Comparison of acid-detergent lignin, alkaline-peroxide lignin, and acid-detergent insoluble ash as internal markers for predicting fecal output and digestibility by cattle offered bermudagrass hays of varying nutrient composition
BACKGROUND: The potential for acid-detergent insoluble ash (ADIA), alkaline-peroxide lignin (APL), and acid-detergent lignin (ADL) to predict fecal output (FO) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) by cattle offered bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] hays of different qualities was evaluated. E...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2014-01, Vol.5 (1), p.7-7, Article 7 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 7 |
| container_title | Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Kanani, Juvenal Philipp, Dirk Coffey, Kenneth P Kegley, Elizabeth B West, Charles P Gadberry, Shane Jennings, John Young, Ashley N Rhein, Robert T |
| description | BACKGROUND: The potential for acid-detergent insoluble ash (ADIA), alkaline-peroxide lignin (APL), and acid-detergent lignin (ADL) to predict fecal output (FO) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) by cattle offered bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] hays of different qualities was evaluated. Eight ruminally cannulated cows (594 ± 35.5 kg) were allocated randomly to 4 hay diets: low (L), medium low (ML), medium high (MH), and high (H) crude protein (CP) concentration (79, 111, 131, and 164 g CP/kg on a DM basis, respectively). Diets were offered in 3 periods with 2 diet replicates per period and were rotated across cows between periods. Cows were individually fed 20 g DM/kg of body weight in equal feedings at 08:00 and 16:00 h for a 10-d adaptation followed by a 5-d total fecal collection. Actual DM intake (DMI), DMD, and FO were determined based on hay offered, ort, and feces excreted. These components were then analyzed for ADL, APL, and ADIA concentration to determine marker recovery and marker-based estimates of FO and DMD. RESULTS: Forage DMI was affected by diet (P = 0.02), and DMI from MH and H was greater (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/2049-1891-5-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3901787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A541259041</galeid><wanfj_id>xmyswjszz_e201403008</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>xmyswjszz_e201403008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b667t-f3606ba5d1fc4c34585277aafa5104960b8a3b77881571bc3735cce42fe732543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFU8tu1TAUjBCIotIlW7DEhkVT7PgRZ4OoKl5SJRbQteU4dnraxL7YSdvb_-U_cHrLpS1CJIqSeOaM5syxi-IFwQeESPG2wqwpiWxIycv6UfFs-__4zvdOsZfSGc6XqGoqydNip2KMSC6aZ8XPozCudIQUPAoOaQNd2dnJxt76CQ3Qe_D7SA_negBvy5WN4Qo6-wfx3cMi8CkMcztYpNNpfvJChrwe0KjjuY0JuRDRKtoOzAS-R86aDIZ5Ws3TjWAHvU0TtDDAtEbtGhk9TVkvOGdzGWptHOdO91GnhE71Oi3WL3RcL2p-niIsPkzuLCSYIPjnxROnh2T3bt-7xcnHD9-PPpfHXz99OTo8Llsh6ql0VGDRat4RZ5ihjEte1bXWTnOS0xS4lZq2dS0l4TVpDa0pN8ayytmaVpzR3eLdRnc1t6PtTLYR9aBWEXLraxU0qPuIh1PVhwtFG0xqWWeB9xuBFsI_BO4juUm1TFotk1ZcLRL7G4lL7Z32vToL85J-UlfjOl2epetrZStMGKYYy0x_c2s5hh9zjl2NkIwdBu1tmJMiQlAuiJDk_1TWVEIKJptMff2AunVR5fgYZZTizDrYsHo9WAXehdyTyXdnRzDBWwd5_ZAzUvEGs8VBuSkwMaQUrdsmQ7BaTsRfWby8O48t-_f-z4RXG4LTQeUNBUmdfLsJB5OKNIzTX71WFhs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788434330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of acid-detergent lignin, alkaline-peroxide lignin, and acid-detergent insoluble ash as internal markers for predicting fecal output and digestibility by cattle offered bermudagrass hays of varying nutrient composition</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Kanani, Juvenal ; Philipp, Dirk ; Coffey, Kenneth P ; Kegley, Elizabeth B ; West, Charles P ; Gadberry, Shane ; Jennings, John ; Young, Ashley N ; Rhein, Robert T</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanani, Juvenal ; Philipp, Dirk ; Coffey, Kenneth P ; Kegley, Elizabeth B ; West, Charles P ; Gadberry, Shane ; Jennings, John ; Young, Ashley N ; Rhein, Robert T</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: The potential for acid-detergent insoluble ash (ADIA), alkaline-peroxide lignin (APL), and acid-detergent lignin (ADL) to predict fecal output (FO) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) by cattle offered bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] hays of different qualities was evaluated. Eight ruminally cannulated cows (594 ± 35.5 kg) were allocated randomly to 4 hay diets: low (L), medium low (ML), medium high (MH), and high (H) crude protein (CP) concentration (79, 111, 131, and 164 g CP/kg on a DM basis, respectively). Diets were offered in 3 periods with 2 diet replicates per period and were rotated across cows between periods. Cows were individually fed 20 g DM/kg of body weight in equal feedings at 08:00 and 16:00 h for a 10-d adaptation followed by a 5-d total fecal collection. Actual DM intake (DMI), DMD, and FO were determined based on hay offered, ort, and feces excreted. These components were then analyzed for ADL, APL, and ADIA concentration to determine marker recovery and marker-based estimates of FO and DMD. RESULTS: Forage DMI was affected by diet (P = 0.02), and DMI from MH and H was greater (P < 0.05) than from L. Apparent DMD tended (P = 0.08) to differ among diets while FO (P = 0.20) was not affected by diet treatments. Average ADL recovery (1.16) was greater (P < 0.05) than that of ADIA (1.03) and APL (1.06), but ADIA and APL did not differ (P = 0.42). Estimates of FO and DMD derived using APL and ADIA were not different (P ≥ 0.05) from total fecal collection while those using ADL differed (P < 0.05). There was no diet by marker interaction (P ≥ 0.22) for either FO or DMD. CONCLUSION: Acid-detergent insoluble ash and APL accurately predicted FO and DMD of cattle fed bermudagrass hay of varying nutrient composition. These internal markers may facilitate studies involving large numbers of animals and forages. Results from such studies may be used to develop improved equations to predict energy values of forages based on the relationship of dietary components to digestibility across a wide range of forages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-1891</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1674-9782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24418569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Acids ; Ashes ; Beef cattle ; Body weight ; Cattle ; Comparative analysis ; Composition ; cows ; crude protein ; Cynodon dactylon ; Diet ; Digestibility ; Dry matter ; Energy value ; Estimates ; Farms ; Feces ; Feeds ; Hay ; Health aspects ; Lignin ; nutrient content ; Nutrient deficiency ; Nutrients ; Physiological aspects ; Proteins ; Recovery</subject><ispartof>Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2014-01, Vol.5 (1), p.7-7, Article 7</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Kanani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Kanani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Kanani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b667t-f3606ba5d1fc4c34585277aafa5104960b8a3b77881571bc3735cce42fe732543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b667t-f3606ba5d1fc4c34585277aafa5104960b8a3b77881571bc3735cce42fe732543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/xmyswjszz-e/xmyswjszz-e.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901787/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901787/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24418569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanani, Juvenal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegley, Elizabeth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Charles P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadberry, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Ashley N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhein, Robert T</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of acid-detergent lignin, alkaline-peroxide lignin, and acid-detergent insoluble ash as internal markers for predicting fecal output and digestibility by cattle offered bermudagrass hays of varying nutrient composition</title><title>Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci Biotechnol</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: The potential for acid-detergent insoluble ash (ADIA), alkaline-peroxide lignin (APL), and acid-detergent lignin (ADL) to predict fecal output (FO) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) by cattle offered bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] hays of different qualities was evaluated. Eight ruminally cannulated cows (594 ± 35.5 kg) were allocated randomly to 4 hay diets: low (L), medium low (ML), medium high (MH), and high (H) crude protein (CP) concentration (79, 111, 131, and 164 g CP/kg on a DM basis, respectively). Diets were offered in 3 periods with 2 diet replicates per period and were rotated across cows between periods. Cows were individually fed 20 g DM/kg of body weight