Emergency department waiting room: many requests, many insured and many primary care physician referrals
Background Increase in waiting time often results in patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without being seen, ultimately decreasing patient satisfaction. We surveyed low-acuity patients in the ED waiting room to understand their preferences and expectations. Methods An IRB approved, 42-ite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of emergency medicine 2013-10, Vol.6 (1), p.35-35, Article 35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | International journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Kamali, Michael F Jain, Minal Jain, Anunaya R Schneider, Sandra M |
description | Background
Increase in waiting time often results in patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without being seen, ultimately decreasing patient satisfaction. We surveyed low-acuity patients in the ED waiting room to understand their preferences and expectations.
Methods
An IRB approved, 42-item survey was administered to 400 adult patients waiting in the ED waiting room for >15 min from April to August 2010. Demographics, visit reasons, triage and waiting room facility preferences were collected.
Results
The mean age of patients was 38.9 years (SD = 14.8), and 52.5% were females. About 53.8% of patients were employed, 79.4% had access to a primary care physician (PCP), and 17% did not have any medical insurance. The most common complaint was pain. A total of 44.4% respondents reported that they believed their problems were urgent and required immediate attention, prompting them to come to the ED, while 14.6% reported that they could not get a timely PCP appointment, and 42.9% were actually referred by their PCP to come to the ED. About 57.7% of patients considered leaving the ED if the waiting times were too long. The mean acceptable waiting time before leaving ED was 221 min (SD = 194; median 180 min, IQR 120–270). A total of 39.1% survey respondents reported being most comfortable being triaged by a physician. Respondents were least comfortable being triaged by residents. On analyzing waiting room expectations for the survey respondents, we found that 70% of the subjects wanted a better estimate of waiting time and 43.5% wanted better information on reasons for the long wait.
Conclusion
Contrary to popular belief, at our ED a large proportion of low-acuity patients has a PCP and is medically insured. Providing patients with appropriate reasons for the wait, an accurate estimate of waiting time and creating separate areas to examine minor illness/injuries would increase patient satisfaction within our population subset. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1865-1380-6-35 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3850753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1459156310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-8087bc1cb2c38b0cf66e498ce1b1667ef357b429b1de672f9ff8fa83269d9f013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1PxCAQJUbj99Wj6dGDVSgtpR5MjPErMfGiZwJ02MVsYYVWs_9e1q4bjfFABuY93sy8QeiI4DNCODtPp8oJ5ThnOa020O46sbm-18UO2ovxFWNGSka20U5RYk4pbXbR9KaDMAGnF1kLcxn6DlyffUjbWzfJgvfdRdZJt8gCvA0Q-3g6Pq2LQ4A2k64dE_NgOxkWmZYBsvl0Ea220qVvBkKQs3iAtkwKcLiK--jl9ub5-j5_fLp7uL56zFXJeZ9zzGuliVaFplxhbRiDsuEaiCKM1WBoVauyaBRpgdWFaYzhRnJasKZtDCZ0H12OuvNBddDqNE4qL1btCS-t-I04OxUT_y4or3Bd0SRwNQoo6_8R-I1o34ml02LpumCCVknjZNVE8F-2ic5GDbOZdOCHKEhZNaRilOBEPRupOvgYk13rSgSL5Yr_ah__HHBN_95pIpyPhJggN4EgXv0QXDL9P8lPDGO0Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459156310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergency department waiting room: many requests, many insured and many primary care physician referrals</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Access via BioMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Kamali, Michael F ; Jain, Minal ; Jain, Anunaya R ; Schneider, Sandra M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Michael F ; Jain, Minal ; Jain, Anunaya R ; Schneider, Sandra M</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Increase in waiting time often results in patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without being seen, ultimately decreasing patient satisfaction. We surveyed low-acuity patients in the ED waiting room to understand their preferences and expectations.
Methods
An IRB approved, 42-item survey was administered to 400 adult patients waiting in the ED waiting room for >15 min from April to August 2010. Demographics, visit reasons, triage and waiting room facility preferences were collected.
