Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial

Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ (Online) 2014-04, Vol.348 (apr01 2), p.g2107-g2107
Hauptverfasser: Sung, Valerie, Hiscock, Harriet, Tang, Mimi L K, Mensah, Fiona K, Nation, Monica L, Satzke, Catherine, Heine, Ralf G, Stock, Amanda, Barr, Ronald G, Wake, Melissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page g2107
container_issue apr01 2
container_start_page g2107
container_title BMJ (Online)
container_volume 348
creator Sung, Valerie
Hiscock, Harriet
Tang, Mimi L K
Mensah, Fiona K
Nation, Monica L
Satzke, Catherine
Heine, Ralf G
Stock, Amanda
Barr, Ronald G
Wake, Melissa
description Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.g2107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3972414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26513660</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26513660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjPOwh-gBHShYI95p8qFIIMvaHAzrkOSutWdJl3pSVKK_96MNY4P0FXCPR8n5-Yg9JCSc0q5eukO-_Mto0TfQSuqpVrTjvO7aEV62a87yrsTdFbKnhDCuO56Je-jEyZUTxSTK3R1mcHWMG1xmEY7VexTDB5_DXWH6w7wMScXUm2jjfU1OetDjHPBGeYKObzCQ5pdBOximIYX-BitB5eay1RzihEGnO00pEMo7VpzsPEBujfaWODs5jxFn9-9vbz4sN58ev_x4s1m7SSVdS2Y8qQTw8hBCD1q3_KzceC0A0GIld1gAbR3XDshrNda90wwAozpNgLFT9Hrxfc4uwMMHloiG80xh4PN30yywfypTGFntumL4b1mgopm8OzGIKerGUo1bQsPMdoJ0lwMlUIsn9rQJ3-h-zTnqa1naM-Jooxw-l-qk1yQvmO8Uc8XyudUSobxNjIl5rpx0xo3Pxpv7OPfd7wlf_bbgEcLsC815V-6ks1IkaY_XfRrz3-_8x27xryo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1853409823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Sung, Valerie ; Hiscock, Harriet ; Tang, Mimi L K ; Mensah, Fiona K ; Nation, Monica L ; Satzke, Catherine ; Heine, Ralf G ; Stock, Amanda ; Barr, Ronald G ; Wake, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Sung, Valerie ; Hiscock, Harriet ; Tang, Mimi L K ; Mensah, Fiona K ; Nation, Monica L ; Satzke, Catherine ; Heine, Ralf G ; Stock, Amanda ; Barr, Ronald G ; Wake, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g2107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24690625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Babies ; Breastfeeding &amp; lactation ; Caregivers ; Children &amp; youth ; Childrens health ; Colic - therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Evidence-based medicine ; Families &amp; family life ; Female ; Food allergies ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Behavior ; Infantile colic ; Infants ; Intervention ; Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism ; Male ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Microbiota ; Milk ; Mothers ; Motivation ; Pediatrics ; Postpartum depression ; Probiotics ; Probiotics - adverse effects ; Probiotics - therapeutic use ; Proteins ; Quality of life ; Regression analysis ; Sleep ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2014-04, Vol.348 (apr01 2), p.g2107-g2107</ispartof><rights>Sung et al 2014</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) Sung et al 2014</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 © Sung et al 2014</rights><rights>Sung et al 2014 2014 Sung et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g2107.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g2107.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,776,780,799,881,3183,23550,27901,27902,57992,58225,77569,77600</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sung, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiscock, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mimi L K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensah, Fiona K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nation, Monica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satzke, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Ralf G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Ronald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Colic - therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food allergies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Behavior</subject><subject>Infantile colic</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Probiotics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjPOwh-gBHShYI95p8qFIIMvaHAzrkOSutWdJl3pSVKK_96MNY4P0FXCPR8n5-Yg9JCSc0q5eukO-_Mto0TfQSuqpVrTjvO7aEV62a87yrsTdFbKnhDCuO56Je-jEyZUTxSTK3R1mcHWMG1xmEY7VexTDB5_DXWH6w7wMScXUm2jjfU1OetDjHPBGeYKObzCQ5pdBOximIYX-BitB5eay1RzihEGnO00pEMo7VpzsPEBujfaWODs5jxFn9-9vbz4sN58ev_x4s1m7SSVdS2Y8qQTw8hBCD1q3_KzceC0A0GIld1gAbR3XDshrNda90wwAozpNgLFT9Hrxfc4uwMMHloiG80xh4PN30yywfypTGFntumL4b1mgopm8OzGIKerGUo1bQsPMdoJ0lwMlUIsn9rQJ3-h-zTnqa1naM-Jooxw-l-qk1yQvmO8Uc8XyudUSobxNjIl5rpx0xo3Pxpv7OPfd7wlf_bbgEcLsC815V-6ks1IkaY_XfRrz3-_8x27xryo</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Sung, Valerie</creator><creator>Hiscock, Harriet</creator><creator>Tang, Mimi L K</creator><creator>Mensah, Fiona K</creator><creator>Nation, Monica L</creator><creator>Satzke, Catherine</creator><creator>Heine, Ralf G</creator><creator>Stock, Amanda</creator><creator>Barr, Ronald G</creator><creator>Wake, Melissa</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</title><author>Sung, Valerie ; Hiscock, Harriet ; Tang, Mimi L K ; Mensah, Fiona K ; Nation, Monica L ; Satzke, Catherine ; Heine, Ralf G ; Stock, Amanda ; Barr, Ronald G ; Wake, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-426c084df3e447f7c0022fd318e400a58daee7cb37b44ac77792420e22737be63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Colic - therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food allergies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Behavior</topic><topic>Infantile colic</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Probiotics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sung, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiscock, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mimi L K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensah, Fiona K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nation, Monica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satzke, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Ralf G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Ronald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sung, Valerie</au><au>Hiscock, Harriet</au><au>Tang, Mimi L K</au><au>Mensah, Fiona K</au><au>Nation, Monica L</au><au>Satzke, Catherine</au><au>Heine, Ralf G</au><au>Stock, Amanda</au><au>Barr, Ronald G</au><au>Wake, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>348</volume><issue>apr01 2</issue><spage>g2107</spage><epage>g2107</epage><pages>g2107-g2107</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×108 colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. ConclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>24690625</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.g2107</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8138
ispartof BMJ (Online), 2014-04, Vol.348 (apr01 2), p.g2107-g2107
issn 0959-8138
1756-1833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3972414
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Babies
Breastfeeding & lactation
Caregivers
Children & youth
Childrens health
Colic - therapy
Double-Blind Method
Double-blind studies
E coli
Escherichia coli
Evidence-based medicine
Families & family life
Female
Food allergies
Health care
Hospitals
Humans
Infant
Infant Behavior
Infantile colic
Infants
Intervention
Lactobacillus reuteri - metabolism
Male
Mental disorders
Mental health
Microbiota
Milk
Mothers
Motivation
Pediatrics
Postpartum depression
Probiotics
Probiotics - adverse effects
Probiotics - therapeutic use
Proteins
Quality of life
Regression analysis
Sleep
Treatment Outcome
title Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treating%20infant%20colic%20with%20the%20probiotic%20Lactobacillus%20reuteri:%20double%20blind,%20placebo%20controlled%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Sung,%20Valerie&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=348&rft.issue=apr01%202&rft.spage=g2107&rft.epage=g2107&rft.pages=g2107-g2107&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.g2107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26513660%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1853409823&rft_id=info:pmid/24690625&rft_jstor_id=26513660&rfr_iscdi=true