End of life in the intensive care unit: should French law be adapted?

Background Longstanding concerns regarding end of life in the ICU led in France to the publication of guidelines, updated in 2009, that take into account the insights provided by a recent law (Leonetti’s law) regarding patients’ rights. After the French President asked a specific expert to review en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of intensive care 2014-02, Vol.4 (1), p.6-6
Hauptverfasser: Robert, René, Salomon, Laurence, Haddad, Lise, Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre, Eon, Béatrice, Dreyfuss, Didier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 6
container_title Annals of intensive care
container_volume 4
creator Robert, René
Salomon, Laurence
Haddad, Lise
Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre
Eon, Béatrice
Dreyfuss, Didier
description Background Longstanding concerns regarding end of life in the ICU led in France to the publication of guidelines, updated in 2009, that take into account the insights provided by a recent law (Leonetti’s law) regarding patients’ rights. After the French President asked a specific expert to review end of life issues, the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) surveyed their members (doctors and paramedics) about various aspects of end of life in the ICU. Methods SRLF members were invited to respond to a questionnaire, sent by Email, designed to assess their knowledge of Leonetti’s law and to determine how many caregivers would agree with the authorization of lethal drug administration in selected end of life situations. Results Questionnaires returned by 616 (23%) of 2,700 members were analyzed. Most members (82.5%) reported that they had a good knowledge of Leonetti’s law, which most (88%) said they have often applied. One third of respondents had received ‘assisted death’ requests from patients and more than 50% from patients’ relatives. One quarter of respondents had experienced the wish to give lethal drugs to end of life patients. Assuming that palliative care in the ICU is well-managed, 25.7% of the respondents would approve a law authorizing euthanasia, while 26.5% would not. Answers were influenced by the fear of a possible risk of abuse. Doctors and nurses answered differently. Conclusion ICU caregivers appear to be well acquainted with Leonetti’s law. Nevertheless, in selected clinical situations with suitable palliative care, one quarter of respondents were in favor of a law authorizing administration of lethal drugs to patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/2110-5820-4-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4015966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1510092186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-a31d7e9d8a467fae4fb1872ce2f6d32bd598dc1ec2682e90bd54c36e611fdd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS1ERavSI1dkiQuXFI_jeB0OQFVtKVKlXsrZcuxJ11XWXuykqP8eR1tWW2h9Gdvz6c3oPULeATsFUPITB2BVozirRCVfkaPd-_Xe_ZCc5HzHymnYgvP6DTnkopEKhDgiy2VwNPZ08D1SH-i4msuIIft7pNYkpFPw42eaV3EaHL1IGOyKDuY37ZAaZzYjuq9vyUFvhownj_WY_LxY3pxfVlfX33-cn11VXQMwVqYGt8DWKSPkojco-g7UglvkvXQ171zTKmcBLZeKY8vKh7C1RAnQO8dYfUy-bHU3U7dGZzGMyQx6k_zapAcdjddPO8Gv9G2814JB00pZBL5tBTofXxB42rFxrWcn9eykFnqW-Pi4Q4q_JsyjXvtscRhMwDhlDQ0w1vIST0E__IPexSmF4pAGqeoShlK8UNWWsinmnLDfrVPGzjH_t8D7fRN29N9QC3C6BXJphVtMe2OfVfwD-Muwrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683722882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>End of life in the intensive care unit: should French law be adapted?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Robert, René ; Salomon, Laurence ; Haddad, Lise ; Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre ; Eon, Béatrice ; Dreyfuss, Didier</creator><creatorcontrib>Robert, René ; Salomon, Laurence ; Haddad, Lise ; Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre ; Eon, Béatrice ; Dreyfuss, Didier ; ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF) ; the ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF)</creatorcontrib><description>Background Longstanding concerns regarding end of life in the ICU led in France to the publication of guidelines, updated in 2009, that take into account the insights provided by a recent law (Leonetti’s law) regarding patients’ rights. After the French President asked a specific expert to review end of life issues, the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) surveyed their members (doctors and paramedics) about various aspects of end of life in the ICU. Methods SRLF members were invited to respond to a questionnaire, sent by Email, designed to assess their knowledge of Leonetti’s law and to determine how many caregivers would agree with the authorization of lethal drug administration