Results
The mean age of patients was 38.9 years (SD = 14.8), and 52.5% were females. About 53.8% of patients were employed, 79.4% had access to a primary care physician (PCP), and 17% did not have any medical insurance. The most common complaint was pain. A total of 44.4% respondents reported that they believed their problems were urgent and required immediate attention, prompting them to come to the ED, while 14.6% reported that they could not get a timely PCP appointment, and 42.9% were actually referred by their PCP to come to the ED. About 57.7% of patients considered leaving the ED if the waiting times were too long. The mean acceptable waiting time before leaving ED was 221 min (SD = 194; median 180 min, IQR 120–270). A total of 39.1% survey respondents reported being most comfortable being triaged by a physician. Respondents were least comfortable being triaged by residents. On analyzing waiting room expectations for the survey respondents, we found that 70% of the subjects wanted a better estimate of waiting time and 43.5% wanted better information on reasons for the long wait.
Conclusion
Contrary to popular belief, at our ED a large proportion of low-acuity patients has a PCP and is medically insured. Providing patients with appropriate reasons for the wait, an accurate estimate of waiting time and creating separate areas to examine minor illness/injuries would increase patient satisfaction within our population subset.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1372</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1865-1380-6-35</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24083339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Angiology ; Cardiology ; Emergency Medicine ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Research ; Pediatrics</subject><ispartof>International journal of emergency medicine, 2013-10, Vol.6 (1), p.35-35, Article 35</ispartof><rights>Kamali et al.; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Kamali et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 Kamali et al.; licensee Springer.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-8087bc1cb2c38b0cf66e498ce1b1667ef357b429b1de672f9ff8fa83269d9f013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-8087bc1cb2c38b0cf66e498ce1b1667ef357b429b1de672f9ff8fa83269d9f013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850753/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3850753/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,24806,27929,27930,41125,41493,42194,42562,51324,51581,53796,53798,75743,75744</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24083339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Minal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Anunaya R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Sandra M</creatorcontrib><title>Emergency department waiting room: many requests, many insured and many primary care physician referrals</title><title>International journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Emerg Med</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Background
Increase in waiting time often results in patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without being seen, ultimately decreasing patient satisfaction. We surveyed low-acuity patients in the ED waiting room to understand their preferences and expectations.
Methods
An IRB approved, 42-item survey was administered to 400 adult patients waiting in the ED waiting room for >15 min from April to August 2010. Demographics, visit reasons, triage and waiting room facility preferences were collected.
Results
The mean age of patients was 38.9 years (SD = 14.8), and 52.5% were females. About 53.8% of patients were employed, 79.4% had access to a primary care physician (PCP), and 17% did not have any medical insurance. The most common complaint was pain. A total of 44.4% respondents reported that they believed their problems were urgent and required immediate attention, prompting them to come to the ED, while 14.6% reported that they could not get a timely PCP appointment, and 42.9% were actually referred by their PCP to come to the ED. About 57.7% of patients considered leaving the ED if the waiting times were too long. The mean acceptable waiting time before leaving ED was 221 min (SD = 194; median 180 min, IQR 120–270). A total of 39.1% survey respondents reported being most comfortable being triaged by a physician. Respondents were least comfortable being triaged by residents. On analyzing waiting room expectations for the survey respondents, we found that 70% of the subjects wanted a better estimate of waiting time and 43.5% wanted better information on reasons for the long wait.
