Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring

Abstract Background Cardiac arrhythmias are remarkably common and routinely go undiagnosed because they are often transient and asymptomatic. Effective diagnosis and treatment can substantially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac arrhythmias. The Zio Patch (iRhythm Technologie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of medicine 2014-01, Vol.127 (1), p.95.e11-95.e17
Hauptverfasser: Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO, Komatireddy, Ravi, MD, Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC, Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA, Sheard, Judith, MPH, Encinas, Jackie, MS, Fought, Angela J., MS, Topol, Eric J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95.e17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95.e11
container_title The American journal of medicine
container_volume 127
creator Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO
Komatireddy, Ravi, MD
Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC
Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA
Sheard, Judith, MPH
Encinas, Jackie, MS
Fought, Angela J., MS
Topol, Eric J., MD
description Abstract Background Cardiac arrhythmias are remarkably common and routinely go undiagnosed because they are often transient and asymptomatic. Effective diagnosis and treatment can substantially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac arrhythmias. The Zio Patch (iRhythm Technologies, Inc, San Francisco, Calif) is a novel, single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG), lightweight, Food and Drug Administration–cleared, continuously recording ambulatory adhesive patch monitor suitable for detecting cardiac arrhythmias in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring. Methods A total of 146 patients referred for evaluation of cardiac arrhythmia underwent simultaneous ambulatory ECG recording with a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor and a 14-day adhesive patch monitor. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the detection arrhythmia events over total wear time for both devices. Arrhythmia events were defined as detection of any 1 of 6 arrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, pause greater than 3 seconds, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. McNemar's tests were used to compare the matched pairs of data from the Holter and the adhesive patch monitor. Results Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected 96 arrhythmia events compared with 61 arrhythmia events by the Holter monitor ( P < .001). Conclusions Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected more events than the Holter monitor. Prolonged duration monitoring for detection of arrhythmia events using single-lead, less-obtrusive, adhesive-patch monitoring platforms could replace conventional Holter monitoring in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3882198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S000293431300870X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1490719710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-5d52f6a31b163bcab87d8c2ae52c06864864a8bf31e64e8ed0c14c40f85b6ad63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7uzqPxDJpTcd89U0vRGWYXUX1g9QwbuQJqfT1LYZk87I_HtTZl1Xb4RAyMk570ne5yD0gpI1JVS-7tdm7Edwa0Yoz6E1IfwRWtGyLIuKSvYYrQghrKi54GfoPKU-H0ldyqfojAmuBCVqhbpNGHcm-hQmHFrMRNGFfcTXYZgh4vdh8nOIftrin37uMBWFM0f8IRxgwJeug-QPgD-Z2Xb4agA7x2BNdD5so9l13j4QeIaetGZI8Pxuv0Bf31592VwXtx_f3WwubwtbUjUXpStZKw2nDZW8saZRlVOWGSiZJVJJkZdRTcspSAEKHLFUWEFaVTbSOMkv0JuT7m7fZHcsTHM0g95FP5p41MF4_ffN5Du9DQfNlWK0Vlng1Z1ADD_2kGY9-mRhGMwEYZ80FTWpaF1RklPFKdXGkFKE9r4NJXqBpHt9gqQXSEs0Q8plLx8-8b7oN5U_f4Bs1MFD1Ml6mCw4H7PJ2gX_vw7_CtjBT96a4TscIfUZ8ZQhaKoT00R_XgZlmRPKCVEV-cZ_ARC0u4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490719710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO ; Komatireddy, Ravi, MD ; Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC ; Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA ; Sheard, Judith, MPH ; Encinas, Jackie, MS ; Fought, Angela J., MS ; Topol, Eric J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO ; Komatireddy, Ravi, MD ; Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC ; Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA ; Sheard, Judith, MPH ; Encinas, Jackie, MS ; Fought, Angela J., MS ; Topol, Eric J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Cardiac arrhythmias are remarkably common and routinely go undiagnosed because they are often transient and asymptomatic. Effective diagnosis and treatment can substantially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac arrhythmias. The Zio Patch (iRhythm Technologies, Inc, San Francisco, Calif) is a novel, single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG), lightweight, Food and Drug Administration–cleared, continuously recording ambulatory adhesive patch monitor suitable for detecting cardiac arrhythmias in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring. Methods A total of 146 patients referred for evaluation of cardiac arrhythmia underwent simultaneous ambulatory ECG recording with a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor and a 14-day adhesive patch monitor. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the detection arrhythmia events over total wear time for both devices. Arrhythmia events were defined as detection of any 1 of 6 arrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, pause greater than 3 seconds, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. McNemar's tests were used to compare the matched pairs of data from the Holter and the adhesive patch monitor. Results Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected 96 arrhythmia events compared with 61 arrhythmia events by the Holter monitor ( P &lt; .001). Conclusions Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected more events than the Holter monitor. Prolonged duration monitoring for detection of arrhythmia events using single-lead, less-obtrusive, adhesive-patch monitoring platforms could replace conventional Holter monitoring in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-7162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24384108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Adult ; Aged ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology ; Atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Flutter - diagnosis ; Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis ; Cardiac arrhythmias ; Electrocardiographic ; Electrocardiography - methods ; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Holter monitor ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; iRhythm ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis ; Time Factors ; Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Zio Patch</subject><ispartof>The American journal of medicine, 2014-01, Vol.127 (1), p.95.e11-95.e17</ispartof><rights>The Authors</rights><rights>2014 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-5d52f6a31b163bcab87d8c2ae52c06864864a8bf31e64e8ed0c14c40f85b6ad63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-5d52f6a31b163bcab87d8c2ae52c06864864a8bf31e64e8ed0c14c40f85b6ad63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatireddy, Ravi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheard, Judith, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Encinas, Jackie, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fought, Angela J., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topol, Eric J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring</title><title>The American journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Cardiac arrhythmias are remarkably common and routinely go undiagnosed because they are often transient and asymptomatic. Effective diagnosis and treatment can substantially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac arrhythmias. The Zio Patch (iRhythm Technologies, Inc, San Francisco, Calif) is a novel, single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG), lightweight, Food and Drug Administration–cleared, continuously recording ambulatory adhesive patch monitor suitable for detecting cardiac arrhythmias in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring. Methods A total of 146 patients referred for evaluation of cardiac arrhythmia underwent simultaneous ambulatory ECG recording with a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor and a 14-day adhesive patch monitor. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the detection arrhythmia events over total wear time for both devices. Arrhythmia events were defined as detection of any 1 of 6 arrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, pause greater than 3 seconds, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. McNemar's tests were used to compare the matched pairs of data from the Holter and the adhesive patch monitor. Results Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected 96 arrhythmia events compared with 61 arrhythmia events by the Holter monitor ( P &lt; .001). Conclusions Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected more events than the Holter monitor. Prolonged duration monitoring for detection of arrhythmia events using single-lead, less-obtrusive, adhesive-patch monitoring platforms could replace conventional Holter monitoring in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Flutter - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmias</subject><subject>Electrocardiographic</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Electrocardiography, Ambulatory</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Holter monitor</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>iRhythm</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Zio Patch</subject><issn>0002-9343</issn><issn>1555-7162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7uzqPxDJpTcd89U0vRGWYXUX1g9QwbuQJqfT1LYZk87I_HtTZl1Xb4RAyMk570ne5yD0gpI1JVS-7tdm7Edwa0Yoz6E1IfwRWtGyLIuKSvYYrQghrKi54GfoPKU-H0ldyqfojAmuBCVqhbpNGHcm-hQmHFrMRNGFfcTXYZgh4vdh8nOIftrin37uMBWFM0f8IRxgwJeug-QPgD-Z2Xb4agA7x2BNdD5so9l13j4QeIaetGZI8Pxuv0Bf31592VwXtx_f3WwubwtbUjUXpStZKw2nDZW8saZRlVOWGSiZJVJJkZdRTcspSAEKHLFUWEFaVTbSOMkv0JuT7m7fZHcsTHM0g95FP5p41MF4_ffN5Du9DQfNlWK0Vlng1Z1ADD_2kGY9-mRhGMwEYZ80FTWpaF1RklPFKdXGkFKE9r4NJXqBpHt9gqQXSEs0Q8plLx8-8b7oN5U_f4Bs1MFD1Ml6mCw4H7PJ2gX_vw7_CtjBT96a4TscIfUZ8ZQhaKoT00R_XgZlmRPKCVEV-cZ_ARC0u4Y</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO</creator><creator>Komatireddy, Ravi, MD</creator><creator>Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC</creator><creator>Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA</creator><creator>Sheard, Judith, MPH</creator><creator>Encinas, Jackie, MS</creator><creator>Fought, Angela