High-density livestock production and molecularly characterized MRSA infections in Pennsylvania
European studies suggest that living near high-density livestock production increases the risk of sequence type (ST) 398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated associations between livestock production and human infection by other...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental health perspectives 2014-05, Vol.122 (5), p.464-470 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 464 |
container_title | Environmental health perspectives |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Casey, Joan A Shopsin, Bo Cosgrove, Sara E Nachman, Keeve E Curriero, Frank C Rose, Hannah R Schwartz, Brian S |
description | European studies suggest that living near high-density livestock production increases the risk of sequence type (ST) 398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated associations between livestock production and human infection by other strain types.
We evaluated associations between MRSA molecular subgroups and high-density livestock production.
We conducted a yearlong 2012 prospective study on a stratified random sample of patients with culture-confirmed MRSA infection; we oversampled patients from the Geisinger Health System with exposure to high-density livestock production in Pennsylvania. Isolates were characterized using S. aureus protein A (spa) typing and detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) and scn genes. We compared patients with one of two specific MRSA strains with patients with all other strains of MRSA isolates, using logistic regression that accounted for the sampling design, for two different exposure models: one based on the location of the animals (livestock model) and the other on crop field application of manure (crop field model).
Of 196 MRSA isolates, we identified 30 spa types, 47 PVL-negative and 15 scn-negative isolates, and no ST398 MRSA. Compared with quartiles 1-3 combined, the highest quartiles of swine livestock and dairy/veal crop field exposures were positively associated with community-onset-PVL-negative MRSA (CO-PVL-negative MRSA vs. all other MRSA), with adjusted odds ratios of 4.24 (95% CI: 1.60, 11.25) and 4.88 (95% CI: 1.40, 17.00), respectively. The association with CO-PVL-negative MRSA infection increased across quartiles of dairy/veal livestock exposure (trend p = 0.05).
Our findings suggest that other MRSA strains, beyond ST398, may be involved in livestock-associated MRSA infection in the United States. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1289/ehp.1307370 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4014753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A368283196</galeid><sourcerecordid>A368283196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c679t-856d65fe00d61d25503f3618306a517b06338c7a1f26f24769b776d948753d273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFrFDEUhwdR7Fo9eZcBQRSZNZlMkpmLsJRqC5VKq15DNnmzk5pN1mRmcfvXm23X2pEFJYeE5MvHy8svy55jNMVl3byDbjXFBHHC0YNsgikti6Ypq4fZBKEGF4wzepA9ifEKIYRrxh5nB2VF0xHBk0ycmEVXaHDR9JvcmjXE3qvv-Sp4PajeeJdLp_Olt6AGK4Pd5KqTQaoegrkGnX-6uJzlxrVwA8e0zD-Dc3Fj19IZ-TR71Eob4dluPsy-fjj-cnRSnJ1_PD2anRWK8aYvaso0oy0gpBnWJaWItIThmiAmKeZzxAipFZe4LVlbVpw1c86ZbqqaU6JLTg6z97fe1TBfglbg-iCtWAWzlGEjvDRifOJMJxZ-LSqEq-RIgtc7QfA_htQFsTRRgbXSgR-iwIwhRFKd1b9RSqqaENxsrS__Qq_8EFzqxFaICceUNX-ohbQgUjN9KlFtpWJGWF3WycUSVeyhFuAgvcc7aE3aHvHTPXwaGpZG7b3wZnQhMT387BdyiFGcXl78P3v-bcy-usd2IG3fRW-Hm8CMwbe3oAo-xgDt3f9hJLZZFynrYpf1RL-4_-V37O9wk1_-CPT4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661371569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-density livestock production and molecularly characterized MRSA infections in Pennsylvania</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Casey, Joan A ; Shopsin, Bo ; Cosgrove, Sara E ; Nachman, Keeve E ; Curriero, Frank C ; Rose, Hannah R ; Schwartz, Brian S</creator><creatorcontrib>Casey, Joan A ; Shopsin, Bo ; Cosgrove, Sara E ; Nachman, Keeve E ; Curriero, Frank C ; Rose, Hannah R ; Schwartz, Brian S</creatorcontrib><description>European studies suggest that living near high-density livestock production increases the risk of sequence type (ST) 398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated associations between livestock production and human infection by other strain types.
We evaluated associations between MRSA molecular subgroups and high-density livestock production.
