The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Workflow and Financial Measures in Primary Care Practices
Objective To estimate a commercially available ambulatory electronic health record's (EHR's) impact on workflow and financial measures. Data Sources/Study Setting Administrative, payroll, and billing data were collected for 26 primary care practices in a fee‐for‐service network that rolled...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health services research 2014-02, Vol.49 (1pt2), p.405-420 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 420 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1pt2 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Health services research |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Fleming, Neil S. Becker, Edmund R. Culler, Steven D. Cheng, Dunlei McCorkle, Russell Graca, Briget da Ballard, David J. |
description | Objective
To estimate a commercially available ambulatory electronic health record's (EHR's) impact on workflow and financial measures.
Data Sources/Study Setting
Administrative, payroll, and billing data were collected for 26 primary care practices in a fee‐for‐service network that rolled out an EHR on a staggered schedule from June 2006 through December 2008.
Study Design
An interrupted time series design was used. Staffing, visit intensity, productivity, volume, practice expense, payments received, and net income data were collected monthly for 2004–2009. Changes were evaluated 1–6, 7–12, and >12 months postimplementation.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Data were accessed through a SQLserver database, transformed into SAS®, and aggregated by practice. Practice‐level data were divided by full‐time physician equivalents for comparisons across practices by month.
Principal Findings
Staffing and practice expenses increased following EHR implementation (3 and 6 percent after 12 months). Productivity, volume, and net income decreased initially but recovered to/close to preimplementation levels after 12 months. Visit intensity did not change significantly, and a secular trend offset the decrease in payments received.
Conclusions
Expenses increased and productivity decreased following EHR implementation, but not as much or as persistently as might be expected. Longer term effects still need to be examined. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1475-6773.12133 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3925410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A357966257</galeid><sourcerecordid>A357966257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7843-922d02b267a4be67598de21ebde61e8f54542f740d8c3e200d9f03e2a345a5f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFk11v0zAUhiMEYmVwzR2yhIRAops_4-QGaVTbOqnb0BjapeU6J6231C52wti_x127sqKKJVLij-e8On6PT5a9JXiPpGefcCn6uZRsj1DC2LOst155nvUwJrJfEsp3slcxXmOMC1bwl9kO5UyUgrFeVl1OAZ3M5tq0yNfosAHTBu-sQUPQTTtFF2B8qCLyDl35cFM3_hZpV6Ej67QzVjfoFHTsAkRkHfoW7EyHOzTQAdIkqVoD8XX2otZNhDer_2724-jwcjDsj86PTwYHo76RBWf9ktIK0zHNpeZjyKUoiwoogXEFOYGiFlxwWkuOq8IwoBhXZY3TQDMutEjD3ezLUnfejWdQGXBt0I2aL5NSXlu1uePsVE38L8VKKjhZCHxcCQT_s4PYqpmNBppGO_BdVEQkm0suko9PorzEklKa84S-_we99l1wyYlESVmyVDnyl5roBpR1tU8pmoWoOmBClnlOhUxUfws1AQfpPN5BbdPyBr-3hU9vBTNrtgZ82ghITAu_24nuYlTF8eh_yaxY45sGJqBSbQfnm_yHR_z0_oJF33St9S5ugp8fgeMuWgcxfaKdTNu4zGUD31_iJvgYA9TrkhOsFn2y8FmoRVeo-z5JEe8e35Q1_9AYCciXwG3y5-4pPTU8_H7xoLzyxMbkxTpQh5vEsxR1dXasvp6NTovBBVOM_QG2ySX-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1477931331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Workflow and Financial Measures in Primary Care Practices</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fleming, Neil S. ; Becker, Edmund R. ; Culler, Steven D. ; Cheng, Dunlei ; McCorkle, Russell ; Graca, Briget da ; Ballard, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Neil S. ; Becker, Edmund R. ; Culler, Steven D. ; Cheng, Dunlei ; McCorkle, Russell ; Graca, Briget da ; Ballard, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To estimate a commercially available ambulatory electronic health record's (EHR's) impact on workflow and financial measures.
Data Sources/Study Setting
Administrative, payroll, and billing data were collected for 26 primary care practices in a fee‐for‐service network that rolled out an EHR on a staggered schedule from June 2006 through December 2008.