in equal feedings at 08:00 and 16:00 h for a 10-d adaptation followed by a 5-d total fecal collection. Actual DM intake (DMI), DMD, and FO were determined based on hay offered, ort, and feces excreted. These components were then analyzed for ADL, APL, and ADIA concentration to determine marker recovery and marker-based estimates of FO and DMD. RESULTS: Forage DMI was affected by diet (P = 0.02), and DMI from MH and H was greater (P < 0.05) than from L. Apparent DMD tended (P = 0.08) to differ among diets while FO (P = 0.20) was not affected by diet treatments. Average ADL recovery (1.16) was greater (P < 0.05) than that of ADIA (1.03) and APL (1.06), but ADIA and APL did not differ (P = 0.42). Estimates of FO and DMD derived using APL and ADIA were not different (P ≥ 0.05) from total fecal collection while those using ADL differed (P < 0.05). There was no diet by marker interaction (P ≥ 0.22) for either FO or DMD. CONCLUSION: Acid-detergent insoluble ash and APL accurately predicted FO and DMD of cattle fed bermudagrass hay of varying nutrient composition. These internal markers may facilitate studies involving large numbers of animals and forages. Results from such studies may be used to develop improved equations to predict energy values of forages based on the relationship of dietary components to digestibility across a wide range of forages.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>cows</subject><subject>crude protein</subject><subject>Cynodon dactylon</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Energy value</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Hay</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Lignin</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><issn>2049-1891</issn><issn>1674-9782</issn><issn>2049-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFU8tu1TAUjBCIotIlW7DEhkVT7PgRZ4OoKl5SJRbQteU4dnraxL7YSdvb_-U_cHrLpS1CJIqSeOaM5syxi-IFwQeESPG2wqwpiWxIycv6UfFs-__4zvdOsZfSGc6XqGoqydNip2KMSC6aZ8XPozCudIQUPAoOaQNd2dnJxt76CQ3Qe_D7SA_negBvy5WN4Qo6-wfx3cMi8CkMcztYpNNpfvJChrwe0KjjuY0JuRDRKtoOzAS-R86aDIZ5Ws3TjWAHvU0TtDDAtEbtGhk9TVkvOGdzGWptHOdO91GnhE71Oi3WL3RcL2p-niIsPkzuLCSYIPjnxROnh2T3bt-7xcnHD9-PPpfHXz99OTo8Llsh6ql0VGDRat4RZ5ihjEte1bXWTnOS0xS4lZq2dS0l4TVpDa0pN8ayytmaVpzR3eLdRnc1t6PtTLYR9aBWEXLraxU0qPuIh1PVhwtFG0xqWWeB9xuBFsI_BO4juUm1TFotk1ZcLRL7G4lL7Z32vToL85J-UlfjOl2epetrZStMGKYYy0x_c2s5hh9zjl2NkIwdBu1tmJMiQlAuiJDk_1TWVEIKJptMff2AunVR5fgYZZTizDrYsHo9WAXehdyTyXdnRzDBWwd5_ZAzUvEGs8VBuSkwMaQUrdsmQ7BaTsRfWby8O48t-_f-z4RXG4LTQeUNBUmdfLsJB5OKNIzTX71WFhs</recordid><startdate>20140113</startdate><enddate>20140113</enddate><creator>Kanani, Juvenal</creator><creator>Philipp, Dirk</creator><creator>Coffey, Kenneth P</creator><creator>Kegley, Elizabeth B</creator><creator>West, Charles P</creator><creator>Gadberry, Shane</creator><creator>Jennings, John</creator><creator>Young, Ashley N</creator><creator>Rhein, Robert T</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayettevil e, AR 72701, USA.%Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140113</creationdate><title>Comparison of acid-detergent lignin, alkaline-peroxide lignin, and acid-detergent insoluble ash as internal markers for predicting fecal output and digestibility by cattle offered bermudagrass hays of varying nutrient composition</title><author>Kanani, Juvenal ; Philipp, Dirk ; Coffey, Kenneth P ; Kegley, Elizabeth B ; West, Charles P ; Gadberry, Shane ; Jennings, John ; Young, Ashley N ; Rhein, Robert T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b667t-f3606ba5d1fc4c34585277aafa5104960b8a3b77881571bc3735cce42fe732543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>cows</topic><topic>crude protein</topic><topic>Cynodon dactylon</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Energy value</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Hay</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Lignin</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanani, Juvenal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegley, Elizabeth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Charles P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadberry, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Ashley N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhein, Robert T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanani, Juvenal</au><au>Philipp, Dirk</au><au>Coffey, Kenneth P</au><au>Kegley, Elizabeth B</au><au>West, Charles P</au><au>Gadberry, Shane</au><au>Jennings, John</au><au>Young, Ashley N</au><au>Rhein, Robert