ResLog plots as an empirical metric of the quality of cryo-EM reconstructions

Compared to the field of X-ray crystallography, the field of single particle three-dimensional electron microscopy has few reliable metrics for assessing the quality of 3D reconstructions. New metrics are needed that can determine whether a given 3D reconstruction accurately reflects the structure o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of structural biology 2014-03, Vol.185 (3), p.418-426
Hauptverfasser: Stagg, Scott M., Noble, Alex J., Spilman, Michael, Chapman, Michael S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 426
container_issue 3
container_start_page 418
container_title Journal of structural biology
container_volume 185
creator Stagg, Scott M.
Noble, Alex J.
Spilman, Michael
Chapman, Michael S.
description Compared to the field of X-ray crystallography, the field of single particle three-dimensional electron microscopy has few reliable metrics for assessing the quality of 3D reconstructions. New metrics are needed that can determine whether a given 3D reconstruction accurately reflects the structure of the particles from which it was derived or instead depicts a plausible though incorrect structure due to coarse misalignment of particles. Here an empirical procedure is presented for differentiating between a reconstruction with well-aligned particles and a reconstruction with grossly misclassified particles. For a given dataset, 3D reconstructions are computed from subsets of particles with decreasing numbers of particles contributing to the reconstruction. A plot of inverse resolution vs. the logarithm of the number of particles (a “ResLog” plot) provides metrics for the reliability of the reconstruction and the overall quality of the dataset and processing. Specifically, the y-intercept of a regression line provides a measure of the relative accuracy of the particle alignment and classification, and the slope is an indicator of the overall data quality including the imaging conditions and processing steps. ResLog plots can also be used to optimize conditions for data collection and reconstruction parameters. Although resolution estimates can vary by method of calculation, ResLog-derived parameters are consistent whether calculated by Fourier shell correlation or Fourier neighbor correlation, or a new coordinate-based metric that serves as a yardstick for structures where atomic coordinates are available. ResLog plots could become part of a standard set of parameters to be included in 3D reconstruction reports.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4001718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1047847713003377</els_id><sourcerecordid>1504149174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d1a378578120b6f1f825b723ae4a4d6f3be6ceeb0d5c1e875e05a0ed42176b2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LxDAUDKL4_QO8SI9eWvPSpKkIgohfsCKInkOavmqWtlmTVNh_b5ZV0YsQyDwyMy_MEHIEtAAK1em8mIemYBTKAlhBgW6QXaBnIq8rITdXmMu85lLukL0Q5pRSDgy2yQ7jZc0B5C55eMIwc6_ZoncxZDqdMcNhYb01us8GjAlkrsviG2bvk-5tXK5G45cuv37IPBo3hugnE20CB2Sr033Aw697n7zcXD9f3eWzx9v7q8tZbriAmLegS1kLWQOjTdVBVzPRSFZq5Jq3VVc2WBnEhrbCANZSIBWaYssZyKphWO6Ti7XvYmoGbA2O0eteLbwdtF8qp636-zLaN_XqPhSnFCTUyeDky8C79wlDVIMNBvtej-imoECkqPgZSJ6osKYa70Lw2P2sAapWNai5SjWoVQ0KmEo1JM3x7__9KL5zT4TzNQFTSh8WvQrG4miwtSnSqFpn_7H_BObOmXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504149174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ResLog plots as an empirical metric of the quality of cryo-EM reconstructions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stagg, Scott M. ; Noble, Alex J. ; Spilman, Michael ; Chapman, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Scott M. ; Noble, Alex J. ; Spilman, Michael ; Chapman, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>Compared to the field of X-ray crystallography, the field of single particle three-dimensional electron microscopy has few reliable metrics for assessing the quality of 3D reconstructions. New metrics are needed that can determine whether a given 3D reconstruction accurately reflects the structure of the particles from which it was derived or instead depicts a plausible though incorrect structure due to coarse misalignment of particles. Here an empirical procedure is presented for differentiating between a reconstruction with well-aligned particles and a reconstruction with grossly misclassified particles. For a given dataset, 3D reconstructions are computed from subsets of particles with decreasing numbers of particles contributing to the reconstruction. A plot of inverse resolution vs. the logarithm of the number of particles (a “ResLog” plot) provides metrics for the reliability of the reconstruction and the overall quality of the dataset and processing. Specifically, the y-intercept of a regression line provides a measure of the relative accuracy of the particle alignment and classification, and the slope is an indicator of the overall data quality including the imaging conditions and processing steps. ResLog plots can also be used to optimize conditions for data collection and reconstruction parameters. Although resolution estimates can vary by method of calculation, ResLog-derived parameters are consistent whether calculated by Fourier shell correlation or Fourier neighbor correlation, or a new coordinate-based metric that serves as a yardstick for structures where atomic coordinates are available. ResLog plots could become part of a standard set of parameters to be included in 3D reconstruction reports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-8477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24384117</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cryoelectron Microscopy - methods ; Crystallography, X-Ray ; Electron microscopy ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Microscopy, Electron - methods ; Noise bias ; Resolution ; Structure validation</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural biology, 2014-03, Vol.185 (3), p.418-426</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d1a378578120b6f1f825b723ae4a4d6f3be6ceeb0d5c1e875e05a0ed42176b2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d1a378578120b6f1f825b723ae4a4d6f3be6ceeb0d5c1e875e05a0ed42176b2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847713003377$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384117$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Alex J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spilman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>ResLog plots as an empirical metric of the quality of cryo-EM reconstructions</title><title>Journal of structural biology</title><addtitle>J Struct Biol</addtitle><description>Compared to the field of X-ray crystallography, the field of single particle three-dimensional electron microscopy has few reliable metrics for assessing