Conclusion
Contrary to popular belief, at our ED a large proportion of low-acuity patients has a PCP and is medically insured. Providing patients with appropriate reasons for the wait, an accurate estimate of waiting time and creating separate areas to examine minor illness/injuries would increase patient satisfaction within our population subset.</description><subject>Angiology</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><issn>1865-1372</issn><issn>1865-1380</issn><issn>1865-1380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1PxCAQJUbj99Wj6dGDVSgtpR5MjPErMfGiZwJ02MVsYYVWs_9e1q4bjfFABuY93sy8QeiI4DNCODtPp8oJ5ThnOa020O46sbm-18UO2ovxFWNGSka20U5RYk4pbXbR9KaDMAGnF1kLcxn6DlyffUjbWzfJgvfdRdZJt8gCvA0Q-3g6Pq2LQ4A2k64dE_NgOxkWmZYBsvl0Ea220qVvBkKQs3iAtkwKcLiK--jl9ub5-j5_fLp7uL56zFXJeZ9zzGuliVaFplxhbRiDsuEaiCKM1WBoVauyaBRpgdWFaYzhRnJasKZtDCZ0H12OuvNBddDqNE4qL1btCS-t-I04OxUT_y4or3Bd0SRwNQoo6_8R-I1o34ml02LpumCCVknjZNVE8F-2ic5GDbOZdOCHKEhZNaRilOBEPRupOvgYk13rSgSL5Yr_ah__HHBN_95pIpyPhJggN4EgXv0QXDL9P8lPDGO0Lg</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Kamali, Michael F</creator><creator>Jain, Minal</creator><creator>Jain, Anunaya R</creator><creator>Schneider, Sandra M</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Emergency department waiting room: many requests, many insured and many primary care physician referrals</title><author>Kamali, Michael F ; Jain, Minal ; Jain, Anunaya R ; Schneider, Sandra M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-8087bc1cb2c38b0cf66e498ce1b1667ef357b429b1de672f9ff8fa83269d9f013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Angiology</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Minal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Anunaya R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Sandra M</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamali, Michael F</au><au>Jain, Minal</au><au>Jain, Anunaya R</au><au>Schneider, Sandra M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergency department waiting room: many requests, many insured and many primary care physician referrals</atitle><jtitle>International journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><stitle>Int J Emerg Med</stitle><addtitle>Int J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>35-35</pages><artnum>35</artnum><issn>1865-1372</issn><issn>1865-1380</issn><eissn>1865-1380</eissn><abstract>Background
Increase in waiting time often results in patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without being seen, ultimately decreasing patient satisfaction. We surveyed low-acuity patients in the ED waiting room to understand their preferences and expectations.
Methods
An IRB approved, 42-item survey was administered to 400 adult patients waiting in the ED waiting room for >15 min from April to August 2010. Demographics, visit reasons, triage and waiting room facility preferences were collected.
Results
The mean age of patients was 38.9 years (SD = 14.8), and 52.5% were females. About 53.8% of patients were employed, 79.4% had access to a primary care physician (PCP), and 17% did not have any medical insurance. The most common complaint was pain. A total of 44.4% respondents reported that they believed their problems were urgent and required immediate attention, prompting them to come to the ED, while 14.6% reported that they could not get a timely PCP appointment, and 42.9% were actually referred by their PCP to come to the ED. About 57.7% of patients considered leaving the ED if the waiting times were too long. The mean acceptable waiting time before leaving ED was 221 min (SD = 194; median 180 min, IQR 120–270). A total of 39.1% survey respondents reported being most comfortable being triaged by a physician. Respondents were least comfortable being triaged by residents. On analyzing waiting room expectations for the survey respondents, we found that 70% of the subjects wanted a better estimate of waiting time and 43.5% wanted better information on reasons for the long wait.
Conclusion
Contrary to popular belief, at our ED a large proportion of low-acuity patients has a PCP and is medically insured. Providing patients with appropriate reasons for the wait, an accurate estimate of waiting time and creating separate areas to examine minor illness/injuries would increase patient satisfaction within our population subset.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24083339</pmid><doi>10.1186/1865-1380-6-35</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-1372 |
ispartof | International journal of emergency medicine, 2013-10, Vol.6 (1), p.35-35, Article 35 |
issn | 1865-1372 1865-1380 1865-1380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3850753 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Access via BioMed Central; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | Angiology Cardiology Emergency Medicine Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research Pediatrics |
title | Emergency department waiting room: many requests, many insured and many primary care physician referrals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T22%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergency%20department%20waiting%20room:%20many%20requests,%20many%20insured%20and%20many%20primary%20care%20physician%20referrals&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Kamali,%20Michael%20F&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=35-35&rft.artnum=35&rft.issn=1865-1372&rft.eissn=1865-1380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1865-1380-6-35&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1459156310%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459156310&rft_id=info:pmid/24083339&rfr_iscdi=true |