Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2014-04, Vol.348 (apr01 2), p.g2107-g2107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | g2107 |
---|---|
container_issue | apr01 2 |
container_start_page | g2107 |
container_title | BMJ (Online) |
container_volume | 348 |
creator | Sung, Valerie Hiscock, Harriet Tang, Mimi L K Mensah, Fiona K Nation, Monica L Satzke, Catherine Heine, Ralf G Stock, Amanda Barr, Ronald G Wake, Melissa |
description | Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.g2107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3972414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26513660</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26513660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjPOwh-gBHShYI95p8qFIIMvaHAzrkOSutWdJl3pSVKK_96MNY4P0FXCPR8n5-Yg9JCSc0q5eukO-_Mto0TfQSuqpVrTjvO7aEV62a87yrsTdFbKnhDCuO56Je-jEyZUTxSTK3R1mcHWMG1xmEY7VexTDB5_DXWH6w7wMScXUm2jjfU1OetDjHPBGeYKObzCQ5pdBOximIYX-BitB5eay1RzihEGnO00pEMo7VpzsPEBujfaWODs5jxFn9-9vbz4sN58ev_x4s1m7SSVdS2Y8qQTw8hBCD1q3_KzceC0A0GIld1gAbR3XDshrNda90wwAozpNgLFT9Hrxfc4uwMMHloiG80xh4PN30yywfypTGFntumL4b1mgopm8OzGIKerGUo1bQsPMdoJ0lwMlUIsn9rQJ3-h-zTnqa1naM-Jooxw-l-qk1yQvmO8Uc8XyudUSobxNjIl5rpx0xo3Pxpv7OPfd7wlf_bbgEcLsC815V-6ks1IkaY_XfRrz3-_8x27xryo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1853409823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Sung, Valerie ; Hiscock, Harriet ; Tang, Mimi L K ; Mensah, Fiona K ; Nation, Monica L ; Satzke, Catherine ; Heine, Ralf G ; Stock, Amanda ; Barr, Ronald G ; Wake, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Sung, Valerie ; Hiscock, Harriet ; Tang, Mimi L K ; Mensah, Fiona K ; Nation, Monica L ; Satzke, Catherine ; Heine, Ralf G ; Stock, Amanda ; Barr, Ronald G ; Wake, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g2107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24690625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Babies ; Breastfeeding & lactation ; Caregivers ; Children & youth ; Childrens health ; Colic - therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Evidence-based medicine ; Families & family life ; Female ; Food allergies ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Behavior ; Infantile colic ; Infants ; Intervention ; Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism ; Male ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Microbiota ; Milk ; Mothers ; Motivation ; Pediatrics ; Postpartum depression ; Probiotics ; Probiotics - adverse effects ; Probiotics - therapeutic use ; Proteins ; Quality of life ; Regression analysis ; Sleep ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2014-04, Vol.348 (apr01 2), p.g2107-g2107</ispartof><rights>Sung et al 2014</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) Sung et al 2014</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 © Sung et al 2014</rights><rights>Sung et al 2014 2014 Sung et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g2107.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g2107.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,776,780,799,881,3183,23550,27901,27902,57992,58225,77569,77600</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sung, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiscock, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mimi L K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensah, Fiona K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nation, Monica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satzke, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Ralf G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Ronald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Breastfeeding & lactation</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Colic - therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food allergies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Behavior</subject><subject>Infantile colic</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Probiotics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjPOwh-gBHShYI95p8qFIIMvaHAzrkOSutWdJl3pSVKK_96MNY4P0FXCPR8n5-Yg9JCSc0q5eukO-_Mto0TfQSuqpVrTjvO7aEV62a87yrsTdFbKnhDCuO56Je-jEyZUTxSTK3R1mcHWMG1xmEY7VexTDB5_DXWH6w7wMScXUm2jjfU1OetDjHPBGeYKObzCQ5pdBOximIYX-BitB5eay1RzihEGnO00pEMo7VpzsPEBujfaWODs5jxFn9-9vbz4sN58ev_x4s1m7SSVdS2Y8qQTw8hBCD1q3_KzceC0A0GIld1gAbR3XDshrNda90wwAozpNgLFT9Hrxfc4uwMMHloiG80xh4PN30yywfypTGFntumL4b1mgopm8OzGIKerGUo1bQsPMdoJ0lwMlUIsn9rQJ3-h-zTnqa1naM-Jooxw-l-qk1yQvmO8Uc8XyudUSobxNjIl5rpx0xo3Pxpv7OPfd7wlf_bbgEcLsC815V-6ks1IkaY_XfRrz3-_8x27xryo</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Sung, Valerie</creator><creator>Hiscock, Harriet</creator><creator>Tang, Mimi L K</creator><creator>Mensah, Fiona K</creator><creator>Nation, Monica L</creator><creator>Satzke, Catherine</creator><creator>Heine, Ralf G</creator><creator>Stock, Amanda</creator><creator>Barr, Ronald G</creator><creator>Wake, Melissa</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</title><author>Sung, Valerie ; Hiscock, Harriet ; Tang, Mimi L K ; Mensah, Fiona K ; Nation, Monica L ; Satzke, Catherine ; Heine, Ralf G ; Stock, Amanda ; Barr, Ronald G ; Wake, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Breastfeeding & lactation</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Colic - therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food allergies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Behavior</topic><topic>Infantile colic</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Probiotics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sung, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiscock, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mimi L K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensah, Fiona K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nation, Monica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satzke, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Ralf G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Ronald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sung, Valerie</au><au>Hiscock, Harriet</au><au>Tang, Mimi L K</au><au>Mensah, Fiona K</au><au>Nation, Monica L</au><au>Satzke, Catherine</au><au>Heine, Ralf G</au><au>Stock, Amanda</au><au>Barr, Ronald G</au><au>Wake, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>348</volume><issue>apr01 2</issue><spage>g2107</spage><epage>g2107</epage><pages>g2107-g2107</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>24690625</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.g2107</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ (Online), 2014-04, Vol.348 (apr01 2), p.g2107-g2107 |
issn | 0959-8138 1756-1833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3972414 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Babies Breastfeeding & lactation Caregivers Children & youth Childrens health Colic - therapy Double-Blind Method Double-blind studies E coli Escherichia coli Evidence-based medicine Families & family life Female Food allergies Health care Hospitals Humans Infant Infant Behavior Infantile colic Infants Intervention Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism Male Mental disorders Mental health Microbiota Milk Mothers Motivation Pediatrics Postpartum depression Probiotics Probiotics - adverse effects Probiotics - therapeutic use Proteins Quality of life Regression analysis Sleep Treatment Outcome |
title | Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treating%20infant%20colic%20with%20the%20probiotic%20Lactobacillus%20reuteri:%20double%20blind,%20placebo%20controlled%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Sung,%20Valerie&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=348&rft.issue=apr01%202&rft.spage=g2107&rft.epage=g2107&rft.pages=g2107-g2107&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.g2107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26513660%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1853409823&rft_id=info:pmid/24690625&rft_jstor_id=26513660&rfr_iscdi=true |