We conducted a yearlong 2012 prospective study on a stratified random sample of patients with culture-confirmed MRSA infection; we oversampled patients from the Geisinger Health System with exposure to high-density livestock production in Pennsylvania. Isolates were characterized using S. aureus protein A (spa) typing and detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) and scn genes. We compared patients with one of two specific MRSA strains with patients with all other strains of MRSA isolates, using logistic regression that accounted for the sampling design, for two different exposure models: one based on the location of the animals (livestock model) and the other on crop field application of manure (crop field model).
Of 196 MRSA isolates, we identified 30 spa types, 47 PVL-negative and 15 scn-negative isolates, and no ST398 MRSA. Compared with quartiles 1-3 combined, the highest quartiles of swine livestock and dairy/veal crop field exposures were positively associated with community-onset-PVL-negative MRSA (CO-PVL-negative MRSA vs. all other MRSA), with adjusted odds ratios of 4.24 (95% CI: 1.60, 11.25) and 4.88 (95% CI: 1.40, 17.00), respectively. The association with CO-PVL-negative MRSA infection increased across quartiles of dairy/veal livestock exposure (trend p = 0.05).
Our findings suggest that other MRSA strains, beyond ST398, may be involved in livestock-associated MRSA infection in the United States.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307370</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24509131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle ; Crop fields ; Crops ; Electronic health records ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental protection ; Genes ; Genotype ; Health ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Livestock ; Livestock - microbiology ; Livestock industry ; Livestock production ; Logistic Models ; Manures ; Meat processing ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - classification ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - pathogenicity ; MRSA ; Patients ; Pennsylvania ; Primary care ; Prospective Studies ; Quartiles ; Socioeconomic factors ; Staphylococcal Infections - metabolism ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus infections ; Staphylococcus infections ; Strain ; Veal</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2014-05, Vol.122 (5), p.464-470</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c679t-856d65fe00d61d25503f3618306a517b06338c7a1f26f24769b776d948753d273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c679t-856d65fe00d61d25503f3618306a517b06338c7a1f26f24769b776d948753d273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014753/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014753/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24509131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casey, Joan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shopsin, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, Sara E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachman, Keeve E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curriero, Frank C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Hannah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Brian S</creatorcontrib><title>High-density livestock production and molecularly characterized MRSA infections in Pennsylvania</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>European studies suggest that living near high-density livestock production increases the risk of sequence type (ST) 398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated associations between livestock production and human infection by other strain types.
We evaluated associations between MRSA molecular subgroups and high-density livestock production.
We conducted a yearlong 2012 prospective study on a stratified random sample of patients with culture-confirmed MRSA infection; we oversampled patients from the Geisinger Health System with exposure to high-density livestock production in Pennsylvania. Isolates were characterized using S. aureus protein A (spa) typing and detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) and scn genes. We compared patients with one of two specific MRSA strains with patients with all other strains of MRSA isolates, using logistic regression that accounted for the sampling design, for two different exposure models: one based on the location of the animals (livestock model) and the other on crop field application of manure (crop field model).
Of 196 MRSA isolates, we identified 30 spa types, 47 PVL-negative and 15 scn-negative isolates, and no ST398 MRSA. Compared with quartiles 1-3 combined, the highest quartiles of swine livestock and dairy/veal crop field exposures were positively associated with community-onset-PVL-negative MRSA (CO-PVL-negative MRSA vs. all other MRSA), with adjusted odds ratios of 4.24 (95% CI: 1.60, 11.25) and 4.88 (95% CI: 1.40, 17.00), respectively. The association with CO-PVL-negative MRSA infection increased across quartiles of dairy/veal livestock exposure (trend p = 0.05).
