The effects of fire on ant trophic assemblage and sex allocation
Fire plays a key role in ecosystem dynamics worldwide, altering energy flows and species community structure and composition. However, the functional mechanisms underlying these effects are not well understood. Many ground‐dwelling animal species can shelter themselves from exposure to heat and ther...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.35-49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Caut, Stephane Jowers, Michael J. Arnan, Xavier Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica Rodrigo, Anselm Cerda, Xim Boulay, Raphaël R. |
description | Fire plays a key role in ecosystem dynamics worldwide, altering energy flows and species community structure and composition. However, the functional mechanisms underlying these effects are not well understood. Many ground‐dwelling animal species can shelter themselves from exposure to heat and therefore rarely suffer direct mortality. However, fire‐induced alterations to the environment may change a species' relative trophic level within a food web and its mode of foraging. We assessed how fire could affect ant resource utilization at different scales in a Mediterranean forest. First, we conducted isotopic analyses on entire ant species assemblages and their potential food resources, which included plants and other arthropods, in burned and unburned plots 1 year postfire. Second, we measured the production of males and females by nests of a fire‐resilient species, Aphaenogaster gibbosa, and analyzed the differences in isotopic values among workers, males, and females to test whether fire constrained resource allocation. We found that, in spite of major modifications in biotic and abiotic conditions, fire had little impact on the relative trophic position of ant species. The studied assemblage was composed of species with a wide array of diets. They ranged from being mostly herbivorous to completely omnivorous, and a given species' trophic level was the same in burned and unburned plots. In A. gibbosa nests, sexuals had greater δ15N values than workers in both burned and unburned plots, which suggests that the former had a more protein‐rich diet than the latter. Fire also appeared to have a major effect on A. gibbosa sex allocation: The proportion of nests that produced male brood was greater on burned zones, as was the mean number of males produced per nest with the same reproductive investment. Our results show that generalist ants with relatively broad diets maintained a constant trophic position, even following a major disturbance like fire. However, the dramatically reduced production of females on burned zones compared to unburned zones 1 year postfire may result in considerably reduced recruitment of new colonies in the mid to long term, which could yield genetic bottlenecks and founder effects. Our study paves the way for future functional analyses of fire‐induced modifications in ant populations and communities.
(A) Number of sexuals in the complete nests excavated in burned and unburned zones; and (B) Effect of fire on the numerical sex ratio (nS |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.714 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3894886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1712569732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-88c08d79e60c14beeaaa0b5813ae9234701430c56bcf49eca835cfc6cd6b842f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkclKBDEQhoMoKir4BBLw4qU1-3IRZRgXELzoOaQzFaelpzMmPS5vbw_ugphLhdTHR1V-hHYpOaSEsCMIwA81FStokxEhK62lWf1230A7pdyT4SjCBNHraIMJISWVdhOd3EwBQ4wQ-oJTxLHJgFOHfdfjPqf5tAnYlwKzuvV3MDxPcIFn7Ns2Bd83qdtGa9G3BXbe6xa6PRvfjC6qq-vzy9HpVRUk16IyJhAz0RYUCVTUAN57UktDuQfLuNCECk6CVHWIwkLwhssQgwoTVRvBIt9Cx2_e-aKewSRA12ffunluZj6_uOQb97PTNVN3lx4dN1YYowbBwbsgp4cFlN7NmhKgbX0HaVEc1ZRJZTVn_6PCMmU013RA93-h92mRu-EnHGPWUqWkJF_CkFMpGeLn3JS4ZYhuGaIbQhzQve97foIfkQ1A9QY8NS28_Cly49GYL4WvmMqkTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299166550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of fire on ant trophic assemblage and sex allocation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Caut, Stephane ; Jowers, Michael J. ; Arnan, Xavier ; Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica ; Rodrigo, Anselm ; Cerda, Xim ; Boulay, Raphaël R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Caut, Stephane ; Jowers, Michael J. ; Arnan, Xavier ; Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica ; Rodrigo, Anselm ; Cerda, Xim ; Boulay, Raphaël R.</creatorcontrib><description>Fire plays a key role in ecosystem dynamics worldwide, altering energy flows and species community structure and composition. However, the functional mechanisms underlying these effects are not well understood. Many ground‐dwelling animal species can shelter themselves from exposure to heat and therefore rarely suffer direct mortality. However, fire‐induced alterations to the environment may change a species' relative trophic level within a food web and its mode of foraging. We assessed how fire could affect ant resource utilization at different scales in a Mediterranean forest. First, we conducted isotopic analyses on entire ant species assemblages and their potential food resources, which included plants and other arthropods, in burned and unburned plots 1 year postfire. Second, we measured the production of males and females by nests of a fire‐resilient species, Aphaenogaster gibbosa, and analyzed the differences in isotopic values among workers, males, and females to test whether fire constrained resource allocation. We found that, in spite of major modifications in biotic and abiotic conditions, fire had little impact on the relative trophic position of ant species. The studied assemblage was composed of species with a wide array of diets. They ranged from being mostly herbivorous to completely omnivorous, and a given species' trophic level was the same in burned and unburned plots. In A. gibbosa nests, sexuals had greater δ15N values than workers in both burned and unburned plots, which suggests that the former had a more protein‐rich diet than the latter. Fire also appeared to have a major effect on A. gibbosa sex allocation: The proportion of nests that produced male brood was greater on burned zones, as was the mean number of males produced per nest with the same reproductive investment. Our results show that generalist ants with relatively broad diets maintained a constant trophic position, even following a major disturbance like fire. However, the dramatically reduced production of females on burned zones compared to unburned zones 1 year postfire may result in considerably reduced recruitment of new colonies in the mid to long term, which could yield genetic bottlenecks and founder effects. Our study paves the way for future functional analyses of fire‐induced modifications in ant populations and communities.
