synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates

BACKGROUND: Select cellulolytic bacteria produce multi-enzymatic cellulosome complexes that bind to the plant cell wall and catalyze its efficient degradation. The multi-modular interconnecting cellulosomal subunits comprise dockerin-containing enzymes that bind cohesively to cohesin-containing scaf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology for biofuels 2013-12, Vol.6 (1), p.182-182, Article 182
Hauptverfasser: Vazana, Yael, Barak, Yoav, Unger, Tamar, Peleg, Yoav, Shamshoum, Melina, Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval, Mazor, Yair, Shapiro, Ehud, Lamed, Raphael, Bayer, Edward A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 1
container_start_page 182
container_title Biotechnology for biofuels
container_volume 6
creator Vazana, Yael
Barak, Yoav
Unger, Tamar
Peleg, Yoav
Shamshoum, Melina
Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval
Mazor, Yair
Shapiro, Ehud
Lamed, Raphael
Bayer, Edward A
description BACKGROUND: Select cellulolytic bacteria produce multi-enzymatic cellulosome complexes that bind to the plant cell wall and catalyze its efficient degradation. The multi-modular interconnecting cellulosomal subunits comprise dockerin-containing enzymes that bind cohesively to cohesin-containing scaffoldins. The organization of the modules into functional polypeptides is achieved by intermodular linkers of different lengths and composition, which provide flexibility to the complex and determine its overall architecture. RESULTS: Using a synthetic biology approach, we systematically investigated the spatial organization of the scaffoldin subunit and its effect on cellulose hydrolysis by designing a combinatorial library of recombinant trivalent designer scaffoldins, which contain a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) and 3 divergent cohesin modules. The positions of the individual modules were shuffled into 24 different arrangements of chimaeric scaffoldins. This basic set was further extended into three sub-sets for each arrangement with intermodular linkers ranging from zero (no linkers), 5 (short linkers) and native linkers of 27–35 amino acids (long linkers). Of the 72 possible scaffoldins, 56 were successfully cloned and 45 of them expressed, representing 14 full sets of chimaeric scaffoldins. The resultant 42-component scaffoldin library was used to assemble designer cellulosomes, comprising three model C. thermocellum cellulases. Activities were examined using Avicel as a pure microcrystalline cellulose substrate and pretreated cellulose-enriched wheat straw as a model substrate derived from a native source. All scaffoldin combinations yielded active trivalent designer cellulosome assemblies on both substrates that exceeded the levels of the free enzyme systems. A preferred modular arrangement for the trivalent designer scaffoldin was not observed for the three enzymes used in this study, indicating that they could be integrated at any position in the designer cellulosome without significant effect on cellulose-degrading activity. Designer cellulosomes assembled with the long-linker scaffoldins achieved higher levels of activity, compared to those assembled with short-and no-linker scaffoldins. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the robustness of the cellulosome system. Long intermodular scaffoldin linkers are preferable, thus leading to enhanced degradation of cellulosic substrates, presumably due to the increased flexibility and spatial positioning
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1754-6834-6-182
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3878649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534781636</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534781636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-6129a9ba5657aa92b1baee372198aaa8b5bf52975c1dc48db0bb8f5dea743f3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5gaWuMBhWztObOeCVCo-KlVCovRsjRM76yqJF39U7O_gD-Mo3VUXgYQiOY7nmcn4facoXhJ8SohgZ4TX1YoJmpcVEeWj4nh_8vjB_qh4FsItxoxwzJ8WR2VFK0IpOS5-he0U1zraFinrBtdvEWw23kG7RsZ5pO9gSBDt1KOMIZOmNlo3wYBaN0VvVZo_kTOo08H2k_ao1cOQBhfcqDM0btykpxhQdBnJSSH61O6Sdmz-fUgqhyDq8Lx4YmAI-sX9-6S4-fTx-8WX1dXXz5cX51crxTiLK0bKBhoFNas5QFMqokBrykvSCAAQqlamLhtet6RrK9EprJQwdaeBV9TQjp4U75e6m6RG3bW5TQ-D3Hg7gt9KB1YeRia7lr27k1RwwaomF_iwFMjS_aPAYSTLIWdT5GyKZDJblou8ve_Cux9JhyhHG2ZdYNIuBUmqpmQU0wb_D4o55bXgGX3zB3rrks--zRTHlIqqnC9wulA9DFraybjcZpufTo82e6WNzefnNa24IIyynPDuIGEeAv0z9pBCkJfX3w7Zs4VtvQvBa7MXhmA5T-9fpHj10JA9vxvXDLxeAANOQu9tkDfXJSYVxrhqOKvpbzpE-ME</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1470338429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Vazana, Yael ; Barak, Yoav ; Unger, Tamar ; Peleg, Yoav ; Shamshoum, Melina ; Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval ; Mazor, Yair ; Shapiro, Ehud ; Lamed, Raphael ; Bayer, Edward A</creator><creatorcontrib>Vazana, Yael ; Barak, Yoav ; Unger, Tamar ; Peleg, Yoav ; Shamshoum, Melina ; Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval ; Mazor, Yair ; Shapiro, Ehud ; Lamed, Raphael ; Bayer, Edward A</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Select cellulolytic