Retained foreign bodies: a serious threat in the Indian operation room

Retained foreign bodies (RFBs) are a surgical complication resulting from foreign materials accidently left in a patient's body. This review attempts to give an overview of different types of RFBs, problems related to them and their management after the surgical operation. The internet was sear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of medical and health sciences research 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.30-37
Hauptverfasser: Sharma, G, Bigelow, Jc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Annals of medical and health sciences research
container_volume 4
creator Sharma, G
Bigelow, Jc
description Retained foreign bodies (RFBs) are a surgical complication resulting from foreign materials accidently left in a patient's body. This review attempts to give an overview of different types of RFBs, problems related to them and their management after the surgical operation. The internet was searched using the Google and Google scholar. In addition, relevant electronic journals from the University's library such as Entrez (including PubMed and PubMed central), Since Direct, Scirus, NIH.gov, Medknow.com, Medscape.com, Scopus, MedHelp.org, Cochrane library, WebMD.com, and World Health Organization Hinari. It shows that the major reasons of RFBs are emergency surgical operation with unplanned changes, patient high body mass index, and poor communication. To prevent this textile material should be radiopaque marked and must be counted once at the start and twice at the conclusion of all surgical procedures. If the count is incorrect, then radiography or manually re-exploration should be performed. Ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and radio frequency identification are also used in the proper identification of RFBs. Safety practice should be robust and simple enough to protect patient under the most chaotic of circumstances. Proper communication among the personnel participating in surgery aimed at preventing this medical negligence would help in mitigating such errors. Finally, the surgeon should not only follow the standard recommended procedure, but also report cases of RFBs.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/2141-9248.126605
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3952293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A358235609</galeid><sourcerecordid>A358235609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e0a2030ff2140384a7394fc943997c45b8908f00b85ef55b0271b403d77f346f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1LJDEQDYuyinrf0xLYi5cZK1-dzh4WRNYPEATRc0h3V8Ys3cls0iP47zfDqKxg5VBF1XuPqjxCvjFYSgbijDPJFobLdsl404D6Qg4517q2QO3V-m18QE5K-QM1GiWBs6_kgMumMYLrQ3J5j7MLEQfqU8awirRLQ8DykzpaMIe0KXR-yuhmGmKtkN7EIbhI0xqzm0OKNKc0HZN978aCJ6_5iDxe_n64uF7c3l3dXJzfLnphxLxAcBwEeF-XA9FKp4WRvjdSGKN7qbrWQOsBulahV6oDrllXkYPWXsjGiyPya6e73nQTDj3GObvRrnOYXH6xyQX7cRLDk12lZyuM4tyIKnD6KpDT3w2W2U6h9DiOLmK91bL6RQyaVusK_bGDrtyINkSfqmK_hdtzoVouVAOmopafoOobcAp9iuhD7X8gwI7Q51RKRv--PQO7NdZunbNb5-zO2Er5_v_V74Q3G8U_CTubLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540106877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retained foreign bodies: a serious threat in the Indian operation room</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sharma, G ; Bigelow, Jc</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, G ; Bigelow, Jc</creatorcontrib><description>Retained foreign bodies (RFBs) are a surgical complication resulting from foreign materials accidently left in a patient's body. This review attempts to give an overview of different types of RFBs, problems related to them and their management after the surgical operation. The internet was searched using the Google and Google scholar. In addition, relevant electronic journals from the University's library such as Entrez (including PubMed and PubMed central), Since Direct, Scirus, NIH.gov, Medknow.com, Medscape.com, Scopus, MedHelp.org, Cochrane library, WebMD.com, and World Health Organization Hinari. It shows that the major reasons of RFBs are emergency surgical operation with unplanned changes, patient high body mass index, and poor communication. To prevent this textile material should be radiopaque marked and must be counted once at the start and twice at the conclusion of all surgical procedures. If the count is incorrect, then radiography or manually re-exploration should be performed. Ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and radio frequency identification are also used in the proper identification of RFBs. Safety practice should be robust and simple enough to protect patient under the most chaotic of circumstances. Proper communication among the personnel participating in surgery aimed at preventing this medical negligence would help in mitigating such errors. Finally, the surgeon should not only follow the standard recommended procedure, but also report cases of RFBs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2141-9248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2277-9205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2141-9248.126605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24669327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Patients ; Prevention ; Review ; Surgical errors</subject><ispartof>Annals of medical and health sciences research, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.30-37</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e0a2030ff2140384a7394fc943997c45b8908f00b85ef55b0271b403d77f346f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e0a2030ff2140384a7394fc943997c45b8908f00b85ef55b0271b403d77f346f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3952293/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3952293/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24669327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, Jc</creatorcontrib><title>Retained foreign bodies: a serious threat in the Indian operation room</title><title>Annals of medical and health sciences