Early Identification of Reading Disabilities Within an RTI Framework

Early and accurate identification of children at risk for reading disabilities (RD) is critical for the prevention of RD within a response to intervention framework. In this study, we investigated the use of universal screening and progress monitoring for the early identification of RD in kindergart...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of learning disabilities 2015-05, Vol.48 (3), p.281-297
Hauptverfasser: Catts, Hugh W., Nielsen, Diane Corcoran, Bridges, Mindy Sittner, Liu, Yi Syuan, Bontempo, Daniel E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 3
container_start_page 281
container_title Journal of learning disabilities
container_volume 48
creator Catts, Hugh W.
Nielsen, Diane Corcoran
Bridges, Mindy Sittner
Liu, Yi Syuan
Bontempo, Daniel E.
description Early and accurate identification of children at risk for reading disabilities (RD) is critical for the prevention of RD within a response to intervention framework. In this study, we investigated the use of universal screening and progress monitoring for the early identification of RD in kindergarten children. A total of 366 children were administered a battery of screening measures at the beginning of kindergarten and progress-monitoring probes across the school year. A subset of children who showed initial risk for RD also received a 26-week Tier 2 intervention. Participants’ achievement in word reading accuracy and/or fluency was assessed at the end of first grade. Results indicated that a screening battery containing measures of letter naming fluency, phonological awareness, rapid naming, or nonword repetition accurately identified good and poor readers at the end of first grade. Findings also showed that children’s response to supplemental and/or classroom instruction measured in terms of growth in letter naming fluency added significantly to the prediction of reading outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022219413498115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3855155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1057391</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0022219413498115</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3669051551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-bcfb75c7d34dd0b46285d2102376ea7c72e0e0ee0cbafa504d21ba5a146c2ac33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2Kqizb3nuhisSFS8r4K04uSGhZ2q2QKiGqHq2J4yym2RjsLIh_j6PdrgAJ-TCH55nxOxpCvlL4TqlSJwCMMVoJykVVUio_kAmVvMyFKmGPTEacj3yfHMR4CwCCqeIT2We8EhJUNSHncwzdU7ZobD-41hkcnO8z32ZXFhvXL7NzF7F2nRucjdlfN9y4PsM-u7peZBcBV_bRh3-fyccWu2i_bOuU_LmYX89-5pe_fyxmZ5e5EaUY8tq0tZJGNVw0DdSiYKVsGAXGVWFRGcUspGfB1NiiBJFgjRKpKAxDw_mUnG7m3q3rlW1Myhyw03fBrTA8aY9Ovya9u9FL_6B5KSWVMg043g4I_n5t46BXLhrbddhbv46aFooyqASIpB69UW_9OvRpvdEqRKEqOVqwsUzwMQbb7sJQ0OOJ9NsTpZZvL5fYNfy_SRION4INzuzw_BcFqXhFE883POLSvkj13ofP57uh2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676467954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early Identification of Reading Disabilities Within an RTI Framework</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Catts, Hugh W. ; Nielsen, Diane Corcoran ; Bridges, Mindy Sittner ; Liu, Yi Syuan ; Bontempo, Daniel E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Catts, Hugh W. ; Nielsen, Diane Corcoran ; Bridges, Mindy Sittner ; Liu, Yi Syuan ; Bontempo, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><description>Early and accurate identification of children at risk for reading disabilities (RD) is critical for the prevention of RD within a response to intervention framework. In this study, we investigated the use of universal screening and progress monitoring for the early identification of RD in kindergarten children. A total of 366 children were administered a battery of screening measures at the beginning of kindergarten and progress-monitoring probes across the school year. A subset of children who showed initial risk for RD also received a 26-week Tier 2 intervention. Participants’ achievement in word reading accuracy and/or fluency was assessed at the end of first grade. Results indicated that a screening battery containing measures of letter naming fluency, phonological awareness, rapid naming, or nonword repetition accurately identified good and poor readers at the end of first grade. Findings also showed that children’s response to supplemental and/or classroom instruction measured in terms of growth in letter naming fluency added significantly to the prediction of reading outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022219413498115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23945079</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLDIAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Alphabets ; At risk ; At Risk Students ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Classrooms ; Dyslexia - diagnosis ; Dyslexia - therapy ; Early Diagnosis ; Early Intervention ; Early Intervention (Education) - methods ; Educational evaluation ; Elementary education ; Female ; Fluency ; Grade 1 ; Humans ; Identification ; Intervention ; Kindergarten ; Kindergarten students ; Language Tests ; Learning disabilities ; Male ; Medical screening ; Naming ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Outcomes of Education ; Phonetics ; Phonological Awareness ; Pretests Posttests ; Progress Monitoring ; Reading accuracy ; Reading Achievement ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading disabilities ; Reading Fluency ; Reading instruction ; Reading Skills ; Repetition ; Response to Intervention ; Screening Tests ; Special education ; Task Analysis ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Journal of learning disabilities, 2015-05, Vol.48 (3), p.281-297</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2013</rights><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2013.</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. May-Jun 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-bcfb75c7d34dd0b46285d2102376ea7c72e0e0ee0cbafa504d21ba5a146c2ac33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-bcfb75c7d34dd0b46285d2102376ea7c72e0e0ee0cbafa504d21ba5a146c2ac33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022219413498115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022219413498115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1057391$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23945079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catts, Hugh W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Diane Corcoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, Mindy Sittner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yi Syuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempo, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><title>Early Identification of Reading Disabilities Within an RTI Framework</title><title>Journal of learning disabilities</title><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><description>Early and accurate identification of children at risk for reading disabilities (RD) is critical for the prevention of RD within a response to intervention framework. In this study, we investigated the use of universal screening and progress monitoring for the early identification of RD in kindergarten children. A total of 366 children were administered a battery of screening measures at the beginning of kindergarten and progress-monitoring probes across the school year. A subset of children who showed initial risk for RD also received a 26-week Tier 2 intervention. Participants’ achievement in word reading accuracy and/or fluency was assessed at the end of first grade. Results indicated that a screening battery containing measures of letter naming fluency, phonological awareness, rapid naming, or nonword repetition accurately identified good and poor readers at the end of first grade. Findings also showed that children’s response to supplemental and/or classroom instruction measured in terms of growth in letter naming fluency added significantly to the prediction of reading outcomes.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Alphabets</subject><subject>At risk</subject><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Dyslexia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dyslexia - therapy</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Early Intervention</subject><subject>Early Intervention (Education) - methods</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluency</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Kindergarten</subject><subject>Kindergarten students</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonological Awareness</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Progress Monitoring</subject><subject>Reading accuracy</subject><subject>Reading Achievement</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading disabilities</subject><subject>Reading Fluency</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Response to Intervention</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0022-2194</issn><issn>1538-4780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2Kqizb3nuhisSFS8r4K04uSGhZ2q2QKiGqHq2J4yym2RjsLIh_j6PdrgAJ-TCH55nxOxpCvlL4TqlSJwCMMVoJykVVUio_kAmVvMyFKmGPTEacj3yfHMR4CwCCqeIT2We8EhJUNSHncwzdU7ZobD-41hkcnO8z32ZXFhvXL7NzF7F2nRucjdlfN9y4PsM-u7peZBcBV_bRh3-fyccWu2i_bOuU_LmYX89-5pe_fyxmZ5e5EaUY8tq0tZJGNVw0DdSiYKVsGAXGVWFRGcUspGfB1NiiBJFgjRKpKAxDw_mUnG7m3q3rlW1Myhyw03fBrTA8aY9Ovya9u9FL_6B5KSWVMg043g4I_n5t46BXLhrbddhbv46aFooyqASIpB69UW_9OvRpvdEqRKEqOVqwsUzwMQbb7sJQ0OOJ9NsTpZZvL5fYNfy_SRION4INzuzw_BcFqXhFE883POLSvkj13ofP57uh2Q</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Catts, Hugh W.