Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998-9 national family health survey
Abstract Objective To investigate the demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical distribution of tobacco consumption in India. Design Multilevel cross sectional analysis of the 1998-9 Indian national family health survey of 301 984 individuals in 92 447 households in 3215 villages in 440 districts...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 2004-04, Vol.328 (7443), p.801-806 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 806 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7443 |
container_start_page | 801 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 328 |
creator | Subramanian, S V Nandy, Shailen Kelly, Michelle Gordon, Dave Smith, George Davey |
description | Abstract Objective To investigate the demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical distribution of tobacco consumption in India. Design Multilevel cross sectional analysis of the 1998-9 Indian national family health survey of 301 984 individuals in 92 447 households in 3215 villages in 440 districts in 26 states. Setting Indian states. Participants 301 984 adults (≥ 18 years). Main outcome measures Dichotomous variable for smoking and chewing tobacco for each respondent (1 if yes, 0 if no) as well as a combined measure of whether an individual smokes, chews tobacco, or both. Results Smoking and chewing tobacco are systematically associated with socioeconomic markers at the individual and household level. Individuals with no education are 2.69 times more likely to smoke and chew tobacco than those with postgraduate education. Households belonging to the lowest fifth of a standard of living index were 2.54 times more likely to consume tobacco than those in the highest fifth. Scheduled tribes (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.29) and scheduled castes (1.19, 1.16 to 1.23) were more likely to consume tobacco than other caste groups. The socioeconomic differences are more marked for smoking than for chewing tobacco. Socioeconomic markers and demographic characteristics of individuals and households do not account fully for the differences at the level of state, district, and village in smoking and chewing tobacco, with state accounting for the bulk of the variation in tobacco consumption. Conclusion The distribution of tobacco consumption is likely to maintain, and perhaps increase, the current considerable socioeconomic differentials in health in India. Interventions aimed at influencing change in tobacco consumption should consider the socioeconomic and geographical determinants of people's susceptibility to consume tobacco. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.328.7443.801 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_383376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41707306</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41707306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b572t-ae8b78a37d3a4d9223c9d0715d02c21ea002c88f6109b3ee8b4d116062efe9ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhSMEYqph9mxAFgg2KMWPxHaQWKCKx2iGh3jN0nKcG-pOEhfbqeh_4EfjTKsyICFWlny_Y91zfLLsLsFzQhh_WverOaNyLoqCzSUmN7IZKbjMS8nYzWyGq7LKJWHyKDsJYYUxpkzIipe3syNSYoE5E7Ps5wcdI_ghID00qLEheluP0boBuRZFV2tjHDJuCGO_vrq2AzodGqufIeNdCCiAme51h_qxi7aDDXQINraBwQBqvetRXAIiVSXzCg16D7e6t90WLUF3cYnC6DewvZPdanUX4GR_HmdfXr38vHiTn79_fbp4cZ7XpaAx1yBrITUTDdNFU1HKTNVgQcoGU0MJ6GTVSNlygquaQaKLhhCOOYUWKmjYcfZ89-56rHtoDAzR606tve213yqnrfpzMtil-uY2iqVoBU_6x3u9d99HCFH1NhjoOj2AG4MSJOVeVDiBD_4CV270yX5QFBeYYcpZgh7-CyJCSMylJGWi8I66St1De1iXYDX1QaU-qNQHNfVBpT4kyf3rNn8L9r-fgEd7QAeju9brwdhwjeOUpj0Td2_HrUJ0_jAviMCC4SmPfDdP9YEfh7n2l4oLJkr17utCffx0cXZx9paoKZYnO35a-b82fgEQOeYc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778068815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998-9 national family health survey</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Subramanian, S V ; Nandy, Shailen ; Kelly, Michelle ; Gordon, Dave ; Smith, George Davey</creator><creatorcontrib>Subramanian, S V ; Nandy, Shailen ; Kelly, Michelle ; Gordon, Dave ; Smith, George Davey</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To investigate the demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical distribution of tobacco consumption in India. Design Multilevel cross sectional analysis of the 1998-9 Indian national family health survey of 301 984 individuals in 92 447 households in 3215 villages in 440 districts in 26 states. Setting Indian states. Participants 301 984 adults (≥ 18 years). Main outcome measures Dichotomous variable for smoking and chewing tobacco for each respondent (1 if yes, 0 if no) as well as a combined measure of whether an individual smokes, chews tobacco, or both. Results Smoking and chewing tobacco are systematically associated with socioeconomic markers at the individual and household level. Individuals with no education are 2.69 times more likely to smoke and chew tobacco than those with postgraduate education. Households belonging to the lowest fifth of a standard of living index were 2.54 times more likely to consume tobacco than those in the highest fifth. Scheduled tribes (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.29) and scheduled castes (1.19, 1.16 to 1.23) were more likely to consume tobacco than other caste groups. The socioeconomic differences are more marked for smoking than for chewing tobacco. Socioeconomic markers and demographic characteristics of individuals and households do not account fully for the differences at the level of state, district, and village in smoking and chewing tobacco, with state accounting for the bulk of the variation in tobacco consumption. Conclusion The distribution of tobacco consumption is likely to maintain, and perhaps increase, the current considerable socioeconomic differentials in health in India. Interventions aimed at influencing change in tobacco consumption should consider the socioeconomic and geographical determinants of people's susceptibility to consume tobacco.