Cortical dendritic spine heads are not electrically isolated by the spine neck from membrane potential signals in parent dendrites

The evidence for an important hypothesis that cortical spine morphology might participate in modifying synaptic efficacy that underlies plasticity and possibly learning and memory mechanisms is inconclusive. Both theory and experiments suggest that the transfer of excitatory postsynaptic potential s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) N.Y. 1991), 2014-02, Vol.24 (2), p.385-395
Hauptverfasser: Popovic, Marko A, Gao, Xin, Carnevale, Nicholas T, Zecevic, Dejan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 395
container_issue 2
container_start_page 385
container_title Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)
container_volume 24
creator Popovic, Marko A
Gao, Xin
Carnevale, Nicholas T
Zecevic, Dejan
description The evidence for an important hypothesis that cortical spine morphology might participate in modifying synaptic efficacy that underlies plasticity and possibly learning and memory mechanisms is inconclusive. Both theory and experiments suggest that the transfer of excitatory postsynaptic potential signals from spines to parent dendrites depends on the spine neck morphology and resistance. Furthermore, modeling of signal transfer in the opposite direction predicts that synapses on spine heads are not electrically isolated from voltages in the parent dendrite. In sharp contrast to this theoretical prediction, one of a very few measurements of electrical signals from spines reported that slow hyperpolarizing membrane potential changes are attenuated considerably by the spine neck as they spread from dendrites to synapses on spine heads. This result challenges our understanding of the electrical behavior of spines at a fundamental level. To re-examine the specific question of the transfer of dendritic signals to synapses of spines, we took advantage of a high-sensitivity Vm-imaging technique and carried out optical measurements of electrical signals from 4 groups of spines with different neck length and simultaneously from parent dendrites. The results show that spine neck does not filter membrane potential signals as they spread from the dendrites into the spine heads.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cercor/bhs320
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3888368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1496898875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a6decf0f14a207b198b4dc22390ce78c77d756e1d6e9ba7847a2dcfedce73713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1vFDEQxS0EIh9Q0iKXNJvz163tBik6JYAUiSa95bVnc4Zde7F9ka7lL8enu0RJR-XRvOffzOgh9ImSK0o0XznILuXVsC2ckTfonIqedIxq_bbVRMiOM0rP0EUpvwihkq3Ze3TGOFkLRck5-rtJuQZnJ-wh-hxajcsSIuAtWF-wzYBjqhgmcDUfjNMeh5ImW8HjYY_rFk4fIrjfeMxpxjPMQ7attaQKsYZGL-Eh2qngEPHSmLE-zYPyAb0bmwQfT-8lur-9ud987-5-fvuxub7rnGCkdrb34EYyUmEZkQPVahDeMcY1cSCVk9LLdQ_U96AHK5WQlnk3gm8ql5Rfoq9H7LIb5kM31mwns-Qw27w3yQbzWolhax7So-FKKd6rBvhyAuT0ZwelmjkUB9PULk27YqjQvdJKyfX_WEmvhRSHtbqj1eVUSobxeSNKzCFhc0zYHBNu_s8vz3h2P0XK_wFzqahX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490694741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cortical dendritic spine heads are not electrically isolated by the spine neck from membrane potential signals in parent dendrites</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Popovic, Marko A ; Gao, Xin ; Carnevale, Nicholas T ; Zecevic, Dejan</creator><creatorcontrib>Popovic, Marko A ; Gao, Xin ; Carnevale, Nicholas T ; Zecevic, Dejan</creatorcontrib><description>The evidence for an important hypothesis that cortical spine morphology might participate in modifying synaptic efficacy that underlies plasticity and possibly learning and memory mechanisms is inconclusive. Both theory and experiments suggest that the transfer of excitatory postsynaptic potential signals from spines to parent dendrites depends on the spine neck morphology and resistance. Furthermore, modeling of signal transfer in the opposite direction predicts that synapses on spine heads are not electrically isolated from voltages in the parent dendrite. In sharp contrast to this theoretical prediction, one of a very few measurements of electrical signals from spines reported that slow hyperpolarizing membrane potential changes are attenuated considerably by the spine neck as they spread from dendrites to synapses on spine heads. This result challenges our understanding of the electrical behavior of spines at a fundamental level. To re-examine the specific question of the transfer of dendritic signals to synapses of spines, we took advantage of a high-sensitivity Vm-imaging technique and carried out optical measurements of electrical signals from 4 groups of spines with different neck length and simultaneously from parent dendrites. The results show that spine neck does not filter membrane potential signals as they spread from the dendrites into the spine heads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-3211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs320</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23054810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; Animals ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Dendrites - physiology ; Dendritic Spines - physiology ; In Vitro Techniques ; Membrane Potentials - physiology ; Mice ; Models, Neurological ; Optical Imaging ; Patch-Clamp Techniques ; Pyramidal Cells - physiology ; Somatosensory Cortex - physiology ; Synapses - physiology ; Time Factors ; Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging</subject><ispartof>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2014-02, Vol.24 (2), p.385-395</ispartof><rights>The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a6decf0f14a207b198b4dc22390ce78c77d756e1d6e9ba7847a2dcfedce73713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a6decf0f14a207b198b4dc22390ce78c77d756e1d6e9ba7847a2dcfedce73713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23054810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Popovic, Marko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnevale, Nicholas T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zecevic, Dejan</creatorcontrib><title>Cortical dendritic spine heads are not electrically isolated by the spine neck from membrane potential signals in parent dendrites</title><title>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</title><addtitle>Cereb Cortex</addtitle><description>The evidence for an important hypothesis that cortical spine morphology might participate in modifying synaptic efficacy that underlies plasticity and possibly learning and memory mechanisms is inconclusive. Both theory and experiments suggest that the transfer of excitatory postsynaptic potential signals from spines to parent dendrites depends on the spine neck morphology and resistance. Furthermore, modeling of signal transfer in the opposite direction predicts that synapses on spine heads are not electrically isolated from voltages in the parent dendrite. In sharp contrast to this theoretical prediction, one of a very few measurements of electrical signals from spines reported that slow hyperpolarizing membrane potential changes are attenuated considerably by the spine neck as they spread from dendrites to synapses on spine heads. This result challenges our understanding of the electrical behavior of spines at a fundamental level. To re-examine the specific question of the transfer of dendritic signals to synapses of spines, we took advantage of a high-sensitivity Vm-imaging technique and carried out optical measurements of electrical signals from 4 groups of spines with different neck length and simultaneously from parent dendrites. The results show that spine neck does not filter membrane potential signals as they spread from the dendrites into the spine heads.