Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel

Several tools are used for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment delivery. However, limited information is available for composite on-line evaluation of these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric verification of IMAT treatment plan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiation research 2014-05, Vol.55 (3), p.541-552
Hauptverfasser: Hayashi, Naoki, Malmin, Ryan L., Watanabe, Yoichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 552
container_issue 3
container_start_page 541
container_title Journal of radiation research
container_volume 55
creator Hayashi, Naoki
Malmin, Ryan L.
Watanabe, Yoichi
description Several tools are used for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment delivery. However, limited information is available for composite on-line evaluation of these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric verification of IMAT treatment plans using a 2D diode array detector (2D array), radiochromic film (RCF) and radiosensitive polymer gel dosimeter (RPGD). The specific verification plans were created for IMAT for two prostate cancer patients by use of the clinical treatment plans. Accordingly, the IMAT deliveries were performed with the 2D array on a gantry-mounting device, RCF in a cylindrical acrylic phantom, and the RPGD in two cylindrical phantoms. After the irradiation, the planar dose distributions from the 2D array and the RCFs, and the 3D dose distributions from the RPGD measurements were compared with the calculated dose distributions using the gamma analysis method (3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement criterion), dose-dependent dose difference diagrams, dose difference histograms, and isodose distributions. The gamma passing rates of 2D array, RCFs and RPGD for one patient were 99.5%, 96.5% and 93.7%, respectively; the corresponding values for the second patient were 97.5%, 92.6% and 92.9%. Mean percentage differences between the RPGD measured and calculated doses in 3D volumes containing PTVs were –0.29 ± 7.1% and 0.97 ± 7.6% for the two patients, respectively. In conclusion, IMAT prostate plans can be delivered with high accuracy, although the 3D measurements indicated less satisfactory agreement with the treatment plans, mainly due to the dosimetric inaccuracy in low-dose regions of the RPGD measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jrr/rrt139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4014162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A536155031</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/jrr/rrt139</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A536155031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-abbc8cbae8004f5cb032b3f98f0d825dd0ce67c386936848b59e4977968d39573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt1qFTEUhYMo9rR64wNIQAQRT5tMJjPJTaG0_kHBG70OmWTnnJSZyZhkDsw7-NCmnVosiOQiP_vbi-zFQugVJaeUSHZ2E-NZjJky-QRtKKvlVlLePkUbUpczIw05Qscp3RBStYST5-ioqkulpfUG_boKyQ-Qozf4ANE7b3T2YcQuROzHDGPyedkOwc69zmCxjgbnPUQ9LXjq9Zhwt-A5AQ4OV1fY-mChQFEvH3DU5Wr2MQxF3fl-wHq062u6E_YHwFPolwEi3kH_Aj1zuk_w8n4_QT8-ffx--WV7_e3z18uL663hUuSt7jojTKdBEFI7bjrCqo45KRyxouLWEgNNa5hoJGtELTouoYzbykZYJnnLTtD5qjvN3QDWwJij7tUU_aDjooL26nFl9Hu1CwdVE1rTpioC7-4FYvg5Q8pq8MlAX_yAMCdFW9FQQStGCvpmRXe6B-VHF4qiucXVBWcN5ZwwWqjTf1BlWSjehRGKe_C44f3aYGJIKYJ7-D0l6jYVqqRCrako8Ou_531A_8SgAG9XIMzT_4R-Ax02wz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786181230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hayashi, Naoki ; Malmin, Ryan L. ; Watanabe, Yoichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Naoki ; Malmin, Ryan L. ; Watanabe, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><description>Several tools are used for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment delivery. However, limited information is available for composite on-line evaluation of these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric verification of IMAT treatment plans using a 2D diode array detector (2D array), radiochromic film (RCF) and radiosensitive polymer gel dosimeter (RPGD). The specific verification plans were created for IMAT for two prostate cancer patients by use of the clinical treatment plans. Accordingly, the IMAT deliveries were performed with the 2D array on a gantry-mounting device, RCF in a cylindrical acrylic phantom, and the RPGD in two cylindrical phantoms. After the irradiation, the planar dose distributions from the 2D array and the RCFs, and the 3D dose distributions from the RPGD measurements were compared with the calculated dose distributions using the gamma analysis method (3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement criterion), dose-dependent dose difference diagrams, dose difference histograms, and isodose distributions. The