in selected end of life situations. Results Questionnaires returned by 616 (23%) of 2,700 members were analyzed. Most members (82.5%) reported that they had a good knowledge of Leonetti’s law, which most (88%) said they have often applied. One third of respondents had received ‘assisted death’ requests from patients and more than 50% from patients’ relatives. One quarter of respondents had experienced the wish to give lethal drugs to end of life patients. Assuming that palliative care in the ICU is well-managed, 25.7% of the respondents would approve a law authorizing euthanasia, while 26.5% would not. Answers were influenced by the fear of a possible risk of abuse. Doctors and nurses answered differently. Conclusion ICU caregivers appear to be well acquainted with Leonetti’s law. Nevertheless, in selected clinical situations with suitable palliative care, one quarter of respondents were in favor of a law authorizing administration of lethal drugs to patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2110-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2110-5820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2110-5820-4-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24568144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><ispartof>Annals of intensive care, 2014-02, Vol.4 (1), p.6-6</ispartof><rights>Robert et al.; licensee Springer. 2014. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Robert et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 Robert et al.; licensee Springer.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-a31d7e9d8a467fae4fb1872ce2f6d32bd598dc1ec2682e90bd54c36e611fdd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-a31d7e9d8a467fae4fb1872ce2f6d32bd598dc1ec2682e90bd54c36e611fdd003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015966/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015966/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,41488,42189,42557,51319,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robert, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salomon, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eon, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfuss, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF)</creatorcontrib><title>End of life in the intensive care unit: should French law be adapted?</title><title>Annals of intensive care</title><addtitle>Ann. Intensive Care</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Intensive Care</addtitle><description>Background Longstanding concerns regarding end of life in the ICU led in France to the publication of guidelines, updated in 2009, that take into account the insights provided by a recent law (Leonetti’s law) regarding patients’ rights. After the French President asked a specific expert to review end of life issues, the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) surveyed their members (doctors and paramedics) about various aspects of end of life in the ICU. Methods SRLF members were invited to respond to a questionnaire, sent by Email, designed to assess their knowledge of Leonetti’s law and to determine how many caregivers would agree with the authorization of lethal drug administration in selected end of life situations. Results Questionnaires returned by 616 (23%) of 2,700 members were analyzed. Most members (82.5%) reported that they had a good knowledge of Leonetti’s law, which most (88%) said they have often applied. One third of respondents had received ‘assisted death’ requests from patients and more than 50% from patients’ relatives. One quarter of respondents had experienced the wish to give lethal drugs to end of life patients. Assuming that palliative care in the ICU is well-managed, 25.7% of the respondents would approve a law authorizing euthanasia, while 26.5% would not. Answers were influenced by the fear of a possible risk of abuse. Doctors and nurses answered differently. Conclusion ICU caregivers appear to be well acquainted with Leonetti’s law. Nevertheless, in selected clinical situations with suitable palliative care, one quarter of respondents were in favor of a law authorizing administration of lethal drugs to patients.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><issn>2110-5820</issn><issn>2110-5820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS1ERavSI1dkiQuXFI_jeB0OQFVtKVKlXsrZcuxJ11XWXuykqP8eR1tWW2h9Gdvz6c3oPULeATsFUPITB2BVozirRCVfkaPd-_Xe_ZCc5HzHymnYgvP6DTnkopEKhDgiy2VwNPZ08D1SH-i4msuIIft7pNYkpFPw42eaV3EaHL1IGOyKDuY37ZAaZzYjuq9vyUFvhownj_WY_LxY3pxfVlfX33-cn11VXQMwVqYGt8DWKSPkojco-g7UglvkvXQ171zTKmcBLZeKY8vKh7C1RAnQO8dYfUy-bHU3U7dGZzGMyQx6k_zapAcdjddPO8Gv9G2814JB00pZBL5tBTofXxB42rFxrWcn9eykFnqW-Pi4Q4q_JsyjXvtscRhMwDhlDQ0w1vIST0E__IPexSmF4pAGqeoShlK8UNWWsinmnLDfrVPGzjH_t8D7fRN29N9QC3C6BXJphVtMe2OfVfwD-Muwrg</recordid><startdate>20140225</startdate><enddate>20140225</enddate><creator>Robert, René</creator><creator>Salomon, Laurence</creator><creator>Haddad, Lise</creator><creator>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Eon, Béatrice</creator><creator>Dreyfuss, Didier</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140225</creationdate><title>End of life in the intensive care unit: should French law be adapted?