</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7443.801</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15070637</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Christianity ; Cigarette smoking ; Comparative analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Demography ; Families & family life ; Family health ; Female ; General aspects ; Health ; Health Surveys ; Household consumption ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Male ; Mastication ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Polls & surveys ; Primary Care ; Residence Characteristics ; Rural Health ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomics ; Standard of living ; Tobacco ; Tobacco smoking ; Tobacco, Smokeless ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; Tuberculosis ; Urban Health</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2004-04, Vol.328 (7443), p.801-806</ispartof><rights>2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2004 (c) 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group Apr 3, 2004</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b572t-ae8b78a37d3a4d9223c9d0715d02c21ea002c88f6109b3ee8b4d116062efe9ed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41707306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41707306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27922,27923,30997,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15622204$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15070637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Subramanian, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandy, Shailen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, George Davey</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998-9 national family health survey</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To investigate the demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical distribution of tobacco consumption in India. Design Multilevel cross sectional analysis of the 1998-9 Indian national family health survey of 301 984 individuals in 92 447 households in 3215 villages in 440 districts in 26 states. Setting Indian states. Participants 301 984 adults (≥ 18 years). Main outcome measures Dichotomous variable for smoking and chewing tobacco for each respondent (1 if yes, 0 if no) as well as a combined measure of whether an individual smokes, chews tobacco, or both. Results Smoking and chewing tobacco are systematically associated with socioeconomic markers at the individual and household level. Individuals with no education are 2.69 times more likely to smoke and chew tobacco than those with postgraduate education. Households belonging to the lowest fifth of a standard of living index were 2.54 times more likely to consume tobacco than those in the highest fifth. Scheduled tribes (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.29) and scheduled castes (1.19, 1.16 to 1.23) were more likely to consume tobacco than other caste groups. The socioeconomic differences are more marked for smoking than for chewing tobacco. Socioeconomic markers and demographic characteristics of individuals and households do not account fully for the differences at the level of state, district, and village in smoking and chewing tobacco, with state accounting for the bulk of the variation in tobacco consumption. Conclusion The distribution of tobacco consumption is likely to maintain, and perhaps increase, the current considerable socioeconomic differentials in health in India. Interventions aimed at influencing change in tobacco consumption should consider the socioeconomic and geographical determinants of people's susceptibility to consume tobacco.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Household consumption</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mastication</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Primary Care</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Rural Health</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Standard of living</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, Smokeless</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Urban Health</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhSMEYqph9mxAFgg2KMWPxHaQWKCKx2iGh3jN0nKcG-pOEhfbqeh_4EfjTKsyICFWlny_Y91zfLLsLsFzQhh_WverOaNyLoqCzSUmN7IZKbjMS8nYzWyGq7LKJWHyKDsJYYUxpkzIipe3syNSYoE5E7Ps5wcdI_ghID00qLEheluP0boBuRZFV2tjHDJuCGO_vrq2AzodGqufIeNdCCiAme51h_qxi7aDDXQINraBwQBqvetRXAIiVSXzCg16D7e6t90WLUF3cYnC6DewvZPdanUX4GR_HmdfXr38vHiTn79_fbp4cZ7XpaAx1yBrITUTDdNFU1HKTNVgQcoGU0MJ6GTVSNlygquaQaKLhhCOOYUWKmjYcfZ89-56rHtoDAzR606tve213yqnrfpzMtil-uY2iqVoBU_6x3u9d99HCFH1NhjoOj2AG4MSJOVeVDiBD_4CV270yX5QFBeYYcpZgh7-CyJCSMylJGWi8I66St1De1iXYDX1QaU-qNQHNfVBpT4kyf3rNn8L9r-fgEd7QAeju9brwdhwjeOUpj0Td2_HrUJ0_jAviMCC4SmPfDdP9YEfh7n2l4oLJkr17utCffx0cXZx9paoKZYnO35a-b82fgEQOeYc</recordid><startdate>20040403</startdate><enddate>20040403</enddate><creator>Subramanian, S