Heterogeneous echogenicity of the underlying thyroid parenchyma: how does this affect the analysis of a thyroid nodule?

Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland has been associated with diffuse thyroid disease and benign and malignant nodules can coexist with diffuse thyroid disease. Underlying heterogeneous echogenicity might make it difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules on US. Thus,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC cancer 2013-11, Vol.13 (1), p.550-550, Article 550
Hauptverfasser: Park, Mina, Park, So Hee, Kim, Eun-Kyung, Yoon, Jung Hyun, Moon, Hee Jung, Lee, Hye Sun, Kwak, Jin Young
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 550
container_issue 1
container_start_page 550
container_title BMC cancer
container_volume 13
creator Park, Mina
Park, So Hee
Kim, Eun-Kyung
Yoon, Jung Hyun
Moon, Hee Jung
Lee, Hye Sun
Kwak, Jin Young
description Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland has been associated with diffuse thyroid disease and benign and malignant nodules can coexist with diffuse thyroid disease. Underlying heterogeneous echogenicity might make it difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules on US. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of underlying thyroid echogenicity on diagnosis of thyroid malignancies using US. A total of 1,373 patients who underwent US-guided fine needle aspiration of 1,449 thyroid nodules from June 2009 to August 2009 were included. The diagnostic performance of US assessment for thyroid nodules was calculated and compared according to underlying thyroid echogenicity. The diagnostic performance of US assessments in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy according to the underlying parenchymal echogenicity was compared using a logistic regression with the GEE (generalized estimating equation) method. Each US feature of malignant and benign thyroid nodules was analyzed according to underlying echogenicity to evaluate which feature affected the final diagnosis. Among the 1,449 nodules, 325 (22.4%) were malignant and 1,124 (77.6%) were benign. Thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity showed significantly lower specificity, PPV, and accuracy compared to thyroid glands with homogeneous echogenicity, 76.3% to 83.7%, 48.7% to 60.9%, and 77.6% to 84.4%, respectively (P=0.009, 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). In benign thyroid nodules, microlobulated or irregular margins were more frequently seen in thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity than in those with homogenous echogenicity (P
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2407-13-550
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3832886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534612318</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534612318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-c6937510378f0f754d3a07a61d5a3a4b926e7f7804783f1f540e29f897349ce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9r1TAcxYsobk7ffZKCIPrQmTRJ0_qgjKFuMBD88Ryy9Js2Ize5S1Jn_3vTbV5vRfKQ5JvPOaWHUxTPMTrGuG3eYspxVVPEK0wqxtCD4nA3erh3PiiexHiFEOYtah8XBzWtCe86fFjcnEGC4Adw4KdYghqXs1EmzaXXZRqhnFwPwc7GDfk6B2_6cisDODXOG_muHP1N2XuI-dHEUmoNKt3qpJN2jnmWfeRO6nw_WfjwtHikpY3w7H4_Kn58-vj99Ky6-PL5_PTkolKMNalSTUc4w4jwViPNGe2JRFw2uGeSSHrZ1Q1wnf-K8pZorBlFUHe67TihnQJKjor3d77b6XIDvQKXgrRiG8xGhll4acT6xZlRDP6nIC2p27bJBq_vDYK_niAmsTFRgbXyNjGBaYeajjY1y-jLf9ArP4WcwkKxzKAc-V9qkBaEcdrn76rFVJwwQhtcE9xm6vg_VF49bIzyDrTJ85XgzUqQmQS_0iCnGMX5t69r9tUeO4K0aYzeTsl4F9cgugNV8DEG0LvgMBJLA8VSMbFUTGAicgOz5MV-4DvBn8qR35He1BA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459460991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogeneous echogenicity of the underlying thyroid parenchyma: how does this affect the analysis of a thyroid nodule?</title><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Park, Mina ; Park, So Hee ; Kim, Eun-Kyung ; Yoon, Jung Hyun ; Moon, Hee Jung ; Lee, Hye Sun ; Kwak, Jin Young</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Mina ; Park, So Hee ; Kim, Eun-Kyung ; Yoon, Jung Hyun ; Moon, Hee Jung ; Lee, Hye Sun ; Kwak, Jin Young</creatorcontrib><description>Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland has been associated with diffuse thyroid disease and benign and malignant nodules can coexist with diffuse thyroid disease. Underlying heterogeneous echogenicity might make it difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules on US. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of underlying thyroid echogenicity on diagnosis of thyroid malignancies using US. A total of 1,373 patients who underwent US-guided fine needle aspiration of 1,449 thyroid nodules from June 2009 to August 2009 were included. The diagnostic performance of US assessment for thyroid nodules was calculated and compared according to underlying thyroid echogenicity. The diagnostic performance of US assessments in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy according to the underlying parenchymal echogenicity was compared using a logistic regression with the GEE (generalized estimating equation) method. Each US feature of malignant and benign thyroid nodules was analyzed according to underlying echogenicity to evaluate which feature affected the final diagnosis. Among the 1,449 nodules, 325 (22.4%) were malignant and 1,124 (77.6%) were benign. Thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity showed significantly lower specificity, PPV, and accuracy compared to thyroid glands with homogeneous echogenicity, 76.3% to 83.7%, 48.7% to 60.9%, and 77.6% to 84.4%, respectively (P=0.009, 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). In benign thyroid nodules, microlobulated or irregular margins were more frequently seen in thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity than in those with homogenous echogenicity (P&lt;0.001). Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland significantly lowers the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of US in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. Therefore, caution is required during evaluation of thyroid nodules detected in thyroid parenchyma showing heterogeneous echogenicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-550</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24237991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Cellular biology ; Comparative analysis ; Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Graves disease ; Health aspects ; Histopathology ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Thyroid cancer ; Thyroid diseases ; Thyroid gland ; Thyroid Gland - diagnostic imaging ; Thyroid Gland - pathology ; Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology ; Thyroid Nodule - diagnostic imaging ; Thyroid Nodule - pathology ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound imaging</subject><ispartof>BMC cancer, 2013-11, Vol.13 (1), p.550-550, Article 550</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Park et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Park et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Park et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-c6937510378f0f754d3a07a61d5a3a4b926e7f7804783f1f540e29f897349ce43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-c6937510378f0f754d3a07a61d5a3a4b926e7f7804783f1f540e29f897349ce43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3832886/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3832886/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24237991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, So Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eun-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Hee Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hye Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Jin Young</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogeneous echogenicity of the underlying thyroid parenchyma: how does this affect the analysis of a thyroid nodule?</title><title>BMC cancer</title><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><description>Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland has been associated with diffuse thyroid disease and benign and malignant nodules can coexist with diffuse thyroid disease. Underlying heterogeneous echogenicity might make it difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules on US. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of underlying thyroid echogenicity on diagnosis of thyroid malignancies using US. A total of 1,373 patients who underwent US-guided fine needle aspiration of 1,449 thyroid nodules from June 2009 to August 2009 were included. The diagnostic performance of US assessment for thyroid nodules was calculated and compared according to underlying thyroid echogenicity. The diagnostic performance of US assessments in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy according to the underlying parenchymal echogenicity was compared using a logistic regression with the GEE (generalized estimating equation) method. Each US feature of malignant and benign thyroid nodules was analyzed according to underlying echogenicity to evaluate which feature affected the final diagnosis. Among the 1,449 nodules, 325 (22.4%) were malignant and 1,124 (77.6%) were benign. Thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity showed significantly lower specificity, PPV, and accuracy compared to thyroid glands with homogeneous echogenicity, 76.3% to 83.7%, 48.7% to 60.9%, and 77.6% to 84.4%, respectively (P=0.009, 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). In benign thyroid nodules, microlobulated or irregular margins were more frequently seen in thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity than in those with homogenous echogenicity (P&lt;0.001). Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland significantly lowers the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of US in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. Therefore, caution is required during evaluation of thyroid nodules detected in thyroid parenchyma showing heterogeneous echogenicity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graves disease</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Thyroid cancer</subject><subject>Thyroid diseases</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - pathology</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Thyroid Nodule - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thyroid Nodule - pathology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><issn>1471-2407</issn><issn>1471-2407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9r1TAcxYsobk7ffZKCIPrQmTRJ0_qgjKFuMBD88Ryy9Js2Ize5S1Jn_3vTbV5vRfKQ5JvPOaWHUxTPMTrGuG3eYspxVVPEK0wqxtCD4nA3erh3PiiexHiFEOYtah8XBzWtCe86fFjcnEGC4Adw4KdYghqXs1EmzaXXZRqhnFwPwc7GDfk6B2_6cisDODXOG_muHP1N2XuI-dHEUmoNKt3qpJN2jnmWfeRO6nw_WfjwtHikpY3w7H4_Kn58-vj99Ky6-PL5_PTkolKMNalSTUc4w4jwViPNGe2JRFw2uGeSSHrZ1Q1wnf-K8pZorBlFUHe67TihnQJKjor3d77b6XIDvQKXgrRiG8xGhll4acT6xZlRDP6nIC2p27bJBq_vDYK_niAmsTFRgbXyNjGBaYeajjY1y-jLf9ArP4WcwkKxzKAc-V9qkBaEcdrn76rFVJwwQhtcE9xm6vg_VF49bIzyDrTJ85XgzUqQmQS_0iCnGMX5t69r9tUeO4K0aYzeTsl4F9cgugNV8DEG0LvgMBJLA8VSMbFUTGAicgOz5MV-4DvBn8qR35He1BA</recordid><startdate>20131116</startdate><enddate>20131116</enddate><creator>Park, Mina</creator><creator>Park, So Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Eun-Kyung</creator><creator>Yoon, Jung Hyun</creator><creator>Moon, Hee Jung</creator><creator>Lee, Hye Sun</creator><creator>Kwak, Jin Young</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131116</creationdate><title>Heterogeneous echogenicity of the underlying thyroid parenchyma: how does this affect the analysis of a thyroid nodule?