Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
Purpose: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for gene...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Genetics in medicine 2012-03, Vol.14 (3), p.323-329 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 329 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 323 |
| container_title | Genetics in medicine |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Houwink, Elisa J.F. Henneman, Lidewij Westerneng, Myrte van Luijk, Scheltus J. Cornel, Martina C. Dinant, Jan Geert Vleuten, Cees van der |
| description | Purpose:
General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice.
Methods:
A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list.
Results:
The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.”
Conclusions:
The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/gim.2011.15 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3905703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>926643994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3401f39cfe1a90314dc94de2e3d872f3a11febedf412a00a74ecc5a4902b05153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1rVDEUxYMoto6u3MsDFxXsG-9N8j7iQpBqVSjowq5DJu9mmvLmZUzyCvWvN9Op9QNxlXDPj5N7chh7irBEEP2rtd8sOSAusbnHDrERUINo2_vlDqqvRQtwwB6ldAmAneDwkB1wzmURxSE7_xJ9iD777yb7MFXBVW7Oc6RqTRNlb1NFw2z3ogvxZhzNWG2jsdnvxhTT68pU72jcXvgq5Xm4fsweODMmenJ7Ltj56fuvJx_rs88fPp28Paut7PpcCwnohLKO0CgQKAer5ECcxNB33AmD6GhFg5PIDYDpJFnbGKmAr6ApSRfszd53O682NFiactlNb6PfmHitg_H6T2XyF3odrrRQ0HQgisHRrUEM32ZKWW98sjSOZqIwJ61420qhlCzki_-SyBW2XLatKujzv9DLMMepfITmfd91yLGkXbCXe8rGkFIkd7c2gt4Vq0uxelesvkn67Pekd-zPJgtwvAdSkaY1xV-P_svvB4OYrjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2887712190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Houwink, Elisa J.F. ; Henneman, Lidewij ; Westerneng, Myrte ; van Luijk, Scheltus J. ; Cornel, Martina C. ; Dinant, Jan Geert ; Vleuten, Cees van der</creator><creatorcontrib>Houwink, Elisa J.F. ; Henneman, Lidewij ; Westerneng, Myrte ; van Luijk, Scheltus J. ; Cornel, Martina C. ; Dinant, Jan Geert ; Vleuten, Cees van der</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice.
Methods:
A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list.
Results:
The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.”
Conclusions:
The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3600</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22241093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>631/208/1516 ; 692/700 ; 706/689/112 ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Delphi method ; Delphi Technique ; Education ; Education, Medical - trends ; General Practitioners - education ; Genetics ; Genetics, Medical - education ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Original ; original-research-article</subject><ispartof>Genetics in medicine, 2012-03, Vol.14 (3), p.323-329</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2012. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American College of Medical Genetics 2012 American College of Medical Genetics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3401f39cfe1a90314dc94de2e3d872f3a11febedf412a00a74ecc5a4902b05153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3401f39cfe1a90314dc94de2e3d872f3a11febedf412a00a74ecc5a4902b05153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2887712190?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22241093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Houwink, Elisa J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneman, Lidewij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerneng, Myrte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Luijk, Scheltus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornel, Martina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinant, Jan Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleuten, Cees van der</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study</title><title>Genetics in medicine</title><addtitle>Genet Med</addtitle><addtitle>Genet Med</addtitle><description>Purpose:
General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice.
Methods:
A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list.
Results:
The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.”
Conclusions:
The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care.</description><subject>631/208/1516</subject><subject>692/700</subject><subject>706/689/112</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical - trends</subject><subject>General Practitioners - education</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genetics, Medical - education</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>original-research-article</subject><issn>1098-3600</issn><issn>1530-0366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1rVDEUxYMoto6u3MsDFxXsG-9N8j7iQpBqVSjowq5DJu9mmvLmZUzyCvWvN9Op9QNxlXDPj5N7chh7irBEEP2rtd8sOSAusbnHDrERUINo2_vlDqqvRQtwwB6ldAmAneDwkB1wzmURxSE7_xJ9iD777yb7MFXBVW7Oc6RqTRNlb1NFw2z3ogvxZhzNWG2jsdnvxhTT68pU72jcXvgq5Xm4fsweODMmenJ7Ltj56fuvJx_rs88fPp28Paut7PpcCwnohLKO0CgQKAer5ECcxNB33AmD6GhFg5PIDYDpJFnbGKmAr6ApSRfszd53O682NFiactlNb6PfmHitg_H6T2XyF3odrrRQ0HQgisHRrUEM32ZKWW98sjSOZqIwJ61420qhlCzki_-SyBW2XLatKujzv9DLMMepfITmfd91yLGkXbCXe8rGkFIkd7c2gt4Vq0uxelesvkn67Pekd-zPJgtwvAdSkaY1xV-P_svvB4OYrjQ</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Houwink, Elisa J.F.</creator><creator>Henneman, Lidewij</creator><creator>Westerneng, Myrte</creator><creator>van Luijk, Scheltus J.</creator><creator>Cornel, Martina C.</creator><creator>Dinant, Jan Geert</creator><creator>Vleuten, Cees van der</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study</title><author>Houwink, Elisa J.F. ; Henneman, Lidewij ; Westerneng, Myrte ; van Luijk, Scheltus J. ; Cornel, Martina C. ; Dinant, Jan Geert ; Vleuten, Cees van der</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3401f39cfe1a90314dc94de2e3d872f3a11febedf412a00a74ecc5a4902b05153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>631/208/1516</topic><topic>692/700</topic><topic>706/689/112</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical - trends</topic><topic>General Practitioners - education</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genetics, Medical - education</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>original-research-article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Houwink, Elisa J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneman, Lidewij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerneng, Myrte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Luijk, Scheltus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornel, Martina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinant, Jan Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleuten, Cees van der</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genetics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Houwink, Elisa J.F.</au><au>Henneman, Lidewij</au><au>Westerneng, Myrte</au><au>van Luijk, Scheltus J.</au><au>Cornel, Martina C.</au><au>Dinant, Jan Geert</au><au>Vleuten, Cees van der</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study</atitle><jtitle>Genetics in medicine</jtitle><stitle>Genet Med</stitle><addtitle>Genet Med</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>323-329</pages><issn>1098-3600</issn><eissn>1530-0366</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice.
Methods:
A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list.
Results:
The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.”
Conclusions:
The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>22241093</pmid><doi>10.1038/gim.2011.15</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1098-3600 |
| ispartof | Genetics in medicine, 2012-03, Vol.14 (3), p.323-329 |
| issn | 1098-3600 1530-0366 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3905703 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | 631/208/1516 692/700 706/689/112 Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Delphi method Delphi Technique Education Education, Medical - trends General Practitioners - education Genetics Genetics, Medical - education Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Human Genetics Humans Laboratory Medicine Original original-research-article |
| title | Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A44%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritization%20of%20future%20genetics%20education%20for%20general%20practitioners:%20a%20Delphi%20study&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Houwink,%20Elisa%20J.F.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=323-329&rft.issn=1098-3600&rft.eissn=1530-0366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/gim.2011.15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E926643994%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2887712190&rft_id=info:pmid/22241093&rfr_iscdi=true |