V</creator><creator>Nandy, Shailen</creator><creator>Kelly, Michelle</creator><creator>Gordon, Dave</creator><creator>Smith, George Davey</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040403</creationdate><title>Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998-9 national family health survey</title><author>Subramanian, S V ; Nandy, Shailen ; Kelly, Michelle ; Gordon, Dave ; Smith, George Davey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b572t-ae8b78a37d3a4d9223c9d0715d02c21ea002c88f6109b3ee8b4d116062efe9ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Household consumption</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mastication</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Primary Care</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Rural Health</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Standard of living</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, Smokeless</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Urban Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Subramanian, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandy, Shailen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, George Davey</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Subramanian, S V</au><au>Nandy, Shailen</au><au>Kelly, Michelle</au><au>Gordon, Dave</au><au>Smith, George Davey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998-9 national family health survey</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2004-04-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>328</volume><issue>7443</issue><spage>801</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>801-806</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective To investigate the demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical distribution of tobacco consumption in India. Design Multilevel cross sectional analysis of the 1998-9 Indian national family health survey of 301 984 individuals in 92 447 households in 3215 villages in 440 districts in 26 states. Setting Indian states. Participants 301 984 adults (≥ 18 years). Main outcome measures Dichotomous variable for smoking and chewing tobacco for each respondent (1 if yes, 0 if no) as well as a combined measure of whether an individual smokes, chews tobacco, or both. Results Smoking and chewing tobacco are systematically associated with socioeconomic markers at the individual and household level. Individuals with no education are 2.69 times more likely to smoke and chew tobacco than those with postgraduate education. Households belonging to the lowest fifth of a standard of living index were 2.54 times more likely to consume tobacco than those in the highest fifth. Scheduled tribes (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.29) and scheduled castes (1.19, 1.16 to 1.23) were more likely to consume tobacco than other caste groups. The socioeconomic differences are more marked for smoking than for chewing tobacco. Socioeconomic markers and demographic characteristics of individuals and households do not account fully for the differences at the level of state, district, and village in smoking and chewing tobacco, with state accounting for the bulk of the variation in tobacco consumption. Conclusion The distribution of tobacco consumption is likely to maintain, and perhaps increase, the current considerable socioeconomic differentials in health in India. Interventions aimed at influencing change in tobacco consumption should consider the socioeconomic and geographical determinants of people's susceptibility to consume tobacco.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>15070637</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.328.7443.801</doi><tpages>6</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 2004-04, Vol.328 (7443), p.801-806 |
issn | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_383376 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Christianity Cigarette smoking Comparative analysis Cross-Sectional Studies Demography Families & family life Family health Female General aspects Health Health Surveys Household consumption Humans India - epidemiology Male Mastication Medical sciences Middle Aged Odds Ratio Polls & surveys Primary Care Residence Characteristics Rural Health Smoking - epidemiology Socioeconomic Factors Socioeconomics Standard of living Tobacco Tobacco smoking Tobacco, Smokeless Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology Tuberculosis Urban Health |
title | Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998-9 national family health survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A15%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20and%20distribution%20of%20tobacco%20consumption%20in%20India:%20cross%20sectional%20multilevel%20evidence%20from%20the%201998-9%20national%20family%20health%20survey&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Subramanian,%20S%20V&rft.date=2004-04-03&rft.volume=328&rft.issue=7443&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=801-806&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.328.7443.801&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41707306%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778068815&rft_id=info:pmid/15070637&rft_jstor_id=41707306&rfr_iscdi=true |