Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large‐scale disturbance specialist
To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas. Habitat suitability models can predict which sites at new disturbances will most likely attract specialists. Without validation data from newly disturbed ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2013-11, Vol.3 (13), p.4348-4364 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4364 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 4348 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Latif, Quresh S. Saab, Victoria A. Dudley, Jonathan G. Hollenbeck, Jeff P. |
description | To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas. Habitat suitability models can predict which sites at new disturbances will most likely attract specialists. Without validation data from newly disturbed areas, however, the best approach for maximizing predictive accuracy can be unclear (Northwestern U.S.A.). We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black‐backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus; a burned‐forest specialist) at 20 recently (≤6 years postwildfire) burned locations in Montana using models calibrated with data from three locations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. We developed 8 models using three techniques (weighted logistic regression, Maxent, and Mahalanobis D2 models) and various combinations of four environmental variables describing burn severity, the north–south orientation of topographic slope, and prefire canopy cover. After translating model predictions into binary classifications (0 = low suitability to unsuitable, 1 = high to moderate suitability), we compiled “ensemble predictions,” consisting of the number of models (0–8) predicting any given site as highly suitable. The suitability status for 40% of the area burned by eastside Montana wildfires was consistent across models and therefore robust to uncertainty in the relative accuracy of particular models and in alternative ecological hypotheses they described. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel (i.e., “no‐analogue”) environments. Areas of disagreement among models suggested where future surveys could help validate and refine models for an improved understanding of Black‐backed Woodpecker nesting habitat relationships. Ensemble predictions presented here can help guide managers attempting to balance salvage logging with habitat conservation in burned‐forest landscapes where black‐backed woodpecker nest location data are not immediately available. Ensemble modeling represents a promising tool for guiding conservation of large‐scale disturbance specialists.
To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must often identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas without the benefit of data from those areas. We predicted habit |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.790 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3856736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1477558148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4710-40fce34bd3413d6ac2a0fc8e38ac6b4429db841981645f1abf095fa2dadea1f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9qFTEUh4NYbKkFn0AG3LiZmn8zyWwEuVyrUHBjV12EM8mZ25TM5JrMWO7OR_AZfZLm0lqrIM0m4eTLR875EfKK0VNGKX-HFsWp6ugzcsSpbGqlGv380fmQnOR8TctqKZdUvSCHXApJmVJH5HI9ZRz7gNUYHQY_bao5VtuEztu5uoLezzBXeSlb74Ofd9UQUwVVgLTBXz9-ZgvlrfN5XlIPk8Uqb9F6CKXykhwMEDKe3O_H5OLj-uvqU33-5ezz6sN5baVitJZ0KB3I3gnJhGvBcigVjUKDbXspeed6LVmnWSubgUE_0K4ZgDtwCGxoxTF5f-fdLv2IzuI0Jwhmm_wIaWciePP3zeSvzCZ-N0I3rRJ7wdt7QYrfFsyzGX22GAJMGJdsmGK8aTvG-dOoLCNvNJO6oG_-Qa_jkqYyCcN51zHJJdd_hDbFnBMOD_9m1OzzNft8Tcm3oK8f9_kA_k6zAPUdcOMD7v4rMuvVWuyFt1VwsJ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299142428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large‐scale disturbance specialist</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Latif, Quresh S. ; Saab, Victoria A. ; Dudley, Jonathan G. ; Hollenbeck, Jeff P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Latif, Quresh S. ; Saab, Victoria A. ; Dudley, Jonathan G. ; Hollenbeck, Jeff P.</creatorcontrib><description>To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas. Habitat suitability models can predict which sites at new disturbances will most likely attract specialists. Without validation data from newly disturbed areas, however, the best approach for maximizing predictive accuracy can be unclear (Northwestern U.S.A.). We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black‐backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus; a burned‐forest specialist) at 20 recently (≤6 years postwildfire) burned locations in Montana using models calibrated with data from three locations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. We developed 8 models using three techniques (weighted logistic regression, Maxent, and Mahalanobis D2 models) and various combinations of four environmental variables describing burn severity, the north–south orientation of topographic slope, and prefire canopy cover. After translating model predictions into binary classifications (0 = low suitability to unsuitable, 1 = high to moderate suitability), we compiled “ensemble predictions,” consisting of the number of models (0–8) predicting any given site as highly suitable. The suitability status for 40% of the area burned by eastside Montana wildfires was consistent across models and therefore robust to uncertainty in the relative accuracy of particular models and in alternative ecological hypotheses they described. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel (i.e., “no‐analogue”) environments. Areas of disagreement among models suggested where future surveys could help validate and refine models for an improved understanding of Black‐backed Woodpecker nesting habitat relationships. Ensemble predictions presented here can help guide managers attempting to balance salvage logging with habitat conservation in burned‐forest landscapes where black‐backed woodpecker nest location data are not immediately available. Ensemble modeling represents a promising tool for guiding conservation of large‐scale disturbance specialists.