bacteria produce multi-enzymatic cellulosome complexes that bind to the plant cell wall and catalyze its efficient degradation. The multi-modular interconnecting cellulosomal subunits comprise dockerin-containing enzymes that bind cohesively to cohesin-containing scaffoldins. The organization of the modules into functional polypeptides is achieved by intermodular linkers of different lengths and composition, which provide flexibility to the complex and determine its overall architecture. RESULTS: Using a synthetic biology approach, we systematically investigated the spatial organization of the scaffoldin subunit and its effect on cellulose hydrolysis by designing a combinatorial library of recombinant trivalent designer scaffoldins, which contain a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) and 3 divergent cohesin modules. The positions of the individual modules were shuffled into 24 different arrangements of chimaeric scaffoldins. This basic set was further extended into three sub-sets for each arrangement with intermodular linkers ranging from zero (no linkers), 5 (short linkers) and native linkers of 27–35 amino acids (long linkers). Of the 72 possible scaffoldins, 56 were successfully cloned and 45 of them expressed, representing 14 full sets of chimaeric scaffoldins. The resultant 42-component scaffoldin library was used to assemble designer cellulosomes, comprising three model C. thermocellum cellulases. Activities were examined using Avicel as a pure microcrystalline cellulose substrate and pretreated cellulose-enriched wheat straw as a model substrate derived from a native source. All scaffoldin combinations yielded active trivalent designer cellulosome assemblies on both substrates that exceeded the levels of the free enzyme systems. A preferred modular arrangement for the trivalent designer scaffoldin was not observed for the three enzymes used in this study, indicating that they could be integrated at any position in the designer cellulosome without significant effect on cellulose-degrading activity. Designer cellulosomes assembled with the long-linker scaffoldins achieved higher levels of activity, compared to those assembled with short-and no-linker scaffoldins. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the robustness of the cellulosome system. Long intermodular scaffoldin linkers are preferable, thus leading to enhanced degradation of cellulosic substrates, presumably due to the increased flexibility and spatial positioning of the attached enzymes in the complex. These findings provide a general basis for improved designer cellulosome systems as a platform for bioethanol production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-6834</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-182</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24341331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>amino acids ; Bacteria ; Bacteriology ; Biomass energy ; carbohydrate binding ; Carbohydrates ; cell walls ; Cellulase ; cellulases ; Cellulose ; Cellulose fibers ; cellulosome ; Design ; Enzymes ; ethanol production ; Health aspects ; Hydrolysis ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Physiological aspects ; polypeptides ; Scaffolding ; Science ; Synthetic biology ; Triticum aestivum ; wheat straw</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology for biofuels, 2013-12, Vol.6 (1), p.182-182, Article 182</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Vazana et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Vazana et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Vazana et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-6129a9ba5657aa92b1baee372198aaa8b5bf52975c1dc48db0bb8f5dea743f3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-6129a9ba5657aa92b1baee372198aaa8b5bf52975c1dc48db0bb8f5dea743f3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878649/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878649/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vazana, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barak, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unger, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamshoum, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazor, Yair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Ehud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamed, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayer, Edward A</creatorcontrib><title>synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates</title><title>Biotechnology for biofuels</title><addtitle>Biotechnol Biofuels</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Select cellulolytic bacteria produce multi-enzymatic cellulosome complexes that bind to the plant cell wall and catalyze its efficient degradation. The multi-modular interconnecting cellulosomal subunits comprise dockerin-containing enzymes that bind cohesively to cohesin-containing scaffoldins. The organization of the modules into functional polypeptides is achieved by intermodular linkers of different lengths and composition, which provide flexibility to the complex and determine its overall architecture. RESULTS: Using a