Could the patient have been seen by a nurse; a questionnaire based survey of GP and patient views in Danish general practice

Nurses in Denmark have been increasingly involved in general practice care, which may have implications for the role of the general practitioner (GP) and patients' experience of primary care. The aim of this study was to explore possibilities of doctor-nurse substitution seen from GP and patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC family practice 2013-11, Vol.14 (1), p.171-8 pages, Article 171
Hauptverfasser: Nørøxe, Karen Busk, Moth, Grete, Maindal, Helle Terkildsen, Vedsted, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8 pages
container_issue 1
container_start_page 171
container_title BMC family practice
container_volume 14
creator Nørøxe, Karen Busk
Moth, Grete
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Vedsted, Peter
description Nurses in Denmark have been increasingly involved in general practice care, which may have implications for the role of the general practitioner (GP) and patients' experience of primary care. The aim of this study was to explore possibilities of doctor-nurse substitution seen from GP and patient perspectives and patient preferences in regard to consultations with a personal GP. The study was based on data from a Danish survey on disease patterns in general practice (KOS 2008). Background information on patients and GPs was linked with their responses to whether a nurse could have substituted the GP in consultations and patient-assessed importance of seeing a personal GP. Associations were measured with prevalence rate ratio (PR). Doctor-nurse substitution was a possibility in 14.8% of consultations according to GPs and in 11.7% according to patients. GP and patient agreed on substitution in 3.5% of consultations (Kappa = 0.164). Follow-up consultations were more often feasible for substitution than new episode according to GPs (adj. PR = 2.06 (1.62-2.62)), but not according to patients (adj. PR = 1.02 (0.64-1.33)). Follow-up consultations were related to high importance of seeing the personal GP (adj. PR = 1.18 (1.05-1.33). For both patients and GPs, consultations with patients with chronic conditions were not significantly associated with nurse substitution. Male and younger patients did more often suggest substitution than women and older patients. For GPs, increasing patient age was associated with relevance of substitution. Patients who found it 'very important' to see their personal GP were less likely to consider nurse substitution a possibility (adj. PR = 0.57 (0.45-0.71). GPs and patients found nurse substitution relevant in more than one in ten consultations, although they rarely agreed on which consultations. Follow-up consultations and consultations with older patients were associated with GPs considering nurse substitution appropriate more often. For patients, male and younger patients most often found substitution relevant. High importance of seeing the personal GP may contribute to patient reluctance to nurse substitution, especially for follow-up consultations. The results indicate a need for involving patients' perspective when altering the future roles of primary health care professionals.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2296-14-171
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3835405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534586542</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534586542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b545t-750c2aed3548fe2d98fce305c0f569bec364a642ffa67500380c7c1dd0c309053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9rFDEUx4NYbK3ePUnAi5ex-Z0ZBKGsWoWCHvQcMpk3uymzyZrMrCz4x5vp1rUtFrwkj7xPvnnvm4fQC0reUFqrMyo0rRhrVEVFRTV9hE4OR49vxcfoac5XhFBdM_YEHTPBmKQ1P0G_FnEaOjyuAG_s6CGMeGW3gFuAgPO8tDtscZhShrcl-DFBHn0MwfpUKJuhw3lKW9jh2OOLr9iG7qC09fAzYx_wext8XuElBEh2wJtk3egdPENHvR0yPL_ZT9H3jx--LT5Vl18uPi_OL6tWCjlWWhLHLHRciroH1jV174AT6UgvVdOC40pYJVjfW1VYwmvitKNdRxwnDZH8FL3b626mdg2dK7WVMswm-bVNOxOtN3czwa_MMm4Nr8ub1wKLvUDr4wMCdzMurs3svpndL5Epn1NUXt-UkeK1j2bts4NhsAHilAvWEC0bIvR_oFqx0nLTFPTVPfQqTikUPwulCGecKv2XWtoBjA99LHW6WdScSy5kraRghSJ7yqWYc4L-0CIlZp64fzX18ra3hwt_Roz_BkfC0Ik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1460323167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Could the patient have been seen by a nurse; a questionnaire based survey of GP and patient views in Danish general practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Nørøxe, Karen Busk ; Moth, Grete ; Maindal, Helle Terkildsen ; Vedsted, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Nørøxe, Karen Busk ; Moth, Grete ; Maindal, Helle Terkildsen ; Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Nurses in Denmark have been increasingly involved in general practice care, which may have implications for the role of the general practitioner (GP) and patients' experience of primary care. The aim of this study was to explore possibilities of doctor-nurse substitution seen from GP and patient perspectives and patient preferences in regard to consultations with a personal GP. The study was based on data from a Danish survey on disease patterns in general practice (KOS 2008). Background information on patients and GPs was linked with their responses to whether a nurse could have substituted the GP in consultations and patient-assessed importance of seeing a personal GP. Associations were measured with prevalence rate ratio (PR). Doctor-nurse substitution was a possibility in 14.8% of consultations according to GPs and in 11.7% according to patients. GP and patient agreed on substitution in 3.5% of consultations (Kappa = 0.164). Follow-up consultations were more often feasible for substitution than new episode according to GPs (adj. PR = 2.06 (1.62-2.62)), but not according to patients (adj. PR = 1.02 (0.64-1.33)). Follow-up consultations were related to high importance of seeing the personal GP (adj. PR = 1.18 (1.05-1.33). For both patients and GPs, consultations with patients with chronic conditions were not significantly associated with nurse substitution. Male and younger patients did more often suggest substitution than women and older patients. For GPs, increasing patient age was associated with relevance of substitution. Patients