Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients
Introduction The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.354-361 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 361 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 354 |
container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | KOLEK, MATTHEW J. DRESEN, WILLIAM F. WELLS, QUINN S. ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R. |
description | Introduction
The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope.
Methods
Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope.
Results
A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04).
Conclusions
In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pace.12063 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3949624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1315134603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFvFCEUx4nR2LV68QMYjsZkKgwwAxeTzbpuN2lq3bTxSBjmTRc7O4zAbu3VTy51241ejFwI8Hu_x8sfodeUnNC83o_GwgktScWeoAkVnBSSCvUUTQjldSGZVEfoRYzfCCEV4eI5OipZKUol5QT9vIqAfYfNgKdDco2xCYIzPZ4PO-j9CNhFPI3RW2cStPjWpTVeQbu1-TAzoXXG4uVm7M2QTNMDnvdgU_CDs_gj7JwFvBy6fOX8ELEb8Km7XhcrF2_whUkOhhRfomed6SO8etiP0dWn-eXstDj7vFjOpmeF5YqygsoauOGqqqExorOMqxIkVK2sVW2brgXRCF4T2igCrKGm46UhSpK2pVbyjh2jD3vvuG020NrcO5hej8FtTLjT3jj998vg1vra7zRTuWvJs-DtgyD471uISW9ctNDn2cFvo6asZJIoKuR_oFRQxivCMvpuj9rgYwzQHX5Eib7PV9_nq3_nm-E3f85wQB8DzQDdA7euh7t_qPTFdDZ_lBb7GhcT_DjUmHCjq5rVQn89X-jFQq7qL-dEX7JfLxPBUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1315134603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>KOLEK, MATTHEW J. ; DRESEN, WILLIAM F. ; WELLS, QUINN S. ; ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creator><creatorcontrib>KOLEK, MATTHEW J. ; DRESEN, WILLIAM F. ; WELLS, QUINN S. ; ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope.
Methods
Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope.
Results
A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04).
Conclusions
In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.12063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23252988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Chronic infection ; CRT ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; new technology ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; pacing ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.354-361</ispartof><rights>2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpace.12063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpace.12063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23252988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLS, QUINN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology</addtitle><description>Introduction
The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope.
Methods
Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope.
Results
A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04).
Conclusions
In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Chronic infection</subject><subject>CRT</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>new technology</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>pacing</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFvFCEUx4nR2LV68QMYjsZkKgwwAxeTzbpuN2lq3bTxSBjmTRc7O4zAbu3VTy51241ejFwI8Hu_x8sfodeUnNC83o_GwgktScWeoAkVnBSSCvUUTQjldSGZVEfoRYzfCCEV4eI5OipZKUol5QT9vIqAfYfNgKdDco2xCYIzPZ4PO-j9CNhFPI3RW2cStPjWpTVeQbu1-TAzoXXG4uVm7M2QTNMDnvdgU_CDs_gj7JwFvBy6fOX8ELEb8Km7XhcrF2_whUkOhhRfomed6SO8etiP0dWn-eXstDj7vFjOpmeF5YqygsoauOGqqqExorOMqxIkVK2sVW2brgXRCF4T2igCrKGm46UhSpK2pVbyjh2jD3vvuG020NrcO5hej8FtTLjT3jj998vg1vra7zRTuWvJs-DtgyD471uISW9ctNDn2cFvo6asZJIoKuR_oFRQxivCMvpuj9rgYwzQHX5Eib7PV9_nq3_nm-E3f85wQB8DzQDdA7euh7t_qPTFdDZ_lBb7GhcT_DjUmHCjq5rVQn89X-jFQq7qL-dEX7JfLxPBUw</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</creator><creator>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</creator><creator>WELLS, QUINN S.</creator><creator>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</title><author>KOLEK, MATTHEW J. ; DRESEN, WILLIAM F. ; WELLS, QUINN S. ; ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4913-187e4a4967eba5fc3492e8e6d8797cbfde5b54701b90e3b1af42a0980dd1c84f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Chronic infection</topic><topic>CRT</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>new technology</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>pacing</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLS, QUINN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOLEK, MATTHEW J.</au><au>DRESEN, WILLIAM F.</au><au>WELLS, QUINN S.</au><au>ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>354-361</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope.
Methods
Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope.
Results
A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow‐up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.13 [0.02–0.95], P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 [0.01–0.73], P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 [0.01–0.85], P = 0.04).
Conclusions
In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23252988</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.12063</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.354-361 |
issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3949624 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Chronic infection CRT Female Humans Male Multivariate Analysis new technology Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects pacing Prospective Studies Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control Risk Factors |
title | Use of an Antibacterial Envelope is Associated with Reduced Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in High-Risk Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20an%20Antibacterial%20Envelope%20is%20Associated%20with%20Reduced%20Cardiac%20Implantable%20Electronic%20Device%20Infections%20in%20High-Risk%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=KOLEK,%20MATTHEW%20J.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=354-361&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.12063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1315134603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1315134603&rft_id=info:pmid/23252988&rfr_iscdi=true |