Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology
This Analysis compares four commonly used assays to measure food intake in flies and identifies radioisotope-labeling and the capillary feeder (CAFE) as the most reproducible and sensitive. Food intake is a fundamental parameter in animal studies. Despite the prevalent use of Drosophila in laborator...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature methods 2014-05, Vol.11 (5), p.535-540 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This Analysis compares four commonly used assays to measure food intake in flies and identifies radioisotope-labeling and the capillary feeder (CAFE) as the most reproducible and sensitive.
Food intake is a fundamental parameter in animal studies. Despite the prevalent use of
Drosophila
in laboratory research, precise measurements of food intake remain challenging in this model organism. Here, we compare several common
Drosophila
feeding assays: the capillary feeder (CAFE), food labeling with a radioactive tracer or colorimetric dye and observations of proboscis extension (PE). We show that the CAFE and radioisotope labeling provide the most consistent results, have the highest sensitivity and can resolve differences in feeding that dye labeling and PE fail to distinguish. We conclude that performing the radiolabeling and CAFE assays in parallel is currently the best approach for quantifying
Drosophila
food intake. Understanding the strengths and limitations of methods for measuring food intake will greatly advance
Drosophila
studies of nutrition, behavior and disease. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1548-7091 1548-7105 |
DOI: | 10.1038/nmeth.2899 |