Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients
The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record repre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical & biological engineering & computing 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.1357-1365 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1365 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1357 |
container_title | Medical & biological engineering & computing |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Kusy, Maciej Obrzut, Bogdan Kluska, Jacek |
description | The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3825140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1449768001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopcLD8AGWWLDJuCJncTZIFUVf1IlNrC2HGeSuiR2sJ1b7jvw0DjcUhUkVmP5fHPG40PIc2CvgbHmTQSooCkY8AKAyUI-IDtoBBRMCPGQ7BgIllWQZ-RJjNeMlVCV4jE5KwXwupZyR36eL8tkjU7WO-oHOqJDij-WgDFuV0vwY9DzbN1IteupwzXoKZd048O3SJPPCPbWJKr7A4aYuw_oUtzMgs5Cpq-OMWFAk_x8pNZRg-HwWzDa5TNd8vit5yl5NOgp4rPbuidf37_7cvGxuPz84dPF-WVhRMNS0VYd9NKw1kgmeuhrXdZt3WmQvO1Rc5A1VoOotRk4Fx1wDW3XsQZENUjgHd-TtyffZe1m7E2enZdSS7CzDkfltVV_K85eqdEfFJdllf80G7y6NQj--4oxqdlGg9OkHfo1KhCibWrJcjJ78vIf9NqvweX1Nkq2suRCZgpOlAk-xoDD3WOAqS1rdcpaZUe1Za22nhf3t7jr-BNuBsoTELPkRgz3Rv_X9RdC2bgo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448982348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kusy, Maciej ; Obrzut, Bogdan ; Kluska, Jacek</creator><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Maciej ; Obrzut, Bogdan ; Kluska, Jacek</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-0118</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-0444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24136688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adjuvants ; Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Cancer therapies ; Cervical cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Chromosomes ; Computational Biology - methods ; Computer Applications ; Computer Simulation ; Disease ; Effectiveness ; Evolution ; Female ; Females ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - adverse effects ; Hysterectomy - statistics & numerical data ; Imaging ; Medical technology ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Neural networks ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Original ; Original Article ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary arteries ; Radiation therapy ; Radiology ; ROC Curve ; Simulation ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.1357-1365</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obrzut, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluska, Jacek</creatorcontrib><title>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</title><title>Medical & biological engineering & computing</title><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><description>The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adjuvants</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Computational Biology - methods</subject><subject>Computer Applications</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0140-0118</issn><issn>1741-0444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopcLD8AGWWLDJuCJncTZIFUVf1IlNrC2HGeSuiR2sJ1b7jvw0DjcUhUkVmP5fHPG40PIc2CvgbHmTQSooCkY8AKAyUI-IDtoBBRMCPGQ7BgIllWQZ-RJjNeMlVCV4jE5KwXwupZyR36eL8tkjU7WO-oHOqJDij-WgDFuV0vwY9DzbN1IteupwzXoKZd048O3SJPPCPbWJKr7A4aYuw_oUtzMgs5Cpq-OMWFAk_x8pNZRg-HwWzDa5TNd8vit5yl5NOgp4rPbuidf37_7cvGxuPz84dPF-WVhRMNS0VYd9NKw1kgmeuhrXdZt3WmQvO1Rc5A1VoOotRk4Fx1wDW3XsQZENUjgHd-TtyffZe1m7E2enZdSS7CzDkfltVV_K85eqdEfFJdllf80G7y6NQj--4oxqdlGg9OkHfo1KhCibWrJcjJ78vIf9NqvweX1Nkq2suRCZgpOlAk-xoDD3WOAqS1rdcpaZUe1Za22nhf3t7jr-BNuBsoTELPkRgz3Rv_X9RdC2bgo</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Kusy, Maciej</creator><creator>Obrzut, Bogdan</creator><creator>Kluska, Jacek</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</title><author>Kusy, Maciej ; Obrzut, Bogdan ; Kluska, Jacek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adjuvants</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Computational Biology - methods</topic><topic>Computer Applications</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obrzut, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluska, Jacek</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical & biological engineering & computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kusy, Maciej</au><au>Obrzut, Bogdan</au><au>Kluska, Jacek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Medical & biological engineering & computing</jtitle><stitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</stitle><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1357</spage><epage>1365</epage><pages>1357-1365</pages><issn>0140-0118</issn><eissn>1741-0444</eissn><abstract>The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24136688</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-0118 |
ispartof | Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.1357-1365 |
issn | 0140-0118 1741-0444 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3825140 |
source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accuracy Adjuvants Adult Aged Algorithms Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedicine Cancer therapies Cervical cancer Chemotherapy Chromosomes Computational Biology - methods Computer Applications Computer Simulation Disease Effectiveness Evolution Female Females Gene expression Gene Expression Profiling Human Physiology Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy - adverse effects Hysterectomy - statistics & numerical data Imaging Medical technology Middle Aged Models, Statistical Neural networks Neural Networks, Computer Original Original Article Patients Postoperative Complications - etiology Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Pulmonary arteries Radiation therapy Radiology ROC Curve Simulation Standard deviation Studies Surgery Surgical outcomes Treatment Outcome Tumors Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery |
title | Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20gene%20expression%20programming%20and%20neural%20networks%20to%20predict%20adverse%20events%20of%20radical%20hysterectomy%20in%20cervical%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Medical%20&%20biological%20engineering%20&%20computing&rft.au=Kusy,%20Maciej&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1357&rft.epage=1365&rft.pages=1357-1365&rft.issn=0140-0118&rft.eissn=1741-0444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1449768001%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448982348&rft_id=info:pmid/24136688&rfr_iscdi=true |