Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients

Introduction The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.354-361
Hauptverfasser: KOLEK, MATTHEW J., DRESEN, WILLIAM F., WELLS, QUINN S., ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 361
container_issue 3
container_start_page 354
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 36
creator KOLEK, MATTHEW J.
DRESEN, WILLIAM F.
WELLS, QUINN S.
ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.
description Introduction The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope. Methods Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope. Results A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04). Conclusions In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pace.12063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3949624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1315134603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFvFCEUx4nR2LV68QMYjsZkKgwwAxeTzbpuN2lq3bTxSBjmTRc7O4zAbu3VTy51241ejFwI8Hu_x8sfodeUnNC83o_GwgktScWeoAkVnBSSCvUUTQjldSGZVEfoRYzfCCEV4eI5OipZKUol5QT9vIqAfYfNgKdDco2xCYIzPZ4PO-j9CNhFPI3RW2cStPjWpTVeQbu1-TAzoXXG4uVm7M2QTNMDnvdgU_CDs_gj7JwFvBy6fOX8ELEb8Km7XhcrF2_whUkOhhRfomed6SO8etiP0dWn-eXstDj7vFjOpmeF5YqygsoauOGqqqExorOMqxIkVK2sVW2brgXRCF4T2igCrKGm46UhSpK2pVbyjh2jD3vvuG020NrcO5hej8FtTLjT3jj998vg1vra7zRTuWvJs-DtgyD471uISW9ctNDn2cFvo6asZJIoKuR_oFRQxivCMvpuj9rgYwzQHX5Eib7PV9_nq3_nm-E3f85wQB8DzQDdA7euh7t_qPTFdDZ_lBb7GhcT_DjUmHCjq5rVQn89X-jFQq7qL-dEX7JfLxPBUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1315134603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>KOLEK, MATTHEW J. ; DRESEN, WILLIAM F. ; WELLS, QUINN S. ; ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creator><creatorcontrib>KOLEK, MATTHEW J. ; DRESEN, WILLIAM F. ; WELLS, QUINN S. ; ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope. Methods Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope. Results A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04). Conclusions In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.12063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23252988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Chronic infection ; CRT ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; new technology ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; pacing ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.354-361</ispartof><rights>2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpace.12063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpace.12063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23252988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLS, QUINN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology</addtitle><description>Introduction The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope. Methods Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope. Results A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04). Conclusions In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Chronic infection</subject><subject>CRT</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>new technology</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>pacing</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFvFCEUx4nR2LV68QMYjsZkKgwwAxeTzbpuN2lq3bTxSBjmTRc7O4zAbu3VTy51241ejFwI8Hu_x8sfodeUnNC83o_GwgktScWeoAkVnBSSCvUUTQjldSGZVEfoRYzfCCEV4eI5OipZKUol5QT9vIqAfYfNgKdDco2xCYIzPZ4PO-j9CNhFPI3RW2cStPjWpTVeQbu1-TAzoXXG4uVm7M2QTNMDnvdgU_CDs_gj7JwFvBy6fOX8ELEb8Km7XhcrF2_whUkOhhRfomed6SO8etiP0dWn-eXstDj7vFjOpmeF5YqygsoauOGqqqExorOMqxIkVK2sVW2brgXRCF4T2igCrKGm46UhSpK2pVbyjh2jD3vvuG020NrcO5hej8FtTLjT3jj998vg1vra7zRTuWvJs-DtgyD471uISW9ctNDn2cFvo6asZJIoKuR_oFRQxivCMvpuj9rgYwzQHX5Eib7PV9_nq3_nm-E3f85wQB8DzQDdA7euh7t_qPTFdDZ_lBb7GhcT_DjUmHCjq5rVQn89X-jFQq7qL-dEX7JfLxPBUw</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</creator><creator>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</creator><creator>WELLS, QUINN S.</creator><creator>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</title><author>KOLEK, MATTHEW J. ; DRESEN, WILLIAM F. ; WELLS, QUINN S. ; ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Chronic infection</topic><topic>CRT</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>new technology</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>pacing</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLS, QUINN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</au><au>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</au><au>WELLS, QUINN S.</au><au>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>354-361</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Introduction The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope. Methods Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope. Results A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04). Conclusions In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23252988</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.12063</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.354-361
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3949624
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Chronic infection
CRT
Female
Humans
Male
Multivariate Analysis
new technology
Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects
pacing
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control
Risk Factors
title Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20an%20Antibacterial%20Envelope%20is%20Associated%20with%20Reduced%20Cardiac%20Implantable%20Electronic%20Device%20Infections%20in%20High-Risk%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=KOLEK,%20MATTHEW%20J.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=354-361&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.12063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1315134603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1315134603&rft_id=info:pmid/23252988&rfr_iscdi=true