Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomedical reports 2013-11, Vol.1 (6), p.873-878
Hauptverfasser: ZHOU, YUN, PENG, LING, LI, YINGJIE, CHEN, LIXUN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 878
container_issue 6
container_start_page 873
container_title Biomedical reports
container_volume 1
creator ZHOU, YUN
PENG, LING
LI, YINGJIE
CHEN, LIXUN
description Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic pyridoxine reduces the incidence of capecitabine-associated HFS by performing a meta-analysis of the literature involving available studies. Systematic searches for trials were undertaken through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, updated to March, 2013, to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine against capecitabine-induced HFS. We performed a meta-analysis of five studies (n=793 patients) that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine in cancer patients treated with capecitabine. The odds ratio (OR) comparing prophylactic pyridoxine to placebo was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.24] for HFS of all grades; OR=1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for HFS ≥ grade 2 and OR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.60-1.85) for HFS ≥ grade 3. Based on our meta-analysis, prophylactic pyridoxine did not appear to reduce the incidence of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine.
doi_str_mv 10.3892/br.2013.161
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3916964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A410678305</galeid><sourcerecordid>A410678305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-9d8c2a042a2efbf5b7a43df5d1a02ffbb2401f10a386a60a803163252f1123b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1rFDEYxgdRbKk9eZeAIEKZNV-TnXgQlmJVKOih9_Dmq5syk4zJjHb_e7NsXa2YHPIm-T1PSPI0zUuCV6yX9J3OK4oJWxFBnjSnFHPZSs7p02PN-ElzXsodrk2uMe36580J5YJLzLvT5v5bTtN2N4CZg0HTLgeb7kN06CcUFNOMQA8OzQllZxdTq61DIZpgXayz5JGByZkwg66iNsQ9ZNEWom19qvKyizan0b1HGzS6GVqIMOxKKC-aZx6G4s4fxrPm5urjzeXn9vrrpy-Xm-vWcLaeW2l7QwFzCtR57Tu9Bs6s7ywBTL3XmnJMPMHAegECQ48ZEYx21BNCmWZnzYeD7bTo0Vnj4pxhUFMOI-SdShDU450Ytuo2_VBMEiEFrwZvHwxy-r64MqsxFOOGAaJLS1Gkp6KTVDJS0df_oHdpyfW-lZIMS9YxIf5QtzA4FaJP9VyzN1UbTrBY9wx3lVr9h6rdujGYFJ0Pdf2R4OIgMDmVkp0_3pFgtY-K0lnto6JqVCr96u9nObK_g1GBNwegTPUvayjKkdG5xaTFosX9mrFf_DvF4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1930935366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis</title><source>Spandidos Publications Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>ZHOU, YUN ; PENG, LING ; LI, YINGJIE ; CHEN, LIXUN</creator><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YUN ; PENG, LING ; LI, YINGJIE ; CHEN, LIXUN</creatorcontrib><description>Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic pyridoxine reduces the incidence of capecitabine-associated HFS by performing a meta-analysis of the literature involving available studies. Systematic searches for trials were undertaken through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, updated to March, 2013, to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine against capecitabine-induced HFS. We performed a meta-analysis of five studies (n=793 patients) that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine in cancer patients treated with capecitabine. The odds ratio (OR) comparing prophylactic pyridoxine to placebo was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.24] for HFS of all grades; OR=1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for HFS ≥ grade 2 and OR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.60-1.85) for HFS ≥ grade 3. Based on our meta-analysis, prophylactic pyridoxine did not appear to reduce the incidence of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-9434</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-9442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3892/br.2013.161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24649045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: D.A. Spandidos</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Bias ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Capecitabine ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Complications and side effects ; Confidence intervals ; Dosage and administration ; Edema ; Effectiveness ; Feet ; hand-foot syndrome ; Incidence ; Libraries ; Meta-analysis ; Pain ; Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia ; Patients ; prophylactic ; Pyridoxine ; Quality ; Risk factors ; Studies ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Biomedical reports, 2013-11, Vol.1 (6), p.873-878</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013, Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Spandidos Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Spandidos Publications UK Ltd. 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013, Spandidos Publications 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-9d8c2a042a2efbf5b7a43df5d1a02ffbb2401f10a386a60a803163252f1123b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-9d8c2a042a2efbf5b7a43df5d1a02ffbb2401f10a386a60a803163252f1123b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916964/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916964/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,5571,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24649045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENG, LING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI, YINGJIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, LIXUN</creatorcontrib><title>Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis</title><title>Biomedical reports</title><addtitle>Biomed