Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy

TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current cardiology reviews 2013-11, Vol.9 (4), p.268-273
Hauptverfasser: Bleiziffer, S, Krane, M, Deutsch, M A, Elhmidi, Y, Piazza, N, Voss, B, Lange, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 273
container_issue 4
container_start_page 268
container_title Current cardiology reviews
container_volume 9
creator Bleiziffer, S
Krane, M
Deutsch, M A
Elhmidi, Y
Piazza, N
Voss, B
Lange, R
description TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics.
doi_str_mv 10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3941089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1501374312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-128f290b269ec0c2a78777948441793b12b5db83929a79668e1de481b984a9633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYoaBv4DCjk3Br8TxBjQa8ZIGEFJ57K4c97YxOLHHdlp1zR_HpUMFC1a-sr9zfOxTVU8oecaoFM9pI7kg_BtRbdtSThlhlHHO2jvVOe1ks2ibRt4tc-EWB_CsepDSd0Ia1ip6vzpjglPeCnleffo6WDPUO72v7fSyXg5Yf0CDKdm8r_26fj-7bIPD-jKE6LUZMNXZ18uop2R0HjBjrL9ot8WDNuqwf1jdW2uX8NHtelF9fv1qefV2cf3xzbury-tF3wiZF5R1a6ZIXxKhIYZp2UkpleiEoFLxnrK-WfUdV0xpWd7ZIV2h6GivOqFVy_lF9eLoG-Z-xJXBKUftIEQ76rgHry38ezLZATZ-C1wJSjpVDJ7eGkR_M2PKMNpk0Dk9oZ8T0IZQLstPsYKqI2qiTyni-nQNJXCoBP5bSdE-_jvnSfmngwL8PAJ9CTroMRmLk8ETOOQcYLfbAc4Rf-iEDk0G40fwAac5ujJPuWghDAE2OEUEHbM1DsGmNP3OBodwsPVuHhHUYX9GEJCC3iCwtuO_AOr3udw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501374312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bleiziffer, S ; Krane, M ; Deutsch, M A ; Elhmidi, Y ; Piazza, N ; Voss, B ; Lange, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bleiziffer, S ; Krane, M ; Deutsch, M A ; Elhmidi, Y ; Piazza, N ; Voss, B ; Lange, R</creatorcontrib><description>TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-403X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-6557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24313647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd</publisher><subject>Aorta ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Cardiac Catheterization - methods ; Femoral Artery ; Femoral Vein ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Humans ; Jugular Veins ; Radiography ; Subclavian Artery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Current cardiology reviews, 2013-11, Vol.9 (4), p.268-273</ispartof><rights>2013 Bentham Science Publishers 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-128f290b269ec0c2a78777948441793b12b5db83929a79668e1de481b984a9633</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24313647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bleiziffer, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krane, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhmidi, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, R</creatorcontrib><title>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</title><title>Current cardiology reviews</title><addtitle>CCR</addtitle><description>TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics.</description><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Femoral Artery</subject><subject>Femoral Vein</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jugular Veins</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Subclavian Artery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1573-403X</issn><issn>1875-6557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuP0zAUhSMEYoaBv4DCjk3Br8TxBjQa8ZIGEFJ57K4c97YxOLHHdlp1zR_HpUMFC1a-sr9zfOxTVU8oecaoFM9pI7kg_BtRbdtSThlhlHHO2jvVOe1ks2ibRt4tc-EWB_CsepDSd0Ia1ip6vzpjglPeCnleffo6WDPUO72v7fSyXg5Yf0CDKdm8r_26fj-7bIPD-jKE6LUZMNXZ18uop2R0HjBjrL9ot8WDNuqwf1jdW2uX8NHtelF9fv1qefV2cf3xzbury-tF3wiZF5R1a6ZIXxKhIYZp2UkpleiEoFLxnrK-WfUdV0xpWd7ZIV2h6GivOqFVy_lF9eLoG-Z-xJXBKUftIEQ76rgHry38ezLZATZ-C1wJSjpVDJ7eGkR_M2PKMNpk0Dk9oZ8T0IZQLstPsYKqI2qiTyni-nQNJXCoBP5bSdE-_jvnSfmngwL8PAJ9CTroMRmLk8ETOOQcYLfbAc4Rf-iEDk0G40fwAac5ujJPuWghDAE2OEUEHbM1DsGmNP3OBodwsPVuHhHUYX9GEJCC3iCwtuO_AOr3udw</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Bleiziffer, S</creator><creator>Krane, M</creator><creator>Deutsch, M A</creator><creator>Elhmidi, Y</creator><creator>Piazza, N</creator><creator>Voss, B</creator><creator>Lange, R</creator><general>Bentham Science Publishers Ltd</general><general>Bentham Science Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</title><author>Bleiziffer, S ; Krane, M ; Deutsch, M A ; Elhmidi, Y ; Piazza, N ; Voss, B ; Lange, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b547t-128f290b269ec0c2a78777948441793b12b5db83929a79668e1de481b984a9633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Femoral Artery</topic><topic>Femoral Vein</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jugular Veins</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Subclavian Artery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bleiziffer, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krane, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhmidi, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current cardiology reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bleiziffer, S</au><au>Krane, M</au><au>Deutsch, M A</au><au>Elhmidi, Y</au><au>Piazza, N</au><au>Voss, B</au><au>Lange, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Current cardiology reviews</jtitle><addtitle>CCR</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>268-273</pages><issn>1573-403X</issn><eissn>1875-6557</eissn><abstract>TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloonexpandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics.</abstract><cop>United Arab Emirates</cop><pub>Bentham Science Publishers Ltd</pub><pmid>24313647</pmid><doi>10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1573-403X
ispartof Current cardiology reviews, 2013-11, Vol.9 (4), p.268-273
issn 1573-403X
1875-6557
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3941089
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Aorta
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Cardiac Catheterization - methods
Femoral Artery
Femoral Vein
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Humans
Jugular Veins
Radiography
Subclavian Artery
Treatment Outcome
title Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20way%20in?%20The%20Necessity%20of%20Multiple%20Approaches%20to%20Transcatheter%20Valve%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Current%20cardiology%20reviews&rft.au=Bleiziffer,%20S&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=268-273&rft.issn=1573-403X&rft.eissn=1875-6557&rft_id=info:doi/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1501374312%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501374312&rft_id=info:pmid/24313647&rfr_iscdi=true