the quality of 3D reconstructions. New metrics are needed that can determine whether a given 3D reconstruction accurately reflects the structure of the particles from which it was derived or instead depicts a plausible though incorrect structure due to coarse misalignment of particles. Here an empirical procedure is presented for differentiating between a reconstruction with well-aligned particles and a reconstruction with grossly misclassified particles. For a given dataset, 3D reconstructions are computed from subsets of particles with decreasing numbers of particles contributing to the reconstruction. A plot of inverse resolution vs. the logarithm of the number of particles (a “ResLog” plot) provides metrics for the reliability of the reconstruction and the overall quality of the dataset and processing. Specifically, the y-intercept of a regression line provides a measure of the relative accuracy of the particle alignment and classification, and the slope is an indicator of the overall data quality including the imaging conditions and processing steps. ResLog plots can also be used to optimize conditions for data collection and reconstruction parameters. Although resolution estimates can vary by method of calculation, ResLog-derived parameters are consistent whether calculated by Fourier shell correlation or Fourier neighbor correlation, or a new coordinate-based metric that serves as a yardstick for structures where atomic coordinates are available. ResLog plots could become part of a standard set of parameters to be included in 3D reconstruction reports.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cryoelectron Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Crystallography, X-Ray</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron - methods</subject><subject>Noise bias</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Structure validation</subject><issn>1047-8477</issn><issn>1095-8657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LxDAUDKL4_QO8SI9eWvPSpKkIgohfsCKInkOavmqWtlmTVNh_b5ZV0YsQyDwyMy_MEHIEtAAK1em8mIemYBTKAlhBgW6QXaBnIq8rITdXmMu85lLukL0Q5pRSDgy2yQ7jZc0B5C55eMIwc6_ZoncxZDqdMcNhYb01us8GjAlkrsviG2bvk-5tXK5G45cuv37IPBo3hugnE20CB2Sr033Aw697n7zcXD9f3eWzx9v7q8tZbriAmLegS1kLWQOjTdVBVzPRSFZq5Jq3VVc2WBnEhrbCANZSIBWaYssZyKphWO6Ti7XvYmoGbA2O0eteLbwdtF8qp636-zLaN_XqPhSnFCTUyeDky8C79wlDVIMNBvtej-imoECkqPgZSJ6osKYa70Lw2P2sAapWNai5SjWoVQ0KmEo1JM3x7__9KL5zT4TzNQFTSh8WvQrG4miwtSnSqFpn_7H_BObOmXw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Stagg, Scott M.</creator><creator>Noble, Alex J.</creator><creator>Spilman, Michael</creator><creator>Chapman, Michael S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>ResLog plots as an empirical metric of the quality of cryo-EM reconstructions</title><author>Stagg, Scott M. ; Noble, Alex J. ; Spilman, Michael ; Chapman, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-d1a378578120b6f1f825b723ae4a4d6f3be6ceeb0d5c1e875e05a0ed42176b2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cryoelectron Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Crystallography, X-Ray</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron - methods</topic><topic>Noise bias</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Structure validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Alex J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spilman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stagg, Scott M.</au><au>Noble, Alex J.</au><au>Spilman, Michael</au><au>Chapman, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ResLog plots as an empirical metric of the quality of cryo-EM reconstructions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Struct Biol</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>185</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>418-426</pages><issn>1047-8477</issn><eissn>1095-8657</eissn><abstract>Compared to the field of X-ray crystallography, the field of single particle three-dimensional electron microscopy has few reliable metrics for assessing the quality of 3D reconstructions. New metrics are needed that can determine whether a given 3D reconstruction accurately reflects the structure of the particles from which it was derived or instead depicts a plausible though incorrect structure due to coarse misalignment of particles. Here an empirical procedure is presented for differentiating between a reconstruction with well-aligned particles and a reconstruction with grossly misclassified particles. For a given dataset, 3D reconstructions are computed from subsets of particles with decreasing numbers of particles contributing to the reconstruction. A plot of inverse resolution vs. the logarithm of the number of particles (a “ResLog” plot) provides metrics for the reliability of the reconstruction and the overall quality of the dataset and processing. Specifically, the y-intercept of a regression line provides a measure of the relative accuracy of the particle alignment and classification, and the slope is an indicator of the overall data quality including the imaging conditions and processing steps. ResLog plots can also be used to optimize conditions for data collection and reconstruction parameters. Although resolution estimates can vary by method of calculation, ResLog-derived parameters are consistent whether calculated by Fourier shell correlation or Fourier neighbor correlation, or a new coordinate-based metric that serves as a yardstick for structures where atomic coordinates are available. ResLog plots could become part of a standard set of parameters to be included in 3D reconstruction reports.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24384117</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsb.2013.12.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-8477
ispartof Journal of structural biology, 2014-03, Vol.185 (3), p.418-426
issn 1047-8477
1095-8657
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4001718
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Cryoelectron Microscopy - methods
Crystallography, X-Ray
Electron microscopy
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Microscopy, Electron - methods
Noise bias
Resolution
Structure validation
title ResLog plots as an empirical metric of the quality of cryo-EM reconstructions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ResLog%20plots%20as%20an%20empirical%20metric%20of%20the%20quality%20of%20cryo-EM%20reconstructions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20biology&rft.au=Stagg,%20Scott%20M.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=418-426&rft.issn=1047-8477&rft.eissn=1095-8657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsb.2013.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1504149174%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504149174&rft_id=info:pmid/24384117&rft_els_id=S1047847713003377&rfr_iscdi=true