To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must often identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas without the benefit of data from those areas. We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black‐backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus), a burned‐forest specialist, using ensemble modeling to combine predictions from multiple models and thereby generate predictions robust to uncertainties associated with individual models. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.790</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24340177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Black‐backed Woodpeckers ; Calibration ; Conservation ; Data collection ; Disturbance ; Ecology ; Environmental protection ; Forest & brush fires ; Forest conservation ; Forest management ; forested habitat management ; Forests ; habitat suitability models ; Habitats ; Hypotheses ; Logging ; Mahalanobis D2 models ; Maxent models ; Model accuracy ; model prediction in no‐analogue environments ; Modelling ; Nesting ; Original Research ; Picoides arcticus ; Predictions ; Regression analysis ; resource selection models ; species distribution models ; wildfire ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2013-11, Vol.3 (13), p.4348-4364</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4710-40fce34bd3413d6ac2a0fc8e38ac6b4429db841981645f1abf095fa2dadea1f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4710-40fce34bd3413d6ac2a0fc8e38ac6b4429db841981645f1abf095fa2dadea1f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856736/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856736/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,1419,11569,27931,27932,45581,45582,46059,46483,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latif, Quresh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saab, Victoria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenbeck, Jeff P.</creatorcontrib><title>Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large‐scale disturbance specialist</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas. Habitat suitability models can predict which sites at new disturbances will most likely attract specialists. Without validation data from newly disturbed areas, however, the best approach for maximizing predictive accuracy can be unclear (Northwestern U.S.A.). We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black‐backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus; a burned‐forest specialist) at 20 recently (≤6 years postwildfire) burned locations in Montana using models calibrated with data from three locations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. We developed 8 models using three techniques (weighted logistic regression, Maxent, and Mahalanobis D2 models) and various combinations of four environmental variables describing burn severity, the north–south orientation of topographic slope, and prefire canopy cover. After translating model predictions into binary classifications (0 = low suitability to unsuitable, 1 = high to moderate suitability), we compiled “ensemble predictions,” consisting of the number of models (0–8) predicting any given site as highly suitable. The suitability status for 40% of the area burned by eastside Montana wildfires was consistent across models and therefore robust to uncertainty in the relative accuracy of particular models and in alternative ecological hypotheses they described. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel (i.e., “no‐analogue”) environments. Areas of disagreement among models suggested where future surveys could help validate and refine models for an improved understanding of Black‐backed Woodpecker nesting habitat relationships. Ensemble predictions presented here can help guide managers attempting to balance salvage logging with habitat conservation in burned‐forest landscapes where black‐backed woodpecker nest location data are not immediately available. Ensemble modeling represents a promising tool for guiding conservation of large‐scale disturbance specialists.