Our findings suggest that other MRSA strains, beyond ST398, may be involved in livestock-associated MRSA infection in the United States.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Crop fields</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock - microbiology</subject><subject>Livestock industry</subject><subject>Livestock production</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Meat processing</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - classification</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - pathogenicity</subject><subject>MRSA</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quartiles</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - metabolism</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Veal</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFrFDEUhwdR7Fo9eZcBQRSZNZlMkpmLsJRqC5VKq15DNnmzk5pN1mRmcfvXm23X2pEFJYeE5MvHy8svy55jNMVl3byDbjXFBHHC0YNsgikti6Ypq4fZBKEGF4wzepA9ifEKIYRrxh5nB2VF0xHBk0ycmEVXaHDR9JvcmjXE3qvv-Sp4PajeeJdLp_Olt6AGK4Pd5KqTQaoegrkGnX-6uJzlxrVwA8e0zD-Dc3Fj19IZ-TR71Eob4dluPsy-fjj-cnRSnJ1_PD2anRWK8aYvaso0oy0gpBnWJaWItIThmiAmKeZzxAipFZe4LVlbVpw1c86ZbqqaU6JLTg6z97fe1TBfglbg-iCtWAWzlGEjvDRifOJMJxZ-LSqEq-RIgtc7QfA_htQFsTRRgbXSgR-iwIwhRFKd1b9RSqqaENxsrS__Qq_8EFzqxFaICceUNX-ohbQgUjN9KlFtpWJGWF3WycUSVeyhFuAgvcc7aE3aHvHTPXwaGpZG7b3wZnQhMT387BdyiFGcXl78P3v-bcy-usd2IG3fRW-Hm8CMwbe3oAo-xgDt3f9hJLZZFynrYpf1RL-4_-V37O9wk1_-CPT4</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Casey, Joan A</creator><creator>Shopsin, Bo</creator><creator>Cosgrove, Sara E</creator><creator>Nachman, Keeve E</creator><creator>Curriero, Frank C</creator><creator>Rose, Hannah R</creator><creator>Schwartz, Brian S</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><general>NLM-Export</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>High-density livestock production and molecularly characterized MRSA infections in Pennsylvania</title><author>Casey, Joan A ; Shopsin, Bo ; Cosgrove, Sara E ; Nachman, Keeve E ; Curriero, Frank C ; Rose, Hannah R ; Schwartz, Brian S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c679t-856d65fe00d61d25503f3618306a517b06338c7a1f26f24769b776d948753d273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Crop fields</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock - microbiology</topic><topic>Livestock industry</topic><topic>Livestock production</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Meat processing</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - classification</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - pathogenicity</topic><topic>MRSA</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quartiles</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - metabolism</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Veal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casey, Joan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shopsin, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, Sara E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachman, Keeve E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curriero, Frank C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Hannah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Brian S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casey, Joan A</au><au>Shopsin, Bo</au><au>Cosgrove, Sara E</au><au>Nachman, Keeve E</au><au>Curriero, Frank C</au><au>Rose, Hannah R</au><au>Schwartz, Brian S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-density livestock production and molecularly characterized MRSA infections in Pennsylvania</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>464-470</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>European studies suggest that living near high-density livestock production increases the risk of sequence type (ST) 398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated associations between livestock production and human infection by other strain types.
We evaluated associations between MRSA molecular subgroups and high-density livestock production.
We conducted a yearlong 2012 prospective study on a stratified random sample of patients with culture-confirmed MRSA infection; we oversampled patients from the Geisinger Health System with exposure to high-density livestock production in Pennsylvania. Isolates were characterized using S. aureus protein A (spa) typing and detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) and scn genes. We compared patients with one of two specific MRSA strains with patients with all other strains of MRSA isolates, using logistic regression that accounted for the sampling design, for two different exposure models: one based on the location of the animals (livestock model) and the other on crop field application of manure (crop field model).
Of 196 MRSA isolates, we identified 30 spa types, 47 PVL-negative and 15 scn-negative isolates, and no ST398 MRSA. Compared with quartiles 1-3 combined, the highest quartiles of swine livestock and dairy/veal crop field exposures were positively associated with community-onset-PVL-negative MRSA (CO-PVL-negative MRSA vs. all other MRSA), with adjusted odds ratios of 4.24 (95% CI: 1.60, 11.25) and 4.88 (95% CI: 1.40, 17.00), respectively. The association with CO-PVL-negative MRSA infection increased across quartiles of dairy/veal livestock exposure (trend p = 0.05).
Our findings suggest that other MRSA strains, beyond ST398, may be involved in livestock-associated MRSA infection in the United States.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</pub><pmid>24509131</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.1307370</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-6765 |
ispartof | Environmental health perspectives, 2014-05, Vol.122 (5), p.464-470 |
issn | 0091-6765 1552-9924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4014753 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Cattle Crop fields Crops Electronic health records Environmental aspects Environmental protection Genes Genotype Health Health aspects Hospitals Humans Laboratories Livestock Livestock - microbiology Livestock industry Livestock production Logistic Models Manures Meat processing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - classification Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - pathogenicity MRSA Patients Pennsylvania Primary care Prospective Studies Quartiles Socioeconomic factors Staphylococcal Infections - metabolism Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus infections Staphylococcus infections Strain Veal |
title | High-density livestock production and molecularly characterized MRSA infections in Pennsylvania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-density%20livestock%20production%20and%20molecularly%20characterized%20MRSA%20infections%20in%20Pennsylvania&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Casey,%20Joan%20A&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=464-470&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.1307370&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA368283196%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661371569&rft_id=info:pmid/24509131&rft_galeid=A368283196&rfr_iscdi=true |