research</title><addtitle>Ann Med Health Sci Res</addtitle><description>Retained foreign bodies (RFBs) are a surgical complication resulting from foreign materials accidently left in a patient's body. This review attempts to give an overview of different types of RFBs, problems related to them and their management after the surgical operation. The internet was searched using the Google and Google scholar. In addition, relevant electronic journals from the University's library such as Entrez (including PubMed and PubMed central), Since Direct, Scirus, NIH.gov, Medknow.com, Medscape.com, Scopus, MedHelp.org, Cochrane library, WebMD.com, and World Health Organization Hinari. It shows that the major reasons of RFBs are emergency surgical operation with unplanned changes, patient high body mass index, and poor communication. To prevent this textile material should be radiopaque marked and must be counted once at the start and twice at the conclusion of all surgical procedures. If the count is incorrect, then radiography or manually re-exploration should be performed. Ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and radio frequency identification are also used in the proper identification of RFBs. Safety practice should be robust and simple enough to protect patient under the most chaotic of circumstances. Proper communication among the personnel participating in surgery aimed at preventing this medical negligence would help in mitigating such errors. Finally, the surgeon should not only follow the standard recommended procedure, but also report cases of RFBs.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Surgical errors</subject><issn>2141-9248</issn><issn>2277-9205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUU1LJDEQDYuyinrf0xLYi5cZK1-dzh4WRNYPEATRc0h3V8Ys3cls0iP47zfDqKxg5VBF1XuPqjxCvjFYSgbijDPJFobLdsl404D6Qg4517q2QO3V-m18QE5K-QM1GiWBs6_kgMumMYLrQ3J5j7MLEQfqU8awirRLQ8DykzpaMIe0KXR-yuhmGmKtkN7EIbhI0xqzm0OKNKc0HZN978aCJ6_5iDxe_n64uF7c3l3dXJzfLnphxLxAcBwEeF-XA9FKp4WRvjdSGKN7qbrWQOsBulahV6oDrllXkYPWXsjGiyPya6e73nQTDj3GObvRrnOYXH6xyQX7cRLDk12lZyuM4tyIKnD6KpDT3w2W2U6h9DiOLmK91bL6RQyaVusK_bGDrtyINkSfqmK_hdtzoVouVAOmopafoOobcAp9iuhD7X8gwI7Q51RKRv--PQO7NdZunbNb5-zO2Er5_v_V74Q3G8U_CTubLA</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Sharma, G</creator><creator>Bigelow, Jc</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Retained foreign bodies: a serious threat in the Indian operation room</title><author>Sharma, G ; Bigelow, Jc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e0a2030ff2140384a7394fc943997c45b8908f00b85ef55b0271b403d77f346f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Surgical errors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, Jc</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of medical and health sciences research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, G</au><au>Bigelow, Jc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retained foreign bodies: a serious threat in the Indian operation room</atitle><jtitle>Annals of medical and health sciences research</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Med Health Sci Res</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>30-37</pages><issn>2141-9248</issn><eissn>2277-9205</eissn><abstract>Retained foreign bodies (RFBs) are a surgical complication resulting from foreign materials accidently left in a patient's body. This review attempts to give an overview of different types of RFBs, problems related to them and their management after the surgical operation. The internet was searched using the Google and Google scholar. In addition, relevant electronic journals from the University's library such as Entrez (including PubMed and PubMed central), Since Direct, Scirus, NIH.gov, Medknow.com, Medscape.com, Scopus, MedHelp.org, Cochrane library, WebMD.com, and World Health Organization Hinari. It shows that the major reasons of RFBs are emergency surgical operation with unplanned changes, patient high body mass index, and poor communication. To prevent this textile material should be radiopaque marked and must be counted once at the start and twice at the conclusion of all surgical procedures. If the count is incorrect, then radiography or manually re-exploration should be performed. Ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and radio frequency identification are also used in the proper identification of RFBs. Safety practice should be robust and simple enough to protect patient under the most chaotic of circumstances. Proper communication among the personnel participating in surgery aimed at preventing this medical negligence would help in mitigating such errors. Finally, the surgeon should not only follow the standard recommended procedure, but also report cases of RFBs.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>24669327</pmid><doi>10.4103/2141-9248.126605</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2141-9248
ispartof Annals of medical and health sciences research, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.30-37
issn 2141-9248
2277-9205
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3952293
source PubMed Central Open Access; African Journals Online (Open Access); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
Patients
Prevention
Review
Surgical errors
title Retained foreign bodies: a serious threat in the Indian operation room
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A09%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retained%20foreign%20bodies:%20a%20serious%20threat%20in%20the%20Indian%20operation%20room&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20medical%20and%20health%20sciences%20research&rft.au=Sharma,%20G&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=30-37&rft.issn=2141-9248&rft.eissn=2277-9205&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2141-9248.126605&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA358235609%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540106877&rft_id=info:pmid/24669327&rft_galeid=A358235609&rfr_iscdi=true