Study Design
An interrupted time series design was used. Staffing, visit intensity, productivity, volume, practice expense, payments received, and net income data were collected monthly for 2004–2009. Changes were evaluated 1–6, 7–12, and >12 months postimplementation.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Data were accessed through a SQLserver database, transformed into SAS®, and aggregated by practice. Practice‐level data were divided by full‐time physician equivalents for comparisons across practices by month.
Principal Findings
Staffing and practice expenses increased following EHR implementation (3 and 6 percent after 12 months). Productivity, volume, and net income decreased initially but recovered to/close to preimplementation levels after 12 months. Visit intensity did not change significantly, and a secular trend offset the decrease in payments received.
Conclusions
Expenses increased and productivity decreased following EHR implementation, but not as much or as persistently as might be expected. Longer term effects still need to be examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12133</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24359533</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HESEA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care - economics ; Ambulatory Care - organization & administration ; Analysis ; Computerized medical records ; Costs ; Efficiency, Organizational - economics ; Electronic health records ; Electronic Health Records - economics ; Electronic Health Records - organization & administration ; Electronic records ; Family medicine ; Female ; financial performance ; Health Information Technology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical practices ; Medical records ; Middle Aged ; Payments ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - economics ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Productivity ; Staffing ; Studies ; Texas ; Time Factors ; Time series ; Workflow ; Workflow software ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>Health services research, 2014-02, Vol.49 (1pt2), p.405-420</ispartof><rights>Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>Health Research and Educational Trust.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>Health Research and Educational Trust 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7843-922d02b267a4be67598de21ebde61e8f54542f740d8c3e200d9f03e2a345a5f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7843-922d02b267a4be67598de21ebde61e8f54542f740d8c3e200d9f03e2a345a5f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925410/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925410/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,30976,30977,45550,45551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Neil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Edmund R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culler, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Dunlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCorkle, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graca, Briget da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Workflow and Financial Measures in Primary Care Practices</title><title>Health services research</title><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Objective
To estimate a commercially available ambulatory electronic health record's (EHR's) impact on workflow and financial measures.
Data Sources/Study Setting
Administrative, payroll, and billing data were collected for 26 primary care practices in a fee‐for‐service network that rolled out an EHR on a staggered schedule from June 2006 through December 2008.
Study Design
An interrupted time series design was used. Staffing, visit intensity, productivity, volume, practice expense, payments received, and net income data were collected monthly for 2004–2009. Changes were evaluated 1–6, 7–12, and >12 months postimplementation.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Data were accessed through a SQLserver database, transformed into SAS®, and aggregated by practice. Practice‐level data were divided by full‐time physician equivalents for comparisons across practices by month.
Principal Findings
Staffing and practice expenses increased following EHR implementation (3 and 6 percent after 12 months). Productivity, volume, and net income decreased initially but recovered to/close to preimplementation levels after 12 months. Visit intensity did not change significantly, and a secular trend offset the decrease in payments received.
Conclusions
Expenses increased and productivity decreased following EHR implementation, but not as much or as persistently as might be expected. Longer term effects still need to be examined.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care - economics</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Computerized medical records</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Efficiency, Organizational - economics</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - economics</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - organization & administration</subject><subject>Electronic records</subject><subject>Family medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>financial performance</subject><subject>Health Information Technology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical practices</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - economics</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Staffing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><subject>Workflow software</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFk11v0zAUhiMEYmVwzR2yhIRAops_4-QGaVTbOqnb0BjapeU6J6231C52wti_x127sqKKJVLij-e8On6PT5a9JXiPpGefcCn6uZRsj1DC2LOst155nvUwJrJfEsp3slcxXmOMC1bwl9kO5UyUgrFeVl1OAZ3M5tq0yNfosAHTBu-sQUPQTTtFF2B8qCLyDl35cFM3_hZpV6Ej67QzVjfoFHTsAkRkHfoW7EyHOzTQAdIkqVoD8XX2otZNhDer_2724-jwcjDsj86PTwYHo76RBWf9ktIK0zHNpeZjyKUoiwoogXEFOYGiFlxwWkuOq8IwoBhXZY3TQDMutEjD3ezLUnfejWdQGXBt0I2aL5NSXlu1uePsVE38L8VKKjhZCHxcCQT_s4PYqpmNBppGO_BdVEQkm0suko9PorzEklKa84S-_we99l1wyYlESVmyVDnyl5roBpR1tU8pmoWoOmBClnlOhUxUfws1AQfpPN5BbdPyBr-3hU9vBTNrtgZ82ghITAu_24nuYlTF8eh_yaxY45sGJqBSbQfnm_yHR_z0_oJF33St9S5ugp8fgeMuWgcxfaKdTNu4zGUD31_iJvgYA9TrkhOsFn2y8FmoRVeo-z5JEe8e35Q1_9AYCciXwG3y5-4pPTU8_H7xoLzyxMbkxTpQh5vEsxR1dXasvp6NTovBBVOM_QG2ySX-</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Fleming, Neil S.