(A) Number of sexuals in the complete nests excavated in burned and unburned zones; and (B) Effect of fire on the numerical sex ratio (nSRT) and investment sex ratio (iSRT) as well as on the percentage of reproductive biomass (%RB), male biomass (%MB), and female biomass (%FB) of excavated nests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.714</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24455159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal species ; Ant assemblage ; Aphaenogaster ; Aphaenogaster gibbosa ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Community structure ; Diet ; Ecosystem dynamics ; Ecosystems ; Energy flow ; Environmental changes ; Females ; Food chains ; Food plants ; Food resources ; Food webs ; Formicidae ; Herbivores ; Laboratories ; Males ; Nests ; Original Research ; Proteins ; reproductive output ; Resource allocation ; Resource utilization ; Sex ; sex ratio ; Species ; stable isotopes ; Studies ; Trophic levels ; wildfire ; Workers (insect caste)</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.35-49</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-88c08d79e60c14beeaaa0b5813ae9234701430c56bcf49eca835cfc6cd6b842f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-88c08d79e60c14beeaaa0b5813ae9234701430c56bcf49eca835cfc6cd6b842f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894886/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894886/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24455159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caut, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jowers, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnan, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigo, Anselm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerda, Xim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulay, Raphaël R.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of fire on ant trophic assemblage and sex allocation</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Fire plays a key role in ecosystem dynamics worldwide, altering energy flows and species community structure and composition. However, the functional mechanisms underlying these effects are not well understood. Many ground‐dwelling animal species can shelter themselves from exposure to heat and therefore rarely suffer direct mortality. However, fire‐induced alterations to the environment may change a species' relative trophic level within a food web and its mode of foraging. We assessed how fire could affect ant resource utilization at different scales in a Mediterranean forest. First, we conducted isotopic analyses on entire ant species assemblages and their potential food resources, which included plants and other arthropods, in burned and unburned plots 1 year postfire. Second, we measured the production of males and females by nests of a fire‐resilient species, Aphaenogaster gibbosa, and analyzed the differences in isotopic values among workers, males, and females to test whether fire constrained resource allocation. We found that, in spite of major modifications in biotic and abiotic conditions, fire had little impact on the relative trophic position of ant species. The studied assemblage was composed of species with a wide array of diets. They ranged from being mostly herbivorous to completely omnivorous, and a given species' trophic level was the same in burned and unburned plots. In A. gibbosa nests, sexuals had greater δ15N values than workers in both burned and unburned plots, which suggests that the former had a more protein‐rich diet than the latter. Fire also appeared to have a major effect on A. gibbosa sex allocation: The proportion of nests that produced male brood was greater on burned zones, as was the mean number of males produced per nest with the same reproductive investment. Our results show that generalist ants with relatively broad diets maintained a constant trophic position, even following a major disturbance like fire. However, the dramatically reduced production of females on burned zones compared to unburned zones 1 year postfire may result in considerably reduced recruitment of new colonies in the mid to long term, which could yield genetic bottlenecks and founder effects. Our study paves the way for future functional analyses of fire‐induced modifications in ant populations and communities.
