Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display

With the increase in the adoption of electronic health records (EHR) across the US, primary care physicians are experiencing information overload. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the information needs of primary care physicians (PCPs) as they review clinic visit notes to inform EHR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied clinical informatics 2014-01, Vol.5 (1), p.169-190
Hauptverfasser: Clarke, M A, Steege, L M, Moore, J L, Koopman, R J, Belden, J L, Kim, M S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 1
container_start_page 169
container_title Applied clinical informatics
container_volume 5
creator Clarke, M A
Steege, L M
Moore, J L
Koopman, R J
Belden, J L
Kim, M S
description With the increase in the adoption of electronic health records (EHR) across the US, primary care physicians are experiencing information overload. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the information needs of primary care physicians (PCPs) as they review clinic visit notes to inform EHR display. Data collection was conducted with 15 primary care physicians during semi-structured interviews, including a third party observer to control bias. Physicians reviewed major sections of an artificial but typical acute and chronic care visit note to identify the note sections that were relevant to their information needs. Statistical methods used were McNemar-Mosteller's and Cochran Q. Physicians identified History of Present Illness (HPI), Assessment, and Plan (A&P) as the most important sections of a visit note. In contrast, they largely judged the Review of Systems (ROS) to be superfluous. There was also a statistical difference in physicians' highlighting among all seven major note sections in acute (p = 0.00) and chronic (p = 0.00) care visit notes. A&P and HPI sections were most frequently identified as important which suggests that physicians may have to identify a few key sections out of a long, unnecessarily verbose visit note. ROS is viewed by doctors as mostly "not needed," but can have relevant information. The ROS can contain information needed for patient care when other sections of the Visit note, such as the HPI, lack the relevant information. Future studies should include producing a display that provides only relevant information to increase physician efficiency at the point of care. Also, research on moving A&P to the top of visit notes instead of having A&P at the bottom of the page is needed, since those are usually the first sections physicians refer to and reviewing from top to bottom may cause cognitive load.
doi_str_mv 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0064
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3974234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1516729254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-575789b497ed69387e9d7cb2f3da20f7fd08cd46e01a614c4f60f57beb6394b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoKuovECRHL6vJJptkL0Kpn1AQit6EkM3O1shuUpNU6L-3S6voXGbIzPtmhgehc0quOGPqejJ9KkpCWUFUMZ8UhAi-h46pEnVBWCn3_9RH6CylD7KJSlCl5CE6KrlknDJ6jN5uIUMcnHd-gZfRDSausTUR8PJ9nZx1xmPnuxAHk13w2AO0Ceewe8RmaFa9yWGj-nLJZexDBty6tOzN-hQddKZPcLbLJ-j1_u5l-ljMnh-eppNZYTmpclHJSqq64bWEVtRMSahbaZuyY60pSSe7lijbcgGEGkG55Z0gXSUbaASrecPZCbrZ-i5XzQCtBZ-j6fXuHB2M0_873r3rRfjSrJa8ZKPB5c4ghs8VpKwHlyz0vfEQVknTigpZ1mU1jrLtqI0hpQjd7zeU6BGN3qDRIxpNlJ5P9Ihmo7r4u-Gv5gcE-wYMiIz9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1516729254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Clarke, M A ; Steege, L M ; Moore, J L ; Koopman, R J ; Belden, J L ; Kim, M S</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, M A ; Steege, L M ; Moore, J L ; Koopman, R J ; Belden, J L ; Kim, M S</creatorcontrib><description>With the increase in the adoption of electronic health records (EHR) across the US, primary care physicians are experiencing information overload. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the information needs of primary care physicians (PCPs) as they review clinic visit notes to inform EHR display. Data collection was conducted with 15 primary care physicians during semi-structured interviews, including a third party observer to control bias. Physicians reviewed major sections of an artificial but typical acute and chronic care visit note to identify the note sections that were relevant to their information needs. Statistical methods used were McNemar-Mosteller's and Cochran Q. Physicians identified History of Present Illness (HPI), Assessment, and Plan (A&amp;P) as the most important sections of a visit note. In contrast, they largely judged the Review of Systems (ROS) to be superfluous. There was also a statistical difference in physicians' highlighting among all seven major note sections in acute (p = 0.00) and chronic (p = 0.00) care visit notes. A&amp;P and HPI sections were most frequently identified as important which suggests that physicians may have to identify a few key sections out of a long, unnecessarily verbose visit note. ROS is viewed by doctors as mostly "not needed," but can have relevant information. The ROS can contain information needed for patient care when other sections of the Visit note, such as the HPI, lack the relevant information. Future studies should include producing a display that provides only relevant information to increase physician efficiency at the point of care. Also, research on moving A&amp;P to the top of visit notes instead of having A&amp;P at the bottom of the page is needed, since those are usually the first sections physicians refer to and reviewing from top to bottom may cause cognitive load.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1869-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-0327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24734131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Schattauer</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adult ; Ambulatory Care ; Ambulatory Care Information Systems ; Chronic Disease ; Demography ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physicians, Primary Care</subject><ispartof>Applied clinical informatics, 2014-01, Vol.5 (1), p.169-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright Schattauer 2014 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-575789b497ed69387e9d7cb2f3da20f7fd08cd46e01a614c4f60f57beb6394b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-575789b497ed69387e9d7cb2f3da20f7fd08cd46e01a614c4f60f57beb6394b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974234/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974234/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steege, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopman, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belden, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, M S</creatorcontrib><title>Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display</title><title>Applied clinical informatics</title><addtitle>Appl Clin Inform</addtitle><description>With the increase in the adoption of electronic health records (EHR) across the US, primary care physicians are experiencing information overload. