Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system
This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian veterinary journal 2013-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1157-1159 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1159 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1157 |
container_title | Canadian veterinary journal |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Occhipinti, Lindsay L Hauptman, Joe G Greco, Justin J Mehler, Stephen J |
description | This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3831391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464500024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-e666658c2d738bbca972963c3f3f2c66f44356e34711b588f15e16afd24fbf3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhbMA0VK4AvKyLCLFP3GSDRJUhSJVYgPraOLYqZFjF9tpxaU4BCcjFQXBbEaa9-Z70jtJplmWlWlOSj5JzkN4zTJSYZ6dJRPCSEV5wafJfrkDM0DUziKnUAMiSq_BIOFshF7bo2RRGHynxai0HrYyIOWMcXttOzQEefiNG4nuQHu0GrpO-vnnx_Vo8kK26HDdg-8P7vAeouwvklMFJsjL454lL_fL58UqXT89PC5u1-mWcB5TycfJS0HagpZNI6AqSMWpoIoqIjhXjNGcS8oKjJu8LBXOJeagWsJUoyjQWXLzzd0OTS9bIW30YOqt1z3499qBrv8rVm_qzu1qWlJMKzwC5keAd2-DDLHudRDSGLDSDaHGjLN8LJqw0Xr1N-s35Kdt-gX1fX4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464500024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Occhipinti, Lindsay L ; Hauptman, Joe G ; Greco, Justin J ; Mehler, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Lindsay L ; Hauptman, Joe G ; Greco, Justin J ; Mehler, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-5286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24293676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</publisher><subject>Animals ; Dogs - surgery ; Equipment Contamination - prevention & control ; Heating - instrumentation ; Heating - methods ; Pilot Projects ; Scientific ; Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation ; Surgical Drapes - microbiology ; Surgical Drapes - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Canadian veterinary journal, 2013-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1157-1159</ispartof><rights>Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831391/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831391/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Joe G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Justin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehler, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</title><title>Canadian veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Can Vet J</addtitle><description>This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Dogs - surgery</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention & control</subject><subject>Heating - instrumentation</subject><subject>Heating - methods</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Scientific</subject><subject>Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgical Drapes - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Drapes - veterinary</subject><issn>0008-5286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhbMA0VK4AvKyLCLFP3GSDRJUhSJVYgPraOLYqZFjF9tpxaU4BCcjFQXBbEaa9-Z70jtJplmWlWlOSj5JzkN4zTJSYZ6dJRPCSEV5wafJfrkDM0DUziKnUAMiSq_BIOFshF7bo2RRGHynxai0HrYyIOWMcXttOzQEefiNG4nuQHu0GrpO-vnnx_Vo8kK26HDdg-8P7vAeouwvklMFJsjL454lL_fL58UqXT89PC5u1-mWcB5TycfJS0HagpZNI6AqSMWpoIoqIjhXjNGcS8oKjJu8LBXOJeagWsJUoyjQWXLzzd0OTS9bIW30YOqt1z3499qBrv8rVm_qzu1qWlJMKzwC5keAd2-DDLHudRDSGLDSDaHGjLN8LJqw0Xr1N-s35Kdt-gX1fX4k</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</creator><creator>Hauptman, Joe G</creator><creator>Greco, Justin J</creator><creator>Mehler, Stephen J</creator><general>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</title><author>Occhipinti, Lindsay L ; Hauptman, Joe G ; Greco, Justin J ; Mehler, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-e666658c2d738bbca972963c3f3f2c66f44356e34711b588f15e16afd24fbf3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Dogs - surgery</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention & control</topic><topic>Heating - instrumentation</topic><topic>Heating - methods</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Scientific</topic><topic>Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgical Drapes - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Drapes - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Joe G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Justin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehler, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Occhipinti, Lindsay L</au><au>Hauptman, Joe G</au><au>Greco, Justin J</au><au>Mehler, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system</atitle><jtitle>Canadian veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Vet J</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1157</spage><epage>1159</epage><pages>1157-1159</pages><issn>0008-5286</issn><abstract>This pilot study determined the rate of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes of small animal patients warmed intra-operatively with the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system compared to a control method. Surgical drapes of 100 patients undergoing clean surgical procedures were swabbed with aerobic culturettes at the beginning and end of surgery. Samples were cultured on Trypticase soy agar. Contamination of the surgical drapes was identified in 6/98 cases (6.1%). There was no significant difference in the number of contaminated surgical drapes between the Bair Hugger(®) and control groups (P = 0.47).</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Veterinary Medical Association</pub><pmid>24293676</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-5286 |
ispartof | Canadian veterinary journal, 2013-12, Vol.54 (12), p.1157-1159 |
issn | 0008-5286 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3831391 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Dogs - surgery Equipment Contamination - prevention & control Heating - instrumentation Heating - methods Pilot Projects Scientific Surgery, Veterinary - instrumentation Surgical Drapes - microbiology Surgical Drapes - veterinary |
title | Evaluation of bacterial contamination on surgical drapes following use of the Bair Hugger(®) forced air warming system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A12%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20bacterial%20contamination%20on%20surgical%20drapes%20following%20use%20of%20the%20Bair%20Hugger(%C2%AE)%20forced%20air%20warming%20system&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=Occhipinti,%20Lindsay%20L&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1157&rft.epage=1159&rft.pages=1157-1159&rft.issn=0008-5286&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1464500024%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464500024&rft_id=info:pmid/24293676&rfr_iscdi=true |