</creator><creator>Becker, Edmund R.</creator><creator>Culler, Steven D.</creator><creator>Cheng, Dunlei</creator><creator>McCorkle, Russell</creator><creator>Graca, Briget da</creator><creator>Ballard, David J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Health Research and Educational Trust</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Workflow and Financial Measures in Primary Care Practices</title><author>Fleming, Neil S. ; Becker, Edmund R. ; Culler, Steven D. ; Cheng, Dunlei ; McCorkle, Russell ; Graca, Briget da ; Ballard, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7843-922d02b267a4be67598de21ebde61e8f54542f740d8c3e200d9f03e2a345a5f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care - economics</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Computerized medical records</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Efficiency, Organizational - economics</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - economics</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - organization & administration</topic><topic>Electronic records</topic><topic>Family medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>financial performance</topic><topic>Health Information Technology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical practices</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - economics</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Staffing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><topic>Workflow software</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Neil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Edmund R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culler, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Dunlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCorkle, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graca, Briget da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleming, Neil S.</au><au>Becker, Edmund R.</au><au>Culler, Steven D.</au><au>Cheng, Dunlei</au><au>McCorkle, Russell</au><au>Graca, Briget da</au><au>Ballard, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Workflow and Financial Measures in Primary Care Practices</atitle><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1pt2</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>405-420</pages><issn>0017-9124</issn><eissn>1475-6773</eissn><coden>HESEA5</coden><abstract>Objective
To estimate a commercially available ambulatory electronic health record's (EHR's) impact on workflow and financial measures.
Data Sources/Study Setting
Administrative, payroll, and billing data were collected for 26 primary care practices in a fee‐for‐service network that rolled out an EHR on a staggered schedule from June 2006 through December 2008.
Study Design
An interrupted time series design was used. Staffing, visit intensity, productivity, volume, practice expense, payments received, and net income data were collected monthly for 2004–2009. Changes were evaluated 1–6, 7–12, and >12 months postimplementation.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Data were accessed through a SQLserver database, transformed into SAS®, and aggregated by practice. Practice‐level data were divided by full‐time physician equivalents for comparisons across practices by month.
Principal Findings
Staffing and practice expenses increased following EHR implementation (3 and 6 percent after 12 months). Productivity, volume, and net income decreased initially but recovered to/close to preimplementation levels after 12 months. Visit intensity did not change significantly, and a secular trend offset the decrease in payments received.
Conclusions
Expenses increased and productivity decreased following EHR implementation, but not as much or as persistently as might be expected. Longer term effects still need to be examined.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24359533</pmid><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.12133</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-9124 |
ispartof | Health services research, 2014-02, Vol.49 (1pt2), p.405-420 |
issn | 0017-9124 1475-6773 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3925410 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ambulatory Care - economics Ambulatory Care - organization & administration Analysis Computerized medical records Costs Efficiency, Organizational - economics Electronic health records Electronic Health Records - economics Electronic Health Records - organization & administration Electronic records Family medicine Female financial performance Health Information Technology Humans Male Medical practices Medical records Middle Aged Payments Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration Primary care Primary health care Primary Health Care - economics Primary Health Care - organization & administration Productivity Staffing Studies Texas Time Factors Time series Workflow Workflow software Workforce planning |
title | The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Workflow and Financial Measures in Primary Care Practices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A40%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Electronic%20Health%20Records%20on%20Workflow%20and%20Financial%20Measures%20in%20Primary%20Care%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20research&rft.au=Fleming,%20Neil%20S.&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1pt2&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=405-420&rft.issn=0017-9124&rft.eissn=1475-6773&rft.coden=HESEA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-6773.12133&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA357966257%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1477931331&rft_id=info:pmid/24359533&rft_galeid=A357966257&rfr_iscdi=true |