gamma passing rates of 2D array, RCFs and RPGD for one patient were 99.5%, 96.5% and 93.7%, respectively; the corresponding values for the second patient were 97.5%, 92.6% and 92.9%. Mean percentage differences between the RPGD measured and calculated doses in 3D volumes containing PTVs were –0.29 ± 7.1% and 0.97 ± 7.6% for the two patients, respectively. In conclusion, IMAT prostate plans can be delivered with high accuracy, although the 3D measurements indicated less satisfactory agreement with the treatment plans, mainly due to the dosimetric inaccuracy in low-dose regions of the RPGD measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0449-3060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-9157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24449714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Arrays ; Care and treatment ; Detection equipment ; Diodes ; Electronic components ; Electronics, Medical - instrumentation ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Gels - radiation effects ; Humans ; Male ; Mathematical analysis ; Oncology ; Patients ; Polymer industry ; Polymers - radiation effects ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Semiconductors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Therapy ; Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation ; Three dimensional ; Two dimensional ; X-Ray Film</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiation research, 2014-05, Vol.55 (3), p.541-552</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-abbc8cbae8004f5cb032b3f98f0d825dd0ce67c386936848b59e4977968d39573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-abbc8cbae8004f5cb032b3f98f0d825dd0ce67c386936848b59e4977968d39573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014162/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014162/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24449714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmin, Ryan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel</title><title>Journal of radiation research</title><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><description>Several tools are used for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment delivery. However, limited information is available for composite on-line evaluation of these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric verification of IMAT treatment plans using a 2D diode array detector (2D array), radiochromic film (RCF) and radiosensitive polymer gel dosimeter (RPGD). The specific verification plans were created for IMAT for two prostate cancer patients by use of the clinical treatment plans. Accordingly, the IMAT deliveries were performed with the 2D array on a gantry-mounting device, RCF in a cylindrical acrylic phantom, and the RPGD in two cylindrical phantoms. After the irradiation, the planar dose distributions from the 2D array and the RCFs, and the 3D dose distributions from the RPGD measurements were compared with the calculated dose distributions using the gamma analysis method (3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement criterion), dose-dependent dose difference diagrams, dose difference histograms, and isodose distributions. The gamma passing rates of 2D array, RCFs and RPGD for one patient were 99.5%, 96.5% and 93.7%, respectively; the corresponding values for the second patient were 97.5%, 92.6% and 92.9%. Mean percentage differences between the RPGD measured and calculated doses in 3D volumes containing PTVs were –0.29 ± 7.1% and 0.97 ± 7.6% for the two patients, respectively. In conclusion, IMAT prostate plans can be delivered with high accuracy, although the 3D measurements indicated less satisfactory agreement with the treatment plans, mainly due to the dosimetric inaccuracy in low-dose regions of the RPGD measurements.</description><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Detection equipment</subject><subject>Diodes</subject><subject>Electronic components</subject><subject>Electronics, Medical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Gels - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymer industry</subject><subject>Polymers - radiation effects</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Semiconductors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><subject>Two dimensional</subject><subject>X-Ray Film</subject><issn>0449-3060</issn><issn>1349-9157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt1qFTEUhYMo9rR64wNIQAQRT5tMJjPJTaG0_kHBG70OmWTnnJSZyZhkDsw7-NCmnVosiOQiP_vbi-zFQugVJaeUSHZ2E-NZjJky-QRtKKvlVlLePkUbUpczIw05Qscp3RBStYST5-ioqkulpfUG_boKyQ-Qozf4ANE7b3T2YcQuROzHDGPyedkOwc69zmCxjgbnPUQ9LXjq9Zhwt-A5AQ4OV1fY-mChQFEvH3DU5Wr2MQxF3fl-wHq062u6E_YHwFPolwEi3kH_Aj1zuk_w8n4_QT8-ffx--WV7_e3z18uL663hUuSt7jojTKdBEFI7bjrCqo45KRyxouLWEgNNa5hoJGtELTouoYzbykZYJnnLTtD5qjvN3QDWwJij7tUU_aDjooL26nFl9Hu1CwdVE1rTpioC7-4FYvg5Q8pq8MlAX_yAMCdFW9FQQStGCvpmRXe6B-VHF4qiucXVBWcN5ZwwWqjTf1BlWSjehRGKe_C44f3aYGJIKYJ7-D0l6jYVqqRCrako8Ou_531A_8SgAG9XIMzT_4R-Ax02wz8</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Hayashi, Naoki</creator><creator>Malmin, Ryan L.