Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues

Previous research has shown that undergraduate science students learn from peer discussions of in-class clicker questions. However, the features that characterize such discussions are largely unknown, as are the instructional factors that may lead students into productive discussions. To explore the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CBE life sciences education 2013-12, Vol.12 (4), p.645-654
Hauptverfasser: Knight, Jennifer K, Wise, Sarah B, Southard, Katelyn M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 654
container_issue 4
container_start_page 645
container_title CBE life sciences education
container_volume 12
creator Knight, Jennifer K
Wise, Sarah B
Southard, Katelyn M
description Previous research has shown that undergraduate science students learn from peer discussions of in-class clicker questions. However, the features that characterize such discussions are largely unknown, as are the instructional factors that may lead students into productive discussions. To explore these questions, we recorded and transcribed 83 discussions among groups of students discussing 34 different clicker questions in an upper-level developmental biology class. Discussion transcripts were analyzed for features such as making claims, questioning, and explaining reasoning. In addition, transcripts were categorized by the quality of reasoning students used and for performance features, such as percent correct on initial vote, percent correct on revote, and normalized learning change. We found that the majority of student discussions included exchanges of reasoning that used evidence and that many such exchanges resulted in students achieving the correct answer. Students also had discussions in which ideas were exchanged, but the correct answer not achieved. Importantly, instructor prompts that asked students to use reasoning resulted in significantly more discussions containing reasoning connected to evidence than without such prompts. Overall, these results suggest that these upper-level biology students readily employ reasoning in their discussions and are positively influenced by instructor cues.
doi_str_mv 10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3846515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1017240</ericid><sourcerecordid>1464910392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-20b164dbbd7df533d9836fde8fd6bb32bb025ba58e9e694bf585f6431b2dae533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAYhCMEoh9w5QbKBYlLtn79lZgDElpKWVSpEtADJ8uO3-waEmexk6767_Fqy6qcbGmeGY81RfEKyAKgqS9aiwtgFREVIYo8KU5BMahqBezpo_tJcZbSL0K4JCCeFyeUU1VTBafFz9vgMKbJBOfDulz2vv2NsfzkUzun5MeQ3pffp9lhmMpvaNIY9limy2mD5WrYmnYqx65chTTFuZ2yw_Tlcsb0onjWmT7hy4fzvLj9fPlj-aW6vrlaLT9eVy3ndKoosSC5s9bVrhOMOdUw2TlsOietZdRaQoU1okGFUnHbiUZ0kjOw1BnMhvPiwyF3O9sBXZubRtPrbfSDifd6NF7_rwS_0evxTrOGSwEiB7x7CIjjn1x80kP-Pfa9CTjOSQOXXAFhimZ0cUDbOKYUsTs-A0Tv99B5Dw1ME6H3e2TDm8fljvi_ATLw-gBg9O1RvvwKBGrK9wFvD_rGrzc7H1GnwfR9jqN6t9sB1VxLLthf2kGfVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464910392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Knight, Jennifer K ; Wise, Sarah B ; Southard, Katelyn M</creator><contributor>Dirks, Clarissa Ann</contributor><creatorcontrib>Knight, Jennifer K ; Wise, Sarah B ; Southard, Katelyn M ; Dirks, Clarissa Ann</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has shown that undergraduate science students learn from peer discussions of in-class clicker questions. However, the features that characterize such discussions are largely unknown, as are the instructional factors that may lead students into productive discussions. To explore these questions, we recorded and transcribed 83 discussions among groups of students discussing 34 different clicker questions in an upper-level developmental biology class. Discussion transcripts were analyzed for features such as making claims, questioning, and explaining reasoning. In addition, transcripts were categorized by the quality of reasoning students used and for performance features, such as percent correct on initial vote, percent correct on revote, and normalized learning change. We found that the majority of student discussions included exchanges of reasoning that used evidence and that many such exchanges resulted in students achieving the correct answer. Students also had discussions in which ideas were exchanged, but the correct answer not achieved. Importantly, instructor prompts that asked students to use reasoning resulted in significantly more discussions containing reasoning connected to evidence than without such prompts. Overall, these results suggest that these upper-level biology students readily employ reasoning in their discussions and are positively influenced by instructor cues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24297291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Cell Biology</publisher><subject>Audience Response Systems ; Biology ; Biology - education ; College Science ; Colorado ; Cues ; Discussion (Teaching Technique) ; Educational Technology ; Female ; Group Discussion ; Handheld Devices ; Humans ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Logical Thinking ; Male ; Science Instruction ; Students - psychology ; Teaching Methods ; Thinking Skills ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>CBE life sciences education, 2013-12, Vol.12 (4), p.645-654</ispartof><rights>2013 J. K. Knight © 2013 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( ). 