</title><author>Robert, René ; Salomon, Laurence ; Haddad, Lise ; Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre ; Eon, Béatrice ; Dreyfuss, Didier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b511t-a31d7e9d8a467fae4fb1872ce2f6d32bd598dc1ec2682e90bd54c36e611fdd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robert, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salomon, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eon, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfuss, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF)</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robert, René</au><au>Salomon, Laurence</au><au>Haddad, Lise</au><au>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Eon, Béatrice</au><au>Dreyfuss, Didier</au><aucorp>ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF)</aucorp><aucorp>the ethics commission of the French Society of Critical Care (SRLF)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>End of life in the intensive care unit: should French law be adapted?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of intensive care</jtitle><stitle>Ann. Intensive Care</stitle><addtitle>Ann Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2014-02-25</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>6-6</pages><issn>2110-5820</issn><eissn>2110-5820</eissn><abstract>Background Longstanding concerns regarding end of life in the ICU led in France to the publication of guidelines, updated in 2009, that take into account the insights provided by a recent law (Leonetti’s law) regarding patients’ rights. After the French President asked a specific expert to review end of life issues, the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) surveyed their members (doctors and paramedics) about various aspects of end of life in the ICU. Methods SRLF members were invited to respond to a questionnaire, sent by Email, designed to assess their knowledge of Leonetti’s law and to determine how many caregivers would agree with the authorization of lethal drug administration in selected end of life situations. Results Questionnaires returned by 616 (23%) of 2,700 members were analyzed. Most members (82.5%) reported that they had a good knowledge of Leonetti’s law, which most (88%) said they have often applied. One third of respondents had received ‘assisted death’ requests from patients and more than 50% from patients’ relatives. One quarter of respondents had experienced the wish to give lethal drugs to end of life patients. Assuming that palliative care in the ICU is well-managed, 25.7% of the respondents would approve a law authorizing euthanasia, while 26.5% would not. Answers were influenced by the fear of a possible risk of abuse. Doctors and nurses answered differently. Conclusion ICU caregivers appear to be well acquainted with Leonetti’s law. Nevertheless, in selected clinical situations with suitable palliative care, one quarter of respondents were in favor of a law authorizing administration of lethal drugs to patients.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>24568144</pmid><doi>10.1186/2110-5820-4-6</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2110-5820
ispartof Annals of intensive care, 2014-02, Vol.4 (1), p.6-6
issn 2110-5820
2110-5820
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4015966
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Anesthesiology
Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Intensive
Intensive care
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
title End of life in the intensive care unit: should French law be adapted?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=End%20of%20life%20in%20the%20intensive%20care%20unit:%20should%20French%20law%20be%20adapted?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20intensive%20care&rft.au=Robert,%20Ren%C3%A9&rft.aucorp=ethics%20commission%20of%20the%20French%20Society%20of%20Critical%20Care%20(SRLF)&rft.date=2014-02-25&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=6-6&rft.issn=2110-5820&rft.eissn=2110-5820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2110-5820-4-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1510092186%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683722882&rft_id=info:pmid/24568144&rfr_iscdi=true