Pharmacological treatments in pathological gambling

Pathological gambling (PG) is a relatively common and often disabling psychiatric condition characterized by intrusive urges to engage in deleterious gambling behaviour. Although common and financially devastating to individuals and families, there currently exist no formally approved pharmacotherap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of clinical pharmacology 2014-02, Vol.77 (2), p.375-381
Hauptverfasser: Grant, Jon E., Odlaug, Brian L., Schreiber, Liana R. N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 381
container_issue 2
container_start_page 375
container_title British journal of clinical pharmacology
container_volume 77
creator Grant, Jon E.
Odlaug, Brian L.
Schreiber, Liana R. N.
description Pathological gambling (PG) is a relatively common and often disabling psychiatric condition characterized by intrusive urges to engage in deleterious gambling behaviour. Although common and financially devastating to individuals and families, there currently exist no formally approved pharmacotherapeutic interventions for this disorder. This review seeks to examine the history of medication treatments for PG. A systematic review of the 18 double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pharmacotherapy studies conducted for the treatment of pathological gambling was conducted. Study outcome and the mean dose of medication administered was documented in an effort to determine a preferred medication choice in this population. A variety of medication classes have been examined in the treatment of PG with varying results. Antidepressants, atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers have demonstrated mixed results in controlled clinical trials. Although limited information is available, opioid antagonists and glutamatergic agents have demonstrated efficacious outcomes, especially for individuals with PG suffering from intense urges to engage in the behaviour. Given that several studies have demonstrated their efficacy in treating the symptoms associated with PG, opioid antagonists should be considered the first line treatment for PG at this time. Most published studies, however, have employed relatively small sample sizes, are of limited duration and involve possibly non‐representative clinical groups (e.g. those without co‐occurring psychiatric disorders). Response measures have varied across studies. Heterogeneity of PG treatment samples may also complicate identification of effective treatments. Identification of factors related to treatment response will help inform future studies and advance treatment strategies for PG.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04457.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4014021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1837320337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5077-113c13ffc43f9f5add78e688a75e0c553a89a36440b20ca587d2a68d4d90185b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EoqXwC6hLNgkePxJ7ARJUvKRKdAFra-o4bao8SpxC-_cktFSwAi_GI907VzM6hAyBhtC-y0UIPJIBAyZDRoGFVAgZh-sD0t8Lh6RPOY0CyST0yIn3C0qBQySPSY8xHWstoU_4ZI51gbbKq1lmMR82tcOmcGXjh1k5XGIz30szLKZ5Vs5OyVGKuXdnu39AXu_vXkaPwfj54Wl0Mw6spHEcAHALPE2t4KlOJSZJrFykFMbSUSslR6WRR0LQKaMWpYoThpFKRKIpKDnlA3K9zV2upoVLbLtUjblZ1lmB9cZUmJnfSpnNzax6N4KCoAzagItdQF29rZxvTJF56_IcS1etvAHFY84ob-ufVqFZpEEo3VrV1mrryvvapfuNgJoOj1mYjoLpKJgOj_nCY9bt6PnPi_aD3zxaw9XW8JHlbvPvYHM7mnQd_wSq0J4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492691489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacological treatments in pathological gambling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Grant, Jon E. ; Odlaug, Brian L. ; Schreiber, Liana R. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grant, Jon E. ; Odlaug, Brian L. ; Schreiber, Liana R. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Pathological gambling (PG) is a relatively common and often disabling psychiatric condition characterized by intrusive urges to engage in deleterious gambling behaviour. Although common and financially devastating to individuals and families, there currently exist no formally approved pharmacotherapeutic interventions for this disorder. This review seeks to examine the history of medication treatments for PG. A systematic review of the 18 double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pharmacotherapy studies conducted for the treatment of pathological gambling was conducted. Study outcome and the mean dose of medication administered was documented in an effort to determine a preferred medication choice in this population. A variety of medication classes have been examined in the treatment of PG with varying results. Antidepressants, atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers have demonstrated mixed results in controlled clinical trials. Although limited information is available, opioid antagonists and glutamatergic agents have demonstrated efficacious outcomes, especially for individuals with PG suffering from intense urges to engage in the behaviour. Given that several studies have demonstrated their efficacy in treating the symptoms associated with PG, opioid antagonists should be considered the first line treatment for PG at this time. Most published studies, however, have employed relatively small sample sizes, are of limited duration and involve possibly non‐representative clinical groups (e.g. those without co‐occurring psychiatric disorders). Response measures have varied across studies. Heterogeneity of PG treatment samples may also complicate identification of effective treatments. Identification of factors related to treatment response will help inform future studies and advance treatment strategies for PG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5251</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04457.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22979951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>addiction ; Behavior, Addictive - drug therapy ; Behavior, Addictive - psychology ; Behavior, Addictive - rehabilitation ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - drug therapy ; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology ; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - rehabilitation ; gambling ; Gambling - drug therapy ; Gambling - psychology ; Gambling - rehabilitation ; Humans ; impulsivity ; pharmacology ; Reviews ; Sample Size</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014-02, Vol.77 (2), p.375-381</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Authors British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5077-113c13ffc43f9f5add78e688a75e0c553a89a36440b20ca587d2a68d4d90185b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5077-113c13ffc43f9f5add78e688a75e0c553a89a36440b20ca587d2a68d4d90185b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2125.2012.04457.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2125.2012.04457.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22979951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grant, Jon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odlaug, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Liana R. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacological treatments in pathological gambling</title><title>British journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Pathological gambling (PG) is a relatively common and often disabling psychiatric condition characterized by intrusive urges to engage in deleterious gambling behaviour. Although common and financially devastating to individuals and families, there currently exist no formally approved pharmacotherapeutic interventions for this disorder. This review seeks to examine the history of medication treatments for PG. A systematic review of the 18 double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pharmacotherapy studies conducted for the treatment of pathological gambling was conducted. Study outcome and the mean dose of medication administered was documented in an effort to determine a preferred medication choice in this population. A variety of medication classes have been examined in the treatment of PG with varying results. Antidepressants, atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers have demonstrated mixed results in controlled clinical trials. Although limited information is available, opioid antagonists and glutamatergic agents have demonstrated efficacious outcomes, especially for individuals with PG suffering from intense urges to engage in the behaviour. Given that several studies have demonstrated their efficacy in treating the symptoms associated with PG, opioid antagonists should be considered the first line treatment for PG at this time. Most published studies, however, have employed relatively small sample sizes, are of limited duration and involve possibly non‐representative clinical groups (e.g. those without co‐occurring psychiatric disorders). Response measures have varied across studies. Heterogeneity of PG treatment samples may also complicate identification of effective treatments. Identification of factors related to treatment response will help inform future studies and advance treatment strategies for PG.</description><subject>addiction</subject><subject>Behavior, Addictive - drug therapy</subject><subject>Behavior, Addictive - psychology</subject><subject>Behavior, Addictive - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - drug therapy</subject><subject>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>gambling</subject><subject>Gambling - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gambling - psychology</subject><subject>Gambling - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>impulsivity</subject><subject>pharmacology</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><issn>0306-5251</issn><issn>1365-2125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EoqXwC6hLNgkePxJ7ARJUvKRKdAFra-o4bao8SpxC-_cktFSwAi_GI907VzM6hAyBhtC-y0UIPJIBAyZDRoGFVAgZh-sD0t8Lh6RPOY0CyST0yIn3C0qBQySPSY8xHWstoU_4ZI51gbbKq1lmMR82tcOmcGXjh1k5XGIz30szLKZ5Vs5OyVGKuXdnu39AXu_vXkaPwfj54Wl0Mw6spHEcAHALPE2t4KlOJSZJrFykFMbSUSslR6WRR0LQKaMWpYoThpFKRKIpKDnlA3K9zV2upoVLbLtUjblZ1lmB9cZUmJnfSpnNzax6N4KCoAzagItdQF29rZxvTJF56_IcS1etvAHFY84ob-ufVqFZpEEo3VrV1mrryvvapfuNgJoOj1mYjoLpKJgOj_nCY9bt6PnPi_aD3zxaw9XW8JHlbvPvYHM7mnQd_wSq0J4k</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Grant, Jon E.</creator><creator>Odlaug, Brian L.</creator><creator>Schreiber, Liana R. N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Pharmacological treatments in pathological gambling</title><author>Grant, Jon E. ; Odlaug, Brian L. ; Schreiber, Liana R. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5077-113c13ffc43f9f5add78e688a75e0c553a89a36440b20ca587d2a68d4d90185b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>addiction</topic><topic>Behavior, Addictive - drug therapy</topic><topic>Behavior, Addictive - psychology</topic><topic>Behavior, Addictive - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - drug therapy</topic><topic>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>gambling</topic><topic>Gambling - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gambling - psychology</topic><topic>Gambling - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>impulsivity</topic><topic>pharmacology</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grant, Jon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odlaug, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Liana R. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grant, Jon E.</au><au>Odlaug, Brian L.</au><au>Schreiber, Liana R. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacological treatments in pathological gambling</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>375-381</pages><issn>0306-5251</issn><eissn>1365-2125</eissn><abstract>Pathological gambling (PG) is a relatively common and often disabling psychiatric condition characterized by intrusive urges to engage in deleterious gambling behaviour. Although common and financially devastating to individuals and families, there currently exist no formally approved pharmacotherapeutic interventions for this disorder. This review seeks to examine the history of medication treatments for PG. A systematic review of the 18 double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pharmacotherapy studies conducted for the treatment of pathological gambling was conducted. Study outcome and the mean dose of medication administered was documented in an effort to determine a preferred medication choice in this population. A variety of medication classes have been examined in the treatment of PG with varying results. Antidepressants, atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers have demonstrated mixed results in controlled clinical trials. Although limited information is available, opioid antagonists and glutamatergic agents have demonstrated efficacious outcomes, especially for individuals with PG suffering from intense urges to engage in the behaviour. Given that several studies have demonstrated their efficacy in treating the symptoms associated with PG, opioid antagonists should be considered the first line treatment for PG at this time. Most published studies, however, have employed relatively small sample sizes, are of limited duration and involve possibly non‐representative clinical groups (e.g. those without co‐occurring psychiatric disorders). Response measures have varied across studies. Heterogeneity of PG treatment samples may also complicate identification of effective treatments. Identification of factors related to treatment response will help inform future studies and advance treatment strategies for PG.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22979951</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04457.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-5251
ispartof British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014-02, Vol.77 (2), p.375-381
issn 0306-5251
1365-2125
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4014021
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects addiction
Behavior, Addictive - drug therapy
Behavior, Addictive - psychology
Behavior, Addictive - rehabilitation
Clinical Trials as Topic
Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - drug therapy
Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology
Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - rehabilitation
gambling
Gambling - drug therapy
Gambling - psychology
Gambling - rehabilitation
Humans
impulsivity
pharmacology
Reviews
Sample Size
title Pharmacological treatments in pathological gambling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacological%20treatments%20in%20pathological%20gambling&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Grant,%20Jon%20E.&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=375-381&rft.issn=0306-5251&rft.eissn=1365-2125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04457.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1837320337%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492691489&rft_id=info:pmid/22979951&rfr_iscdi=true