Factors Associated With Paraspinal Muscle Asymmetry in Size and Composition in a General Population Sample of Men

Paraspinal muscle asymmetry in cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition have been associated with low back pain and pathology. However, substantial multifidus muscle asymmetry also has been reported in men who were asymptomatic, and little is known about other factors influencing asymmetry. The go...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical therapy 2013-11, Vol.93 (11), p.1540-1550
Hauptverfasser: Fortin, Maryse, Yuan, Yan, Battie, Michele C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1550
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1540
container_title Physical therapy
container_volume 93
creator Fortin, Maryse
Yuan, Yan
Battie, Michele C
description Paraspinal muscle asymmetry in cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition have been associated with low back pain and pathology. However, substantial multifidus muscle asymmetry also has been reported in men who were asymptomatic, and little is known about other factors influencing asymmetry. The goal of this study was to identify behavioral, environmental, and constitutional factors associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry. A cross-sectional study of 202 adult male twins was conducted. Data were collected through a structured interview, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements of multifidus and erector spinae muscle CSA and the ratio of fat-free CSA to total CSA were obtained from T2-weighted axial images at L3-L4 and L5-S1. In multivariable analyses, greater asymmetry in multifidus CSA at L3-L4 was associated with lower occupational physical demands and less disk height narrowing. Handedness was the only factor associated with multifidus muscle CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. For the erector spinae muscle, greater age, handedness, and disk height narrowing were associated with CSA asymmetry at L3-L4, and sports activity, handedness, disk height narrowing, and familial aggregation were associated with CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. In multivariable analyses of asymmetry in muscle composition, familial aggregation explained 7% to 20% of the variance in multifidus and erector spinae muscle side-to-side differences at both levels measured. In addition, handedness and pain severity entered the model for erector spinae muscle asymmetry at L5-S1, and disability, handedness, and disk height narrowing entered the model for multifidus muscle asymmetry at L5-S1. Reliance on participants' recall for low back pain history, occupation, and physical activity levels was a limitation of this study. Few of the factors investigated were associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry, and associations were inconsistent and modest, explaining little of the variance in paraspinal muscle asymmetry.
doi_str_mv 10.2522/ptj.20130051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3827715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A351434857</galeid><sourcerecordid>A351434857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c728t-8df18dc9d05766239b025043f4f7bbf000d6471c9c62c39f0cb7b29971a5ac293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk9tv0zAUhyMEYqXwxjOKxAtIpPiSxPHLpKpiZVLHJgri0XIcp3XlxJntAOWvx1m7jaKKi_xg6fg7P59rFD2HYIIyhN52fjNBAGIAMvggGsEMF0lOUPowGgGAYUIBwifRE-c2AABIUvo4OkG4CA4FHkXXZ1x4Y108dc4Ixb2s4i_Kr-MrbrnrVMt1fNE7oWUgtk0jvd3Gqo2X6oeMeVvFM9N0ximvTDvYeTyXrbTB68p0veY39iVvuiBg6vhCtk-jRzXXTj7b3-Po89m7T7P3yeJyfj6bLhJBUOGToqphUQlagYzkOcK0BCgDKa7TmpRlHXKp8pRAQUWOBKY1ECUpEaUE8owLRPE4Ot3pdn3ZyErI1oewWGdVw-2WGa7Y4Uur1mxlvjJcIEJCGcfRq72ANde9dJ41ygmpNW-l6R2DGQCEkJwWf0fTlKKcgHwI6-Vv6Mb0NpR5oDKKaYEAuadWXEum2tqEEMUgyqY4gylOi2ygkiPUatcA08paBfMBPznCh1PJRomjDq8PHALj5Xe_4r1z7Hz58T_YD__MFvPFn5Lcs8JoLVeShZmZXR7yb3a8sMY5K-u7lkPAho1hYWPY7cYE_MWvY3IH367I_f9rtVp_U1Yy13CtA36jtGsexQzCMBEpwD8B09obPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459398207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Associated With Paraspinal Muscle Asymmetry in Size and Composition in a General Population Sample of Men</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fortin, Maryse ; Yuan, Yan ; Battie, Michele C</creator><creatorcontrib>Fortin, Maryse ; Yuan, Yan ; Battie, Michele C</creatorcontrib><description>Paraspinal muscle asymmetry in cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition have been associated with low back pain and pathology. However, substantial multifidus muscle asymmetry also has been reported in men who were asymptomatic, and little is known about other factors influencing asymmetry. The goal of this study was to identify behavioral, environmental, and constitutional factors associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry. A cross-sectional study of 202 adult male twins was conducted. Data were collected through a structured interview, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements of multifidus and erector spinae muscle CSA and the ratio of fat-free CSA to total CSA were obtained from T2-weighted axial images at L3-L4 and L5-S1. In multivariable analyses, greater asymmetry in multifidus CSA at L3-L4 was associated with lower occupational physical demands and less disk height narrowing. Handedness was the only factor associated with multifidus muscle CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. For the erector spinae muscle, greater age, handedness, and disk height narrowing were associated with CSA asymmetry at L3-L4, and sports activity, handedness, disk height narrowing, and familial aggregation were associated with CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. In multivariable analyses of asymmetry in muscle composition, familial aggregation explained 7% to 20% of the variance in multifidus and erector