A comparison of bolus injection of landiolol versus oral administration of propranolol before cardiac computed tomography

Heart rate (HR) reduction is essential to achieve good image quality for cardiac computed tomography (CCT). We evaluated the efficacy of a bolus injection of landiolol, an ultra-short acting β-blocker, without the administration of oral β-blocker to reduce HR prior to CCT. We enrolled 678 consecutiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SpringerPlus 2014-02, Vol.3 (1), p.93-93, Article 93
Hauptverfasser: Nakamura, Yoshitaka, Yamaji, Kyohei, Saho, Tatsunori, Matsuzaki, Zyousin, Yuda, Itsuo, Soga, Yoshimitsu, Shirai, Shinichi, Ando, Kenji, Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 93
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title SpringerPlus
container_volume 3
creator Nakamura, Yoshitaka
Yamaji, Kyohei
Saho, Tatsunori
Matsuzaki, Zyousin
Yuda, Itsuo
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Shirai, Shinichi
Ando, Kenji
Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo
description Heart rate (HR) reduction is essential to achieve good image quality for cardiac computed tomography (CCT). We evaluated the efficacy of a bolus injection of landiolol, an ultra-short acting β-blocker, without the administration of oral β-blocker to reduce HR prior to CCT. We enrolled 678 consecutive patients who underwent CCT from December 2011 to March 2012 and divided them into three groups, which were a propranolol group (n = 277), a low-dose landiolol group (n = 188), and a high-dose landiolol group (n = 213). Patients in the propranolol group received oral propranolol (10–20 mg) prior to CCT. Patients in the low-dose and high-dose landiolol groups were administered a bolus injection of landiolol (0.125 mg/kg), while the high-dose group received an additional 3.75 mg of landiolol if the baseline HR was ≥75/min. Although the average HR was significantly lower in the propranolol group (61.6 ± 8.0/min) than in the low-dose landiolol group (64.1 ± 7.4/min, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/2193-1801-3-93
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3951651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1508432487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-9e8536227447e1e4fbc7da39605441a63ebc99a0b2f8e64df8846473052683c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1r3DAQxU1paUKaa47F0EsvTiRLlqVLYQltUgj0kpyFLI83WmyNK9mB_e-jjZNl0w-ILhIzP948PSbLzig5p1SKi5IqVlBJaMEKxd5lx_vC-4P3UXYa44akI2rKa_IxOyq5YFyS-jjbrnKLw2iCi-hz7PIG-znmzm_ATm4p9ca3Dnvs8wcIMXUxmD437eC8i1MwL9wYcAzGP5ENdBggtya0ztinGfMEbT7hgOtgxvvtp-xDZ_oIp8_3SXb34_vt5XVx8-vq5-XqpmgEraZCgayYKMua8xoo8K6xdWuYEqTinBrBoLFKGdKUnQTB205KLnjNSFUKyaxiJ9m3RXecmwFaCz5Z7vUY3GDCVqNx-nXHu3u9xgfNVEVFRZPAahFoHP5H4HUnfVbv0te79DXTiiWNr88mAv6eIU56cNFCn6IFnGMik1mmiHgDWhHJWcllndAvf6AbnINPae4EBWW0ZCRR5wtlA8YYoNtbp0Tv9uhvs58PE9vjL1uTgIsFiKnl1xAO5v5b8hF24tPX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866131230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of bolus injection of landiolol versus oral administration of propranolol before cardiac computed tomography</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Nakamura, Yoshitaka ; Yamaji, Kyohei ; Saho, Tatsunori ; Matsuzaki, Zyousin ; Yuda, Itsuo ; Soga, Yoshimitsu ; Shirai, Shinichi ; Ando, Kenji ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Yoshitaka ; Yamaji, Kyohei ; Saho, Tatsunori ; Matsuzaki, Zyousin ; Yuda, Itsuo ; Soga, Yoshimitsu ; Shirai, Shinichi ; Ando, Kenji ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo</creatorcontrib><description>Heart rate (HR) reduction is essential to achieve good image quality for cardiac computed tomography (CCT). We evaluated the efficacy of a bolus injection of landiolol, an ultra-short acting β-blocker, without the administration of oral β-blocker to reduce HR prior to CCT. We enrolled 678 consecutive patients who underwent CCT from December 2011 to March 2012 and divided them into three groups, which were a propranolol group (n = 277), a low-dose landiolol group (n = 188), and a high-dose landiolol group (n = 213). Patients in the propranolol group received oral propranolol (10–20 mg) prior to CCT. Patients in the low-dose and high-dose landiolol groups were administered a bolus injection of landiolol (0.125 mg/kg), while the high-dose group received an additional 3.75 mg of landiolol if the baseline HR was ≥75/min. Although the average HR was significantly lower in the propranolol group (61.6 ± 8.0/min) than in the low-dose landiolol group (64.1 ± 7.4/min, P &lt; 0.001), there was no significant difference in the image quality (P = 0.91). Among patients with baseline HR ≥75/min, the average HR tended to be lower in the high-dose landiolol group (67.2 ± 6.9/min) compared