How Different Knee Flexion Angles Influence the Hip Extensor in the Prone Position

[Purpose] The present study examined the effects of knee flexion angle on hip extensor muscle activity. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty healthy subjects maintained knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 110° in the prone position and performed maximal voluntary contraction in hip extension. Maxi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2013, Vol.25(10), pp.1295-1297
Hauptverfasser: Kwon, Yu-Jeong, Lee, Hyun-Ok
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1297
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1295
container_title Journal of Physical Therapy Science
container_volume 25
creator Kwon, Yu-Jeong
Lee, Hyun-Ok
description [Purpose] The present study examined the effects of knee flexion angle on hip extensor muscle activity. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty healthy subjects maintained knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 110° in the prone position and performed maximal voluntary contraction in hip extension. Maximum torque in hip extension at the different angles was measured, and surface electromyogram activities of the gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) were recorded and normalized by the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). [Results] The maximum torque of the hip extensor showed significant decreases between 0°and 60°, 90° and 110° of knee flexion. The muscle activity of BF was significantly high at 0°, and GM showed a significantly higher activity than both BF and ST at 60°, 90°and 110° of knee flexion. [Conclusion] The maximum torque in hip extension and muscle activities of BF and ST were significantly high at 0° but they decreased at knee flexion angles of more than 60°. Therefore, we consider that more than 60° of knee joint flexion is required to increase GM activity, and to reduce the muscle activities of BF and ST.
doi_str_mv 10.1589/jpts.25.1295
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3820173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1469207723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-312711ce372df58fc1f5ad47a92eeb1e8e00b9e4eafb33314625a434a451e3cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEotvCjTPKkQNZPP6IkwtSVdruikogBGfL8U52HXntxU5K-e-bNGULJy5jyfP8mzd-WfYGyBJEVX_oDn1aUrEEWotn2YJCJQtR0vJ5tiA1iELQSp5kpyl1hFBJePUyO6GcilrKepF9W4Vf-SfbthjR9_lnj5hfObyzwefnfusw5WvfugG9wbzfYb6yh_zyrkefQsytf7j7GoMfa0i2H9-9yl602iV8_XieZT-uLr9frIqbL9fri_ObwkjgfcGASgCDTNJNK6rWQCv0hktdU8QGsEJCmho56rZhjAEvqdCccc0FIDMNO8s-ztzD0OxxY0b_UTt1iHav428VtFX_drzdqW24VayiBCQbAe8eATH8HDD1am-TQee0xzAkBYLxitaEk_9LeVlTIiWdqO9nqYkhpYjt0REQNSWmpsQUFWpKbJS__XuLo_hPRKPgehaMXWu0C95Zj6oLQ_Tj9yqjq24mEmBqzFiMcwiFB_xUJAVOSDk5W8-kLvV6i8dROvbWOHzyRab6xAQOR43Z6ajQs3sEWcM3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1469207723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Different Knee Flexion Angles Influence the Hip Extensor in the Prone Position</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kwon, Yu-Jeong ; Lee, Hyun-Ok</creator><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Yu-Jeong ; Lee, Hyun-Ok ; Department of Physical Therapy ; College of Health Sciences ; Catholic University of Pusan</creatorcontrib><description>[Purpose] The present study examined the effects of knee flexion angle on hip extensor muscle activity. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty healthy subjects maintained knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 110° in the prone position and performed maximal voluntary contraction in hip extension. Maximum torque in hip extension at the different angles was measured, and surface electromyogram activities of the gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) were recorded and normalized by the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). [Results] The maximum torque of the hip extensor showed significant decreases between 0°and 60°, 90° and 110° of knee flexion. The muscle activity of BF was significantly high at 0°, and GM showed a significantly higher activity than both BF and ST at 60°, 90°and 110° of knee flexion. [Conclusion] The maximum torque in hip extension and muscle activities of BF and ST were significantly high at 0° but they decreased at knee flexion angles of more than 60°. Therefore, we consider that more than 60° of knee joint flexion is required to increase GM activity, and to reduce the muscle activities of BF and ST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0915-5287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2187-5626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.1295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24259779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Society of Physical Therapy Science</publisher><subject>Gluteus maximus ; Hamstring muscle ; Original ; Prone hip extension</subject><ispartof>Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2013, Vol.25(10), pp.1295-1297</ispartof><rights>2013 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science</rights><rights>2013©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science 2013</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-312711ce372df58fc1f5ad47a92eeb1e8e00b9e4eafb33314625a434a451e3cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-312711ce372df58fc1f5ad47a92eeb1e8e00b9e4eafb33314625a434a451e3cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820173/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820173/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,1884,4025,27927,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24259779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Yu-Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun-Ok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Physical Therapy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>College of Health Sciences</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catholic University of Pusan</creatorcontrib><title>How Different Knee Flexion Angles Influence the Hip Extensor in the Prone Position</title><title>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</title><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><description>[Purpose] The present study examined the effects of knee flexion angle on hip extensor muscle activity. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty healthy subjects maintained knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 110° in the prone position and performed maximal voluntary contraction in hip extension. Maximum torque in hip extension at the different angles was measured, and surface electromyogram activities of the gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) were recorded and normalized by the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). [Results] The maximum torque of the hip extensor showed significant decreases between 0°and 60°, 90° and 110° of knee flexion. The muscle activity of BF was significantly high at 0°, and GM showed a significantly higher activity than both BF and ST at 60°, 90°and 110° of knee flexion. [Conclusion] The maximum torque in hip extension and muscle activities of BF and ST were significantly high at 0° but they decreased at knee flexion angles of more than 60°. Therefore, we consider that more than 60° of knee joint flexion is required to increase GM activity, and to reduce the muscle activities of BF and ST.</description><subject>Gluteus maximus</subject><subject>Hamstring muscle</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prone hip extension</subject><issn>0915-5287</issn><issn>2187-5626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEotvCjTPKkQNZPP6IkwtSVdruikogBGfL8U52HXntxU5K-e-bNGULJy5jyfP8mzd-WfYGyBJEVX_oDn1aUrEEWotn2YJCJQtR0vJ5tiA1iELQSp5kpyl1hFBJePUyO6GcilrKepF9W4Vf-SfbthjR9_lnj5hfObyzwefnfusw5WvfugG9wbzfYb6yh_zyrkefQsytf7j7GoMfa0i2H9-9yl602iV8_XieZT-uLr9frIqbL9fri_ObwkjgfcGASgCDTNJNK6rWQCv0hktdU8QGsEJCmho56rZhjAEvqdCccc0FIDMNO8s-ztzD0OxxY0b_UTt1iHav428VtFX_drzdqW24VayiBCQbAe8eATH8HDD1am-TQee0xzAkBYLxitaEk_9LeVlTIiWdqO9nqYkhpYjt0REQNSWmpsQUFWpKbJS__XuLo_hPRKPgehaMXWu0C95Zj6oLQ_Tj9yqjq24mEmBqzFiMcwiFB_xUJAVOSDk5W8-kLvV6i8dROvbWOHzyRab6xAQOR43Z6ajQs3sEWcM3</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Kwon, Yu-Jeong</creator><creator>Lee, Hyun-Ok</creator><general>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>How Different Knee Flexion Angles Influence the Hip Extensor in the Prone Position</title><author>Kwon, Yu-Jeong ; Lee, Hyun-Ok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c714t-312711ce372df58fc1f5ad47a92eeb1e8e00b9e4eafb33314625a434a451e3cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Gluteus maximus</topic><topic>Hamstring muscle</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prone hip extension</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Yu-Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun-Ok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Physical Therapy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>College of Health Sciences</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catholic University of Pusan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kwon, Yu-Jeong</au><au>Lee, Hyun-Ok</au><aucorp>Department of Physical Therapy</aucorp><aucorp>College of Health Sciences</aucorp><aucorp>Catholic University of Pusan</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Different Knee Flexion Angles Influence the Hip Extensor in the Prone Position</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1295</spage><epage>1297</epage><pages>1295-1297</pages><issn>0915-5287</issn><eissn>2187-5626</eissn><abstract>[Purpose] The present study examined the effects of knee flexion angle on hip extensor muscle activity. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty healthy subjects maintained knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 110° in the prone position and performed maximal voluntary contraction in hip extension. Maximum torque in hip extension at the different angles was measured, and surface electromyogram activities of the gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) were recorded and normalized by the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). [Results] The maximum torque of the hip extensor showed significant decreases between 0°and 60°, 90° and 110° of knee flexion. The muscle activity of BF was significantly high at 0°, and GM showed a significantly higher activity than both BF and ST at 60°, 90°and 110° of knee flexion. [Conclusion] The maximum torque in hip extension and muscle activities of BF and ST were significantly high at 0° but they decreased at knee flexion angles of more than 60°. Therefore, we consider that more than 60° of knee joint flexion is required to increase GM activity, and to reduce the muscle activities of BF and ST.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</pub><pmid>24259779</pmid><doi>10.1589/jpts.25.1295</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0915-5287
ispartof Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2013, Vol.25(10), pp.1295-1297
issn 0915-5287
2187-5626
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3820173
source J-STAGE Free; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Gluteus maximus
Hamstring muscle
Original
Prone hip extension
title How Different Knee Flexion Angles Influence the Hip Extensor in the Prone Position
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T13%3A21%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Different%20Knee%20Flexion%20Angles%20Influence%20the%20Hip%20Extensor%20in%20the%20Prone%20Position&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Physical%20Therapy%20Science&rft.au=Kwon,%20Yu-Jeong&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Physical%20Therapy&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1295&rft.epage=1297&rft.pages=1295-1297&rft.issn=0915-5287&rft.eissn=2187-5626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1589/jpts.25.1295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1469207723%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1469207723&rft_id=info:pmid/24259779&rfr_iscdi=true