spinae muscle side-to-side differences at both levels measured. In addition, handedness and pain severity entered the model for erector spinae muscle asymmetry at L5-S1, and disability, handedness, and disk height narrowing entered the model for multifidus muscle asymmetry at L5-S1. Reliance on participants' recall for low back pain history, occupation, and physical activity levels was a limitation of this study. Few of the factors investigated were associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry, and associations were inconsistent and modest, explaining little of the variance in paraspinal muscle asymmetry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23813083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physical Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Adiposity ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Analysis ; Asymmetry ; Back ; Back muscles ; Back surgery ; Causes of ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Fluctuating asymmetry (Biology) ; Functional Laterality ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - pathology ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - etiology ; Low Back Pain - genetics ; Low Back Pain - pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Men ; Men's health ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Muscles ; Occupations ; Organ Size ; Paraspinal Muscles - pathology ; Physiological aspects ; Research Reports ; Sacrum ; Sports ; Studies ; Twins</subject><ispartof>Physical therapy, 2013-11, Vol.93 (11), p.1540-1550</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION Nov 2013</rights><rights>2013 American Physical Therapy Association 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c728t-8df18dc9d05766239b025043f4f7bbf000d6471c9c62c39f0cb7b29971a5ac293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c728t-8df18dc9d05766239b025043f4f7bbf000d6471c9c62c39f0cb7b29971a5ac293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23813083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fortin, Maryse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battie, Michele C</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Associated With Paraspinal Muscle Asymmetry in Size and Composition in a General Population Sample of Men</title><title>Physical therapy</title><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Paraspinal muscle asymmetry in cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition have been associated with low back pain and pathology. However, substantial multifidus muscle asymmetry also has been reported in men who were asymptomatic, and little is known about other factors influencing asymmetry. The goal of this study was to identify behavioral, environmental, and constitutional factors associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry. A cross-sectional study of 202 adult male twins was conducted. Data were collected through a structured interview, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements of multifidus and erector spinae muscle CSA and the ratio of fat-free CSA to total CSA were obtained from T2-weighted axial images at L3-L4 and L5-S1. In multivariable analyses, greater asymmetry in multifidus CSA at L3-L4 was associated with lower occupational physical demands and less disk height narrowing. Handedness was the only factor associated with multifidus muscle CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. For the erector spinae muscle, greater age, handedness, and disk height narrowing were associated with CSA asymmetry at L3-L4, and sports activity, handedness, disk height narrowing, and familial aggregation were associated with CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. In multivariable analyses of asymmetry in muscle composition, familial aggregation explained 7% to 20% of the variance in multifidus and erector spinae muscle side-to-side differences at both levels measured. In addition, handedness and pain severity entered the model for erector spinae muscle asymmetry at L5-S1, and disability, handedness, and disk height narrowing entered the model for multifidus muscle asymmetry at L5-S1. Reliance on participants' recall for low back pain history, occupation, and physical activity levels was a limitation of this study. Few of the factors investigated were associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry, and associations were inconsistent and modest, explaining little of the variance in paraspinal muscle asymmetry.</description><subject>Adiposity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Back</subject><subject>Back muscles</subject><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Causes of</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Fluctuating asymmetry (Biology)</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - pathology</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - genetics</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - pathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Men's health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Paraspinal Muscles - pathology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Sacrum</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Twins</subject><issn>0031-9023</issn><issn>1538-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk9tv0zAUhyMEYqXwxjOKxAtIpPiSxPHLpKpiZVLHJgri0XIcp3XlxJntAOWvx1m7jaKKi_xg6fg7P59rFD2HYIIyhN52fjNBAGIAMvggGsEMF0lOUPowGgGAYUIBwifRE-c2AABIUvo4OkG4CA4FHkXXZ1x4Y108dc4Ixb2s4i_Kr-MrbrnrVMt1fNE7oWUgtk0jvd3Gqo2X6oeMeVvFM9N0ximvTDvYeTyXrbTB68p0veY39iVvuiBg6vhCtk-jRzXXTj7b3-Po89m7T7P3yeJyfj6bLhJBUOGToqphUQlagYzkOcK0BCgDKa7TmpRlHXKp8pRAQUWOBKY1ECUpEaUE8owLRPE4Ot3pdn3ZyErI1oewWGdVw-2WGa7Y4Uur1mxlvjJcIEJCGcfRq72ANde9dJ41ygmpNW-l6R2DGQCEkJwWf0fTlKKcgHwI6-Vv6Mb0NpR5oDKKaYEAuadWXEum2tqEEMUgyqY4gylOi2ygkiPUatcA08paBfMBPznCh1PJRomjDq8PHALj5Xe_4r1z7Hz58T_YD__MFvPFn5Lcs8JoLVeShZmZXR7yb3a8sMY5K-u7lkPAho1hYWPY7cYE_MWvY3IH367I_f9rtVp_U1Yy13CtA36jtGsexQzCMBEpwD8B09obPg</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Fortin, Maryse</creator><creator>Yuan, Yan</creator><creator>Battie, Michele