with the low-dose landiolol group (69.0 ± 6.9/min, P = 0.10), and there was a corresponding difference in image quality between these two groups (P = 0.02). In conclusion, Although the decrease of HR was significantly larger in the propranolol group than in the landiolol groups, the image quality was similar. Among the patients who received landiolol, a higher dose was associated with a lower HR and better image quality. Further investigation to assess higher-dose bolus injection of landiolol or bolus injection following oral administration of a β-blocker would be needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-93</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24634807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences ; Medicine ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>SpringerPlus, 2014-02, Vol.3 (1), p.93-93, Article 93</ispartof><rights>Nakamura et al.; licensee Springer. 2014. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.</rights><rights>SpringerPlus is a copyright of Springer, 2014.</rights><rights>Nakamura et al.; licensee Springer. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-9e8536227447e1e4fbc7da39605441a63ebc99a0b2f8e64df8846473052683c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-9e8536227447e1e4fbc7da39605441a63ebc99a0b2f8e64df8846473052683c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951651/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951651/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24634807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaji, Kyohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saho, Tatsunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuzaki, Zyousin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuda, Itsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Yoshimitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirai, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of bolus injection of landiolol versus oral administration of propranolol before cardiac computed tomography</title><title>SpringerPlus</title><addtitle>SpringerPlus</addtitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><description>Heart rate (HR) reduction is essential to achieve good image quality for cardiac computed tomography (CCT). We evaluated the efficacy of a bolus injection of landiolol, an ultra-short acting β-blocker, without the administration of oral β-blocker to reduce HR prior to CCT. We enrolled 678 consecutive patients who underwent CCT from December 2011 to March 2012 and divided them into three groups, which were a propranolol group (n = 277), a low-dose landiolol group (n = 188), and a high-dose landiolol group (n = 213). Patients in the propranolol group received oral propranolol (10–20 mg) prior to CCT. Patients in the low-dose and high-dose landiolol groups were administered a bolus injection of landiolol (0.125 mg/kg), while the high-dose group received an additional 3.75 mg of landiolol if the baseline HR was ≥75/min. Although the average HR was significantly lower in the propranolol group (61.6 ± 8.0/min) than in the low-dose landiolol group (64.1 ± 7.4/min, P &lt; 0.001), there was no significant difference in the image quality (P = 0.91). Among patients with baseline HR ≥75/min, the average HR tended to be lower in the high-dose landiolol group (67.2 ± 6.9/min) compared with the low-dose landiolol group (69.0 ± 6.9/min, P = 0.10), and there was a corresponding difference in image quality between these two groups (P = 0.02). In conclusion, Although the decrease of HR was significantly larger in the propranolol group than in the landiolol groups, the image quality was similar. Among the patients who received landiolol, a higher dose was associated with a lower HR and better image quality. Further investigation to assess higher-dose bolus injection of landiolol or bolus injection following oral administration of a β-blocker would be needed.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2193-1801</issn><issn>2193-1801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1r3DAQxU1paUKaa47F0EsvTiRLlqVLYQltUgj0kpyFLI83WmyNK9mB_e-jjZNl0w-ILhIzP948PSbLzig5p1SKi5IqVlBJaMEKxd5lx_vC-4P3UXYa44akI2rKa_IxOyq5YFyS-jjbrnKLw2iCi-hz7PIG-znmzm_ATm4p9ca3Dnvs8wcIMXUxmD437eC8i1MwL9wYcAzGP5ENdBggtya0ztinGfMEbT7hgOtgxvvtp-xDZ_oIp8_3SXb34_vt5XVx8-vq5-XqpmgEraZCgayYKMua8xoo8K6xdWuYEqTinBrBoLFKGdKUnQTB205KLnjNSFUKyaxiJ9m3RXecmwFaCz5Z7vUY3GDCVqNx-nXHu3u9xgfNVEVFRZPAahFoHP5H4HUnfVbv0te79DXTiiWNr88mAv6eIU56cNFCn6IFnGMik1mmiHgDWhHJWcllndAvf6AbnINPae4EBWW0ZCRR5wtlA8YYoNtbp0Tv9uhvs58PE9vjL1uTgIsFiKnl1xAO5v5b8hF24tPX</recordid><startdate>20140217</startdate><enddate>20140217</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Yoshitaka</creator><creator>Yamaji, Kyohei</creator><creator>Saho, Tatsunori</creator><creator>Matsuzaki, Zyousin</creator><creator>Yuda, Itsuo</creator><creator>Soga, Yoshimitsu</creator><creator>Shirai, Shinichi</creator><creator>Ando, Kenji</creator><creator>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140217</creationdate><title>A