Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks

Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical bioinformatics 2013-10, Vol.3 (1), p.19-19
Hauptverfasser: Islam, Md Fahmid, Hoque, Md Moinul, Banik, Rajat Suvra, Roy, Sanjoy, Sumi, Sharmin Sultana, Hassan, F M Nazmul, Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki, Ullah, Ahmad, Rahman, K M Taufiqur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Journal of clinical bioinformatics
container_volume 3
creator Islam, Md Fahmid
Hoque, Md Moinul
Banik, Rajat Suvra
Roy, Sanjoy
Sumi, Sharmin Sultana
Hassan, F M Nazmul
Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki
Ullah, Ahmad
Rahman, K M Taufiqur
description Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard. In the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively. In case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions. The study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/2043-9113-3-19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3852839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534819040</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534819040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5009-32a78a56400f83703b25a455c576eb0c32ea4db1e94ce4d14dbcee3963a2cd303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkFv1TAMxysEYtPYlSOKxIVLR9Ikr80F6ekJ2KRJXOAcuak7DG1SknbT-_aketvTJkZyiGP__JdtuSjeCn4hRLP5WHElSyOELGUpzIvi9Oh4-cg-Kc5T-sXzUflbN6-Lk0pxI2tdnxb7XRgniDDTLTLwMOwTJRZ61lHfY0Q_EwzM43wX4m82hm4ZINK8Z-TZTCktyNKEjnpyzIc4Zhh8xxx4h5FNMcyYSfIzRnAzBf-gld4Ur3oYEp7fv2fFjy-fv-8uy-tvX6922-uy1ZybUlZQN6A3ivO-kTWXbaVBae10vcGWO1khqK4VaJRD1YlsO0RpNhIq10kuz4pPB91paUfsXG4pwmCnSCPEvQ1A9mnE0097E26tbHTVSJMFtgeBlsJ_BJ5GXBjtOn27Tt9KK1aND_dFxPBnwTTbkZLDYQCPYUlWKG2EroyoMvr-gN7AgJZ8H7KoW3G71VI1wnC1dnXxDJVvhyO54LGn7H8uwcWQUsT-2IDgdt2mf0t-93huR_xhd-RfkV7Hwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459152912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Islam, Md Fahmid ; Hoque, Md Moinul ; Banik, Rajat Suvra ; Roy, Sanjoy ; Sumi, Sharmin Sultana ; Hassan, F M Nazmul ; Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki ; Ullah, Ahmad ; Rahman, K M Taufiqur</creator><creatorcontrib>Islam, Md Fahmid ; Hoque, Md Moinul ; Banik, Rajat Suvra ; Roy, Sanjoy ; Sumi, Sharmin Sultana ; Hassan, F M Nazmul ; Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki ; Ullah, Ahmad ; Rahman, K M Taufiqur</creatorcontrib><description>Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard. In the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively. In case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions. The study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2043-9113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-9113</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2043-9113-3-19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24093757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cellular signal transduction ; Comparative analysis ; Development and progression ; Liver</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2013-10, Vol.3 (1), p.19-19</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Islam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Islam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5009-32a78a56400f83703b25a455c576eb0c32ea4db1e94ce4d14dbcee3963a2cd303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5009-32a78a56400f83703b25a455c576eb0c32ea4db1e94ce4d14dbcee3963a2cd303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852839/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852839/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24093757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Islam, Md Fahmid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoque, Md Moinul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banik, Rajat Suvra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Sanjoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumi, Sharmin Sultana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, F M Nazmul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullah, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, K M Taufiqur</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks</title><title>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</title><addtitle>J Clin Bioinforma</addtitle><description>Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard. In the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively. In case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions. The study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cellular signal transduction</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Liver</subject><issn>2043-9113</issn><issn>2043-9113</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kkFv1TAMxysEYtPYlSOKxIVLR9Ikr80F6ekJ2KRJXOAcuak7DG1SknbT-_aketvTJkZyiGP__JdtuSjeCn4hRLP5WHElSyOELGUpzIvi9Oh4-cg-Kc5T-sXzUflbN6-Lk0pxI2tdnxb7XRgniDDTLTLwMOwTJRZ61lHfY0Q_EwzM43wX4m82hm4ZINK8Z-TZTCktyNKEjnpyzIc4Zhh8xxx4h5FNMcyYSfIzRnAzBf-gld4Ur3oYEp7fv2fFjy-fv-8uy-tvX6922-uy1ZybUlZQN6A3ivO-kTWXbaVBae10vcGWO1khqK4VaJRD1YlsO0RpNhIq10kuz4pPB91paUfsXG4pwmCnSCPEvQ1A9mnE0097E26tbHTVSJMFtgeBlsJ_BJ5GXBjtOn27Tt9KK1aND_dFxPBnwTTbkZLDYQCPYUlWKG2EroyoMvr-gN7AgJZ8H7KoW3G71VI1wnC1dnXxDJVvhyO54LGn7H8uwcWQUsT-2IDgdt2mf0t-93huR_xhd-RfkV7Hwg</recordid><startdate>20131006</startdate><enddate>20131006</enddate><creator>Islam, Md Fahmid</creator><creator>Hoque, Md Moinul</creator><creator>Banik, Rajat Suvra</creator><creator>Roy, Sanjoy</creator><creator>Sumi, Sharmin Sultana</creator><creator>Hassan, F M Nazmul</creator><creator>Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki</creator><creator>Ullah, Ahmad</creator><creator>Rahman, K M Taufiqur</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131006</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks</title><author>Islam, Md Fahmid ; Hoque, Md Moinul ; Banik, Rajat Suvra ; Roy, Sanjoy ; Sumi, Sharmin Sultana ; Hassan, F M Nazmul ; Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki ; Ullah, Ahmad ; Rahman, K M Taufiqur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5009-32a78a56400f83703b25a455c576eb0c32ea4db1e94ce4d14dbcee3963a2cd303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cellular signal transduction</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Liver</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Islam, Md Fahmid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoque, Md Moinul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banik, Rajat Suvra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Sanjoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumi, Sharmin Sultana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, F M Nazmul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullah, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, K M Taufiqur</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Islam, Md Fahmid</au><au>Hoque, Md Moinul</au><au>Banik, Rajat Suvra</au><au>Roy, Sanjoy</au><au>Sumi, Sharmin Sultana</au><au>Hassan, F M Nazmul</au><au>Tomal, Md Tauhid Siddiki</au><au>Ullah, Ahmad</au><au>Rahman, K M Taufiqur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Bioinforma</addtitle><date>2013-10-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>19-19</pages><issn>2043-9113</issn><eissn>2043-9113</eissn><abstract>Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard. In the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively. In case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions. The study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24093757</pmid><doi>10.1186/2043-9113-3-19</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2043-9113
ispartof Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2013-10, Vol.3 (1), p.19-19
issn 2043-9113
2043-9113
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3852839
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Cancer
Cellular signal transduction
Comparative analysis
Development and progression
Liver
title Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A01%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20differential%20network%20modularity%20in%20tissue%20specific%20normal%20and%20cancer%20protein%20interaction%20networks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Islam,%20Md%20Fahmid&rft.date=2013-10-06&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=19-19&rft.issn=2043-9113&rft.eissn=2043-9113&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2043-9113-3-19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534819040%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459152912&rft_id=info:pmid/24093757&rft_galeid=A534819040&rfr_iscdi=true