J., MS</creator><creator>Topol, Eric J., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring</title><author>Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO ; Komatireddy, Ravi, MD ; Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC ; Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA ; Sheard, Judith, MPH ; Encinas, Jackie, MS ; Fought, Angela J., MS ; Topol, Eric J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-5d52f6a31b163bcab87d8c2ae52c06864864a8bf31e64e8ed0c14c40f85b6ad63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Flutter - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmias</topic><topic>Electrocardiographic</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Electrocardiography, Ambulatory</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Holter monitor</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>iRhythm</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Zio Patch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatireddy, Ravi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheard, Judith, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Encinas, Jackie, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fought, Angela J., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topol, Eric J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrett, Paddy M., MB, BCh, BAO</au><au>Komatireddy, Ravi, MD</au><au>Haaser, Sharon, RN, BSN, CCRC</au><au>Topol, Sarah, RN, BSN, BA</au><au>Sheard, Judith, MPH</au><au>Encinas, Jackie, MS</au><au>Fought, Angela J., MS</au><au>Topol, Eric J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95.e11</spage><epage>95.e17</epage><pages>95.e11-95.e17</pages><issn>0002-9343</issn><eissn>1555-7162</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Cardiac arrhythmias are remarkably common and routinely go undiagnosed because they are often transient and asymptomatic. Effective diagnosis and treatment can substantially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac arrhythmias. The Zio Patch (iRhythm Technologies, Inc, San Francisco, Calif) is a novel, single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG), lightweight, Food and Drug Administration–cleared, continuously recording ambulatory adhesive patch monitor suitable for detecting cardiac arrhythmias in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring. Methods A total of 146 patients referred for evaluation of cardiac arrhythmia underwent simultaneous ambulatory ECG recording with a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor and a 14-day adhesive patch monitor. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the detection arrhythmia events over total wear time for both devices. Arrhythmia events were defined as detection of any 1 of 6 arrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, pause greater than 3 seconds, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. McNemar's tests were used to compare the matched pairs of data from the Holter and the adhesive patch monitor. Results Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected 96 arrhythmia events compared with 61 arrhythmia events by the Holter monitor ( P &lt; .001). Conclusions Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected more events than the Holter monitor. Prolonged duration monitoring for detection of arrhythmia events using single-lead, less-obtrusive, adhesive-patch monitoring platforms could replace conventional Holter monitoring in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24384108</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9343
ispartof The American journal of medicine, 2014-01, Vol.127 (1), p.95.e11-95.e17
issn 0002-9343
1555-7162
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3882198
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adhesives
Adult
Aged
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis
Atrial Flutter - diagnosis
Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis
Cardiac arrhythmias
Electrocardiographic
Electrocardiography - methods
Electrocardiography, Ambulatory
Equipment Design
Female
Holter monitor
Humans
Internal Medicine
iRhythm
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis
Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis
Time Factors
Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis
Zio Patch
title Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A27%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%2024-hour%20Holter%20Monitoring%20with%2014-day%20Novel%20Adhesive%20Patch%20Electrocardiographic%20Monitoring&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Barrett,%20Paddy%20M.,%20MB,%20BCh,%20BAO&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95.e11&rft.epage=95.e17&rft.pages=95.e11-95.e17&rft.issn=0002-9343&rft.eissn=1555-7162&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1490719710%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490719710&rft_id=info:pmid/24384108&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S000293431300870X&rfr_iscdi=true