comparison of bolus injection of landiolol versus oral administration of propranolol before cardiac computed tomography</title><author>Nakamura, Yoshitaka ; Yamaji, Kyohei ; Saho, Tatsunori ; Matsuzaki, Zyousin ; Yuda, Itsuo ; Soga, Yoshimitsu ; Shirai, Shinichi ; Ando, Kenji ; Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-9e8536227447e1e4fbc7da39605441a63ebc99a0b2f8e64df8846473052683c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaji, Kyohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saho, Tatsunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuzaki, Zyousin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuda, Itsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Yoshimitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirai, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Yoshitaka</au><au>Yamaji, Kyohei</au><au>Saho, Tatsunori</au><au>Matsuzaki, Zyousin</au><au>Yuda, Itsuo</au><au>Soga, Yoshimitsu</au><au>Shirai, Shinichi</au><au>Ando, Kenji</au><au>Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of bolus injection of landiolol versus oral administration of propranolol before cardiac computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle><stitle>SpringerPlus</stitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><date>2014-02-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>93-93</pages><artnum>93</artnum><issn>2193-1801</issn><eissn>2193-1801</eissn><abstract>Heart rate (HR) reduction is essential to achieve good image quality for cardiac computed tomography (CCT). We evaluated the efficacy of a bolus injection of landiolol, an ultra-short acting β-blocker, without the administration of oral β-blocker to reduce HR prior to CCT. We enrolled 678 consecutive patients who underwent CCT from December 2011 to March 2012 and divided them into three groups, which were a propranolol group (n = 277), a low-dose landiolol group (n = 188), and a high-dose landiolol group (n = 213). Patients in the propranolol group received oral propranolol (10–20 mg) prior to CCT. Patients in the low-dose and high-dose landiolol groups were administered a bolus injection of landiolol (0.125 mg/kg), while the high-dose group received an additional 3.75 mg of landiolol if the baseline HR was ≥75/min. Although the average HR was significantly lower in the propranolol group (61.6 ± 8.0/min) than in the low-dose landiolol group (64.1 ± 7.4/min, P &lt; 0.001), there was no significant difference in the image quality (P = 0.91). Among patients with baseline HR ≥75/min, the average HR tended to be lower in the high-dose landiolol group (67.2 ± 6.9/min) compared with the low-dose landiolol group (69.0 ± 6.9/min, P = 0.10), and there was a corresponding difference in image quality between these two groups (P = 0.02). In conclusion, Although the decrease of HR was significantly larger in the propranolol group than in the landiolol groups, the image quality was similar. Among the patients who received landiolol, a higher dose was associated with a lower HR and better image quality. Further investigation to assess higher-dose bolus injection of landiolol or bolus injection following oral administration of a β-blocker would be needed.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>24634807</pmid><doi>10.1186/2193-1801-3-93</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2193-1801
ispartof SpringerPlus, 2014-02, Vol.3 (1), p.93-93, Article 93
issn 2193-1801
2193-1801
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3951651
source PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Humanities and Social Sciences
Medicine
multidisciplinary
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title A comparison of bolus injection of landiolol versus oral administration of propranolol before cardiac computed tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A13%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20bolus%20injection%20of%20landiolol%20versus%20oral%20administration%20of%20propranolol%20before%20cardiac%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=SpringerPlus&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Yoshitaka&rft.date=2014-02-17&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=93-93&rft.artnum=93&rft.issn=2193-1801&rft.eissn=2193-1801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2193-1801-3-93&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1508432487%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866131230&rft_id=info:pmid/24634807&rfr_iscdi=true