synthetic biology approach, we systematically investigated the spatial organization of the scaffoldin subunit and its effect on cellulose hydrolysis by designing a combinatorial library of recombinant trivalent designer scaffoldins, which contain a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) and 3 divergent cohesin modules. The positions of the individual modules were shuffled into 24 different arrangements of chimaeric scaffoldins. This basic set was further extended into three sub-sets for each arrangement with intermodular linkers ranging from zero (no linkers), 5 (short linkers) and native linkers of 27–35 amino acids (long linkers). Of the 72 possible scaffoldins, 56 were successfully cloned and 45 of them expressed, representing 14 full sets of chimaeric scaffoldins. The resultant 42-component scaffoldin library was used to assemble designer cellulosomes, comprising three model C. thermocellum cellulases. Activities were examined using Avicel as a pure microcrystalline cellulose substrate and pretreated cellulose-enriched wheat straw as a model substrate derived from a native source. All scaffoldin combinations yielded active trivalent designer cellulosome assemblies on both substrates that exceeded the levels of the free enzyme systems. A preferred modular arrangement for the trivalent designer scaffoldin was not observed for the three enzymes used in this study, indicating that they could be integrated at any position in the designer cellulosome without significant effect on cellulose-degrading activity. Designer cellulosomes assembled with the long-linker scaffoldins achieved higher levels of activity, compared to those assembled with short-and no-linker scaffoldins. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the robustness of the cellulosome system. Long intermodular scaffoldin linkers are preferable, thus leading to enhanced degradation of cellulosic substrates, presumably due to the increased flexibility and spatial positioning of the attached enzymes in the complex. These findings provide a general basis for improved designer cellulosome systems as a platform for bioethanol production.</description><subject>amino acids</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>carbohydrate binding</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>cell walls</subject><subject>Cellulase</subject><subject>cellulases</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Cellulose fibers</subject><subject>cellulosome</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>ethanol production</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>polypeptides</subject><subject>Scaffolding</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Synthetic biology</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>wheat straw</subject><issn>1754-6834</issn><issn>1754-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5gaWuMBhWztObOeCVCo-KlVCovRsjRM76yqJF39U7O_gD-Mo3VUXgYQiOY7nmcn4facoXhJ8SohgZ4TX1YoJmpcVEeWj4nh_8vjB_qh4FsItxoxwzJ8WR2VFK0IpOS5-he0U1zraFinrBtdvEWw23kG7RsZ5pO9gSBDt1KOMIZOmNlo3wYBaN0VvVZo_kTOo08H2k_ao1cOQBhfcqDM0btykpxhQdBnJSSH61O6Sdmz-fUgqhyDq8Lx4YmAI-sX9-6S4-fTx-8WX1dXXz5cX51crxTiLK0bKBhoFNas5QFMqokBrykvSCAAQqlamLhtet6RrK9EprJQwdaeBV9TQjp4U75e6m6RG3bW5TQ-D3Hg7gt9KB1YeRia7lr27k1RwwaomF_iwFMjS_aPAYSTLIWdT5GyKZDJblou8ve_Cux9JhyhHG2ZdYNIuBUmqpmQU0wb_D4o55bXgGX3zB3rrks--zRTHlIqqnC9wulA9DFraybjcZpufTo82e6WNzefnNa24IIyynPDuIGEeAv0z9pBCkJfX3w7Zs4VtvQvBa7MXhmA5T-9fpHj10JA9vxvXDLxeAANOQu9tkDfXJSYVxrhqOKvpbzpE-ME</recordid><startdate>20131216</startdate><enddate>20131216</enddate><creator>Vazana, Yael</creator><creator>Barak, Yoav</creator><creator>Unger, Tamar</creator><creator>Peleg, Yoav</creator><creator>Shamshoum, Melina</creator><creator>Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval</creator><creator>Mazor, Yair</creator><creator>Shapiro, Ehud</creator><creator>Lamed, Raphael</creator><creator>Bayer, Edward A</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131216</creationdate><title>synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates</title><author>Vazana, Yael ; Barak, Yoav ; Unger, Tamar ; Peleg, Yoav ; Shamshoum, Melina ; Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval ; Mazor, Yair ; Shapiro, Ehud ; Lamed, Raphael ; Bayer, Edward A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b676t-6129a9ba5657aa92b1baee372198aaa8b5bf52975c1dc48db0bb8f5dea743f3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>amino acids</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>carbohydrate binding</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>cell walls</topic><topic>Cellulase</topic><topic>cellulases</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Cellulose fibers</topic><topic>cellulosome</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>ethanol production</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>polypeptides</topic><topic>Scaffolding</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Synthetic biology</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>wheat