Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients

The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record repre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical & biological engineering & computing 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.1357-1365
Hauptverfasser: Kusy, Maciej, Obrzut, Bogdan, Kluska, Jacek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1365
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1357
container_title Medical & biological engineering & computing
container_volume 51
creator Kusy, Maciej
Obrzut, Bogdan
Kluska, Jacek
description The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3825140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1449768001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopcLD8AGWWLDJuCJncTZIFUVf1IlNrC2HGeSuiR2sJ1b7jvw0DjcUhUkVmP5fHPG40PIc2CvgbHmTQSooCkY8AKAyUI-IDtoBBRMCPGQ7BgIllWQZ-RJjNeMlVCV4jE5KwXwupZyR36eL8tkjU7WO-oHOqJDij-WgDFuV0vwY9DzbN1IteupwzXoKZd048O3SJPPCPbWJKr7A4aYuw_oUtzMgs5Cpq-OMWFAk_x8pNZRg-HwWzDa5TNd8vit5yl5NOgp4rPbuidf37_7cvGxuPz84dPF-WVhRMNS0VYd9NKw1kgmeuhrXdZt3WmQvO1Rc5A1VoOotRk4Fx1wDW3XsQZENUjgHd-TtyffZe1m7E2enZdSS7CzDkfltVV_K85eqdEfFJdllf80G7y6NQj--4oxqdlGg9OkHfo1KhCibWrJcjJ78vIf9NqvweX1Nkq2suRCZgpOlAk-xoDD3WOAqS1rdcpaZUe1Za22nhf3t7jr-BNuBsoTELPkRgz3Rv_X9RdC2bgo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448982348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kusy, Maciej ; Obrzut, Bogdan ; Kluska, Jacek</creator><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Maciej ; Obrzut, Bogdan ; Kluska, Jacek</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-0118</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-0444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24136688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adjuvants ; Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Cancer therapies ; Cervical cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Chromosomes ; Computational Biology - methods ; Computer Applications ; Computer Simulation ; Disease ; Effectiveness ; Evolution ; Female ; Females ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - adverse effects ; Hysterectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Imaging ; Medical technology ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Neural networks ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Original ; Original Article ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary arteries ; Radiation therapy ; Radiology ; ROC Curve ; Simulation ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.1357-1365</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obrzut, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluska, Jacek</creatorcontrib><title>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</title><title>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing</title><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><description>The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adjuvants</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Computational Biology - methods</subject><subject>Computer Applications</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0140-0118</issn><issn>1741-0444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopcLD8AGWWLDJuCJncTZIFUVf1IlNrC2HGeSuiR2sJ1b7jvw0DjcUhUkVmP5fHPG40PIc2CvgbHmTQSooCkY8AKAyUI-IDtoBBRMCPGQ7BgIllWQZ-RJjNeMlVCV4jE5KwXwupZyR36eL8tkjU7WO-oHOqJDij-WgDFuV0vwY9DzbN1IteupwzXoKZd048O3SJPPCPbWJKr7A4aYuw_oUtzMgs5Cpq-OMWFAk_x8pNZRg-HwWzDa5TNd8vit5yl5NOgp4rPbuidf37_7cvGxuPz84dPF-WVhRMNS0VYd9NKw1kgmeuhrXdZt3WmQvO1Rc5A1VoOotRk4Fx1wDW3XsQZENUjgHd-TtyffZe1m7E2enZdSS7CzDkfltVV_K85eqdEfFJdllf80G7y6NQj--4oxqdlGg9OkHfo1KhCibWrJcjJ78vIf9NqvweX1Nkq2suRCZgpOlAk-xoDD3WOAqS1rdcpaZUe1Za22nhf3t7jr-BNuBsoTELPkRgz3Rv_X9RdC2bgo</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Kusy, Maciej</creator><creator>Obrzut, Bogdan</creator><creator>Kluska, Jacek</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</title><author>Kusy, Maciej ; Obrzut, Bogdan ; Kluska, Jacek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-95b1d8c09c804d1d6a2696ba1839dea3186e5f46acf334b13a19bb07145f813b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adjuvants</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Computational Biology - methods</topic><topic>Computer Applications</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kusy, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obrzut, Bogdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluska, Jacek</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kusy, Maciej</au><au>Obrzut, Bogdan</au><au>Kluska, Jacek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing</jtitle><stitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</stitle><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1357</spage><epage>1365</epage><pages>1357-1365</pages><issn>0140-0118</issn><eissn>1741-0444</eissn><abstract>The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24136688</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-0118
ispartof Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.1357-1365
issn 0140-0118
1741-0444
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3825140
source MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
Adjuvants
Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biomedicine
Cancer therapies
Cervical cancer
Chemotherapy
Chromosomes
Computational Biology - methods
Computer Applications
Computer Simulation
Disease
Effectiveness
Evolution
Female
Females
Gene expression
Gene Expression Profiling
Human Physiology
Humans
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy - adverse effects
Hysterectomy - statistics & numerical data
Imaging
Medical technology
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Neural networks
Neural Networks, Computer
Original
Original Article
Patients
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary arteries
Radiation therapy
Radiology
ROC Curve
Simulation
Standard deviation
Studies
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - metabolism
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
title Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20gene%20expression%20programming%20and%20neural%20networks%20to%20predict%20adverse%20events%20of%20radical%20hysterectomy%20in%20cervical%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Medical%20&%20biological%20engineering%20&%20computing&rft.au=Kusy,%20Maciej&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1357&rft.epage=1365&rft.pages=1357-1365&rft.issn=0140-0118&rft.eissn=1741-0444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1449768001%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448982348&rft_id=info:pmid/24136688&rfr_iscdi=true