Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system

This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian veterinary journal 2013-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1157-1159
Hauptverfasser: Occhipinti, Lindsay L, Hauptman, Joe G, Greco, Justin J, Mehler, Stephen J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1159
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1157
container_title Canadian veterinary journal
container_volume 54
creator Occhipinti, Lindsay L
Hauptman, Joe G
Greco, Justin J
Mehler, Stephen J
description This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3831391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464500024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-e666658c2d738bbca972963c3f3f2c66f44356e34711b588f15e16afd24fbf3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhbMA0VK4AvKyLCLFP3GSDRJUhSJVYgPraOLYqZFjF9tpxaU4BCcjFQXBbEaa9-Z70jtJplmWlWlOSj5JzkN4zTJSYZ6dJRPCSEV5wafJfrkDM0DUziKnUAMiSq_BIOFshF7bo2RRGHynxai0HrYyIOWMcXttOzQEefiNG4nuQHu0GrpO-vnnx_Vo8kK26HDdg-8P7vAeouwvklMFJsjL454lL_fL58UqXT89PC5u1-mWcB5TycfJS0HagpZNI6AqSMWpoIoqIjhXjNGcS8oKjJu8LBXOJeagWsJUoyjQWXLzzd0OTS9bIW30YOqt1z3499qBrv8rVm_qzu1qWlJMKzwC5keAd2-DDLHudRDSGLDSDaHGjLN8LJqw0Xr1N-s35Kdt-gX1fX4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464500024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Occhipinti, Lindsay L ; Hauptman, Joe G ; Greco, Justin J ; Mehler, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Lindsay L ; Hauptman, Joe G ; Greco, Justin J ; Mehler, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-5286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24293676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</publisher><subject>Animals ; Dogs - surgery ; Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control ; Heating - instrumentation ; Heating - methods ; Pilot Projects ; Scientific ; Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation ; Surgical Drapes - microbiology ; Surgical Drapes - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Canadian veterinary journal, 2013-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1157-1159</ispartof><rights>Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831391/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831391/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Joe G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Justin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehler, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</title><title>Canadian veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Can Vet J</addtitle><description>This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Dogs - surgery</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Heating - instrumentation</subject><subject>Heating - methods</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Scientific</subject><subject>Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgical Drapes - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Drapes - veterinary</subject><issn>0008-5286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhbMA0VK4AvKyLCLFP3GSDRJUhSJVYgPraOLYqZFjF9tpxaU4BCcjFQXBbEaa9-Z70jtJplmWlWlOSj5JzkN4zTJSYZ6dJRPCSEV5wafJfrkDM0DUziKnUAMiSq_BIOFshF7bo2RRGHynxai0HrYyIOWMcXttOzQEefiNG4nuQHu0GrpO-vnnx_Vo8kK26HDdg-8P7vAeouwvklMFJsjL454lL_fL58UqXT89PC5u1-mWcB5TycfJS0HagpZNI6AqSMWpoIoqIjhXjNGcS8oKjJu8LBXOJeagWsJUoyjQWXLzzd0OTS9bIW30YOqt1z3499qBrv8rVm_qzu1qWlJMKzwC5keAd2-DDLHudRDSGLDSDaHGjLN8LJqw0Xr1N-s35Kdt-gX1fX4k</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</creator><creator>Hauptman, Joe G</creator><creator>Greco, Justin J</creator><creator>Mehler, Stephen J</creator><general>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</title><author>Occhipinti, Lindsay L ; Hauptman, Joe G ; Greco, Justin J ; Mehler, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-e666658c2d738bbca972963c3f3f2c66f44356e34711b588f15e16afd24fbf3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Dogs - surgery</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Heating - instrumentation</topic><topic>Heating - methods</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Scientific</topic><topic>Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgical Drapes - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Drapes - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Joe G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Justin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehler, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</au><au>Hauptman, Joe G</au><au>Greco, Justin J</au><au>Mehler, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</atitle><jtitle>Canadian veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Vet J</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1157</spage><epage>1159</epage><pages>1157-1159</pages><issn>0008-5286</issn><abstract>This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</pub><pmid>24293676</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-5286
ispartof Canadian veterinary journal, 2013-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1157-1159
issn 0008-5286
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3831391
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Dogs - surgery
Equipment Contamination - prevention & control
Heating - instrumentation
Heating - methods
Pilot Projects
Scientific
Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation
Surgical Drapes - microbiology
Surgical Drapes - veterinary
title Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A12%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20bacterial%20contamination%20on%20surgical%20drapes%20following%20use%20of%20the%20Bair%20Hugger(%C2%AE)%20forced%20air%20warming%20system&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=Occhipinti,%20Lindsay%20L&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1157&rft.epage=1159&rft.pages=1157-1159&rft.issn=0008-5286&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1464500024%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464500024&rft_id=info:pmid/24293676&rfr_iscdi=true