Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat
Within the last decades, collagen types I and III have been established as a sufficient biomaterial for GBR and GTR procedures. They might also be an adequate matrix for soft tissue augmentations. However, collagen materials differ significantly regarding resorption time, biodegradation pattern and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Head & face medicine 2014-03, Vol.10 (1), p.10-10, Article 10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Head & face medicine |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Rothamel, Daniel Benner, Marcel Fienitz, Tim Happe, Arndt Kreppel, Matthias Nickenig, Hans-Joachim Zöller, Joachim E |
description | Within the last decades, collagen types I and III have been established as a sufficient biomaterial for GBR and GTR procedures. They might also be an adequate matrix for soft tissue augmentations. However, collagen materials differ significantly regarding resorption time, biodegradation pattern and the invasion of inflammatory cells.The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation and tissue integration of native, differently processed and cross-linked collagen scaffolds in rats.
Four experimental porcine collagen matrices of 1.0 mm thickness, developed for soft tissue augmentation procedures, were tested. Based on the same native dermal Type I and III collagen, native (ND, Mucoderm prototype), specifically defatted (DD), ethylene dioxide cross-linked (ECL) and dehydrothermally cross-linked (DCL) dermis collagen (AAP/Botiss Biomaterials, Berlin, Germany) were evaluated. Two specimens of 1 × 1 cm were fixed around a non-absorbable spacer using non-absorbable sutures. After rehydration, specimens (N = 8) were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches on the back of 40 Wistar rats. Rats were divided into five groups (1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks), including eight animals each. After each period, eight rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histological analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: membrane thickness as a sign of biodegradation and volume stability, cell ingrowth, vascularization, tissue integration and foreign body reaction.
Biodegradation pattern of the non cross-linked collagen scaffolds differed only slightly in terms of presence of inflammatory cells and cell invasion into the matrix. In terms of biodegradation, ECL displayed a considerable slower resorption than ND, DCL and DD. Chemical cross-linking using ethylene dioxide showed a significant higher invasion of inflammatory cells.
Within the limits of the present study it was concluded that the processing techniques influenced the collagen properties in a different intensity. Dehydrothermal cross-linking and special defatting did not notably change the biodegradation pattern, whereas cross-linking using ethylene dioxide led to significant higher volume stability of the matrix. However, ECL showed an increased inflammatory response and compromised tissue integration. Therefore, ethylene dioxide seems to be not suitable for stabilization of collagen matrices for soft tissue augmentation procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1746-160x-10-10 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3984020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A540642068</galeid><sourcerecordid>A540642068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-b196d3eb51928f7d9e01af575a3397d53cbdae9c95c1572e98503cdb810332863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1rFTEUhgdR7Ieu3UnATTfTJpOPmdkIbdEqFNwouAuZ5Mw0dSa5JpnS_hl_q5l7e2uvVJAEEnKevHlzzimKNwQfE9KIE1IzURKBb0uC83xW7G9Pvj9_tN8rDmK8xphxXpGXxV7FRI0r0u4Xv86sNzAEZVSy3qGVSgmCQ8oZlGyMMyDr0gKsw75HLu9uYA3o4GMsR-t-gEErH7R1gLQfRzWAQ9H3aauh5mEClzYik0rBaoiozCoIblcQ7Do6ophmc5dfROkKUH7zVfGiV2OE1_frYfHt44ev55_Kyy8Xn89PL8tOMJHKjrTCUOg4aaumr00LmKie11xR2taGU90ZBa1uuSa8rqBtOKbadA3BlFaNoIfF-43uau4mMDq7CWqUq2xMhTvplZW7EWev5OBvJG0bhiucBc42Ap31_xDYjWg_yaU-cqmPJDjPLHJ07yL4nzPEJCcbNeR8OvBzlIQzhongnP0HSgRtueA0o-_-Qq_9HFxO50LxbL_G7A81qBGkdb3PNvUiKk8zI1iFRZOp4yeoPAxMVnsHvc3nOxdONhfWvRKgf0jJ8uXcwk8k4e3jUjzw256lvwEgYu6_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1515402704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rothamel, Daniel ; Benner, Marcel ; Fienitz, Tim ; Happe, Arndt ; Kreppel, Matthias ; Nickenig, Hans-Joachim ; Zöller, Joachim E</creator><creatorcontrib>Rothamel, Daniel ; Benner, Marcel ; Fienitz, Tim ; Happe, Arndt ; Kreppel, Matthias ; Nickenig, Hans-Joachim ; Zöller, Joachim E</creatorcontrib><description>Within the last decades, collagen types I and III have been established as a sufficient biomaterial for GBR and GTR procedures. They might also be an adequate matrix for soft tissue augmentations. However, collagen materials differ significantly regarding resorption time, biodegradation pattern and the invasion of inflammatory cells.The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation and tissue integration of native, differently processed and cross-linked collagen scaffolds in rats.