To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must often identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas without the benefit of data from those areas. We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black‐backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus), a burned‐forest specialist, using ensemble modeling to combine predictions from multiple models and thereby generate predictions robust to uncertainties associated with individual models. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel environments.</description><subject>Black‐backed Woodpeckers</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Forest & brush fires</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forested habitat management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>habitat suitability models</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Mahalanobis D2 models</subject><subject>Maxent models</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>model prediction in no‐analogue environments</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Picoides arcticus</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>resource selection models</subject><subject>species distribution models</subject><subject>wildfire</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9qFTEUh4NYbKkFn0AG3LiZmn8zyWwEuVyrUHBjV12EM8mZ25TM5JrMWO7OR_AZfZLm0lqrIM0m4eTLR875EfKK0VNGKX-HFsWp6ugzcsSpbGqlGv380fmQnOR8TctqKZdUvSCHXApJmVJH5HI9ZRz7gNUYHQY_bao5VtuEztu5uoLezzBXeSlb74Ofd9UQUwVVgLTBXz9-ZgvlrfN5XlIPk8Uqb9F6CKXykhwMEDKe3O_H5OLj-uvqU33-5ezz6sN5baVitJZ0KB3I3gnJhGvBcigVjUKDbXspeed6LVmnWSubgUE_0K4ZgDtwCGxoxTF5f-fdLv2IzuI0Jwhmm_wIaWciePP3zeSvzCZ-N0I3rRJ7wdt7QYrfFsyzGX22GAJMGJdsmGK8aTvG-dOoLCNvNJO6oG_-Qa_jkqYyCcN51zHJJdd_hDbFnBMOD_9m1OzzNft8Tcm3oK8f9_kA_k6zAPUdcOMD7v4rMuvVWuyFt1VwsJ4</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Latif, Quresh S.</creator><creator>Saab, Victoria A.</creator><creator>Dudley, Jonathan G.</creator><creator>Hollenbeck, Jeff P.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large‐scale disturbance specialist</title><author>Latif, Quresh S. ; Saab, Victoria A. ; Dudley, Jonathan G. ; Hollenbeck, Jeff P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4710-40fce34bd3413d6ac2a0fc8e38ac6b4429db841981645f1abf095fa2dadea1f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Black‐backed Woodpeckers</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Forest & brush fires</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forested habitat management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>habitat suitability models</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Mahalanobis D2 models</topic><topic>Maxent models</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>model prediction in no‐analogue environments</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Picoides arcticus</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>resource selection models</topic><topic>species distribution models</topic><topic>wildfire</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latif, Quresh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saab, Victoria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenbeck, Jeff P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latif, Quresh S.</au><au>Saab, Victoria A.</au><au>Dudley, Jonathan G.</au><au>Hollenbeck, Jeff P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large‐scale disturbance specialist</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>4348</spage><epage>4364</epage><pages>4348-4364</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas. Habitat suitability models can predict which sites at new disturbances will most likely attract specialists. Without validation data from newly disturbed areas, however, the best approach for maximizing predictive accuracy can be unclear (Northwestern U.S.A.). We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black‐backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus; a burned‐forest specialist) at 20 recently (≤6 years postwildfire) burned locations in Montana using models calibrated with data from three locations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. We developed 8 models using three techniques (weighted logistic regression, Maxent, and Mahalanobis D2 models) and various combinations of four environmental variables describing burn severity, the north–south orientation of topographic slope, and prefire canopy cover. After translating model predictions into binary classifications (0 = low suitability to unsuitable, 1 = high to moderate suitability), we compiled “ensemble predictions,” consisting of the number of models (0–8) predicting any given site as highly suitable. The suitability status for 40% of the area burned by eastside Montana wildfires was consistent across models and therefore robust to uncertainty in the relative accuracy of particular models and in alternative ecological hypotheses they described. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel (i.e., “no‐analogue”) environments. Areas of disagreement among models suggested where future surveys could help validate and refine models for an improved understanding of Black‐backed Woodpecker nesting habitat relationships. Ensemble predictions presented here can help guide managers attempting to balance salvage logging with habitat conservation in burned‐forest landscapes where black‐backed woodpecker nest location data are not immediately available. Ensemble modeling represents a promising tool for guiding conservation of large‐scale disturbance specialists.
To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must often identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas without the benefit of data from those areas. We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black‐backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus), a burned‐forest specialist, using ensemble modeling to combine predictions from multiple models and thereby generate predictions robust to uncertainties associated with individual models. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel environments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>24340177</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.790</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2013-11, Vol.3 (13), p.4348-4364 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3856736 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central |
subjects | Black‐backed Woodpeckers Calibration Conservation Data collection Disturbance Ecology Environmental protection Forest & brush fires Forest conservation Forest management forested habitat management Forests habitat suitability models Habitats Hypotheses Logging Mahalanobis D2 models Maxent models Model accuracy model prediction in no‐analogue environments Modelling Nesting Original Research Picoides arcticus Predictions Regression analysis resource selection models species distribution models wildfire Wildfires |
title | Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large‐scale disturbance specialist |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T14%3A15%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ensemble%20modeling%20to%20predict%20habitat%20suitability%20for%20a%20large%E2%80%90scale%20disturbance%20specialist&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Latif,%20Quresh%20S.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=4348&rft.epage=4364&rft.pages=4348-4364&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.790&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1477558148%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299142428&rft_id=info:pmid/24340177&rfr_iscdi=true |