</title><author>Park, Mina ; Park, So Hee ; Kim, Eun-Kyung ; Yoon, Jung Hyun ; Moon, Hee Jung ; Lee, Hye Sun ; Kwak, Jin Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-c6937510378f0f754d3a07a61d5a3a4b926e7f7804783f1f540e29f897349ce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graves disease</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Thyroid cancer</topic><topic>Thyroid diseases</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - pathology</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Thyroid Nodule - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thyroid Nodule - pathology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, So Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eun-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Hee Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hye Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Jin Young</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Mina</au><au>Park, So Hee</au><au>Kim, Eun-Kyung</au><au>Yoon, Jung Hyun</au><au>Moon, Hee Jung</au><au>Lee, Hye Sun</au><au>Kwak, Jin Young</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogeneous echogenicity of the underlying thyroid parenchyma: how does this affect the analysis of a thyroid nodule?</atitle><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><date>2013-11-16</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>550-550</pages><artnum>550</artnum><issn>1471-2407</issn><eissn>1471-2407</eissn><abstract>Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland has been associated with diffuse thyroid disease and benign and malignant nodules can coexist with diffuse thyroid disease. Underlying heterogeneous echogenicity might make it difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules on US. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of underlying thyroid echogenicity on diagnosis of thyroid malignancies using US. A total of 1,373 patients who underwent US-guided fine needle aspiration of 1,449 thyroid nodules from June 2009 to August 2009 were included. The diagnostic performance of US assessment for thyroid nodules was calculated and compared according to underlying thyroid echogenicity. The diagnostic performance of US assessments in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy according to the underlying parenchymal echogenicity was compared using a logistic regression with the GEE (generalized estimating equation) method. Each US feature of malignant and benign thyroid nodules was analyzed according to underlying echogenicity to evaluate which feature affected the final diagnosis. Among the 1,449 nodules, 325 (22.4%) were malignant and 1,124 (77.6%) were benign. Thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity showed significantly lower specificity, PPV, and accuracy compared to thyroid glands with homogeneous echogenicity, 76.3% to 83.7%, 48.7% to 60.9%, and 77.6% to 84.4%, respectively (P=0.009, 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). In benign thyroid nodules, microlobulated or irregular margins were more frequently seen in thyroid glands with heterogeneous echogenicity than in those with homogenous echogenicity (P&lt;0.001). Heterogeneous echogenicity of the thyroid gland significantly lowers the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of US in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. Therefore, caution is required during evaluation of thyroid nodules detected in thyroid parenchyma showing heterogeneous echogenicity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24237991</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2407-13-550</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2407
ispartof BMC cancer, 2013-11, Vol.13 (1), p.550-550, Article 550
issn 1471-2407
1471-2407
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3832886
source SpringerOpen; MEDLINE; SpringerLink; PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Adult
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Cellular biology
Comparative analysis
Diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Graves disease
Health aspects
Histopathology
Humans
Laboratories
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Patients
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thyroid cancer
Thyroid diseases
Thyroid gland
Thyroid Gland - diagnostic imaging
Thyroid Gland - pathology
Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology
Thyroid Nodule - diagnostic imaging
Thyroid Nodule - pathology
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound imaging
title Heterogeneous echogenicity of the underlying thyroid parenchyma: how does this affect the analysis of a thyroid nodule?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A34%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogeneous%20echogenicity%20of%20the%20underlying%20thyroid%20parenchyma:%20how%20does%20this%20affect%20the%20analysis%20of%20a%20thyroid%20nodule?&rft.jtitle=BMC%20cancer&rft.au=Park,%20Mina&rft.date=2013-11-16&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=550-550&rft.artnum=550&rft.issn=1471-2407&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2407-13-550&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534612318%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459460991&rft_id=info:pmid/24237991&rft_galeid=A534612318&rfr_iscdi=true