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the information needs of primary care physicians (PCPs) as they review clinic visit notes to inform EHR display. Data collection was conducted with 15 primary care physicians during semi-structured interviews, including a third party observer to control bias. Physicians reviewed major sections of an artificial but typical acute and chronic care visit note to identify the note sections that were relevant to their information needs. Statistical methods used were McNemar-Mosteller's and Cochran Q. Physicians identified History of Present Illness (HPI), Assessment, and Plan (A&amp;P) as the most important sections of a visit note. In contrast, they largely judged the Review of Systems (ROS) to be superfluous. There was also a statistical difference in physicians' highlighting among all seven major note sections in acute (p = 0.00) and chronic (p = 0.00) care visit notes. A&amp;P and HPI sections were most frequently identified as important which suggests that physicians may have to identify a few key sections out of a long, unnecessarily verbose visit note. ROS is viewed by doctors as mostly "not needed," but can have relevant information. The ROS can contain information needed for patient care when other sections of the Visit note, such as the HPI, lack the relevant information. Future studies should include producing a display that provides only relevant information to increase physician efficiency at the point of care. Also, research on moving A&amp;P to the top of visit notes instead of having A&amp;P at the bottom of the page is needed, since those are usually the first sections physicians refer to and reviewing from top to bottom may cause cognitive load.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Information Systems</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physicians, Primary Care</subject><issn>1869-0327</issn><issn>1869-0327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoKuovECRHL6vJJptkL0Kpn1AQit6EkM3O1shuUpNU6L-3S6voXGbIzPtmhgehc0quOGPqejJ9KkpCWUFUMZ8UhAi-h46pEnVBWCn3_9RH6CylD7KJSlCl5CE6KrlknDJ6jN5uIUMcnHd-gZfRDSausTUR8PJ9nZx1xmPnuxAHk13w2AO0Ceewe8RmaFa9yWGj-nLJZexDBty6tOzN-hQddKZPcLbLJ-j1_u5l-ljMnh-eppNZYTmpclHJSqq64bWEVtRMSahbaZuyY60pSSe7lijbcgGEGkG55Z0gXSUbaASrecPZCbrZ-i5XzQCtBZ-j6fXuHB2M0_873r3rRfjSrJa8ZKPB5c4ghs8VpKwHlyz0vfEQVknTigpZ1mU1jrLtqI0hpQjd7zeU6BGN3qDRIxpNlJ5P9Ihmo7r4u-Gv5gcE-wYMiIz9</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Clarke, M A</creator><creator>Steege, L M</creator><creator>Moore, J L</creator><creator>Koopman, R J</creator><creator>Belden, J L</creator><creator>Kim, M S</creator><general>Schattauer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display</title><author>Clarke, M A ; Steege, L M ; Moore, J L ; Koopman, R J ; Belden, J L ; Kim, M S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-575789b497ed69387e9d7cb2f3da20f7fd08cd46e01a614c4f60f57beb6394b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Information Systems</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physicians, Primary Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steege, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopman, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belden, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, M S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Applied clinical informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, M A</au><au>Steege, L M</au><au>Moore, J L</au><au>Koopman, R J</au><au>Belden, J L</au><au>Kim, M S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display</atitle><jtitle>Applied clinical informatics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Clin Inform</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>169-190</pages><issn>1869-0327</issn><eissn>1869-0327</eissn><abstract>With the increase in the adoption of electronic health records (EHR) across the US, primary care physicians are experiencing information overload. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the information needs of primary care physicians (PCPs) as they review clinic visit notes to inform EHR display. Data collection was conducted with 15 primary care physicians during semi-structured interviews, including a third party observer to control bias. Physicians reviewed major sections of an artificial but typical acute and chronic care visit note to identify the note sections that were relevant to their information needs. Statistical methods used were McNemar-Mosteller's and Cochran Q. Physicians identified History of Present Illness (HPI), Assessment, and Plan (A&amp;P) as the most important sections of a visit note. In contrast, they largely judged the Review of Systems (ROS) to be superfluous. There was also a statistical difference in physicians' highlighting among all seven major note sections in acute (p = 0.00) and chronic (p = 0.00) care visit notes. A&amp;P and HPI sections were most frequently identified as important which suggests that physicians may have to identify a few key sections out of a long, unnecessarily verbose visit note. ROS is viewed by doctors as mostly "not needed," but can have relevant information. The ROS can contain information needed for patient care when other sections of the Visit note, such as the HPI, lack the relevant information. Future studies should include producing a display that provides only relevant information to increase physician efficiency at the point of care. Also, research on moving A&amp;P to the top of visit notes instead of having A&amp;P at the bottom of the page is needed, since those are usually the first sections physicians refer to and reviewing from top to bottom may cause cognitive load.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Schattauer</pub><pmid>24734131</pmid><doi>10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0064</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1869-0327
ispartof Applied clinical informatics, 2014-01, Vol.5 (1), p.169-190
issn 1869-0327
1869-0327
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3974234
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Acute Disease
Adult
Ambulatory Care
Ambulatory Care Information Systems
Chronic Disease
Demography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physicians, Primary Care
title Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T10%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20primary%20care%20physician%20information%20needs%20to%20inform%20ambulatory%20visit%20note%20display&rft.jtitle=Applied%20clinical%20informatics&rft.au=Clarke,%20M%20A&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=169-190&rft.issn=1869-0327&rft.eissn=1869-0327&rft_id=info:doi/10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1516729254%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1516729254&rft_id=info:pmid/24734131&rfr_iscdi=true