(A) Number of sexuals in the complete nests excavated in burned and unburned zones; and (B) Effect of fire on the numerical sex ratio (nSRT) and investment sex ratio (iSRT) as well as on the percentage of reproductive biomass (%RB), male biomass (%MB), and female biomass (%FB) of excavated nests.</description><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Ant assemblage</subject><subject>Aphaenogaster</subject><subject>Aphaenogaster gibbosa</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecosystem dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Energy flow</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>reproductive output</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Resource utilization</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>sex ratio</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>stable isotopes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>wildfire</subject><subject>Workers (insect caste)</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkclKBDEQhoMoKir4BBLw4qU1-3IRZRgXELzoOaQzFaelpzMmPS5vbw_ugphLhdTHR1V-hHYpOaSEsCMIwA81FStokxEhK62lWf1230A7pdyT4SjCBNHraIMJISWVdhOd3EwBQ4wQ-oJTxLHJgFOHfdfjPqf5tAnYlwKzuvV3MDxPcIFn7Ns2Bd83qdtGa9G3BXbe6xa6PRvfjC6qq-vzy9HpVRUk16IyJhAz0RYUCVTUAN57UktDuQfLuNCECk6CVHWIwkLwhssQgwoTVRvBIt9Cx2_e-aKewSRA12ffunluZj6_uOQb97PTNVN3lx4dN1YYowbBwbsgp4cFlN7NmhKgbX0HaVEc1ZRJZTVn_6PCMmU013RA93-h92mRu-EnHGPWUqWkJF_CkFMpGeLn3JS4ZYhuGaIbQhzQve97foIfkQ1A9QY8NS28_Cly49GYL4WvmMqkTA</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Caut, Stephane</creator><creator>Jowers, Michael J.</creator><creator>Arnan, Xavier</creator><creator>Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica</creator><creator>Rodrigo, Anselm</creator><creator>Cerda, Xim</creator><creator>Boulay, Raphaël R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>The effects of fire on ant trophic assemblage and sex allocation</title><author>Caut, Stephane ; Jowers, Michael J. ; Arnan, Xavier ; Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica ; Rodrigo, Anselm ; Cerda, Xim ; Boulay, Raphaël R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-88c08d79e60c14beeaaa0b5813ae9234701430c56bcf49eca835cfc6cd6b842f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Ant assemblage</topic><topic>Aphaenogaster</topic><topic>Aphaenogaster gibbosa</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecosystem dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Energy flow</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>reproductive output</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Resource utilization</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>sex ratio</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>stable isotopes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>wildfire</topic><topic>Workers (insect caste)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caut, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jowers, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnan, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigo, Anselm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerda, Xim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulay, Raphaël R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caut, Stephane</au><au>Jowers, Michael J.</au><au>Arnan, Xavier</au><au>Pearce‐Duvet, Jessica</au><au>Rodrigo, Anselm</au><au>Cerda, Xim</au><au>Boulay, Raphaël R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of fire on ant trophic assemblage and sex allocation</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>35-49</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Fire plays a key role in ecosystem dynamics worldwide, altering energy flows and species community structure and composition. However, the functional mechanisms underlying these effects are not well understood. Many ground‐dwelling animal species can shelter themselves from exposure to heat and therefore rarely suffer direct mortality. However, fire‐induced alterations to the environment may change a species' relative trophic level within a food web and its mode of foraging. We assessed how fire could affect ant resource utilization at different scales in a Mediterranean forest. First, we conducted isotopic analyses on entire ant species assemblages and their potential food resources, which included plants and other arthropods, in burned and unburned plots 1 year postfire. Second, we measured the production of males and females by nests of a fire‐resilient species, Aphaenogaster gibbosa, and analyzed the differences in isotopic values among workers, males, and females to test whether fire constrained resource allocation. We found that, in spite of major modifications in biotic and abiotic conditions, fire had little impact on the relative trophic position of ant species. The studied assemblage was composed of species with a wide array of diets. They ranged from being mostly herbivorous to completely omnivorous, and a given species' trophic level was the same in burned and unburned plots. In A. gibbosa nests, sexuals had greater δ15N values than workers in both burned and unburned plots, which suggests that the former had a more protein‐rich diet than the latter. Fire also appeared to have a major effect on A. gibbosa sex allocation: The proportion of nests that produced male brood was greater on burned zones, as was the mean number of males produced per nest with the same reproductive investment. Our results show that generalist ants with relatively broad diets maintained a constant trophic position, even following a major disturbance like fire. However, the dramatically reduced production of females on burned zones compared to unburned zones 1 year postfire may result in considerably reduced recruitment of new colonies in the mid to long term, which could yield genetic bottlenecks and founder effects. Our study paves the way for future functional analyses of fire‐induced modifications in ant populations and communities.
(A) Number of sexuals in the complete nests excavated in burned and unburned zones; and (B) Effect of fire on the numerical sex ratio (nSRT) and investment sex ratio (iSRT) as well as on the percentage of reproductive biomass (%RB), male biomass (%MB), and female biomass (%FB) of excavated nests.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>24455159</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.714</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.35-49 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3894886 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animal species Ant assemblage Aphaenogaster Aphaenogaster gibbosa Arthropoda Arthropods Community structure Diet Ecosystem dynamics Ecosystems Energy flow Environmental changes Females Food chains Food plants Food resources Food webs Formicidae Herbivores Laboratories Males Nests Original Research Proteins reproductive output Resource allocation Resource utilization Sex sex ratio Species stable isotopes Studies Trophic levels wildfire Workers (insect caste) |
title | The effects of fire on ant trophic assemblage and sex allocation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A32%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20fire%20on%20ant%20trophic%20assemblage%20and%20sex%20allocation&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Caut,%20Stephane&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=35-49&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.714&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1712569732%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299166550&rft_id=info:pmid/24455159&rfr_iscdi=true |