Rep</addtitle><description>Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic pyridoxine reduces the incidence of capecitabine-associated HFS by performing a meta-analysis of the literature involving available studies. Systematic searches for trials were undertaken through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, updated to March, 2013, to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine against capecitabine-induced HFS. We performed a meta-analysis of five studies (n=793 patients) that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine in cancer patients treated with capecitabine. The odds ratio (OR) comparing prophylactic pyridoxine to placebo was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.24] for HFS of all grades; OR=1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for HFS ≥ grade 2 and OR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.60-1.85) for HFS ≥ grade 3. Based on our meta-analysis, prophylactic pyridoxine did not appear to reduce the incidence of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Capecitabine</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>hand-foot syndrome</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>prophylactic</subject><subject>Pyridoxine</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>2049-9434</issn><issn>2049-9442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1rFDEYxgdRbKk9eZeAIEKZNV-TnXgQlmJVKOih9_Dmq5syk4zJjHb_e7NsXa2YHPIm-T1PSPI0zUuCV6yX9J3OK4oJWxFBnjSnFHPZSs7p02PN-ElzXsodrk2uMe36580J5YJLzLvT5v5bTtN2N4CZg0HTLgeb7kN06CcUFNOMQA8OzQllZxdTq61DIZpgXayz5JGByZkwg66iNsQ9ZNEWom19qvKyizan0b1HGzS6GVqIMOxKKC-aZx6G4s4fxrPm5urjzeXn9vrrpy-Xm-vWcLaeW2l7QwFzCtR57Tu9Bs6s7ywBTL3XmnJMPMHAegECQ48ZEYx21BNCmWZnzYeD7bTo0Vnj4pxhUFMOI-SdShDU450Ytuo2_VBMEiEFrwZvHwxy-r64MqsxFOOGAaJLS1Gkp6KTVDJS0df_oHdpyfW-lZIMS9YxIf5QtzA4FaJP9VyzN1UbTrBY9wx3lVr9h6rdujGYFJ0Pdf2R4OIgMDmVkp0_3pFgtY-K0lnto6JqVCr96u9nObK_g1GBNwegTPUvayjKkdG5xaTFosX9mrFf_DvF4A</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>ZHOU, YUN</creator><creator>PENG, LING</creator><creator>LI, YINGJIE</creator><creator>CHEN, LIXUN</creator><general>D.A. Spandidos</general><general>Spandidos Publications</general><general>Spandidos Publications UK Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis</title><author>ZHOU, YUN ; PENG, LING ; LI, YINGJIE ; CHEN, LIXUN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-9d8c2a042a2efbf5b7a43df5d1a02ffbb2401f10a386a60a803163252f1123b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Capecitabine</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>hand-foot syndrome</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>prophylactic</topic><topic>Pyridoxine</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENG, LING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI, YINGJIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, LIXUN</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biomedical reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZHOU, YUN</au><au>PENG, LING</au><au>LI, YINGJIE</au><au>CHEN, LIXUN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical reports</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Rep</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>873</spage><epage>878</epage><pages>873-878</pages><issn>2049-9434</issn><eissn>2049-9442</eissn><abstract>Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic pyridoxine reduces the incidence of capecitabine-associated HFS by performing a meta-analysis of the literature involving available studies. Systematic searches for trials were undertaken through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, updated to March, 2013, to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine against capecitabine-induced HFS. We performed a meta-analysis of five studies (n=793 patients) that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine in cancer patients treated with capecitabine. The odds ratio (OR) comparing prophylactic pyridoxine to placebo was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.24] for HFS of all grades; OR=1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for HFS ≥ grade 2 and OR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.60-1.85) for HFS ≥ grade 3. Based on our meta-analysis, prophylactic pyridoxine did not appear to reduce the incidence of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>D.A. Spandidos</pub><pmid>24649045</pmid><doi>10.3892/br.2013.161</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-9434
ispartof Biomedical reports, 2013-11, Vol.1 (6), p.873-878
issn 2049-9434
2049-9442
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3916964
source Spandidos Publications Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Activities of daily living
Bias
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Capecitabine
Chemotherapy
Clinical trials
Complications and side effects
Confidence intervals
Dosage and administration
Edema
Effectiveness
Feet
hand-foot syndrome
Incidence
Libraries
Meta-analysis
Pain
Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia
Patients
prophylactic
Pyridoxine
Quality
Risk factors
Studies
Toxicity
title Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prophylactic%20pyridoxine%20was%20not%20able%20to%20reduce%20the%20incidence%20of%20capecitabine-induced%20hand-foot%20syndrome:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20reports&rft.au=ZHOU,%20YUN&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=873&rft.epage=878&rft.pages=873-878&rft.issn=2049-9434&rft.eissn=2049-9442&rft_id=info:doi/10.3892/br.2013.161&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA410678305%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1930935366&rft_id=info:pmid/24649045&rft_galeid=A410678305&rfr_iscdi=true