C</creator><general>American Physical Therapy Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Factors Associated With Paraspinal Muscle Asymmetry in Size and Composition in a General Population Sample of Men</title><author>Fortin, Maryse ; Yuan, Yan ; Battie, Michele C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c728t-8df18dc9d05766239b025043f4f7bbf000d6471c9c62c39f0cb7b29971a5ac293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adiposity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Back</topic><topic>Back muscles</topic><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Causes of</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Fluctuating asymmetry (Biology)</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - pathology</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - genetics</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - pathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Men's health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Paraspinal Muscles - pathology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Sacrum</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Twins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fortin, Maryse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battie, Michele C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fortin, Maryse</au><au>Yuan, Yan</au><au>Battie, Michele C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Associated With Paraspinal Muscle Asymmetry in Size and Composition in a General Population Sample of Men</atitle><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1540</spage><epage>1550</epage><pages>1540-1550</pages><issn>0031-9023</issn><eissn>1538-6724</eissn><abstract>Paraspinal muscle asymmetry in cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition have been associated with low back pain and pathology. However, substantial multifidus muscle asymmetry also has been reported in men who were asymptomatic, and little is known about other factors influencing asymmetry. The goal of this study was to identify behavioral, environmental, and constitutional factors associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry. A cross-sectional study of 202 adult male twins was conducted. Data were collected through a structured interview, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements of multifidus and erector spinae muscle CSA and the ratio of fat-free CSA to total CSA were obtained from T2-weighted axial images at L3-L4 and L5-S1. In multivariable analyses, greater asymmetry in multifidus CSA at L3-L4 was associated with lower occupational physical demands and less disk height narrowing. Handedness was the only factor associated with multifidus muscle CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. For the erector spinae muscle, greater age, handedness, and disk height narrowing were associated with CSA asymmetry at L3-L4, and sports activity, handedness, disk height narrowing, and familial aggregation were associated with CSA asymmetry at L5-S1. In multivariable analyses of asymmetry in muscle composition, familial aggregation explained 7% to 20% of the variance in multifidus and erector spinae muscle side-to-side differences at both levels measured. In addition, handedness and pain severity entered the model for erector spinae muscle asymmetry at L5-S1, and disability, handedness, and disk height narrowing entered the model for multifidus muscle asymmetry at L5-S1. Reliance on participants' recall for low back pain history, occupation, and physical activity levels was a limitation of this study. Few of the factors investigated were associated with paraspinal muscle asymmetry, and associations were inconsistent and modest, explaining little of the variance in paraspinal muscle asymmetry.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physical Therapy Association</pub><pmid>23813083</pmid><doi>10.2522/ptj.20130051</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9023
ispartof Physical therapy, 2013-11, Vol.93 (11), p.1540-1550
issn 0031-9023
1538-6724
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3827715
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adiposity
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Analysis
Asymmetry
Back
Back muscles
Back surgery
Causes of
Cross-Sectional Studies
Fluctuating asymmetry (Biology)
Functional Laterality
Health aspects
Humans
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - pathology
Low back pain
Low Back Pain - etiology
Low Back Pain - genetics
Low Back Pain - pathology
Lumbar Vertebrae
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Men
Men's health
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Muscles
Occupations
Organ Size
Paraspinal Muscles - pathology
Physiological aspects
Research Reports
Sacrum
Sports
Studies
Twins
title Factors Associated With Paraspinal Muscle Asymmetry in Size and Composition in a General Population Sample of Men
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A17%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Associated%20With%20Paraspinal%20Muscle%20Asymmetry%20in%20Size%20and%20Composition%20in%20a%20General%20Population%20Sample%20of%20Men&rft.jtitle=Physical%20therapy&rft.au=Fortin,%20Maryse&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1540&rft.epage=1550&rft.pages=1540-1550&rft.issn=0031-9023&rft.eissn=1538-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20130051&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA351434857%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459398207&rft_id=info:pmid/23813083&rft_galeid=A351434857&rfr_iscdi=true