</creator><creator>Nielsen, Diane Corcoran</creator><creator>Bridges, Mindy Sittner</creator><creator>Liu, Yi Syuan</creator><creator>Bontempo, Daniel E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Early Identification of Reading Disabilities Within an RTI Framework</title><author>Catts, Hugh W. ; Nielsen, Diane Corcoran ; Bridges, Mindy Sittner ; Liu, Yi Syuan ; Bontempo, Daniel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-bcfb75c7d34dd0b46285d2102376ea7c72e0e0ee0cbafa504d21ba5a146c2ac33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Alphabets</topic><topic>At risk</topic><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Dyslexia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dyslexia - therapy</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Early Intervention</topic><topic>Early Intervention (Education) - methods</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluency</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Kindergarten</topic><topic>Kindergarten students</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonological Awareness</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Progress Monitoring</topic><topic>Reading accuracy</topic><topic>Reading Achievement</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading disabilities</topic><topic>Reading Fluency</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Response to Intervention</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catts, Hugh W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Diane Corcoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, Mindy Sittner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yi Syuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempo, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catts, Hugh W.</au><au>Nielsen, Diane Corcoran</au><au>Bridges, Mindy Sittner</au><au>Liu, Yi Syuan</au><au>Bontempo, Daniel E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1057391</ericid><atitle>Early Identification of Reading Disabilities Within an RTI Framework</atitle><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>281-297</pages><issn>0022-2194</issn><eissn>1538-4780</eissn><coden>JLDIAD</coden><abstract>Early and accurate identification of children at risk for reading disabilities (RD) is critical for the prevention of RD within a response to intervention framework. In this study, we investigated the use of universal screening and progress monitoring for the early identification of RD in kindergarten children. A total of 366 children were administered a battery of screening measures at the beginning of kindergarten and progress-monitoring probes across the school year. A subset of children who showed initial risk for RD also received a 26-week Tier 2 intervention. Participants’ achievement in word reading accuracy and/or fluency was assessed at the end of first grade. Results indicated that a screening battery containing measures of letter naming fluency, phonological awareness, rapid naming, or nonword repetition accurately identified good and poor readers at the end of first grade. Findings also showed that children’s response to supplemental and/or classroom instruction measured in terms of growth in letter naming fluency added significantly to the prediction of reading outcomes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23945079</pmid><doi>10.1177/0022219413498115</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2194
ispartof Journal of learning disabilities, 2015-05, Vol.48 (3), p.281-297
issn 0022-2194
1538-4780
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3855155
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Accuracy
Alphabets
At risk
At Risk Students
Child, Preschool
Children
Classrooms
Dyslexia - diagnosis
Dyslexia - therapy
Early Diagnosis
Early Intervention
Early Intervention (Education) - methods
Educational evaluation
Elementary education
Female
Fluency
Grade 1
Humans
Identification
Intervention
Kindergarten
Kindergarten students
Language Tests
Learning disabilities
Male
Medical screening
Naming
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Outcomes of Education
Phonetics
Phonological Awareness
Pretests Posttests
Progress Monitoring
Reading accuracy
Reading Achievement
Reading Difficulties
Reading disabilities
Reading Fluency
Reading instruction
Reading Skills
Repetition
Response to Intervention
Screening Tests
Special education
Task Analysis
Word Recognition
title Early Identification of Reading Disabilities Within an RTI Framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A00%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20Identification%20of%20Reading%20Disabilities%20Within%20an%20RTI%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20learning%20disabilities&rft.au=Catts,%20Hugh%20W.&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=281-297&rft.issn=0022-2194&rft.eissn=1538-4780&rft.coden=JLDIAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022219413498115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3669051551%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676467954&rft_id=info:pmid/23945079&rft_ericid=EJ1057391&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022219413498115&rfr_iscdi=true