The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty
Purpose Implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are considered as rare in clinical practice. Nevertheless they are relevant complications for patients, physicians, and the public health system leading to high socioeconomic burdens. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of fr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2014-01, Vol.38 (1), p.39-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | International orthopaedics |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Sadoghi, Patrick Pawelka, Wolfram Liebensteiner, Michael C. Williams, Alexandra Leithner, Andreas Labek, Gerold |
description | Purpose
Implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are considered as rare in clinical practice. Nevertheless they are relevant complications for patients, physicians, and the public health system leading to high socioeconomic burdens. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of fractures after THAs in a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register datasets.
Methods
We calculated the pooled incidence of revision operations after fractures of THAs in a comparison of clinical studies published in Medline-listed journals and annual reports of worldwide arthroplasty registers in a structured literature analysis based on a standardised methodology.
Results
Included clinical studies (sample-based datasets) were mono-centre trials comprising a cumulative number of approximately 70,000 primary implantations whereas worldwide national arthroplasty register datasets referred to 733,000 primary implantations, i.e. approximately ten times as many as sample-based datasets. In general, sample-based datasets presented higher revision rates than register datasets with a maximum deviation of a 14.5 ratio for ceramic heads, respectively. The incidence of implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty in pooled worldwide arthroplasty register datasets is 304 fractures per 100,000 implants. In other words, one out of 323 patients has to undergo revision surgery due to an implant fracture after THA in their lifetime.
Conclusions
Implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty occur in a relevant number of patients. The authors believe that comprehensive arthroplasty register datasets allow more general evaluations and conclusions on that topic in contrast to clinical studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00264-013-2110-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3890121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1501833628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-543fdece2a9b0897dcab4e1a6e1ee60e5763d2f89df1262bf4bf3fe87b19eac03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PxDAMhiMEguPgB7CgjiwFO-lHuoAQ4ktCYjnmKE0drqjXHEmKxL8n6ADBwuTBj1_bD2NHCKcIUJ8FAF4VOaDIOSLkYovNsBA8L7Ept9kMRIE5r5pyj-2H8AKAdSVxl-3xAupaynrGLhZLyvrR9B2NhjJns361HvQYM-u1iZOnkGkbyWfRRT1ky36daR-X3iUqxPcDtmP1EOjwq87Z08314uouf3i8vb-6fMhNCTLmZSFsR4a4blqQTd0Z3RaEuiIkqoDKuhIdt7LpLPKKt7ZorbAk6xYb0gbEnJ1vctdTu6LO0Bi9HtTa9yvt35XTvfrbGfulenZvSsgGkGMKOPkK8O51ohDVqg-GhvQruSkoLAGlEBWXCcUNarwLwZP9WYOgPsWrjXiVxKtP8UqkmePf9_1MfJtOAN8AIbXGZ_LqxU1-TM7-Sf0ArhyQRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501833628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sadoghi, Patrick ; Pawelka, Wolfram ; Liebensteiner, Michael C. ; Williams, Alexandra ; Leithner, Andreas ; Labek, Gerold</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadoghi, Patrick ; Pawelka, Wolfram ; Liebensteiner, Michael C. ; Williams, Alexandra ; Leithner, Andreas ; Labek, Gerold</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are considered as rare in clinical practice. Nevertheless they are relevant complications for patients, physicians, and the public health system leading to high socioeconomic burdens. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of fractures after THAs in a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register datasets.
Methods
We calculated the pooled incidence of revision operations after fractures of THAs in a comparison of clinical studies published in Medline-listed journals and annual reports of worldwide arthroplasty registers in a structured literature analysis based on a standardised methodology.
Results
Included clinical studies (sample-based datasets) were mono-centre trials comprising a cumulative number of approximately 70,000 primary implantations whereas worldwide national arthroplasty register datasets referred to 733,000 primary implantations, i.e. approximately ten times as many as sample-based datasets. In general, sample-based datasets presented higher revision rates than register datasets with a maximum deviation of a 14.5 ratio for ceramic heads, respectively. The incidence of implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty in pooled worldwide arthroplasty register datasets is 304 fractures per 100,000 implants. In other words, one out of 323 patients has to undergo revision surgery due to an implant fracture after THA in their lifetime.
Conclusions
Implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty occur in a relevant number of patients. The authors believe that comprehensive arthroplasty register datasets allow more general evaluations and conclusions on that topic in contrast to clinical studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-2695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2110-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24077887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; Incidence ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Original Paper ; Orthopedics ; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>International orthopaedics, 2014-01, Vol.38 (1), p.39-46</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-543fdece2a9b0897dcab4e1a6e1ee60e5763d2f89df1262bf4bf3fe87b19eac03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-543fdece2a9b0897dcab4e1a6e1ee60e5763d2f89df1262bf4bf3fe87b19eac03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890121/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890121/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24077887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadoghi, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawelka, Wolfram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebensteiner, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leithner, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labek, Gerold</creatorcontrib><title>The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty</title><title>International orthopaedics</title><addtitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</addtitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><description>Purpose
Implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are considered as rare in clinical practice. Nevertheless they are relevant complications for patients, physicians, and the public health system leading to high socioeconomic burdens. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of fractures after THAs in a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register datasets.