straw</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vazana, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barak, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unger, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamshoum, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazor, Yair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Ehud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamed, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayer, Edward A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology for biofuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vazana, Yael</au><au>Barak, Yoav</au><au>Unger, Tamar</au><au>Peleg, Yoav</au><au>Shamshoum, Melina</au><au>Ben-Yehezkel, Tuval</au><au>Mazor, Yair</au><au>Shapiro, Ehud</au><au>Lamed, Raphael</au><au>Bayer, Edward A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology for biofuels</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol Biofuels</addtitle><date>2013-12-16</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>182-182</pages><artnum>182</artnum><issn>1754-6834</issn><eissn>1754-6834</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Select cellulolytic bacteria produce multi-enzymatic cellulosome complexes that bind to the plant cell wall and catalyze its efficient degradation. The multi-modular interconnecting cellulosomal subunits comprise dockerin-containing enzymes that bind cohesively to cohesin-containing scaffoldins. The organization of the modules into functional polypeptides is achieved by intermodular linkers of different lengths and composition, which provide flexibility to the complex and determine its overall architecture. RESULTS: Using a synthetic biology approach, we systematically investigated the spatial organization of the scaffoldin subunit and its effect on cellulose hydrolysis by designing a combinatorial library of recombinant trivalent designer scaffoldins, which contain a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) and 3 divergent cohesin modules. The positions of the individual modules were shuffled into 24 different arrangements of chimaeric scaffoldins. This basic set was further extended into three sub-sets for each arrangement with intermodular linkers ranging from zero (no linkers), 5 (short linkers) and native linkers of 27–35 amino acids (long linkers). Of the 72 possible scaffoldins, 56 were successfully cloned and 45 of them expressed, representing 14 full sets of chimaeric scaffoldins. The resultant 42-component scaffoldin library was used to assemble designer cellulosomes, comprising three model C. thermocellum cellulases. Activities were examined using Avicel as a pure microcrystalline cellulose substrate and pretreated cellulose-enriched wheat straw as a model substrate derived from a native source. All scaffoldin combinations yielded active trivalent designer cellulosome assemblies on both substrates that exceeded the levels of the free enzyme systems. A preferred modular arrangement for the trivalent designer scaffoldin was not observed for the three enzymes used in this study, indicating that they could be integrated at any position in the designer cellulosome without significant effect on cellulose-degrading activity. Designer cellulosomes assembled with the long-linker scaffoldins achieved higher levels of activity, compared to those assembled with short-and no-linker scaffoldins. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the robustness of the cellulosome system. Long intermodular scaffoldin linkers are preferable, thus leading to enhanced degradation of cellulosic substrates, presumably due to the increased flexibility and spatial positioning of the attached enzymes in the complex. These findings provide a general basis for improved designer cellulosome systems as a platform for bioethanol production.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24341331</pmid><doi>10.1186/1754-6834-6-182</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-6834
ispartof Biotechnology for biofuels, 2013-12, Vol.6 (1), p.182-182, Article 182
issn 1754-6834
1754-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3878649
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects amino acids
Bacteria
Bacteriology
Biomass energy
carbohydrate binding
Carbohydrates
cell walls
Cellulase
cellulases
Cellulose
Cellulose fibers
cellulosome
Design
Enzymes
ethanol production
Health aspects
Hydrolysis
Pharmaceutical industry
Physiological aspects
polypeptides
Scaffolding
Science
Synthetic biology
Triticum aestivum
wheat straw
title synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A27%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=synthetic%20biology%20approach%20for%20evaluating%20the%20functional%20contribution%20of%20designer%20cellulosome%20components%20to%20deconstruction%20of%20cellulosic%20substrates&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20for%20biofuels&rft.au=Vazana,%20Yael&rft.date=2013-12-16&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=182-182&rft.artnum=182&rft.issn=1754-6834&rft.eissn=1754-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1754-6834-6-182&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534781636%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1470338429&rft_id=info:pmid/24341331&rft_galeid=A534781636&rfr_iscdi=true