</creator><creator>Watanabe, Yoichi</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel</title><author>Hayashi, Naoki ; Malmin, Ryan L. ; Watanabe, Yoichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-abbc8cbae8004f5cb032b3f98f0d825dd0ce67c386936848b59e4977968d39573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Detection equipment</topic><topic>Diodes</topic><topic>Electronic components</topic><topic>Electronics, Medical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Gels - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymer industry</topic><topic>Polymers - radiation effects</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Semiconductors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><topic>Two dimensional</topic><topic>X-Ray Film</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmin, Ryan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayashi, Naoki</au><au>Malmin, Ryan L.</au><au>Watanabe, Yoichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>541-552</pages><issn>0449-3060</issn><eissn>1349-9157</eissn><abstract>Several tools are used for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment delivery. However, limited information is available for composite on-line evaluation of these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric verification of IMAT treatment plans using a 2D diode array detector (2D array), radiochromic film (RCF) and radiosensitive polymer gel dosimeter (RPGD). The specific verification plans were created for IMAT for two prostate cancer patients by use of the clinical treatment plans. Accordingly, the IMAT deliveries were performed with the 2D array on a gantry-mounting device, RCF in a cylindrical acrylic phantom, and the RPGD in two cylindrical phantoms. After the irradiation, the planar dose distributions from the 2D array and the RCFs, and the 3D dose distributions from the RPGD measurements were compared with the calculated dose distributions using the gamma analysis method (3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement criterion), dose-dependent dose difference diagrams, dose difference histograms, and isodose distributions. The gamma passing rates of 2D array, RCFs and RPGD for one patient were 99.5%, 96.5% and 93.7%, respectively; the corresponding values for the second patient were 97.5%, 92.6% and 92.9%. Mean percentage differences between the RPGD measured and calculated doses in 3D volumes containing PTVs were –0.29 ± 7.1% and 0.97 ± 7.6% for the two patients, respectively. In conclusion, IMAT prostate plans can be delivered with high accuracy, although the 3D measurements indicated less satisfactory agreement with the treatment plans, mainly due to the dosimetric inaccuracy in low-dose regions of the RPGD measurements.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>24449714</pmid><doi>10.1093/jrr/rrt139</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0449-3060
ispartof Journal of radiation research, 2014-05, Vol.55 (3), p.541-552
issn 0449-3060
1349-9157
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4014162
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Arrays
Care and treatment
Detection equipment
Diodes
Electronic components
Electronics, Medical - instrumentation
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure Analysis
Gels - radiation effects
Humans
Male
Mathematical analysis
Oncology
Patients
Polymer industry
Polymers - radiation effects
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiometry - instrumentation
Radiometry - methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Semiconductors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Therapy
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation
Three dimensional
Two dimensional
X-Ray Film
title Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A34%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20verification%20for%20intensity-modulated%20arc%20therapy%20plans%20by%20use%20of%202D%20diode%20array,%20radiochromic%20film%20and%20radiosensitive%20polymer%20gel&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiation%20research&rft.au=Hayashi,%20Naoki&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=541-552&rft.issn=0449-3060&rft.eissn=1349-9157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jrr/rrt139&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA536155031%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786181230&rft_id=info:pmid/24449714&rft_galeid=A536155031&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jrr/rrt139&rfr_iscdi=true