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Dendrites - physiology</subject><subject>Dendritic Spines - physiology</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Membrane Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Optical Imaging</subject><subject>Patch-Clamp Techniques</subject><subject>Pyramidal Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Somatosensory Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Synapses - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging</subject><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb1vFDEQxS0EIh9Q0iKXNJvz163tBik6JYAUiSa95bVnc4Zde7F9ka7lL8enu0RJR-XRvOffzOgh9ImSK0o0XznILuXVsC2ckTfonIqedIxq_bbVRMiOM0rP0EUpvwihkq3Ze3TGOFkLRck5-rtJuQZnJ-wh-hxajcsSIuAtWF-wzYBjqhgmcDUfjNMeh5ImW8HjYY_rFk4fIrjfeMxpxjPMQ7attaQKsYZGL-Eh2qngEPHSmLE-zYPyAb0bmwQfT-8lur-9ud987-5-fvuxub7rnGCkdrb34EYyUmEZkQPVahDeMcY1cSCVk9LLdQ_U96AHK5WQlnk3gm8ql5Rfoq9H7LIb5kM31mwns-Qw27w3yQbzWolhax7So-FKKd6rBvhyAuT0ZwelmjkUB9PULk27YqjQvdJKyfX_WEmvhRSHtbqj1eVUSobxeSNKzCFhc0zYHBNu_s8vz3h2P0XK_wFzqahX</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Popovic, Marko A</creator><creator>Gao, Xin</creator><creator>Carnevale, Nicholas T</creator><creator>Zecevic, Dejan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Cortical dendritic spine heads are not electrically isolated by the spine neck from membrane potential signals in parent dendrites</title><author>Popovic, Marko A ; Gao, Xin ; Carnevale, Nicholas T ; Zecevic, Dejan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a6decf0f14a207b198b4dc22390ce78c77d756e1d6e9ba7847a2dcfedce73713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Dendrites - physiology</topic><topic>Dendritic Spines - physiology</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Membrane Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Optical Imaging</topic><topic>Patch-Clamp Techniques</topic><topic>Pyramidal Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Somatosensory Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Synapses - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Popovic, Marko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnevale, Nicholas T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zecevic, Dejan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Popovic, Marko A</au><au>Gao, Xin</au><au>Carnevale, Nicholas T</au><au>Zecevic, Dejan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cortical dendritic spine heads are not electrically isolated by the spine neck from membrane potential signals in parent dendrites</atitle><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle><addtitle>Cereb Cortex</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>385-395</pages><issn>1047-3211</issn><eissn>1460-2199</eissn><abstract>The evidence for an important hypothesis that cortical spine morphology might participate in modifying synaptic efficacy that underlies plasticity and possibly learning and memory mechanisms is inconclusive. Both theory and experiments suggest that the transfer of excitatory postsynaptic potential signals from spines to parent dendrites depends on the spine neck morphology and resistance. Furthermore, modeling of signal transfer in the opposite direction predicts that synapses on spine heads are not electrically isolated from voltages in the parent dendrite. In sharp contrast to this theoretical prediction, one of a very few measurements of electrical signals from spines reported that slow hyperpolarizing membrane potential changes are attenuated considerably by the spine neck as they spread from dendrites to synapses on spine heads. This result challenges our understanding of the electrical behavior of spines at a fundamental level. To re-examine the specific question of the transfer of dendritic signals to synapses of spines, we took advantage of a high-sensitivity Vm-imaging technique and carried out optical measurements of electrical signals from 4 groups of spines with different neck length and simultaneously from parent dendrites. The results show that spine neck does not filter membrane potential signals as they spread from the dendrites into the spine heads.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>23054810</pmid><doi>10.1093/cercor/bhs320</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-3211
ispartof Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2014-02, Vol.24 (2), p.385-395
issn 1047-3211
1460-2199
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3888368
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Action Potentials
Animals
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Computer Simulation
Dendrites - physiology
Dendritic Spines - physiology
In Vitro Techniques
Membrane Potentials - physiology
Mice
Models, Neurological
Optical Imaging
Patch-Clamp Techniques
Pyramidal Cells - physiology
Somatosensory Cortex - physiology
Synapses - physiology
Time Factors
Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging
title Cortical dendritic spine heads are not electrically isolated by the spine neck from membrane potential signals in parent dendrites
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T22%3A31%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cortical%20dendritic%20spine%20heads%20are%20not%20electrically%20isolated%20by%20the%20spine%20neck%20from%20membrane%20potential%20signals%20in%20parent%20dendrites&rft.jtitle=Cerebral%20cortex%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201991)&rft.au=Popovic,%20Marko%20A&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=385-395&rft.issn=1047-3211&rft.eissn=1460-2199&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cercor/bhs320&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1496898875%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490694741&rft_id=info:pmid/23054810&rfr_iscdi=true