Methods
We calculated the pooled incidence of revision operations after fractures of THAs in a comparison of clinical studies published in Medline-listed journals and annual reports of worldwide arthroplasty registers in a structured literature analysis based on a standardised methodology.
Results
Included clinical studies (sample-based datasets) were mono-centre trials comprising a cumulative number of approximately 70,000 primary implantations whereas worldwide national arthroplasty register datasets referred to 733,000 primary implantations, i.e. approximately ten times as many as sample-based datasets. In general, sample-based datasets presented higher revision rates than register datasets with a maximum deviation of a 14.5 ratio for ceramic heads, respectively. The incidence of implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty in pooled worldwide arthroplasty register datasets is 304 fractures per 100,000 implants. In other words, one out of 323 patients has to undergo revision surgery due to an implant fracture after THA in their lifetime.
Conclusions
Implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty occur in a relevant number of patients. The authors believe that comprehensive arthroplasty register datasets allow more general evaluations and conclusions on that topic in contrast to clinical studies.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0341-2695</issn><issn>1432-5195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PxDAMhiMEguPgB7CgjiwFO-lHuoAQ4ktCYjnmKE0drqjXHEmKxL8n6ADBwuTBj1_bD2NHCKcIUJ8FAF4VOaDIOSLkYovNsBA8L7Ept9kMRIE5r5pyj-2H8AKAdSVxl-3xAupaynrGLhZLyvrR9B2NhjJns361HvQYM-u1iZOnkGkbyWfRRT1ky36daR-X3iUqxPcDtmP1EOjwq87Z08314uouf3i8vb-6fMhNCTLmZSFsR4a4blqQTd0Z3RaEuiIkqoDKuhIdt7LpLPKKt7ZorbAk6xYb0gbEnJ1vctdTu6LO0Bi9HtTa9yvt35XTvfrbGfulenZvSsgGkGMKOPkK8O51ohDVqg-GhvQruSkoLAGlEBWXCcUNarwLwZP9WYOgPsWrjXiVxKtP8UqkmePf9_1MfJtOAN8AIbXGZ_LqxU1-TM7-Sf0ArhyQRw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Sadoghi, Patrick</creator><creator>Pawelka, Wolfram</creator><creator>Liebensteiner, Michael C.</creator><creator>Williams, Alexandra</creator><creator>Leithner, Andreas</creator><creator>Labek, Gerold</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Sadoghi, Patrick ; Pawelka, Wolfram ; Liebensteiner, Michael C. ; Williams, Alexandra ; Leithner, Andreas ; Labek, Gerold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-543fdece2a9b0897dcab4e1a6e1ee60e5763d2f89df1262bf4bf3fe87b19eac03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadoghi, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawelka, Wolfram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebensteiner, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leithner, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labek, Gerold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadoghi, Patrick</au><au>Pawelka, Wolfram</au><au>Liebensteiner, Michael C.</au><au>Williams, Alexandra</au><au>Leithner, Andreas</au><au>Labek, Gerold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</stitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>39-46</pages><issn>0341-2695</issn><eissn>1432-5195</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are considered as rare in clinical practice. Nevertheless they are relevant complications for patients, physicians, and the public health system leading to high socioeconomic burdens. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of fractures after THAs in a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register datasets.
Methods
We calculated the pooled incidence of revision operations after fractures of THAs in a comparison of clinical studies published in Medline-listed journals and annual reports of worldwide arthroplasty registers in a structured literature analysis based on a standardised methodology.
Results
Included clinical studies (sample-based datasets) were mono-centre trials comprising a cumulative number of approximately 70,000 primary implantations whereas worldwide national arthroplasty register datasets referred to 733,000 primary implantations, i.e. approximately ten times as many as sample-based datasets. In general, sample-based datasets presented higher revision rates than register datasets with a maximum deviation of a 14.5 ratio for ceramic heads, respectively. The incidence of implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty in pooled worldwide arthroplasty register datasets is 304 fractures per 100,000 implants. In other words, one out of 323 patients has to undergo revision surgery due to an implant fracture after THA in their lifetime.
Conclusions
Implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty occur in a relevant number of patients. The authors believe that comprehensive arthroplasty register datasets allow more general evaluations and conclusions on that topic in contrast to clinical studies.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24077887</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00264-013-2110-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0341-2695 |
ispartof | International orthopaedics, 2014-01, Vol.38 (1), p.39-46 |
issn | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3890121 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data Clinical Trials as Topic Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects Humans Incidence Medicine Medicine & Public Health Multicenter Studies as Topic Original Paper Orthopedics Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology Registries Retrospective Studies |
title | The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A46%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20incidence%20of%20implant%20fractures%20after%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=International%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Sadoghi,%20Patrick&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=39-46&rft.issn=0341-2695&rft.eissn=1432-5195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00264-013-2110-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1501833628%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501833628&rft_id=info:pmid/24077887&rfr_iscdi=true |