Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current cardiology reviews 2013-11, Vol.9 (4), p.268-273 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 273 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 268 |
container_title | Current cardiology reviews |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Bleiziffer, S Krane, M Deutsch, M A Elhmidi, Y Piazza, N Voss, B Lange, R |
description | TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while
avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable
stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the
worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde
or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature
demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data
providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision
making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of
this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and
to outline the respective special characteristics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3941089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1501374312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-128f290b269ec0c2a78777948441793b12b5db83929a79668e1de481b984a9633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYoaBv4DCjk3Br8TxBjQa8ZIGEFJ57K4c97YxOLHHdlp1zR_HpUMFC1a-sr9zfOxTVU8oecaoFM9pI7kg_BtRbdtSThlhlHHO2jvVOe1ks2ibRt4tc-EWB_CsepDSd0Ia1ip6vzpjglPeCnleffo6WDPUO72v7fSyXg5Yf0CDKdm8r_26fj-7bIPD-jKE6LUZMNXZ18uop2R0HjBjrL9ot8WDNuqwf1jdW2uX8NHtelF9fv1qefV2cf3xzbury-tF3wiZF5R1a6ZIXxKhIYZp2UkpleiEoFLxnrK-WfUdV0xpWd7ZIV2h6GivOqFVy_lF9eLoG-Z-xJXBKUftIEQ76rgHry38ezLZATZ-C1wJSjpVDJ7eGkR_M2PKMNpk0Dk9oZ8T0IZQLstPsYKqI2qiTyni-nQNJXCoBP5bSdE-_jvnSfmngwL8PAJ9CTroMRmLk8ETOOQcYLfbAc4Rf-iEDk0G40fwAac5ujJPuWghDAE2OEUEHbM1DsGmNP3OBodwsPVuHhHUYX9GEJCC3iCwtuO_AOr3udw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501374312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bleiziffer, S ; Krane, M ; Deutsch, M A ; Elhmidi, Y ; Piazza, N ; Voss, B ; Lange, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bleiziffer, S ; Krane, M ; Deutsch, M A ; Elhmidi, Y ; Piazza, N ; Voss, B ; Lange, R</creatorcontrib><description>TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while
avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable
stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the
worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde
or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature
demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data
providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision
making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of
this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and
to outline the respective special characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-403X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-6557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24313647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd</publisher><subject>Aorta ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Cardiac Catheterization - methods ; Femoral Artery ; Femoral Vein ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Humans ; Jugular Veins ; Radiography ; Subclavian Artery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Current cardiology reviews, 2013-11, Vol.9 (4), p.268-273</ispartof><rights>2013 Bentham Science Publishers 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-128f290b269ec0c2a78777948441793b12b5db83929a79668e1de481b984a9633</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24313647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bleiziffer, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krane, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhmidi, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, R</creatorcontrib><title>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</title><title>Current cardiology reviews</title><addtitle>CCR</addtitle><description>TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while
avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable
stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the
worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde
or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature
demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data
providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision
making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of
this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and
to outline the respective special characteristics.</description><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Femoral Artery</subject><subject>Femoral Vein</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jugular Veins</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Subclavian Artery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1573-403X</issn><issn>1875-6557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYoaBv4DCjk3Br8TxBjQa8ZIGEFJ57K4c97YxOLHHdlp1zR_HpUMFC1a-sr9zfOxTVU8oecaoFM9pI7kg_BtRbdtSThlhlHHO2jvVOe1ks2ibRt4tc-EWB_CsepDSd0Ia1ip6vzpjglPeCnleffo6WDPUO72v7fSyXg5Yf0CDKdm8r_26fj-7bIPD-jKE6LUZMNXZ18uop2R0HjBjrL9ot8WDNuqwf1jdW2uX8NHtelF9fv1qefV2cf3xzbury-tF3wiZF5R1a6ZIXxKhIYZp2UkpleiEoFLxnrK-WfUdV0xpWd7ZIV2h6GivOqFVy_lF9eLoG-Z-xJXBKUftIEQ76rgHry38ezLZATZ-C1wJSjpVDJ7eGkR_M2PKMNpk0Dk9oZ8T0IZQLstPsYKqI2qiTyni-nQNJXCoBP5bSdE-_jvnSfmngwL8PAJ9CTroMRmLk8ETOOQcYLfbAc4Rf-iEDk0G40fwAac5ujJPuWghDAE2OEUEHbM1DsGmNP3OBodwsPVuHhHUYX9GEJCC3iCwtuO_AOr3udw</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Bleiziffer, S</creator><creator>Krane, M</creator><creator>Deutsch, M A</creator><creator>Elhmidi, Y</creator><creator>Piazza, N</creator><creator>Voss, B</creator><creator>Lange, R</creator><general>Bentham Science Publishers Ltd</general><general>Bentham Science Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</title><author>Bleiziffer, S ; Krane, M ; Deutsch, M A ; Elhmidi, Y ; Piazza, N ; Voss, B ; Lange, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-128f290b269ec0c2a78777948441793b12b5db83929a79668e1de481b984a9633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Femoral Artery</topic><topic>Femoral Vein</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jugular Veins</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Subclavian Artery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bleiziffer, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krane, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhmidi, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current cardiology reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bleiziffer, S</au><au>Krane, M</au><au>Deutsch, M A</au><au>Elhmidi, Y</au><au>Piazza, N</au><au>Voss, B</au><au>Lange, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Current cardiology reviews</jtitle><addtitle>CCR</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>268-273</pages><issn>1573-403X</issn><eissn>1875-6557</eissn><abstract>TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while
avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable
stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the
worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde
or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature
demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data
providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision
making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of
this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and
to outline the respective special characteristics.</abstract><cop>United Arab Emirates</cop><pub>Bentham Science Publishers Ltd</pub><pmid>24313647</pmid><doi>10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1573-403X |
ispartof | Current cardiology reviews, 2013-11, Vol.9 (4), p.268-273 |
issn | 1573-403X 1875-6557 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3941089 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Aorta Aortic Valve - surgery Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery Cardiac Catheterization - methods Femoral Artery Femoral Vein Heart Valve Prosthesis Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods Humans Jugular Veins Radiography Subclavian Artery Treatment Outcome |
title | Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20way%20in?%20The%20Necessity%20of%20Multiple%20Approaches%20to%20Transcatheter%20Valve%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Current%20cardiology%20reviews&rft.au=Bleiziffer,%20S&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=268-273&rft.issn=1573-403X&rft.eissn=1875-6557&rft_id=info:doi/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1501374312%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501374312&rft_id=info:pmid/24313647&rfr_iscdi=true |