T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of acid-detergent lignin, alkaline-peroxide lignin, and acid-detergent insoluble ash as internal markers for predicting fecal output and digestibility by cattle offered bermudagrass hays of varying nutrient composition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2014-01-13</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>7-7</pages><artnum>7</artnum><issn>2049-1891</issn><issn>1674-9782</issn><eissn>2049-1891</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: The potential for acid-detergent insoluble ash (ADIA), alkaline-peroxide lignin (APL), and acid-detergent lignin (ADL) to predict fecal output (FO) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) by cattle offered bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] hays of different qualities was evaluated. Eight ruminally cannulated cows (594 ± 35.5 kg) were allocated randomly to 4 hay diets: low (L), medium low (ML), medium high (MH), and high (H) crude protein (CP) concentration (79, 111, 131, and 164 g CP/kg on a DM basis, respectively). Diets were offered in 3 periods with 2 diet replicates per period and were rotated across cows between periods. Cows were individually fed 20 g DM/kg of body weight in equal feedings at 08:00 and 16:00 h for a 10-d adaptation followed by a 5-d total fecal collection. Actual DM intake (DMI), DMD, and FO were determined based on hay offered, ort, and feces excreted. These components were then analyzed for ADL, APL, and ADIA concentration to determine marker recovery and marker-based estimates of FO and DMD. RESULTS: Forage DMI was affected by diet (P = 0.02), and DMI from MH and H was greater (P < 0.05) than from L. Apparent DMD tended (P = 0.08) to differ among diets while FO (P = 0.20) was not affected by diet treatments. Average ADL recovery (1.16) was greater (P < 0.05) than that of ADIA (1.03) and APL (1.06), but ADIA and APL did not differ (P = 0.42). Estimates of FO and DMD derived using APL and ADIA were not different (P ≥ 0.05) from total fecal collection while those using ADL differed (P < 0.05). There was no diet by marker interaction (P ≥ 0.22) for either FO or DMD. CONCLUSION: Acid-detergent insoluble ash and APL accurately predicted FO and DMD of cattle fed bermudagrass hay of varying nutrient composition. These internal markers may facilitate studies involving large numbers of animals and forages. Results from such studies may be used to develop improved equations to predict energy values of forages based on the relationship of dietary components to digestibility across a wide range of forages.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24418569</pmid><doi>10.1186/2049-1891-5-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2049-1891 |
| ispartof | Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2014-01, Vol.5 (1), p.7-7, Article 7 |
| issn | 2049-1891 1674-9782 2049-1891 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3901787 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
| subjects | Acids Ashes Beef cattle Body weight Cattle Comparative analysis Composition cows crude protein Cynodon dactylon Diet Digestibility Dry matter Energy value Estimates Farms Feces Feeds Hay Health aspects Lignin nutrient content Nutrient deficiency Nutrients Physiological aspects Proteins Recovery |
| title | Comparison of acid-detergent lignin, alkaline-peroxide lignin, and acid-detergent insoluble ash as internal markers for predicting fecal output and digestibility by cattle offered bermudagrass hays of varying nutrient composition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T00%3A05%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20acid-detergent%20lignin,%20alkaline-peroxide%20lignin,%20and%20acid-detergent%20insoluble%20ash%20as%20internal%20markers%20for%20predicting%20fecal%20output%20and%20digestibility%20by%20cattle%20offered%20bermudagrass%20hays%20of%20varying%20nutrient%20composition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Animal%20Science%20and%20Biotechnology&rft.au=Kanani,%20Juvenal&rft.date=2014-01-13&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=7-7&rft.artnum=7&rft.issn=2049-1891&rft.eissn=2049-1891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2049-1891-5-7&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_pubme%3Exmyswjszz_e201403008%3C/wanfang_jour_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788434330&rft_id=info:pmid/24418569&rft_galeid=A541259041&rft_wanfj_id=xmyswjszz_e201403008&rfr_iscdi=true |