who found it 'very important' to see their personal GP were less likely to consider nurse substitution a possibility (adj. PR = 0.57 (0.45-0.71). GPs and patients found nurse substitution relevant in more than one in ten consultations, although they rarely agreed on which consultations. Follow-up consultations and consultations with older patients were associated with GPs considering nurse substitution appropriate more often. For patients, male and younger patients most often found substitution relevant. High importance of seeing the personal GP may contribute to patient reluctance to nurse substitution, especially for follow-up consultations. The results indicate a need for involving patients' perspective when altering the future roles of primary health care professionals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-171</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24225183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Health ; Chronic illnesses ; Denmark ; Epidemiology ; Family medicine ; Female ; General Practitioners - utilization ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Middle Aged ; Nurse Practitioners - utilization ; Nurses ; Nurses - utilization ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Physician and patient ; Physicians ; Physicians (General practice) ; Practice Patterns, Nurses' - utilization ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - manpower ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Studies ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC family practice, 2013-11, Vol.14 (1), p.171-8 pages, Article 171</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Nørøxe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Nørøxe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Nørøxe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b545t-750c2aed3548fe2d98fce305c0f569bec364a642ffa67500380c7c1dd0c309053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b545t-750c2aed3548fe2d98fce305c0f569bec364a642ffa67500380c7c1dd0c309053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835405/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835405/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24225183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nørøxe, Karen Busk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moth, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maindal, Helle Terkildsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Could the patient have been seen by a nurse; a questionnaire based survey of GP and patient views in Danish general practice</title><title>BMC family practice</title><addtitle>BMC Fam Pract</addtitle><description>Nurses in Denmark have been increasingly involved in general practice care, which may have implications for the role of the general practitioner (GP) and patients' experience of primary care. The aim of this study was to explore possibilities of doctor-nurse substitution seen from GP and patient perspectives and patient preferences in regard to consultations with a personal GP. The study was based on data from a Danish survey on disease patterns in general practice (KOS 2008). Background information on patients and GPs was linked with their responses to whether a nurse could have substituted the GP in consultations and patient-assessed importance of seeing a personal GP. Associations were measured with prevalence rate ratio (PR). Doctor-nurse substitution was a possibility in 14.8% of consultations according to GPs and in 11.7% according to patients. GP and patient agreed on substitution in 3.5% of consultations (Kappa = 0.164). Follow-up consultations were more often feasible for substitution than new episode according to GPs (adj. PR = 2.06 (1.62-2.62)), but not according to patients (adj. PR = 1.02 (0.64-1.33)). Follow-up consultations were related to high importance of seeing the personal GP (adj. PR = 1.18 (1.05-1.33). For both patients and GPs, consultations with patients with chronic conditions were not significantly associated with nurse substitution. Male and younger patients did more often suggest substitution than women and older patients. For GPs, increasing patient age was associated with relevance of substitution. Patients who found it 'very important' to see their personal GP were less likely to consider nurse substitution a possibility (adj. PR = 0.57 (0.45-0.71). GPs and patients found nurse substitution relevant in more than one in ten consultations, although they rarely agreed on which consultations. Follow-up consultations and consultations with older patients were associated with GPs considering nurse substitution appropriate more often. For patients, male and younger patients most often found substitution relevant. High importance of seeing the personal GP may contribute to patient reluctance to nurse substitution, especially for follow-up consultations. The results indicate a need for involving patients' perspective when altering the future roles of primary health care professionals.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Practitioners - utilization</subject><subject>Health Services Needs and Demand</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurse Practitioners - utilization</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nurses - utilization</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physician and patient</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians (General practice)</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - utilization</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - manpower</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2296</issn><issn>1471-2296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9rFDEUx4NYbK3ePUnAi5ex-Z0ZBKGsWoWCHvQcMpk3uymzyZrMrCz4x5vp1rUtFrwkj7xPvnnvm4fQC0reUFqrMyo0rRhrVEVFRTV9hE4OR49vxcfoac5XhFBdM_YEHTPBmKQ1P0G_FnEaOjyuAG_s6CGMeGW3gFuAgPO8tDtscZhShrcl-DFBHn0MwfpUKJuhw3lKW9jh2OOLr9iG7qC09fAzYx_wext8XuElBEh2wJtk3egdPENHvR0yPL_ZT9H3jx--LT5Vl18uPi_OL6tWCjlWWhLHLHRciroH1jV174AT6UgvVdOC40pYJVjfW1VYwmvitKNdRxwnDZH8FL3b626mdg2dK7WVMswm-bVNOxOtN3czwa_MMm4Nr8ub1wKLvUDr4wMCdzMurs3svpndL5Epn1NUXt-UkeK1j2bts4NhsAHilAvWEC0bIvR_oFqx0nLTFPTVPfQqTikUPwulCGecKv2XWtoBjA99LHW6WdScSy5kraRghSJ7yqWYc4L-0CIlZp64fzX18ra3hwt_Roz_BkfC0Ik</recordid><startdate>20131114</startdate><enddate>20131114</enddate><creator>Nørøxe, Karen