
Adult
Back pain
Chronic Disease
Clinical trials
Combined Modality Therapy - methods
Epidemiology
Exercise
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypotheses
Life Sciences
Low Back Pain - diagnosis
Low Back Pain - psychology
Low Back Pain - therapy
Male
Medical research
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal diseases
Occupational Health
Pain Measurement - methods
Pain Measurement - psychology
Patients
Prospective Studies
Public health
Quality of Life - psychology
Questionnaires
Rehabilitation
Studies
Study Protocol
Success
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Effectiveness of three treatment strategies on occupational limitations and quality of life for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Is a multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A14%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20three%20treatment%20strategies%20on%20occupational%20limitations%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20for%20patients%20with%20non-specific%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain:%20Is%20a%20multidisciplinary%20approach%20the%20key%20feature%20to%20success:%20study%20protocol%20for%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMC%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.au=Petit,%20Audrey&rft.date=2014-04-16&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=131-131&rft.artnum=131&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2474-15-131&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539592384%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1528158039&rft_id=info:pmid/24739659&rft_galeid=A539592384&rfr_iscdi=true