Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports

Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports

Weller provides her views on a report conducted by Cochrane on the replicability of the literature search strategies provided by meta-analysis. She points out that even though the Cochrane authors handsearched a number of monographs and journals, they did not explain their selection criteria.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Medical Library Association 2004-04, Vol.92 (2), p.163-164
1. Verfasser: Weller, Ann C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Comment and Opinion
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Librarians
Library Services - standards
Meta-analysis
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Opinions
Peer Review - standards
Publication Bias
Studies
United States
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 163
container_title Journal of the Medical Library Association
container_volume 92
creator Weller, Ann C
description Weller provides her views on a report conducted by Cochrane on the replicability of the literature search strategies provided by meta-analysis. She points out that even though the Cochrane authors handsearched a number of monographs and journals, they did not explain their selection criteria.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_385293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>889784971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p288t-b36d2e44f3defd61251c0274bdf0fbfb114745ee7acb3ebbcd36e134804df7073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9r3jAMxsNoWbt2X6GYHXoL2LH92jn0UF72Dzp6Wc9BtpXGJbFT23mhsA8_d-vG1pOE9JN4HulNc8qk1G0veH_0nPNdK6mkJ827nB8oZUor-rY5YZJqTRU_bX58i1soPtwTPHiHwSIpExQye5MgeQiZQEKCOWPFYCZjTMTGZU04Ycj-gBUtmKBsFcsIyU6Yf1ELFmghwPyUawWCI_topwQBScI1ppLPm-MR5ozvX-JZc_fp4_f9l_bm9vPX_fVNu3Zal9bwnetQiJE7HN2OdZJZ2ilh3EhHMxrGhBISUYE1HI2xju-QcaGpcKOqNs-aq997180s6Gy1kmAe1uQXSE9DBD_83wl-Gu7jYeBadj2v85cv8yk-bpjLsPhscZ6rl7jlQTHd9ZLrCn54BT7ELdUT5KGjXPS94qxCF_-q-Svjz1P4T6vGjnM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203499731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Weller, Ann C</creator><creatorcontrib>Weller, Ann C</creatorcontrib><description>Weller provides her views on a report conducted by Cochrane on the replicability of the literature search strategies provided by meta-analysis. She points out that even though the Cochrane authors handsearched a number of monographs and journals, they did not explain their selection criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-5050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15088073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh</publisher><subject>Comment and Opinion ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Librarians ; Library Services - standards ; Meta-analysis ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Opinions ; Peer Review - standards ; Publication Bias ; Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2004-04, Vol.92 (2), p.163-164</ispartof><rights>Copyright Medical Library Association Apr 2004</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004, Medical Library Association 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC385293/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC385293/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15088073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weller, Ann C</creatorcontrib><title>Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports</title><title>Journal of the Medical Library Association</title><addtitle>J Med Libr Assoc</addtitle><description>Weller provides her views on a report conducted by Cochrane on the replicability of the literature search strategies provided by meta-analysis. She points out that even though the Cochrane authors handsearched a number of monographs and journals, they did not explain their selection criteria.</description><subject>Comment and Opinion</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Library Services - standards</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Peer Review - standards</subject><subject>Publication Bias</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1536-5050</issn><issn>1558-9439</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9r3jAMxsNoWbt2X6GYHXoL2LH92jn0UF72Dzp6Wc9BtpXGJbFT23mhsA8_d-vG1pOE9JN4HulNc8qk1G0veH_0nPNdK6mkJ827nB8oZUor-rY5YZJqTRU_bX58i1soPtwTPHiHwSIpExQye5MgeQiZQEKCOWPFYCZjTMTGZU04Ycj-gBUtmKBsFcsIyU6Yf1ELFmghwPyUawWCI_topwQBScI1ppLPm-MR5ozvX-JZc_fp4_f9l_bm9vPX_fVNu3Zal9bwnetQiJE7HN2OdZJZ2ilh3EhHMxrGhBISUYE1HI2xju-QcaGpcKOqNs-aq997180s6Gy1kmAe1uQXSE9DBD_83wl-Gu7jYeBadj2v85cv8yk-bpjLsPhscZ6rl7jlQTHd9ZLrCn54BT7ELdUT5KGjXPS94qxCF_-q-Svjz1P4T6vGjnM</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Weller, Ann C</creator><general>University Library System, University of Pittsburgh</general><general>Medical Library Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports</title><author>Weller, Ann C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p288t-b36d2e44f3defd61251c0274bdf0fbfb114745ee7acb3ebbcd36e134804df7073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Comment and Opinion</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Library Services - standards</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Peer Review - standards</topic><topic>Publication Bias</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weller, Ann C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Medical Library Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weller, Ann C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Medical Library Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Libr Assoc</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>163-164</pages><issn>1536-5050</issn><eissn>1558-9439</eissn><abstract>Weller provides her views on a report conducted by Cochrane on the replicability of the literature search strategies provided by meta-analysis. She points out that even though the Cochrane authors handsearched a number of monographs and journals, they did not explain their selection criteria.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University Library System, University of Pittsburgh</pub><pmid>15088073</pmid><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1536-5050
ispartof Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2004-04, Vol.92 (2), p.163-164
issn 1536-5050
1558-9439
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_385293
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Comment and Opinion
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Librarians
Library Services - standards
Meta-analysis
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Opinions
Peer Review - standards
Publication Bias
Studies
United States
title Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A50%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mounting%20evidence%20that%20librarians%20are%20essential%20for%20comprehensive%20literature%20searches%20for%20meta-analyses%20and%20Cochrane%20reports&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Medical%20Library%20Association&rft.au=Weller,%20Ann%20C&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=163-164&rft.issn=1536-5050&rft.eissn=1558-9439&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E889784971%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203499731&rft_id=info:pmid/15088073&rfr_iscdi=true