Busk</creator><creator>Moth, Grete</creator><creator>Maindal, Helle Terkildsen</creator><creator>Vedsted, Peter</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131114</creationdate><title>Could the patient have been seen by a nurse; a questionnaire based survey of GP and patient views in Danish general practice</title><author>Nørøxe, Karen Busk ; Moth, Grete ; Maindal, Helle Terkildsen ; Vedsted, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b545t-750c2aed3548fe2d98fce305c0f569bec364a642ffa67500380c7c1dd0c309053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Practitioners - utilization</topic><topic>Health Services Needs and Demand</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurse Practitioners - utilization</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nurses - utilization</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physician and patient</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians (General practice)</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - utilization</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - manpower</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nørøxe, Karen Busk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moth, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maindal, Helle Terkildsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedsted, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC family practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nørøxe, Karen Busk</au><au>Moth, Grete</au><au>Maindal, Helle Terkildsen</au><au>Vedsted, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Could the patient have been seen by a nurse; a questionnaire based survey of GP and patient views in Danish general practice</atitle><jtitle>BMC family practice</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Fam Pract</addtitle><date>2013-11-14</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>8 pages</epage><pages>171-8 pages</pages><artnum>171</artnum><issn>1471-2296</issn><eissn>1471-2296</eissn><abstract>Nurses in Denmark have been increasingly involved in general practice care, which may have implications for the role of the general practitioner (GP) and patients' experience of primary care. The aim of this study was to explore possibilities of doctor-nurse substitution seen from GP and patient perspectives and patient preferences in regard to consultations with a personal GP. The study was based on data from a Danish survey on disease patterns in general practice (KOS 2008). Background information on patients and GPs was linked with their responses to whether a nurse could have substituted the GP in consultations and patient-assessed importance of seeing a personal GP. Associations were measured with prevalence rate ratio (PR). Doctor-nurse substitution was a possibility in 14.8% of consultations according to GPs and in 11.7% according to patients. GP and patient agreed on substitution in 3.5% of consultations (Kappa = 0.164). Follow-up consultations were more often feasible for substitution than new episode according to GPs (adj. PR = 2.06 (1.62-2.62)), but not according to patients (adj. PR = 1.02 (0.64-1.33)). Follow-up consultations were related to high importance of seeing the personal GP (adj. PR = 1.18 (1.05-1.33). For both patients and GPs, consultations with patients with chronic conditions were not significantly associated with nurse substitution. Male and younger patients did more often suggest substitution than women and older patients. For GPs, increasing patient age was associated with relevance of substitution. Patients who found it 'very important' to see their personal GP were less likely to consider nurse substitution a possibility (adj. PR = 0.57 (0.45-0.71). GPs and patients found nurse substitution relevant in more than one in ten consultations, although they rarely agreed on which consultations. Follow-up consultations and consultations with older patients were associated with GPs considering nurse substitution appropriate more often. For patients, male and younger patients most often found substitution relevant. High importance of seeing the personal GP may contribute to patient reluctance to nurse substitution, especially for follow-up consultations. The results indicate a need for involving patients' perspective when altering the future roles of primary health care professionals.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24225183</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2296-14-171</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2296
ispartof BMC family practice, 2013-11, Vol.14 (1), p.171-8 pages, Article 171
issn 1471-2296
1471-2296
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3835405
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Health
Chronic illnesses
Denmark
Epidemiology
Family medicine
Female
General Practitioners - utilization
Health Services Needs and Demand
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Middle Aged
Nurse Practitioners - utilization
Nurses
Nurses - utilization
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Physician and patient
Physicians
Physicians (General practice)
Practice Patterns, Nurses' - utilization
Primary care
Primary Health Care - manpower
Primary Health Care - methods
Public health
Questionnaires
Studies
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Could the patient have been seen by a nurse; a questionnaire based survey of GP and patient views in Danish general practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Could%20the%20patient%20have%20been%20seen%20by%20a%20nurse;%20a%20questionnaire%20based%20survey%20of%20GP%20and%20patient%20views%20in%20Danish%20general%20practice&rft.jtitle=BMC%20family%20practice&rft.au=N%C3%B8r%C3%B8xe,%20Karen%20Busk&rft.date=2013-11-14&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=8%20pages&rft.pages=171-8%20pages&rft.artnum=171&rft.issn=1471-2296&rft.eissn=1471-2296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2296-14-171&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534586542%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1460323167&rft_id=info:pmid/24225183&rft_galeid=A534586542&rfr_iscdi=true