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-20b164dbbd7df533d9836fde8fd6bb32bb025ba58e9e694bf585f6431b2dae533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-20b164dbbd7df533d9836fde8fd6bb32bb025ba58e9e694bf585f6431b2dae533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846515/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3846515/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1017240$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24297291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Dirks, Clarissa Ann</contributor><creatorcontrib>Knight, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Sarah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southard, Katelyn M</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues</title><title>CBE life sciences education</title><addtitle>CBE Life Sci Educ</addtitle><description>Previous research has shown that undergraduate science students learn from peer discussions of in-class clicker questions. However, the features that characterize such discussions are largely unknown, as are the instructional factors that may lead students into productive discussions. To explore these questions, we recorded and transcribed 83 discussions among groups of students discussing 34 different clicker questions in an upper-level developmental biology class. Discussion transcripts were analyzed for features such as making claims, questioning, and explaining reasoning. In addition, transcripts were categorized by the quality of reasoning students used and for performance features, such as percent correct on initial vote, percent correct on revote, and normalized learning change. We found that the majority of student discussions included exchanges of reasoning that used evidence and that many such exchanges resulted in students achieving the correct answer. Students also had discussions in which ideas were exchanged, but the correct answer not achieved. Importantly, instructor prompts that asked students to use reasoning resulted in significantly more discussions containing reasoning connected to evidence than without such prompts. Overall, these results suggest that these upper-level biology students readily employ reasoning in their discussions and are positively influenced by instructor cues.</description><subject>Audience Response Systems</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology - education</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group Discussion</subject><subject>Handheld Devices</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1931-7913</issn><issn>1931-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAYhCMEoh9w5QbKBYlLtn79lZgDElpKWVSpEtADJ8uO3-waEmexk6767_Fqy6qcbGmeGY81RfEKyAKgqS9aiwtgFREVIYo8KU5BMahqBezpo_tJcZbSL0K4JCCeFyeUU1VTBafFz9vgMKbJBOfDulz2vv2NsfzkUzun5MeQ3pffp9lhmMpvaNIY9limy2mD5WrYmnYqx65chTTFuZ2yw_Tlcsb0onjWmT7hy4fzvLj9fPlj-aW6vrlaLT9eVy3ndKoosSC5s9bVrhOMOdUw2TlsOietZdRaQoU1okGFUnHbiUZ0kjOw1BnMhvPiwyF3O9sBXZubRtPrbfSDifd6NF7_rwS_0evxTrOGSwEiB7x7CIjjn1x80kP-Pfa9CTjOSQOXXAFhimZ0cUDbOKYUsTs-A0Tv99B5Dw1ME6H3e2TDm8fljvi_ATLw-gBg9O1RvvwKBGrK9wFvD_rGrzc7H1GnwfR9jqN6t9sB1VxLLthf2kGfVQ</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Knight, Jennifer K</creator><creator>Wise, Sarah B</creator><creator>Southard, Katelyn M</creator><general>American Society for Cell Biology</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues</title><author>Knight, Jennifer K ; Wise, Sarah B ; Southard, Katelyn M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-20b164dbbd7df533d9836fde8fd6bb32bb025ba58e9e694bf585f6431b2dae533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Audience Response Systems</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology - education</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group Discussion</topic><topic>Handheld Devices</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knight, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Sarah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southard, Katelyn M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knight, Jennifer K</au><au>Wise, Sarah B</au><au>Southard, Katelyn M</au><au>Dirks, Clarissa Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1017240</ericid><atitle>Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues</atitle><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>CBE Life Sci Educ</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>654</epage><pages>645-654</pages><issn>1931-7913</issn><eissn>1931-7913</eissn><abstract>Previous research has shown that undergraduate science students learn from peer discussions of in-class clicker questions. However, the features that characterize such discussions are largely unknown, as are the instructional factors that may lead students into productive discussions. To explore these questions, we recorded and transcribed 83 discussions among groups of students discussing 34 different clicker questions in an upper-level developmental biology class. Discussion transcripts were analyzed for features such as making claims, questioning, and explaining reasoning. In addition, transcripts were categorized by the quality of reasoning students used and for performance features, such as percent correct on initial vote, percent correct on revote, and normalized learning change. We found that the majority of student discussions included exchanges of reasoning that used evidence and that many such exchanges resulted in students achieving the correct answer. Students also had discussions in which ideas were exchanged, but the correct answer not achieved. Importantly, instructor prompts that asked students to use reasoning resulted in significantly more discussions containing reasoning connected to evidence than without such prompts. Overall, these results suggest that these upper-level biology students readily employ reasoning in their discussions and are positively influenced by instructor cues.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Cell Biology</pub><pmid>24297291</pmid><doi>10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7913
ispartof CBE life sciences education, 2013-12, Vol.12 (4), p.645-654
issn 1931-7913
1931-7913
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3846515
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Audience Response Systems
Biology
Biology - education
College Science
Colorado
Cues
Discussion (Teaching Technique)
Educational Technology
Female
Group Discussion
Handheld Devices
Humans
Instructional Effectiveness
Logical Thinking
Male
Science Instruction
Students - psychology
Teaching Methods
Thinking Skills
Undergraduate Students
title Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Clicker%20Discussions:%20Student%20Reasoning%20and%20the%20Impact%20of%20Instructional%20Cues&rft.jtitle=CBE%20life%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Knight,%20Jennifer%20K&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=654&rft.pages=645-654&rft.issn=1931-7913&rft.eissn=1931-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1464910392%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464910392&rft_id=info:pmid/24297291&rft_ericid=EJ1017240&rfr_iscdi=true