Four experimental porcine collagen matrices of 1.0 mm thickness, developed for soft tissue augmentation procedures, were tested. Based on the same native dermal Type I and III collagen, native (ND, Mucoderm prototype), specifically defatted (DD), ethylene dioxide cross-linked (ECL) and dehydrothermally cross-linked (DCL) dermis collagen (AAP/Botiss Biomaterials, Berlin, Germany) were evaluated. Two specimens of 1 × 1 cm were fixed around a non-absorbable spacer using non-absorbable sutures. After rehydration, specimens (N = 8) were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches on the back of 40 Wistar rats. Rats were divided into five groups (1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks), including eight animals each. After each period, eight rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histological analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: membrane thickness as a sign of biodegradation and volume stability, cell ingrowth, vascularization, tissue integration and foreign body reaction.
Biodegradation pattern of the non cross-linked collagen scaffolds differed only slightly in terms of presence of inflammatory cells and cell invasion into the matrix. In terms of biodegradation, ECL displayed a considerable slower resorption than ND, DCL and DD. Chemical cross-linking using ethylene dioxide showed a significant higher invasion of inflammatory cells.
Within the limits of the present study it was concluded that the processing techniques influenced the collagen properties in a different intensity. Dehydrothermal cross-linking and special defatting did not notably change the biodegradation pattern, whereas cross-linking using ethylene dioxide led to significant higher volume stability of the matrix. However, ECL showed an increased inflammatory response and compromised tissue integration. Therefore, ethylene dioxide seems to be not suitable for stabilization of collagen matrices for soft tissue augmentation procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-160X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-160X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1746-160x-10-10</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24670219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorbable Implants ; Animals ; Biocompatibility ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biodegradation ; Biological products ; Biomedical materials ; Bone Regeneration - physiology ; Collagen ; Collagen - chemistry ; Health aspects ; Membranes ; Membranes, Artificial ; Morbidity ; Pain ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Skin & tissue grafts ; Studies ; Surgery ; Swine ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>Head & face medicine, 2014-03, Vol.10 (1), p.10-10, Article 10</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Rothamel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Rothamel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Rothamel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-b196d3eb51928f7d9e01af575a3397d53cbdae9c95c1572e98503cdb810332863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-b196d3eb51928f7d9e01af575a3397d53cbdae9c95c1572e98503cdb810332863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984020/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984020/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24670219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rothamel, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benner, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fienitz, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happe, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreppel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickenig, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zöller, Joachim E</creatorcontrib><title>Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat</title><title>Head & face medicine</title><addtitle>Head Face Med</addtitle><description>Within the last decades, collagen types I and III have been established as a sufficient biomaterial for GBR and GTR procedures. They might also be an adequate matrix for soft tissue augmentations. However, collagen materials differ significantly regarding resorption time, biodegradation pattern and the invasion of inflammatory cells.The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation and tissue integration of native, differently processed and cross-linked collagen scaffolds in rats.
Four experimental porcine collagen matrices of 1.0 mm thickness, developed for soft tissue augmentation procedures, were tested. Based on the same native dermal Type I and III collagen, native (ND, Mucoderm prototype), specifically defatted (DD), ethylene dioxide cross-linked (ECL) and dehydrothermally cross-linked (DCL) dermis collagen (AAP/Botiss Biomaterials, Berlin, Germany) were evaluated. Two specimens of 1 × 1 cm were fixed around a non-absorbable spacer using non-absorbable sutures. After rehydration, specimens (N = 8) were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches on the back of 40 Wistar rats. Rats were divided into five groups (1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks), including eight animals each. After each period, eight rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histological analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: membrane thickness as a sign of biodegradation and volume stability, cell ingrowth, vascularization, tissue integration and foreign body reaction.
Biodegradation pattern of the non cross-linked collagen scaffolds differed only slightly in terms of presence of inflammatory cells and cell invasion into the matrix. In terms of biodegradation, ECL displayed a considerable slower resorption than ND, DCL and DD. Chemical cross-linking using ethylene dioxide showed a significant higher invasion of inflammatory cells.
