Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. In this pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC genomics 2013-11, Vol.14 (1), p.746-746
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Chunxian, Gmitter, Jr, Fred G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 746
container_issue 1
container_start_page 746
container_title BMC genomics
container_volume 14
creator Chen, Chunxian
Gmitter, Jr, Fred G
description Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2164-14-746
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3827885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464513216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-109a425e049081ee9ccfc1681fd304f52af4450f711f6191ba7ddb98425800a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks-L1TAQx4O4uD_07kkKXrzUzbRJk14Eeegq7OJlT15Cmk7ey9ImNWnF99-b8tbHrijsKUPmM1-GD0PIa6DvAWRzCUxAWUHDSmClYM0zcnb8ev6gPiXnKd1RCkJW_AU5rRgI3lb1Gfl-47zz2yLYYqenIcz7CctOJ-wL_DVFTGuV8MeC3mAx622RMj5g4RczYJhdj8UUhv0Y4rRzaUyF84Vxc1zSS3Ji9ZDw1f17QW4_f7rdfCmvv1193Xy8LjvGxFwCbTWrOFLWUgmIrTHWQCPB9jVlllfaMsapFQC2gRY6Lfq-a2WekZTq-oJ8OMROSzdib9DPUQ9qim7Uca-Cdupxx7ud2oafqpaVkJLngM0hoHPhPwGPOyaMalWrVrW5Utl8Tnl3v0YM2Vaa1eiSwWHQHsOSMtbS7Bw4ewLaMA51Ts_o27_Qu7BEn3VmisumBhArRQ-UiSGliPa4PFC1Hsq_1n3z0Npx4M9l1L8BlY653g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1458631176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chen, Chunxian ; Gmitter, Jr, Fred G</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chunxian ; Gmitter, Jr, Fred G</creatorcontrib><description>Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2164</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24175923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Adenylate cyclase ; Citrus ; Citrus - genetics ; Contig Mapping ; Cultivars ; Databases, Genetic ; Expressed Sequence Tags ; Genes ; Genome, Plant ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genotype ; Genotyping Techniques ; Haplotypes ; Heterozygote ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Studies</subject><ispartof>BMC genomics, 2013-11, Vol.14 (1), p.746-746</ispartof><rights>2013 Chen and Gmitter; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Chen and Gmitter; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Chen and Gmitter; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-109a425e049081ee9ccfc1681fd304f52af4450f711f6191ba7ddb98425800a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-109a425e049081ee9ccfc1681fd304f52af4450f711f6191ba7ddb98425800a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827885/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827885/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24175923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chunxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gmitter, Jr, Fred G</creatorcontrib><title>Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus</title><title>BMC genomics</title><addtitle>BMC Genomics</addtitle><description>Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.</description><subject>Adenylate cyclase</subject><subject>Citrus</subject><subject>Citrus - genetics</subject><subject>Contig Mapping</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Databases, Genetic</subject><subject>Expressed Sequence Tags</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genome, Plant</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotyping Techniques</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Heterozygote</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1471-2164</issn><issn>1471-2164</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks-L1TAQx4O4uD_07kkKXrzUzbRJk14Eeegq7OJlT15Cmk7ey9ImNWnF99-b8tbHrijsKUPmM1-GD0PIa6DvAWRzCUxAWUHDSmClYM0zcnb8ev6gPiXnKd1RCkJW_AU5rRgI3lb1Gfl-47zz2yLYYqenIcz7CctOJ-wL_DVFTGuV8MeC3mAx622RMj5g4RczYJhdj8UUhv0Y4rRzaUyF84Vxc1zSS3Ji9ZDw1f17QW4_f7rdfCmvv1193Xy8LjvGxFwCbTWrOFLWUgmIrTHWQCPB9jVlllfaMsapFQC2gRY6Lfq-a2WekZTq-oJ8OMROSzdib9DPUQ9qim7Uca-Cdupxx7ud2oafqpaVkJLngM0hoHPhPwGPOyaMalWrVrW5Utl8Tnl3v0YM2Vaa1eiSwWHQHsOSMtbS7Bw4ewLaMA51Ts_o27_Qu7BEn3VmisumBhArRQ-UiSGliPa4PFC1Hsq_1n3z0Npx4M9l1L8BlY653g</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Chen, Chunxian</creator><creator>Gmitter, Jr, Fred G</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus</title><author>Chen, Chunxian ; Gmitter, Jr, Fred G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b447t-109a425e049081ee9ccfc1681fd304f52af4450f711f6191ba7ddb98425800a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adenylate cyclase</topic><topic>Citrus</topic><topic>Citrus - genetics</topic><topic>Contig Mapping</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Databases, Genetic</topic><topic>Expressed Sequence Tags</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genome, Plant</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotyping Techniques</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Heterozygote</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chunxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gmitter, Jr, Fred G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC genomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Chunxian</au><au>Gmitter, Jr, Fred G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus</atitle><jtitle>BMC genomics</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Genomics</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>746</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>746-746</pages><issn>1471-2164</issn><eissn>1471-2164</eissn><abstract>Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>24175923</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2164-14-746</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2164
ispartof BMC genomics, 2013-11, Vol.14 (1), p.746-746
issn 1471-2164
1471-2164
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3827885
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adenylate cyclase
Citrus
Citrus - genetics
Contig Mapping
Cultivars
Databases, Genetic
Expressed Sequence Tags
Genes
Genome, Plant
Genomes
Genomics
Genotype
Genotyping Techniques
Haplotypes
Heterozygote
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Studies
title Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mining%20of%20haplotype-based%20expressed%20sequence%20tag%20single%20nucleotide%20polymorphisms%20in%20citrus&rft.jtitle=BMC%20genomics&rft.au=Chen,%20Chunxian&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=746&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=746-746&rft.issn=1471-2164&rft.eissn=1471-2164&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1464513216%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1458631176&rft_id=info:pmid/24175923&rfr_iscdi=true