Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response

•Human OFRs were studied using narrow sinusoidal strip in counterphase.•Retinal receptive fields were modeled as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions.•Non-oriented center/surround antagonistic filters (retina, LGN) accounted for the data. Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial track...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vision research (Oxford) 2013-12, Vol.93, p.29-42
Hauptverfasser: Sheliga, B.M., Quaia, C., FitzGibbon, E.J., Cumming, B.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue
container_start_page 29
container_title Vision research (Oxford)
container_volume 93
creator Sheliga, B.M.
Quaia, C.
FitzGibbon, E.J.
Cumming, B.G.
description •Human OFRs were studied using narrow sinusoidal strip in counterphase.•Retinal receptive fields were modeled as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions.•Non-oriented center/surround antagonistic filters (retina, LGN) accounted for the data. Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial tracking eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency by sudden motion of a textured pattern. We wished to evaluate quantitatively the impact that subcortical stages of visual processing might have on the OFRs. In three experiments we recorded the OFRs of human subjects to brief horizontal motion of 1D vertical sine-wave gratings restricted to an elongated horizontal aperture. Gratings were composed of a variable number of abutting horizontal strips where alternate strips were in counterphase. In one of the experiments we also utilized gratings occupying a variable number of horizontal strips separated vertically by mean-luminance gaps. We modeled retinal center/surround receptive fields as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions. When the characteristics of such local filters were selected in accord with the known properties of primate retinal ganglion cells, a single-layer model was capable to quantitatively account for the observed changes in the OFR amplitude for stimuli composed of counterphase strips of different heights (Experiment 1), for a wide range of stimulus contrasts (Experiment 2) and spatial frequencies (Experiment 3). A similar model using oriented filters that resemble cortical simple cells was also able to account for these data. Since similar filters can be constructed from the linear summation of retinal filters, and these filters alone can explain the data, we conclude that retinal processing determines the response to these stimuli. Thus, with appropriately chosen stimuli, OFRs can be used to study visual spatial integration processes as early as in the retina.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3902995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004269891300237X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1461337820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-2ee339935c05ec3f139efa99dc0bf8f3f315b2c72b540e217a0eaa7b83ed11e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rGzEQhkVJqR2n_yCEPeay7kha7a4uheL0CwKFkJyFVjtry6wlR9p16L-vjF0nuSSngZl33vl4CLmkMKdAyy_r-c7GgHHOgPKUmgOwD2RK66rORVmUZ2QKULC8lLWckPMY1wBQCSY_kQkrKBMV8Cm5ucPBOt1nyWxMYRu8wRitW2bGuzgEbV3MVuNGu8ybsdch63zf-6e9Ik3fJhFekI-d7iN-PsYZefjx_X7xK7_98_P34tttbkTJhpwhci4lFwYEGt5RLrHTUrYGmq7ueMepaJipWCMKQEYrDah11dQcW0pR8hn5evDdjs0GW4Mu7derbbAbHf4qr616XXF2pZZ-p7gEJqVIBtdHg-AfR4yD2thosO-1Qz9GRUV6UV1yQd-XFiXlvKoZJGlxkJrgY0LSnTaioPas1FodWKk9q302sUptVy-vOTX9h_N8Lqaf7iwGFY1FZ7C1Ac2gWm_fnvAPQnWpmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1461337820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sheliga, B.M. ; Quaia, C. ; FitzGibbon, E.J. ; Cumming, B.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheliga, B.M. ; Quaia, C. ; FitzGibbon, E.J. ; Cumming, B.G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Human OFRs were studied using narrow sinusoidal strip in counterphase.•Retinal receptive fields were modeled as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions.•Non-oriented center/surround antagonistic filters (retina, LGN) accounted for the data. Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial tracking eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency by sudden motion of a textured pattern. We wished to evaluate quantitatively the impact that subcortical stages of visual processing might have on the OFRs. In three experiments we recorded the OFRs of human subjects to brief horizontal motion of 1D vertical sine-wave gratings restricted to an elongated horizontal aperture. Gratings were composed of a variable number of abutting horizontal strips where alternate strips were in counterphase. In one of the experiments we also utilized gratings occupying a variable number of horizontal strips separated vertically by mean-luminance gaps. We modeled retinal center/surround receptive fields as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions. When the characteristics of such local filters were selected in accord with the known properties of primate retinal ganglion cells, a single-layer model was capable to quantitatively account for the observed changes in the OFR amplitude for stimuli composed of counterphase strips of different heights (Experiment 1), for a wide range of stimulus contrasts (Experiment 2) and spatial frequencies (Experiment 3). A similar model using oriented filters that resemble cortical simple cells was also able to account for these data. Since similar filters can be constructed from the linear summation of retinal filters, and these filters alone can explain the data, we conclude that retinal processing determines the response to these stimuli. Thus, with appropriately chosen stimuli, OFRs can be used to study visual spatial integration processes as early as in the retina.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24125703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Contrast gain control ; Contrast Sensitivity - physiology ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Primates ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Retinal ganglion cells ; Retinal Ganglion Cells - physiology ; Surround inhibition ; Visual motion</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2013-12, Vol.93, p.29-42</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-2ee339935c05ec3f139efa99dc0bf8f3f315b2c72b540e217a0eaa7b83ed11e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-2ee339935c05ec3f139efa99dc0bf8f3f315b2c72b540e217a0eaa7b83ed11e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24125703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheliga, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaia, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FitzGibbon, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumming, B.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>•Human OFRs were studied using narrow sinusoidal strip in counterphase.•Retinal receptive fields were modeled as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions.•Non-oriented center/surround antagonistic filters (retina, LGN) accounted for the data. Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial tracking eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency by sudden motion of a textured pattern. We wished to evaluate quantitatively the impact that subcortical stages of visual processing might have on the OFRs. In three experiments we recorded the OFRs of human subjects to brief horizontal motion of 1D vertical sine-wave gratings restricted to an elongated horizontal aperture. Gratings were composed of a variable number of abutting horizontal strips where alternate strips were in counterphase. In one of the experiments we also utilized gratings occupying a variable number of horizontal strips separated vertically by mean-luminance gaps. We modeled retinal center/surround receptive fields as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions. When the characteristics of such local filters were selected in accord with the known properties of primate retinal ganglion cells, a single-layer model was capable to quantitatively account for the observed changes in the OFR amplitude for stimuli composed of counterphase strips of different heights (Experiment 1), for a wide range of stimulus contrasts (Experiment 2) and spatial frequencies (Experiment 3). A similar model using oriented filters that resemble cortical simple cells was also able to account for these data. Since similar filters can be constructed from the linear summation of retinal filters, and these filters alone can explain the data, we conclude that retinal processing determines the response to these stimuli. Thus, with appropriately chosen stimuli, OFRs can be used to study visual spatial integration processes as early as in the retina.</description><subject>Contrast gain control</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Retinal ganglion cells</subject><subject>Retinal Ganglion Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Surround inhibition</subject><subject>Visual motion</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rGzEQhkVJqR2n_yCEPeay7kha7a4uheL0CwKFkJyFVjtry6wlR9p16L-vjF0nuSSngZl33vl4CLmkMKdAyy_r-c7GgHHOgPKUmgOwD2RK66rORVmUZ2QKULC8lLWckPMY1wBQCSY_kQkrKBMV8Cm5ucPBOt1nyWxMYRu8wRitW2bGuzgEbV3MVuNGu8ybsdch63zf-6e9Ik3fJhFekI-d7iN-PsYZefjx_X7xK7_98_P34tttbkTJhpwhci4lFwYEGt5RLrHTUrYGmq7ueMepaJipWCMKQEYrDah11dQcW0pR8hn5evDdjs0GW4Mu7derbbAbHf4qr616XXF2pZZ-p7gEJqVIBtdHg-AfR4yD2thosO-1Qz9GRUV6UV1yQd-XFiXlvKoZJGlxkJrgY0LSnTaioPas1FodWKk9q302sUptVy-vOTX9h_N8Lqaf7iwGFY1FZ7C1Ac2gWm_fnvAPQnWpmg</recordid><startdate>20131218</startdate><enddate>20131218</enddate><creator>Sheliga, B.M.</creator><creator>Quaia, C.</creator><creator>FitzGibbon, E.J.</creator><creator>Cumming, B.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131218</creationdate><title>Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response</title><author>Sheliga, B.M. ; Quaia, C. ; FitzGibbon, E.J. ; Cumming, B.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-2ee339935c05ec3f139efa99dc0bf8f3f315b2c72b540e217a0eaa7b83ed11e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Contrast gain control</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Retinal ganglion cells</topic><topic>Retinal Ganglion Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Surround inhibition</topic><topic>Visual motion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheliga, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaia, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FitzGibbon, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumming, B.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheliga, B.M.</au><au>Quaia, C.</au><au>FitzGibbon, E.J.</au><au>Cumming, B.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2013-12-18</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>93</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>29-42</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><abstract>•Human OFRs were studied using narrow sinusoidal strip in counterphase.•Retinal receptive fields were modeled as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions.•Non-oriented center/surround antagonistic filters (retina, LGN) accounted for the data. Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial tracking eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency by sudden motion of a textured pattern. We wished to evaluate quantitatively the impact that subcortical stages of visual processing might have on the OFRs. In three experiments we recorded the OFRs of human subjects to brief horizontal motion of 1D vertical sine-wave gratings restricted to an elongated horizontal aperture. Gratings were composed of a variable number of abutting horizontal strips where alternate strips were in counterphase. In one of the experiments we also utilized gratings occupying a variable number of horizontal strips separated vertically by mean-luminance gaps. We modeled retinal center/surround receptive fields as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions. When the characteristics of such local filters were selected in accord with the known properties of primate retinal ganglion cells, a single-layer model was capable to quantitatively account for the observed changes in the OFR amplitude for stimuli composed of counterphase strips of different heights (Experiment 1), for a wide range of stimulus contrasts (Experiment 2) and spatial frequencies (Experiment 3). A similar model using oriented filters that resemble cortical simple cells was also able to account for these data. Since similar filters can be constructed from the linear summation of retinal filters, and these filters alone can explain the data, we conclude that retinal processing determines the response to these stimuli. Thus, with appropriately chosen stimuli, OFRs can be used to study visual spatial integration processes as early as in the retina.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24125703</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.002</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-6989
ispartof Vision research (Oxford), 2013-12, Vol.93, p.29-42
issn 0042-6989
1878-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3902995
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Contrast gain control
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
Eye Movements - physiology
Humans
Models, Biological
Motion Perception - physiology
Photic Stimulation - methods
Primates
Reaction Time - physiology
Retinal ganglion cells
Retinal Ganglion Cells - physiology
Surround inhibition
Visual motion
title Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A22%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retinal%20visual%20processing%20constrains%20human%20ocular%20following%20response&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Sheliga,%20B.M.&rft.date=2013-12-18&rft.volume=93&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=29-42&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1461337820%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1461337820&rft_id=info:pmid/24125703&rft_els_id=S004269891300237X&rfr_iscdi=true