Within the limits of the present study it was concluded that the processing techniques influenced the collagen properties in a different intensity. Dehydrothermal cross-linking and special defatting did not notably change the biodegradation pattern, whereas cross-linking using ethylene dioxide led to significant higher volume stability of the matrix. However, ECL showed an increased inflammatory response and compromised tissue integration. Therefore, ethylene dioxide seems to be not suitable for stabilization of collagen matrices for soft tissue augmentation procedures.</description><subject>Absorbable Implants</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biological products</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Collagen - chemistry</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>1746-160X</issn><issn>1746-160X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1rFTEUhgdR7Ieu3UnATTfTJpOPmdkIbdEqFNwouAuZ5Mw0dSa5JpnS_hl_q5l7e2uvVJAEEnKevHlzzimKNwQfE9KIE1IzURKBb0uC83xW7G9Pvj9_tN8rDmK8xphxXpGXxV7FRI0r0u4Xv86sNzAEZVSy3qGVSgmCQ8oZlGyMMyDr0gKsw75HLu9uYA3o4GMsR-t-gEErH7R1gLQfRzWAQ9H3aauh5mEClzYik0rBaoiozCoIblcQ7Do6ophmc5dfROkKUH7zVfGiV2OE1_frYfHt44ev55_Kyy8Xn89PL8tOMJHKjrTCUOg4aaumr00LmKie11xR2taGU90ZBa1uuSa8rqBtOKbadA3BlFaNoIfF-43uau4mMDq7CWqUq2xMhTvplZW7EWev5OBvJG0bhiucBc42Ap31_xDYjWg_yaU-cqmPJDjPLHJ07yL4nzPEJCcbNeR8OvBzlIQzhongnP0HSgRtueA0o-_-Qq_9HFxO50LxbL_G7A81qBGkdb3PNvUiKk8zI1iFRZOp4yeoPAxMVnsHvc3nOxdONhfWvRKgf0jJ8uXcwk8k4e3jUjzw256lvwEgYu6_</recordid><startdate>20140327</startdate><enddate>20140327</enddate><creator>Rothamel, Daniel</creator><creator>Benner, Marcel</creator><creator>Fienitz, Tim</creator><creator>Happe, Arndt</creator><creator>Kreppel, Matthias</creator><creator>Nickenig, Hans-Joachim</creator><creator>Zöller, Joachim E</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140327</creationdate><title>Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat</title><author>Rothamel, Daniel ; Benner, Marcel ; Fienitz, Tim ; Happe, Arndt ; Kreppel, Matthias ; Nickenig, Hans-Joachim ; Zöller, Joachim E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-b196d3eb51928f7d9e01af575a3397d53cbdae9c95c1572e98503cdb810332863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Absorbable Implants</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biological products</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Collagen - chemistry</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rothamel, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benner, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fienitz, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happe, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreppel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickenig, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zöller, Joachim E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Head & face medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rothamel, Daniel</au><au>Benner, Marcel</au><au>Fienitz, Tim</au><au>Happe, Arndt</au><au>Kreppel, Matthias</au><au>Nickenig, Hans-Joachim</au><au>Zöller, Joachim E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat</atitle><jtitle>Head & face medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Head Face Med</addtitle><date>2014-03-27</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>10-10</pages><artnum>10</artnum><issn>1746-160X</issn><eissn>1746-160X</eissn><abstract>Within the last decades, collagen types I and III have been established as a sufficient biomaterial for GBR and GTR procedures. They might also be an adequate matrix for soft tissue augmentations. However, collagen materials differ significantly regarding resorption time, biodegradation pattern and the invasion of inflammatory cells.The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation and tissue integration of native, differently processed and cross-linked collagen scaffolds in rats.
Four experimental porcine collagen matrices of 1.0 mm thickness, developed for soft tissue augmentation procedures, were tested. Based on the same native dermal Type I and III collagen, native (ND, Mucoderm prototype), specifically defatted (DD), ethylene dioxide cross-linked (ECL) and dehydrothermally cross-linked (DCL) dermis collagen (AAP/Botiss Biomaterials, Berlin, Germany) were evaluated. Two specimens of 1 × 1 cm were fixed around a non-absorbable spacer using non-absorbable sutures. After rehydration, specimens (N = 8) were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches on the back of 40 Wistar rats. Rats were divided into five groups (1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks), including eight animals each. After each period, eight rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histological analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: membrane thickness as a sign of biodegradation and volume stability, cell ingrowth, vascularization, tissue integration and foreign body reaction.
Biodegradation pattern of the non cross-linked collagen scaffolds differed only slightly in terms of presence of inflammatory cells and cell invasion into the matrix. In terms of biodegradation, ECL displayed a considerable slower resorption than ND, DCL and DD. Chemical cross-linking using ethylene dioxide showed a significant higher invasion of inflammatory cells.
Within the limits of the present study it was concluded that the processing techniques influenced the collagen properties in a different intensity. Dehydrothermal cross-linking and special defatting did not notably change the biodegradation pattern, whereas cross-linking using ethylene dioxide led to significant higher volume stability of the matrix. However, ECL showed an increased inflammatory response and compromised tissue integration. Therefore, ethylene dioxide seems to be not suitable for stabilization of collagen matrices for soft tissue augmentation procedures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24670219</pmid><doi>10.1186/1746-160x-10-10</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-160X |
ispartof | Head & face medicine, 2014-03, Vol.10 (1), p.10-10, Article 10 |
issn | 1746-160X 1746-160X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3984020 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Absorbable Implants Animals Biocompatibility Biocompatible Materials - chemistry Biodegradation Biological products Biomedical materials Bone Regeneration - physiology Collagen Collagen - chemistry Health aspects Membranes Membranes, Artificial Morbidity Pain Rats Rats, Wistar Skin & tissue grafts Studies Surgery Swine Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry Wound healing |
title | Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biodegradation%20pattern%20and%20tissue%20integration%20of%20native%20and%20cross-linked%20porcine%20collagen%20soft%20tissue%20augmentation%20matrices%20-%20an%20experimental%20study%20in%20the%20rat&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20face%20medicine&rft.au=Rothamel,%20Daniel&rft.date=2014-03-27&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=10-10&rft.artnum=10&rft.issn=1746-160X&rft.eissn=1746-160X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1746-160x-10-10&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA540642068%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1515402704&rft_id=info:pmid/24670219&rft_galeid=A540642068&rfr_iscdi=true |